Addressing State and MPO Concerns with Performance Requirements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCHRP Task 254 Project Vehicle Size & Weight Management Technology Transfer/Best Practices.
Advertisements

Update - Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures Kelley Rehm, PE July 2011.
1. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Presentation to RCC Stakeholder Dialogue Session January 17, 2014 Transport Canada John Hnatyshyn Department.
Tribal Transportation Safety Program Funding Craig Genzlinger Federal Lands Highways TTP Team.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
Moving Toward a Performance- based Federal-aid Highway Program Integrating Maintenance AASHTO Subcommittee on Maintenance July 18, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
Transportation Asset Management A Framework for Successful Performance-Based Planning Michael Bridges, P.E. Undersecretary – Office of Management and Finance.
Moving Research into Practice.  Implementation is the routine use of a SHRP 2 product by users in their regular way of doing business.  Users can include.
Performance Measurement Requirements Notice of Proposed Rule Making.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to NCHRP Project Panel presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with PB Consult Inc. Texas Transportation.
Value Engineering at FHWA
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Minnesota Department of Transportation Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Minnesota Department of Transportation TRB International.
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Regional Workshop on Performance Management and Performance-Based.
Participating from a Distance Bringing the TRB Annual Meeting Home to the Washington State Department of Transportation Leni Oman Director Office of Research.
SCOHTS STRATEGIC PLAN Goal 5 – Workforce Development.
1. Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Webinar presentation January 2014 Transport Canada Ron Carter (Chief, Standards) Department of Transportation James.
AASHTO and the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) A Strategic Approach to Implementation Priscilla Tobias, PE State Safety Engineer Illinois Department of Transportation.
FHWA - O FFICE OF A SSET M ANAGEMENT October 14, 2009 Managing our Pavements FHWA Initiatives U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
Future of TransXML Workshop NCHRP Project Frances Harrison Spy Pond Partners, LLC.
PennDOT’s Study of NCHRP Research Results Implementation TRB State Representatives & AASHTO National RAC Meetings July 27, Michael Bonini Transportation.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
James McMinimee, P.S.E. July 27, 2011 AASHTO SCOR/RAC Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah.
Master Plan Process FY Proposed Draft. October - February Cluster Groups and Units Identify Initiatives These are general goals or outcomes that.
Sue Sillick Research Manager Montana Department of Transportation Georgene Geary Research Manager – Retired Georgia Department of Transportation AASHTO.
Washington State Peer Exchange Research and Program Management May 2014 Washington, Utah, Louisiana, Minnesota, Massachusetts, Nevada, Montana, Michigan,
NCHER Legislative Conference Washington, DC Federal Update February 2, 2016 Annmarie Weisman, Office of Postsecondary Education.
Greta Smith, P.E. Associate Program Director, Project Delivery AASHTO Subcommittee on Design June 5, 2013.
U.S. DOT Automated Vehicle Policy Activities ITS PCB T3 Webinar The National Transportation Systems Center U.S. Department of Transportation Office of.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century An Update on Implementation.
Performance-Based Planning and Programming 1 Session AMPO Annual Meeting, October, 2014.
Economics of Policing Shared Forward Agenda Economics of Policing Shared Forward Agenda.
Roadmap to Change: Updating Maine’s Response to the Olmstead Decision Project Overview.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management Transportation Performance Management Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
“Our Commitment to Impact: Implementing Penn State’s Strategic Plan”
Campaign Fundamentals
Performance Measure Index
Transportation Research Resources
Vehicle to Infrastructure Deployment Coalition (V2I DC) & SPaT Challenge Overview January 8, 2017.
The TPB’s Draft Participation Plan
REGIONAL MODELS OF COOPERATION Between FDOT & Florida’s MPOs
Using State Pooled Funds to Support TRB Conferences
RAC Region IV Report.
AASHTO Winter Meeting Safety Rulemaking Update Office of Transit Safety and Oversight Angela Dluger December 3, 2015.
TPF-5(181) Research Management Database Business Analysis
EDUCATION DIALOGUE SESSION
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
Planning, Conducting, and Implementing Research Peer Exchanges
The HCM and MAP-21 Performance Requirements: Opportunities
Administration Task Force Report
RAC Summer Meeting Salt Lake City, UT July , 2011
Building Changes’ Strategic Business Planning Process
Implementation of the New Federal Performance-based Planning Requirements: Data and Information Needs of State DOTs Data Collection and Analysis in Washington.
AASHTO STSMO Research Working Group
Cybersecurity ATD technical
Federal Rulemaking Process for Significant Regulatory Actions
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
Strategic Planning Timeline Overview
Wednesday, December 1st Today’s Facilitators: Kim Glow & Cindy Dollman
TPM/PBPP Implementation Timeline
1915(c) WAIVER REDESIGN 2019 Brain Injury Summit
Performance-Based Federal Highway Program Implementation Update
TRB Spatial Data and Information Science Committee (ABJ60) Asset Management and Infrastructure Renewal.
Transportation Performance Management Resources you can Use Susanna Reck FHWA Office of Transportation Performance Management June 2019 Outline: What.
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Neil Burke, Program Manager Erin Kinne, Principal Planner
Experiences Engaging Managed Care
Presentation transcript:

Addressing State and MPO Concerns with Performance Requirements 2018 AASHTO Spring Meeting May 22, 2018

Concerns The results of federal pavement performance measure (percent pavement in good/fair/poor condition) may result in conflicting messages between measures states have historically used to report on pavement condition and the federal measures. The methodology used in the metrics for calculating the measure (IRI, etc.) are different from the way State DOTs manage their pavements and there is concern that having to set targets based upon the federal measures and metrics may not enable the state DOTs to best management their pavement systems. Waiting until after the end of the first full reporting period (January 2022) is too long to wait to begin to evaluate the current measures being used in case changes and modifications need to be made.

South Carolina

Arkansas

Asks Begin discussions now with the state DOTs on needed modifications and changes to the pavement performance measure and metrics. Do not wait until the end of the first reporting period (January 1, 2022) to institute needed modifications and changes to the pavement performance measures. Work with the state DOTs starting now on how to best message and harmonize the federal and state pavement performance measures.

Actions Study Implementation Issues Develop Messaging for Differences Between State and Federal Measures Identify Priority Research Areas

Study Implementation Issues CPBM to develop list of specific issues that will be studied e.g., thresholds to define good, fair, and poor pavement conditions. CPBM will develop a work plan to conduct each study to determine if any modifications to the regulations are recommended Work plan will include activities, resource needs, and a timeline. FHWA, NCHRP, and the TPM Pooled Fund will provide resources, if available and appropriate, to support the delivery of each work plan. The CPBM will determine if any separate work groups need to be formed to manage and carry out the plan activities and will report quarterly on progress. They will include AMPO and MPOs in this effort. Any recommendations for modifications to regulations will be presented to FHWA for consideration. If accepted, the changes will be published in a notice for public comment in the Federal Register. Although much of this work could go on for several years, efforts will be conducted to try and develop initial recommendations by 2020.

Develop Messaging for Differences Between State and Federal Measures The TPM Pooled Fund will hold a peer exchange before October, 2018 to discuss approaches to effectively message differences between performance outcomes as they are viewed through a State’s measures and the new required federal measures. States and MPOs will be invited to this peer exchange. The peer exchange will be developed in coordination with the AASHTO CPBM and the Transportation Communications Committee. The CPBM may reform a communications subcommittee to support State performance communication efforts.

Identify Priority Research Areas Efforts will be conducted to ensure that research needs build on and improve the existing regulations are identified and prioritized. Many of these needs were discussed in the rulemaking preamble text (i.e. including element level data in the determination of bridge condition measures). A session will be held during the July joint meeting of the CPBM and the TRB Committee on Performance Management (ABC30) to develop a list of research needs that come from the rulemaking and resulting regulations. During the meeting the group will organize and prioritize these needs. Efforts will be conducted by the Research Subcommittee within CPBM to integrate these needs into the existing TPM Research Roadmap. This will involve the development of problem statements and prioritizing the needs within the complete list of needs in the roadmap. The roadmap will be used to identify opportunities to seek research funds by the CPBM and by FHWA moving forward.

Next Steps CPBM leadership to organize sessions at 2018 Summer Meeting to develop implementation issues Work through the current Subcommittee on Policy and Rulemaking and Subcommittee on Research Work with TPM Pooled Fund to Organize Messaging Peer Exchange Update CPBM Strategic Plan and Action Plan with new information