Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) With Latent Variables

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEM PURPOSE Model phenomena from observed or theoretical stances
Advertisements

Using the SmartPLS Software “Structural Model Assessment”
StatisticalDesign&ModelsValidation. Introduction.
Structural Equation Modeling Using Mplus Chongming Yang Research Support Center FHSS College.
General Structural Equation (LISREL) Models
Structural Equation Modeling
Structural Equation Modeling: An Overview P. Paxton.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Forecasting Using the Simple Linear Regression Model and Correlation
6-1 Introduction To Empirical Models 6-1 Introduction To Empirical Models.
Outline 1) Objectives 2) Model representation 3) Assumptions 4) Data type requirement 5) Steps for solving problem 6) A hypothetical example Path Analysis.
Structural Equation Modeling
Factor analysis Caroline van Baal March 3 rd 2004, Boulder.
Concept of Reliability and Validity. Learning Objectives  Discuss the fundamentals of measurement  Understand the relationship between Reliability and.
Multivariate Data Analysis Chapter 11 - Structural Equation Modeling.
When Measurement Models and Factor Models Conflict: Maximizing Internal Consistency James M. Graham, Ph.D. Western Washington University ABSTRACT: The.
“Ghost Chasing”: Demystifying Latent Variables and SEM
Structural Equation Modeling
CHAPTER 30 Structural Equation Modeling From: McCune, B. & J. B. Grace Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach,
Measurement Models and CFA Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
GRA 6020 Multivariate Statistics Factor Analysis Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
© 2000 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap Forecasting Using the Simple Linear Regression Model and Correlation.
Structural Equation Modeling Intro to SEM Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Stages in Structural Equation Modeling
Factor Analysis Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Path Analysis. Figure 1 Exogenous Variables Causally influenced only by variables outside of the model. SES and IQ in Figure 1. The two-headed arrow.
Multiple Sample Models James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Introduction to CFA. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: Upon completing this chapter, you should be able to do the following: Distinguish between exploratory factor.
Kayla Jordan D. Wayne Mitchell RStats Institute Missouri State University.
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) With Latent Variables James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
SEM: Testing a Structural Model
10 SEM is Based on the Analysis of Covariances! Why?Analysis of correlations represents loss of information. A B r = 0.86r = 0.50 illustration.
SEM: Basics Byrne Chapter 1 Tabachnick SEM
CJT 765 Quantitative Methods in Communication Structural Equation Modeling: Highlights for Quiz 1.
1 Exploratory & Confirmatory Factor Analysis Alan C. Acock OSU Summer Institute, 2009.
ROB CRIBBIE QUANTITATIVE METHODS PROGRAM – DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY COORDINATOR - STATISTICAL CONSULTING SERVICE COURSE MATERIALS AVAILABLE AT:
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Structural Equation Models with Directly Observed Variables II James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 12: Wrap Up: Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions for SEM.
Aron, Aron, & Coups, Statistics for the Behavioral and Social Sciences: A Brief Course (3e), © 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter 12 Making Sense of Advanced Statistical.
Measurement Models: Identification and Estimation James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
G Lecture 81 Comparing Measurement Models across Groups Reducing Bias with Hybrid Models Setting the Scale of Latent Variables Thinking about Hybrid.
Estimating and Testing Hypotheses about Means James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
SEM: Basics Byrne Chapter 1 Tabachnick SEM
SEM Basics 2 Byrne Chapter 2 Kline pg 7-15, 50-51, ,
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
ALISON BOWLING CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS. REVIEW OF EFA Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) Explores the data All measured variables are related to every.
How to Fool Yourself with SEM James G. Anderson, Ph.D Purdue University.
Advanced Statistics Factor Analysis, I. Introduction Factor analysis is a statistical technique about the relation between: (a)observed variables (X i.
Evaluation of structural equation models Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 18 Multivariate Statistics.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Final Lecture: Multiple-Group Models, a Word about Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions.
Approaches to quantitative data analysis Lara Traeger, PhD Methods in Supportive Oncology Research.
Chapter 17 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)  Relatively new statistical technique used to test theoretical or causal.
The SweSAT Vocabulary (word): understanding of words and concepts. Data Sufficiency (ds): numerical reasoning ability. Reading Comprehension (read): Swedish.
Advanced Statistical Methods: Continuous Variables
Chapter 15 Confirmatory Factor Analysis
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
Making Sense of Advanced Statistical Procedures in Research Articles
Regression Analysis PhD Course.
عنوان عنوان فرعی.
Structural Equation Modeling
Structural Equation Modeling
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
15.1 The Role of Statistics in the Research Process
SOC 681 – Causal Models with Directly Observed Variables
James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University
MGS 3100 Business Analysis Regression Feb 18, 2016
Structural Equation Modeling
Presentation transcript:

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) With Latent Variables James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University

Steps In Structural Equation Modeling Data preparation Model specification Identification Estimation Testing fit Respecification

Data Preparation Estimation of missing data Creation of scales and indices Descriptive statistics to include Examination for outliers skewness and kurtosis Transformation of variables

Measurement Model (1) Specifying the relationship between the latent variables and the observed variables Answers these questions: To what extent are the observed variables actually measuring the hypothesized latent variables? Which observed variable is the best measure of a particular latent variable? To what extent are the observed variables actually measuring something other than the hypothesized latent variable?

Measurement Model (2) The relationships between the observed variables and the latent variables are described by factor loadings Factor loadings provide information about the extent to which a given observed variable is able to measure the latent variable. They serve as validity coefficients. Measurement error is defined as that portion of an observed variable that is measuring something other than what the latent variable is hypothesized to measure. It serves as a measure of reliability.

Measurement Model (3) Measurement error could be the result of: An unobserved variable that is measuring some other latent variable Unreliability A second-order factor

Setting the Error Variance Error variance can be set to 0 if you have a single indicator of the latent variable and no information about its reliability Error Variance = (1-Reliability) Variance of the Observed Score if you know the reliability of the indicator

Creating a Latent Variable from Multiple Indicators Exploratory factor analysis can be used with multiple indicators of a construct to determine the number of factors and which indicators are associated with each factor. Confirmatory factor analysis can then be used to test the fit of the measurement model.

Example of a Complete Structural Equation Model We can specify a model to further discuss how to diagram a model, specify the equations related to the model and discuss the “effects” apparent in the model. The example we use is a model of educational achievement and aspirations. Figure 3 shows there are four latent variables (depicted by ellipses), three exogenous variables (knowledge, Value and Satisfaction) and one endogenous (performance).

Variables Performance – Planning, Organization, controlling, coordinating and directing a farm cooperative Knowledge – Knowledge of economic phases of management directed toward profit-making Value-Tendency to rationally evaluate means to an economic end Satisfaction - Gratification from performing the managerial role

Structural Model (1) The researcher specifies the structural model to allow for certain relationships among the latent variables depicted by lines or arrows In the path diagram, we specified that Performance is related to Knowledge, Value and Satisfaction in a specific way. Thus, one result from the structural model is an indication of the extent to which these a priori hypothesized relationships are supported by our sample data.

Structural Model (2) The structural equation addresses the following questions: Is Performance related to the three predictor variables? Exactly how strong is the influence of each variable on Performance? How well does the model fit the data?

Example of a Complete Structural Equation Model (2) Each of the four latent variables is assessed by two indicator variables. The indicator variables are depicted in rectangles.

Model Building If the original model does not provide an acceptable fit to the data, alternative models can be tested. The standardized residuals and modification indices can be used to determine how to modify the model to achieve a better fit to the data.

Covariance SEM involves the decomposition of covariances There are different types of covariance matrices: Among the observed variables Among the latent exogenous variables. Among the equation prediction errors Among the measurement errors

Covariance (2) Types of covariance Among the observed variables Among the latent exogenous variables IQ ACH HOME

Covariance (3) Among the equation prediction errors Religion Legal F1 Profess Error Experience E2 V2 F2 E4

Total, Direct and Indirect Effects There is a direct effect between two latent variables when a single directed line or arrow connects them There is an indirect effect between two variables when the second latent variable is connected to the first latent variable through one or more other latent variables The total effect between two latent variables is the sum of any direct effect and all indirect effects that connect them.