A Sox Transcription Factor Is a Critical Regulator of Adult Stem Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Intestine  Fanju W. Meng, Benoît Biteau  Cell Reports 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Advertisements

SMK-1, an Essential Regulator of DAF-16-Mediated Longevity
Dpp Signaling Determines Regional Stem Cell Identity in the Regenerating Adult Drosophila Gastrointestinal Tract  Hongjie Li, Yanyan Qi, Heinrich Jasper 
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages e2 (August 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Infection-Induced Intestinal Oxidative Stress Triggers Organ-to-Organ Immunological Communication in Drosophila  Shih-Cheng Wu, Chih-Wei Liao, Rong-Long.
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Control of Lipid Metabolism by Tachykinin in Drosophila
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages e4 (August 2018)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Tatsushi Igaki, Raymond A. Pagliarini, Tian Xu  Current Biology 
Spyros Goulas, Ryan Conder, Juergen A. Knoblich  Cell Stem Cell 
Intestinal Stem Cell Pool Regulation in Drosophila
Role of Connective Tissue Growth Factor in Oval Cell Response During Liver Regeneration After 2-AAF/PHx in Rats  Liya Pi, Seh-Hoon Oh, Thomas Shupe, Bryon.
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (October 2018)
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
Jiawen Huang, Hongyan Wang  Stem Cell Reports 
The Drosophila Hindgut Lacks Constitutively Active Adult Stem Cells but Proliferates in Response to Tissue Damage  Donald T. Fox, Allan C. Spradling 
Jia You, Yan Zhang, Zhouhua Li, Zhefeng Lou, Longjin Jin, Xinhua Lin 
In Vivo Analysis of Centromeric Proteins Reveals a Stem Cell-Specific Asymmetry and an Essential Role in Differentiated, Non-proliferating Cells  Ana.
Alexandra Schambony, Doris Wedlich  Developmental Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
TALEN Gene Knockouts Reveal No Requirement for the Conserved Human Shelterin Protein Rap1 in Telomere Protection and Length Regulation  Shaheen Kabir,
Transient Expression of WNT2 Promotes Somatic Cell Reprogramming by Inducing β- Catenin Nuclear Accumulation  Mizuki Kimura, May Nakajima-Koyama, Joonseong.
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Tissue Damage-Induced Intestinal Stem Cell Division in Drosophila
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Piwi Is Required to Limit Exhaustion of Aging Somatic Stem Cells
GRM7 Regulates Embryonic Neurogenesis via CREB and YAP
Christine E. Hochmuth, Benoit Biteau, Dirk Bohmann, Heinrich Jasper 
Benoît Biteau, Heinrich Jasper  Cell Reports 
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
VRILLE Controls PDF Neuropeptide Accumulation and Arborization Rhythms in Small Ventrolateral Neurons to Drive Rhythmic Behavior in Drosophila  Kushan.
Xuepei Lei, Jianwei Jiao  Stem Cell Reports 
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
EVA1A/TMEM166 Regulates Embryonic Neurogenesis by Autophagy
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
The POU/Oct Transcription Factor Nubbin Controls the Balance of Intestinal Stem Cell Maintenance and Differentiation by Isoform-Specific Regulation  Xiongzhuo.
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Shree Ram Singh, Wei Liu, Steven X. Hou  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Misregulation of an Adaptive Metabolic Response Contributes to the Age-Related Disruption of Lipid Homeostasis in Drosophila  Jason Karpac, Benoit Biteau,
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Intestinal Stem Cells Exhibit Conditional Circadian Clock Function
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2018)
A Direct HDAC4-MAP Kinase Crosstalk Activates Muscle Atrophy Program
Fig. 5 C9orf72 knockdown disrupts autophagy induction.
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Presentation transcript:

A Sox Transcription Factor Is a Critical Regulator of Adult Stem Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Intestine  Fanju W. Meng, Benoît Biteau  Cell Reports  Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 906-914 (November 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.061 Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2015 13, 906-914DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.061) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Sox21a Is Specifically Expressed in ISCs and EBs in the Drosophila Intestine (A) In situ hybridization detects Sox21a mRNA expression in escargot (esg)-positive ISCs and EBs in the posterior midgut (esgGal4 > UAS-GFP). (B) Sox21a immunocytochemistry of posterior midguts shows that the Sox21a protein is detected in small diploid nuclei (indicated by the arrowhead), but not in differentiated polyploid ECs and Prospero-positive EEs (red). Sox21a protein is not detected when a dsRNA construct directed against Sox21a is expressed ubiquitously (act5c-Geneswitch > UAS-Sox21aRNAi(KK)). (C and D) Confocal images of posterior midguts show that the Sox21a protein is expressed in both ISCs and EBs (nuclear; red). GFP expression labels both ISCs and EBs (esgGal4 > UAS-GFP; green). β-galactosidase expression from the reporter lines Delta-LacZ (C) and GBE-Su(H)-LacZ (D) specifically identifies ISCs (arrowheads) and EBs (arrows), respectively. (E) Western blot analysis shows that Sox21a protein is detected in total protein extracts from intestines but absent when Sox21aRNAi(KK) is expressed in esg-positive ISCs and EBs. β-actin is used as loading control. In all panels, DNA is detected by Hoechst staining (blue). EB, enteroblast; EC, enterocyte; EE, enteroendocrine cell; ISC, intestinal stem cell. The scale bars represent 10 μm. Cell Reports 2015 13, 906-914DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.061) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Sox21a Is Required in ISCs for Stem Cell Proliferation under Both Homeostasis and Stress Conditions (A) Western blot analysis of total intestinal proteins shows that Sox21af04672 homozygous flies have significantly reduced Sox21a expression compared to control and heterozygous animals. β-actin is used as loading control. (B) Sox21af04672 homozygous flies show reduced ISCs proliferation after a 48-hr dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) treatment. (C) MARCM clones expressing dsRNA constructs directed against Sox21a fail to grow. Clones are labeled by GFP expression (green), EEs are detected by prospero staining (nuclear; red), and DNA is stained with Hoechst (blue). Box plots representing the size distribution of control and Sox21aRNAi-expressing clones, 7 days after induction, are in the lower panels. Results for two independent dsRNA constructs Sox21aRNAi(TRiP) and Sox21aRNAi(KK) are shown. (D) Representative images showing that Sox21a knockdown in ISCs and EBs, using the esgGal4ts driver, abolishes DSS-mediated expansion of esg-positive cells. Quantification of proliferation, as measured by the number of phospho-Histone H3 (pH3)-positive cells per gut, in control treatment and after 48 hr DSS exposure, is shown in the lower panel for three independent dsRNA constructs. EEs are labeled with nuclear prospero straining (red). DNA is detected with Hoechst staining (blue). (E) Cell-type-specific Sox21a knockdown using the ISC-specific DeltaGal4ts driver and the EB-specific GBE-Su(H)-Gal4ts driver shows that Sox21a is specifically required in ISCs, but not in EBs for ISCs proliferation in response to DSS. N represents total number of guts included in each analysis. The data are represented as average ± SEM. All p values are calculated using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. See also Figure S1. Cell Reports 2015 13, 906-914DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.061) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Sox21a Expression Is Induced upon Stress Exposure and Sufficient to Promote ISC Proliferation (A–C) Western blot analysis shows that Sox21a expression is strongly induced in response DSS treatment (A and B), as early as 24 hr after treatment, and in response to paraquat (C). No Sox21a protein is detected when Sox21a is knocked down in ISCs and EBs using the esgGal4ts driver (A). GFP expression is used to approximate the number of ISCs and EBs in (B). β-actin serves as loading control. (D) Representative confocal images of posterior midguts illustrating the categories used to score Sox21a expression. Scoring analysis of Sox21a expression in sucrose-treated (Ctrl), 24 hr DSS-treated (DSS), or paraquat-treated (Paraquat) flies is shown on the right panel. (E) Confocal images demonstrating that the Sox21a protein is specifically induced in ISCs (esg- and Delta-positive cells) and EBS (esg-positive Delta-negative cells). Additional images are provided in Figure S2D. (F) qRT-PCR shows that Sox21a mRNA expression is induced in the intestine after 48 hr DSS treatment. (G and H) qRT-PCR shows that the Sox21ad03399 (Sox21aEP) insertion is sufficient to induce intestinal Sox21a mRNA expression when combined with the esgGal4ts driver and increase ISCs proliferation compared to control animals. (I) Western blot and immunostaining show that the Sox21aFlag transgene allows overexpression of Flag-tagged Sox21a protein, using the ubiquitous actGal4 driver or the esgGal4ts driver. (J) Overexpression of the Sox21aFlag in ISCs and EBs (esgGal4ts) or only in ISCs (DeltaGal4ts) is sufficient to drive ISC proliferation. In (H) and (J), pH3-positive cells per gut were used to monitor ISCs proliferation. In (F)–(H) and (J), values are presented as average ± SEM. All p values are calculated using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. See also Figures S2 and S3. Cell Reports 2015 13, 906-914DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.061) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Sox21a Is a Critical Mediator of the JNK and Ras/ERK Pathways in the Control of ISC Proliferation (A) Activation of JNK (esgGal4ts > UAS-Hep) and Ras (esgGal4ts > UAS-RasV12) is sufficient to induce Sox21a expression. Intestinal proteins were extracted 18 hr after transgenes induction at 29°C. (B) Expression of a dominant-negative form of JNK/Bsk (UAS-BskDN) or a dsRNA directed against Ras (UAS-RasRNAi) in ISCs and EBs is sufficient to significantly affect proliferation response to DSS exposure. (C) Sox21a induction (24 hr DSS treatment) is impaired when BskDN or RasRNAi are expressed in ISCs and EBs. (D) ISCs proliferation induced by JNKK/Hep and RasV12 expression is significantly inhibited when Sox21aRNAi(TRiP) is expressed simultaneously. (E) Western blot analysis showing that Fos is required for DSS-mediated Sox21a induction (24 hr treatment). (F) Western blot shows that Sox21a induction by JNKK/Hep and RasV12 overexpression is impaired when Fos is knocked down. The dsRNA directed against Fos with higher knockdown efficiency was used. (G) Sox21aFlag expression is sufficient to significantly rescue the proliferation defects of Ras knockdown ISCs, 24 hr after DSS exposure. (H) Sox21a overexpression rescues ISCs proliferation defects caused by Fos loss of function. (I) A model presenting the role and regulation of Sox21a in the control of ISC proliferation. In all panels, the esgGal4ts driver was used to allow transgenic constructs expression in ISCs and EBs. In (A), (C), (E), and (F), GFP expression is used to approximate the number of ISCs and EBs and β-actin serves as loading control. In (B), (D), (G), and (H), pH3-positive cells per gut were used to monitor ISCs proliferation, and values are presented as average ± SEM. All p values are calculated using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. See also Figure S4. Cell Reports 2015 13, 906-914DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.061) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions