TOP 5d) Floods Directive reporting - INSPIRE progress -

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress on Risk Assessment......continued Ms. Albana Gjinopulli, MPA Mr. Stanislav Buchkov.
Advertisements

INSPIRE and flood directive reporting: important issues to raise Manuela Pfeiffer WISE GIS/IT-Workshop 7.5./ Copenhagen.
1 INSPIRE Conference, Edinburgh1 Theme Natural Risk Zones Facilitator: Matt Harrison, UK Editor: Florian Thomas, France JRC Contact Point: Robert Tomas.
New ways to geo-reference and classify spatial data in Annex II & III data specifications Clemens Portele interactive instruments GmbH Drafting Team „Data.
Disaster Risk Reduction: The global paradigm shift
1 Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services Data quality and Metadata: what is needed, what is feasible, next steps Interoperability of Spatial.
SIPI61508 Soft computing based qualitative method for determination of SILs István Ajtonyi 1 – László Ormos 2 1 University of Miskolc, Institute of Electric.
1 SDS Implementation Agreed at MIG-T meeting 12/
The Geographic Information System of the European Commission (GISCO) By Albrecht Wirthmann, GISCO, Eurostat ESPON.
1 SDS Implementation. 2 Discovery service View service Download service The services can be accessed on Internet, a few extra metadata elements is added.
Health Emergency Risk Management Pir Mohammad Paya MD, MPH,DCBHD Senior Technical Specialist Public Health in Emergencies Asian Disaster Preparedness Center.
SDS – a discussion paper Version Version  Version SDS group – Christina Wasström (SE), Daniela Hogrebe (DE), Joeri Robbrecht (DG ENV),
The FDES revision process: progress so far, state of the art, the way forward United Nations Statistics Division.
Risk assessment and Natural Hazards. Concept of vulnerability (e.g. fatalities in two contrasting societies) Deaths 1 …………………………………………
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
INSPIRE and the role of Spatial Data Interest Communities (SDIC)
DISASTER VULNERABILITY, RISK AND CAPACITY
The Language of Safety and Health Signs and Signals in Wood Industry
Risk Assessment.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Ensuring a safe workplace
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1136 on CSM Design Targets (CSM-DT)
Palace of the Parliament
Agenda 5.11 General Regulations
Risk management - HIRAC awareness presentation
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TOOLS
14th MEETING OF WORKING GROUP F ON FLOODS Thursday 17 October 2013
Hazards Planning and Risk Management Risk Analysis and Assessment
14th MEETING OF WORKING GROUP F ON FLOODS Thursday 17 October 2013
European Commission EUROSTAT E4
Reporting on socio-economic aspects in regard to socio-economic assessment & environmental targets under MSFD Lydia MARTIN-ROUMEGAS DG Environment -
LECTURE NO. 2 INTRODUCTION TO HAZARDS
Amendment to the NUTS Regulation Oliver Heiden Eurostat.E4
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Achievements and plans in GISCO
CIS WG D meeting 28 April 2010, Brussels Agenda 6.d
Reporting on socio-economic aspects in regard to socio-economic assessment & environmental targets under MSFD Lydia MARTIN-ROUMEGAS DG Environment -
Inspiren toimeenpanon tilanne Euroopassa
EU Water Framework Directive
Vanda Nunes de Lima 18th June 2009
Reporting for MSFD Article 13 and 14 –
Proposed EQS Directive
WG 2.5 Intercalibration.
Revision of MSFD Decision 2010/477/EU - overview
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
WG F Drafting Group 10./ Brussels
Identifying regulatory documents
WISE & INSPIRE FloodsDirective
Drafting group Mixing Zones
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
INSPIRE Development of Implementing Rules
9th meeting of the Floods Working Group
European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit
WG GES: Decision review progress
Jakub Hrkal ESTAT Unit F-4
Analysis of likelihood, risks and consequences of major accidents involving category acute toxic 3 dermal substances and assessment of the impact of covering.
Information on work related to
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
WISE development Workshop on reporting for UWWTD
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
Revision of Decision 2010/477/EU
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
DG Regional and Urban Policy
EU Water Framework Directive
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
… Two-step approach Conceptual Framework Annex I Annex II Annex III
Marine Strategy Coordination Group 14 November 2011, Brussels
ESS conceptual standards for quality reporting
Presentation transcript:

TOP 5d) Floods Directive reporting - INSPIRE progress - Status-Quo Implementing Rules - Final Implementing Rules - Status-Quo Dataspecification NZ Meike Gierk and Manuela Pfeiffer 12. WG F 16./17.10.2012 Brussels

Status-Quo Implementing Rules After consultation (MS + EC Inter Service) of draft Implementing Rules comments were considered for final version of IR Consistency across all themes in terms of modelling aspects and content aspects: Harmonisation Modification of definitions Deletion of requirements … TWG’s were requested to check proposed changes from INSPIRE-Team most challenging was to check interrelations between proposed changes in definitions and wordings in IR and Dataspecification Final Implementing Rules are out for translation into x-languages (it’s still not clear how many)

Final Implementing Rules 375 pages - Natural Risk Zones: chapter 12, pg. 293 – 309 IR for Annex II and III themes cause changes for Annex I themes E. g. praeambel: (3) In order to ensure the overall consistency of the technical arrangements for the interoperability of spatial data sets included in this Regulation, the existing technical arrangements for the interoperability of spatial data sets related to the spatial data themes in Annex I to Directive 2007/2/EC should be amended. (9) Sixth, in order to avoid overlaps with spatial object types specified for spatial data themes of Annexes II and III to Directive 2007/2/EC, certain candidate types should be removed from the “Hydrography” spatial data theme.

zones that are thereby subject to potential losses. 12. NATURAL RISK ZONES 12.1. Definitions In addition to the definitions set out in Article 2, the following definition shall apply: (1) ‘risk’ means the combination of the consequences of an event (hazard) and the associated likelihood/probability of its occurrence, in accordance with ISO/IEC 31010:2009. (2) ‘hazard’ means a dangerous phenomenon, substance, human activity or condition that may cause loss of life, injury or other health impacts, property damage, loss of livelihoods and services, social and economic disruption, or environmental damage. (3) ‘exposure’ means people, property, systems, or other elements present in hazard zones that are thereby subject to potential losses. (4) ‘vulnerability’ means the characteristics and circumstances of a community, system or asset that make it susceptible to the damaging effects of a hazard. Article 2* For the purpose of this Regulation, the following definitions as well as the theme-specific definitions set out in Annex II shall apply: … *COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services

– Abstract Hazard Area (An area affected by a natural hazard.) 12.2. Spatial object types The following spatial object types are specified for the spatial data theme Natural Risk Zones: – Abstract Exposed Element (People, property, systems, or other elements present in hazard zones that are thereby subject to potential losses.) – Abstract Hazard Area (An area affected by a natural hazard.) – Abstract Observed Event (A natural phenomenon relevant to the study of natural hazards which occurred or is currently occurring and which has been observed.) – Abstract Risk Zone (A risk zone is the spatial extent of a combination of the consequences of an event (hazard) and the associated probability/likelihood of its occurrence.) These spatial objects types are abstract, they could be represented by vector data (discrete spatial objects) or raster data (coverage) - cf. next slides

– Observed Event (Discrete spatial objects representing natural phenomenon relevant to the study of natural hazards which occurred, or is currently occurring, and which has been observed.) – Observed Event Coverage (A coverage representing continuous information about observed events.The range set shall be described by magnitude or intensity, or by the likelihood of occurence. The domain shall be a rectified grid or referenceable grid.) – Hazard Area (Discrete spatial objects representing a natural hazard.) – Hazard Coverage (A coverage representing continuous information about a type of natural hazard. The range set shall be described by magnitude or intensity, or by the likelihood of occurence. The domain shall be a rectified grid or referenceable grid.)

– Risk Zone (Discrete spatial objects representing the spatial extent of a combination of the consequences of an event (hazard) and the associated probability/likelihood of its occurrence.) – Risk Coverage (A coverage representing continuous information about intensity or level of risk. The range set shall be described by level or intensity. The domain shall be a rectified grid or referenceable grid.) – Exposed Elements (Discrete spatial objects representing exposed elements.) – Exposed Element Coverage (A coverage representing continuous information about exposed elements.The range set shall be the level, or intensity, of the vulnerability assessment. The domain shall be a rectified grid or referenceable grid.)

12.3. Data types 12.3.1. Exposed Element Classification (ExposedElementClassification) This class provides piece of information about the nature of the exposed element which is relevant to risk analysis. 12.3.2. Level Or Intensity (LevelOrIntensity) Quantitative or qualitative assessment of either risk, hazard or vulnerability. Either the qualitative value or the quantitative value shall be provided. 12.3.3. Likelihood Of Occurrence (LikelihoodOfOccurrence) Likelihood is a general concept relating to the chance of an event occurring. Either the qualitative likelihood or the quantitative likelihood shall be provided. 12.3.4. Natural Hazard Classification (NaturalHazardClassification) This class provides piece of information about the nature of the natural hazard as well as the type of hazard which is the source of risk. 12.3.5. Quantitative Likelihood (QuantitativeLikelihood) A frequency of occurrence or return period of a hazard phenomenon. 12.3.6. Vulnerability Assessment (VulnerabilityAssessment) Assessment of the vulnerability.

12.4. Enumerations 12.4.1. Determination Method (DeterminationMethodValue) An enumeration to describe the method used to define the area of hazard.

12.5. Code lists 12.5.1. Exposed Element Category (ExposedElementCategoryValue) A classification of the exposed element. The allowed values for this code list comprise the values specified in the table below and additional values at any level defined by data providers. This code list is hierarchical. 12.5.2.1. Specific Exposed Element Type (SpecificExposedElementTypeValue) An additional denomination of exposed elements. The allowed values for this coded list comprise any values defined by data providers. Child = „Subcategory“ parent Parent = „Category“ FD-List of Adverse consequences: Specific Exposed Element Type

12.5.2. Natural Hazard Category (NaturalHazardCategoryValue) A generic classification of types of natural hazards. The allowed values for this code list comprise the values specified in the table below and narrower values defined by data providers. This code list is hierarchical. 12.5.2.2. Specific Hazard Type (SpecificHazardTypeValue) An additional classification of the natural hazard. The allowed values for this coded list comprise any values defined by data providers. FD-List of Floodtypes „Subcategory“ = child „Category“ = parent

12.6. Theme-specific requirements (1) Where a RiskZone is associated with a HazardArea, the RiskZone and the HazardArea shall overlap. (2) Where a RiskZone is associated with an ExposedElement, the ExposedElement shall overlap with the RiskZone. Relationship between risk, hazard, vulnerability and exposure

12.7. Layers Layers for the spatial data theme Natural Risk Zones Article 14 3. For spatial object types whose objects can be further classified using a code list-valued attribute, several layers may be defined. Each of these layers shall include the spatial objects corresponding to one specific code list value. In the definition of such sets of layers in Annexes II-IV, (a) the placeholder <CodeListValue> shall represent the values of the relevant code list, with the first letter in upper case, (b) the placeholder <human-readable name> shall represent the humanreadable name of the code list values, (c) the spatial object type shall include the relevant attribute and code list, in parentheses, and (d) one example layer shall be given.

Status-Quo Dataspecification NZ TWG’s are requested to implement changes in accordance with final IR and to use new templates Deadline for final Dataspecification is end of October 2012 Additional Informations: http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ http://inspire-geoportal.ec.europa.eu/

Thank you for your attention !