Conventional Neutrino Beam Experiment : JHF – Super-Kamiokande

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of T2K Tokai to Kamioka Neutrino Project at J-PARC June 21, 2004 Koichiro Nishikawa Kyoto University.
Advertisements

Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
T2K neutrino experiment at JPARC Approved since 2003, first beam in April Priorities : 1. search for, and measurement of,   e appearance  sin.
K2K : KEK-to-Kamioka Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Kenzo NAKAMURA KEK For the K2K Collaboration Les Houches EuroConference on Neutrino.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Performance of a Water Cherenkov Detector for e Appearance Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, University of Tokyo) November 18-19, 2005 International Workshop on a.
Alain Blondel Detectors UNO (400kton Water Cherenkov) Liquid Ar TPC (~100kton)
1 CC analysis update New analysis of SK atm. data –Somewhat lower best-fit value of  m 2 –Implications for CC analysis – 5 year plan plots revisited Effect.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
Future Accelerator-based Oscillation Experiment (JHFnu, Off-axis) Changgen Yang Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing.
JHF2K neutrino beam line A. K. Ichikawa KEK 2002/7/2 Overview Primary Proton beamline Target Decay Volume Strategy to change peak energy.
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
Present status of oscillation studies by atmospheric neutrino experiments ν μ → ν τ 2 flavor oscillations 3 flavor analysis Non-standard explanations Search.
Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct , Univ.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Douglas Michael California Institute of Technology NuFACT 03 June 5, 2003 What’s a Super Beam? The Physics Some of the common features Specific Proposals.
Apr. 4, KEK JHF-SK neutrino workshop 1 e appearance search Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK - IPNS)
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
K2K NC  0 production Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for the K2K Collaboration July 28, NuFact04.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Fermilab, May, 2003 Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U. Tokyo ・ Introduction ・ JHF-Kamioka neutrino project -overview- ・ Physics in phase-I ・ Phase-II ・ Summary Outline.
1 Super muon-neutrino beam Takashi Kobayashi IPNS, KEK Fact02 July 1, 2002 Imperial College London Contents 1.Introduction 2.“Super-beam” long baseline.
1 DISCOVERY OF ATMOSPHERIC MUON NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS Prologue First Hint in Kamiokande Second Hint in Kamiokande Evidence found in Super-Kamiokande Nov-12.
JHF-Kamioka Neutrino Oscillation Experiment using JHF 50 GeV PS Y.Itow ICRR,Univ.of Tokyo Jul27,2002 Jul27,2002 ICHEP02 Amsterdam Introduction Facility.
1 The JHF-Kamioka Neutrino experiment 1.Introduction 2.Overview of the experiment 3.Physics sensitivity in Phase-I 4.Physics sensitivity in Phase-II 5.Summary.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Oct. Neutrino Oscillation Experiment between JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR)
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
1 Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment in Japan III International Workshop on “Neutrino Oscillations in Venice” Koichiro Nishikawa Kyoto University February.
NuFact02, July 2002, London Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U.Tokyo For the K2K collab. and JHF-Kamioka WG.
Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo NOW2004, Sep 2004.
Road Map of Neutrino Physics in Japan Largely my personal view Don’t take too seriously K. Nakamura KEK NuFact04 July 30, 2004.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
An experiment to measure   with the CNGS beam off axis and a deep underwater Cherenkov detector in the Gulf of Taranto CNGS.
1 A study to clarify important systematic errors A.K.Ichikawa, Kyoto univ. We have just started not to be in a time blind with construction works. Activity.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
Monday, Mar. 3, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #12 Monday, Mar. 3, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Measurements 1.Atmospheric.
Hiroyuki Sekiya ICHEP2012 Jul 5 The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment -Neutrino Physics Potentials- ICHEP2012 July Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR,
Neutrino Interaction measurement in K2K experiment (1kton water Cherenkov detector) Jun Kameda(ICRR) for K2K collaboration RCCN international workshop.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Status of Super-Kamiokande, K2K and JHF ACFA LC Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration, K2K collaboration and JHF collaboration.
T2K Oscillation Strategies Kevin McFarland (University of Rochester) on behalf of the T2K Collaboration Neutrino Factories 2010 October 24 th 2010.
The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
T2K : New physics results
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Preliminary T2K beam simulation using the G4 2km detector
First MINOS Results from the NuMI Beam
Experiments to detect q13
Super-Kamiokande and K2K: Recent Results, Status, and Plans
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
LBL Oscillation H. Minakata (Tokyo Metropolitan U.)
Results from K2K and status of T2K
Physics with the ICARUS T1800 detector
スーパーカミオカンデ1140日の 大気ニュートリノ観測
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK - IPNS)
Prospects of J-PARC Neutrino Program
Report of the T2KK Workshop
T2KK sensitivity as a function of L and Dm2
T2KK Sensitivity of Resolving q23 Octant Degeneracy
Fine-Grained Near Detector(s) at JHF: Purpose and Thoughts
Naotoshi Okamura (YITP) NuFact05
Toward realistic evaluation of the T2KK physics potential
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
Presentation transcript:

Conventional Neutrino Beam Experiment : JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR) Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

JHF Neutrino Working Group Y. Itow, Y. Obayashi, Y. Totsuka (ICRR) Y. Hayato, H. Ishino, T. Kobayashi, K. Nakamura, M. Sakuda (KEK) T. Hara (Kobe) T. Nakaya, K. Nishikawa (Kyoto) T. Hasegawa, K. Ishihara, A. Suzuki (Tohoku) Konaka (TRIUMF) http://neutrino.kek.jp/jhfnu Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

Overview of JHF – SK nm→nx disappearance: nm→ne appearance: Precise measurement of oscillation parameters: d(Dm232)~ 2x10-4eV2, d(sin22qmx)~ 1% nm→ne appearance: Explore down to sin22qme ~ 5x10-3 Oscillation Max @ En=0.5~1.2GeV P=sin22q・sin2(1.27Dm232L/En) Dm232=2~5x10-3eV2, L=295km Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

JHF (Japan Hadrons Facility) JAERI @ Tokai-mura Construction: 2001 ~ 2006 N 50GeV PS 3GeV PS Neutrino Beam Line 600MeV Linac Front Detector(s) To Super-Kamiokande J H F MINOS K 2 K E(GeV) 50 120 12 Int.(1012ppp) 330 40 6 Rate(Hz) 0.29 0.53 0.45 Power(MW) 0.77 0.41 0.0052 1021p.o.t./1year(130day) Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

Far Detector Super-Kamiokande @ Kamioka Operation Start: 1996 295 km from JAERI 50.0kt Pure Water in the tank 22.5kt Fiducial Volume as a neutrino target Energy measurement by total amount of Cherenkov light e-m separation is performed by ring pattern likelihood Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

Neutrino Beam at JHF Three Possible options: Present Strategy: Wide Band Beam (WBB) 2 horns, almost same as K2K Narrow Band Beam (NBB) Horn(s) + Bending Off Axis Beam Another option of NBB Present Strategy: First 1(~2) year: High Statistics Run with WBB Pin down Dm2 Next 5 years: Precise Analysis with (one of) NBB Measurement of q23,q13 Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

Wide Band Beam High Intensity Wide sensitivity in Dm2 Established technique Backgrounds from HE tail Spectra diff. btw near&far Systematic error Needs Heavy shielding decay pipe must be short ~ 4200 nm int./22.5kt/yr (ne:0.8%) Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

Narrow Band Beam Less systematic error Less BG from HE tail Easy to tune En Less shielding Low intensity ~ 830 nm int./22.5kt/yr (ne:0.3%@peak) Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

Off Axis Beam: Another option of NBB q WBB with intentionally misaligned from detector axis Quasi Monochromatic Beam Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

Off Axis Beam More intense than NBB More HE tail than NBB Hard to tune En Needs heavy shielding Not established technique Beam monitor Near/Far ratio, … ~ 2200 nm int./22.5kt/yr (ne:0.2%@peak) Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

Physics Sensitivity Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

nm Disappearance Ratio after BG subtraction: Fit with 1-sin22q・sin2(1.27Dm2L/E) Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

nm Disappearance d(sin22q)~0.01 in 5 years Possible systematic errors: inelastic cross section: 20% Spectrum @FD: 4%・E Spectrum diff.(Near/Far): 10% Energy measurement: 3% d(sin22q)~0.01 in 5 years Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

nm → ne Appearance Three flavor oscillation framework: Dm212 <<Dm223 ~Dm213≡Dm2 Dm223= Dm2atm>10-3eV2 Dm212= Dm2sol<10-4eV2 Oscillation Probability P : Present limit: sin22qme > 5x10-2 sin22qme= sin22q13・ sin2q23 sin22q13 <0.1(CHOOZ) sin2q23 ~ 0.5 (Atmospheric n) Goal: sin22qme ~ 5x10-3 m22 m12 m32 Dm2atm Dm2sol Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

ne nm m easy to reject Signal & Backgrounds Signal: ne C.C. interaction BG 1: nm C.C. interaction Single fuzzy ring Cherenkov angle ~ 42deg. ne e+- shower Sharp ring edge Cherenkov angle < 42deg. nm m easy to reject Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

Backgrounds (continued) BG 2: N.C. p0 production n n p0→2g 2 showers 2 fuzzy rings → hard to separate Not reproduce En need effort to reject Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

ne Selection by SK Official Cuts nm (w/p0) ne Fid. Vol. 3651 795 53.3 1R e-like 92 68 29.5 reduct.rate 2.5% 8.6% 1.8% sin22qme=0.05, Dm2=3x10-3eV2 S/N ~ 1/3 (@sin22qme=0.05) Main Background come from p0 Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

p0 rejection Force to find 2nd g ring Cut with follow quantities: Shower direction w.r.t. n (cosqne) Energy fraction of second g R(g2)=E(g2)/(E(g1)+E(g2)) Pattern likelihood difference Invariant mass of 2 g Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

p0 cut efficiency PRELIMINARY WBB 1year NBB 1year Off Axis 1year WIDE nm ne Fid. Vol. 3651 53.3 1R e-like 92(2.5%) 29.5(55.3%) p0 cut 4.0(0.1%) 9.8(18.4%) NBB 1year LE2p nm ne Fid. Vol. 740 23.0 1R e-like 13.2(1.8%) 16.2(70.4%) p0 cut 1.8(0.2%) 11.6(50.4%) Off Axis 1year 2deg. nm ne Fid. Vol. 1801 45.5 1R e-like 37.4(2.1%) 32.1(70.5%) p0 cut 3.8(0.2%) 24.3(53.4%) sin22qme=0.05, Dm2=3x10-3eV2 Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

nm → ne Oscillation Sensitivity PRELIMINARY 10% systematic in BG rate is considered sin22qme~5(3)x10-3 @90%CL by 5year run of NBB (off axis beam) Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

nm → ne Oscillation Sensitivity PRELIMINARY 10% systematic in BG rate is considered Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

Comparison to MINOS MINOS Ph2he,me,le 2yr exposure (hep-ph0005012) JHF neutrino is more sensitive especially in Atmospheric Dm2 region Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

nm→ nt? nsterile? nm nt nsterile nt ⇔ nsterile discrimination NC p0 production: n + N → n + N + p0 In the case of nm→ nsterile oscillation, Number of p0 also decrease nt ⇔ nsterile discrimination CC NC nm Yes nt Few nsterile No Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

nm disappearance search Summary JHF neutrino experiment Expected to start in 2006 Far Detector: Super-K By 5 years of run: nm disappearance search d(Dm2) ~ 2x10-4eV2 d(sin22q) ~ 1% ne appearance search sin22qme ~ 5x10-3 @90%CL nm⇔nt or nm⇔nsterile Can be tested Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000

Test of CP Violation If sin22q13 ~ 0.01: 1MW(2deg. off axis) → SK : 2 nm → ne / year Too few to see CP 4MW → Mton : 300 nm → ne / year 100 nm → ne / year 1year n + 3year n 600 total events with asym: 150xsind d=30deg.(3s), 12deg.(90% CL) Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Honolulu- Oct. 6, 2000