Nucleosynthesis in jets from Collapsars

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutron Stars: Insights into their Formation, Evolution & Structure from their Masses and Radii Feryal Ozel University of Arizona In collaboration with.
Advertisements

Who are the usual suspects? Type I Supernovae No fusion in white dwarf, star is supported only by electron degeneracy pressure. This sets max mass for.
Gamma-Ray bursts from binary neutron star mergers Roland Oechslin MPA Garching, SFB/TR 7 SFB/TR7 Albert Einstein‘s Century, Paris,
Mass transfer in a binary system
Neutron Stars and Black Holes
‘Dark Side’ The ‘Dark Side’ of Gamma-Ray Bursts and Implications for Nucleosynthesis neutron capture elements (‘n-process’) light elements (spallation?)
Life and Evolution of a Massive Star M ~ 25 M Sun.
Supernova and Neutron Stars
Neutron Star Formation and the Supernova Engine Bounce Masses Mass at Explosion Fallback.
Apparent Brightness α Luminosity/Distance^2
Collapse of Massive Stars A.MacFadyen Caltech. Muller (1999) “Delayed” SN Explosion acac Accretion vs. Neutrino heating Burrows (2001)
Neutron Stars and Black Holes Chapter 14. Formation of Neutron Stars Compact objects more massive than the Chandrasekhar Limit (1.4 M sun ) collapse beyond.
Death of Stars I Physics 113 Goderya Chapter(s): 13 Learning Outcomes:
1 Explosive nucleosynthesis in neutrino-driven, aspherical Pop. III supernovae Shin-ichiro Fujimoto (Kumamoto NCT, Japan) collaboration with M. Hashimoto.
Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts. Summary of Post-Main-Sequence Evolution of Stars M > 8 M sun M < 4 M sun Subsequent ignition of nuclear reactions involving.
Stellar Fuel, Nuclear Energy and Elements How do stars shine? E = mc 2 How did matter come into being? Big bang  stellar nucleosynthesis How did different.
Relativistic Outflow Formation by Magnetic Field around Rapidly Rotating Black Hole Shinji Koide ( Toyama University ) Black Hole 2003, October 29 (Wed),
Stars. I.Introduction A. Some ‘observations’ During the 20 th Century 1. Our Sun is not the center of our Galaxy.
Plasma universe Fluctuations in the primordial plasma are observed in the cosmic microwave background ESA Planck satellite to be launched in 2007 Data.
Collapsar Accretion and the Gamma-Ray Burst X-Ray Light Curve Chris Lindner Milos Milosavljevic, Sean M. Couch, Pawan Kumar.
Dec. 6, Review: >8Msun stars become Type II SNe As nuclear burning proceeds to, finally, burning Silicon (Si) into iron (Fe), catastrophe looms.
Stellar Evolution Part 3 Fate of the most massive stars.
Abel, Bryan, and Norman, (2002), Science, 295, 5552 density molecular cloud analog (200 K) shock 600 pc.
Recap: Death of Stars: Low and Medium Mass Red Giant Main Sequence Star Planetary Nebula White Dwarf Black Dwarf ?? Red Dwarf Low Mass Medium Mass.
Observational Properties and Modelling of Hypernovae Jinsong Deng National Astronomical Observatories of China Collaborators: P. A. Mazzali (Trieste Obs.
Death of Stars II Physics 113 Goderya Chapter(s): 14
1 Chang-Hwan Spin of Stellar Mass Black Holes: Hypernova and BH Spin Correlation in Soft X-ray BH Binaries.
Stellar Corpses and Other Space Oddities
Magneto-hydrodynamic Simulations of Collapsars Shin-ichiro Fujimoto (Kumamoto National College of Technology), Collaborators: Kei Kotake(NAOJ), Sho-ichi.
Nucleosynthesis in decompressed Neutron stars crust matter Sarmistha Banik Collaborators: Smruti Smita Lenka & B. Hareesh Gautham BITS-PILANI, Hyderabad.
Formation of BH-Disk system via PopIII core collapse in full GR National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Yuichiro Sekiguchi.
Nuclear Chemistry Part 2. Fission vs. Fusion Fission A larger nucleus splits into smaller pieces Creates a lot of energy Used in nuclear bombs and nuclear.
Ryohei Fukuda 1, Motoaki Saruwatari 1, Masa-aki Hashimoto 1, Shin-ichiro Fujimoto 2 1 Department of Physics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 2 Department of.
Gravitational wave sources
Waseda univ. Yamada lab. D1 Chinami Kato
Jim Truran 56Ni, SNeIa Luminosities, and Explosive Nucleosynthesis
Supernova.
Neutron Stars and Black Holes
The Fate of High-Mass Stars
Long GRB rate in the binary merger model
Progenitors of long GRBs
Ch Exploding Stars & Black Holes
Rebecca Surman Union College
Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts
Theoretical Astrophysics Group
Middleweight Stars 4-12 solar masses.
Chapter 21 Galaxy Evolution
The lifecycles of stars
Neutron Stars and Black Holes
Nucleosynthesis and stellar lifecycles
White Dwarf Stars Low mass stars are unable to reach high enough temperatures to ignite elements heavier than carbon in their core become white dwarfs.
Evolution of the Solar System
Supernova in images of Greg Thorne and Nick McCaw
N. Tominaga, H. Umeda, K. Maeda, K. Nomoto (Univ. of Tokyo),
GRB-Supernova observations: State of the art
Announcements Observing Monday-Thursday of this week counts on the third exam. Fourth exam is Wednesday, November 17 Review will be Monday, November 15.
The Death of a Star.
Death of Stars (for high mass stars)
High Energy Astrophysics: problems and expectations
Afterglow Radiation from Gamma-Ray Bursts
Supernova Nucleosynthesis and Extremely Metal-Poor Stars
Black Holes Chapter 14.
Center for Computational Physics
(National Astronomical Observatory of Japan)
Formation of supernova-origin presolar SiC grains
The Death of a Star.
Part 3 Fate of the most massive stars
Stochastic Wake Field particle acceleration in GRB
Nucleosynthesis in Pop III, Massive and Low-Mass Stars
Supernova.
Presentation transcript:

Nucleosynthesis in jets from Collapsars Shin-ichiro Fujimoto (KNCT, Japan), Collaboration with Nobuya Nishimura, & Masa-aki Hashimoto (Kyusyu Univ., Japan) OMEG07@Sapporo, Japan 2007.12.04

Collapsar model of gamma-ray bursts Collapsar = Rapidly rotating massive star collapsing to BH (Woosley 1993) During gravitational collapse of a massive star ( > about 20Msun) The central core collapses to a black hole (BH) Outer layers form an accretion disk around BH due to high angular momentum. Jets from an inner part of the disk. The jets are accelerated to relativistic velocities. We can observe a GRB if we locate on directions to jet propagation. Scenario plausible for GRB because of the discovery of GRB with a core collapse supernova (SN) (GRB980425/SN1998bw, GRB030329/SN2003dh)

Motivations R (rapid neutron capture)-process in collapsar jets Neutron-rich disk in a collapsar from 1D study Collapsar = New r-process site ? Variety of masses of 56Ni in SN with nearby GRBs GRB with hypernova (HN): GRB030329: M(56Ni) > 0.3 Msun GRB with normal SN: GRB060219: M(56Ni) < 0.1 Msun GRB without SN: GRB060505: M(56Ni) < 0.01 Msun  Can such the diversity be explained in light of collapsar model ? Based on 2D MHD simulations of collapsars with various distributions of rotation and B fields  Nucleosynthesis in jets from the collapsars R-process & masses of 56Ni No parameters other than initial conditions of a collapsar before core collapse

Numerical setup in MHD simulations 40Msun collapsar before the core collapse (Hashimoto 1995) Rapid, Moderate, or Slow core Vertical and uniform magnetic fields Angular velocity: R (rapid), M (moderate), S (slow) Magnetic field B0: 108G, 1010G, 1012G 9 collapsars: R8, R10, R12, no ejection of jets M8, M10, M12, ejection of jets S8, S10, S12 rapid moderate slow

Lagrangian evolution of the jets Distribution of jet particles: M12 3000km x 3000km Tracer particle method ρ,T↑ t=0.20s Lagrangian evolution from Eulerian evolution (M12). 2,000 tracer particles are initially placed from Fe core to O-rich layers. We can follow time evolution of position of all tracer particles. One can select particles (jet particles) that are ejected through the jets. 214 jet particles ρ,T↓ t=0.25s ρ,T↓ t=0.31s the onset of collapse: t = 0 s

Maximum densities and temperatures of jet particles Higher density & T states High density jet particles are expected to be neutron-rich due to p+e n 1e+11 1e+9g/cc 56Ni produced Similar to Type II SNe Incomplete Si burning Complete Si burning 1e+06 3e+9 3e+10 1e+9 g/cc B0=1010G Incomplete Si burning Complete Si Burning 3e+9 3e+10 B0=1012G

Ye vs maximum density of jet particles Ye = electron fraction (=electron par baryon) at T = 9e+9 K Ye = 0.4 more n-rich for Ye↓ 1e+9g/cc 1e+06 1e+11 B0=1010G Ye = 0.4 Many n-rich particles for M10, M12, & R12 1e+9g/cc R-process is expected to operate 1e+06 1e+11 B0=1012G

Composition of collapsar jets and Eu-scaled solar r-elements □: Eu-scaled solar r-nuclei Abundance profiles of collapsar jets are similar to those of the solar r-elements for A > 80-100 U,Th M12 R12 U,Th U,Th A=80 A=80

Ejected masses of 56Ni & r-elements Bright SNe (HNe) Enegetic jet with r-elements 0.12 & 0.3 Msun/s Normal SNe Weak or no SNe M(56Ni)ej↑ for Eej↑ Bright-ness of SNe Eej [1051 ergs]

Summary R-process in the jets Masses of 56Ni in the jets We have investigated nucleosynthesis inside the jets from collapsars, based on 2D MHD simulations of the collapsars in light of the collapsar model of GRBs R-process in the jets R-process in the energetic jets (Eej > 1051ergs) from three collapsars (M10, M12, R12) Even for a collapsar (M10) with moderate rotation (2.5Hz) and 1010G Large amounts of r-nuclei (> 0.01Msun) Masses of 56Ni in the jets Jets with Eej ↑, Mass of 56Ni ↑ The diversity of Ni56 mass in GRBs is likely to be explained in light of the collapsar model ApJ644, 1040, 2006 (MHD), ApJ656, 382, 2007 (r-proc.)