Naomi Courtemanche, Doug Barrick  Structure 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Advertisements

Mark E. Zweifel, Daniel J. Leahy, Doug Barrick  Structure 
The Contribution of Entropy, Enthalpy, and Hydrophobic Desolvation to Cooperativity in Repeat-Protein Folding  Tural Aksel, Ananya Majumdar, Doug Barrick 
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
A Naturally Occurring Repeat Protein with High Internal Sequence Identity Defines a New Class of TPR-like Proteins  Jacob D. Marold, Jennifer M. Kavran,
Liam M. Longo, Ozan S. Kumru, C. Russell Middaugh, Michael Blaber 
Volume 110, Issue 10, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Key Interactions for Clathrin Coat Stability
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Complex Energy Landscape of a Giant Repeat Protein
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 
Mark E. Zweifel, Daniel J. Leahy, Doug Barrick  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Influence of Protein Scaffold on Side-Chain Transfer Free Energies
Changbong Hyeon, Ruxandra I. Dima, D. Thirumalai  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Jason O. Moore, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 
Jason P. Mulvenna, Lillian Sando, David J. Craik  Structure 
Hongyu Zhang, Sophie E. Jackson  Biophysical Journal 
Optimizing Protein Stability In Vivo
Alternative Folding Nuclei Definitions Facilitate the Evolution of a Symmetric Protein Fold from a Smaller Peptide Motif  Liam M. Longo, Jihun Lee, Connie A.
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Speeding up protein folding: mutations that increase the rate at which Rop folds and unfolds by over four orders of magnitude  Mary Munson, Karen S. Anderson,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Jason O. Moore, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 
The Unmasking of Telomerase
Untangling the Influence of a Protein Knot on Folding
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
In Search of the Hair-Cell Gating Spring
Structure of the InlB Leucine-Rich Repeats, a Domain that Triggers Host Cell Invasion by the Bacterial Pathogen L. monocytogenes  Michael Marino, Laurence.
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structural Basis for Ligand Binding to the Guanidine-I Riboswitch
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Alternate Modes of Cognate RNA Recognition by Human PUMILIO Proteins
Tural Aksel, Doug Barrick  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

The Leucine-Rich Repeat Domain of Internalin B Folds along a Polarized N-Terminal Pathway  Naomi Courtemanche, Doug Barrick  Structure  Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 705-714 (May 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.02.015 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structural Features of the Seven Leucine-Rich Repeats and α-Helical Capping Motif of InlB (A) Ribbon diagram in which the conserved leucine residues at position 18 of each repeat, as well as the isoleucine at position 22 of the N-terminal capping motif, are shown in CPK representation. Short loops are positioned toward the reader. (B) Ribbon diagram of repeat 4; conserved hydrophobic residues are shown in green, and carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen atoms of conserved polar residues are shown in gray, red, and blue, respectively. (C) Consensus sequences for the leucine-rich repeats and the N-terminal capping motif (x, any residue; s, small residue). Secondary structure assignments (a, α helix; b, β strand; h, 310 helix) and the numbering of residues within each repeat are taken from Marino et al. (1999). This figure was generated using PDB file 1d0b (Marino et al., 1999) and PyMOL (DeLano, 2002). Structure 2008 16, 705-714DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.02.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Urea-Induced Equilibrium Unfolding of Wild-Type InlB and L18 Variants Denaturation curves of InlB (wild-type, black), N_I22V (gray), 1_I18A (red), 2_L18A (orange), 3_L18V (gold), 4_L18V (green), 5_L18A (blue), 6_L18V (cyan), and 7_L18A (purple) were monitored by CD at 217 nm. Solid lines are the results of fits of a two-state model to the data, holding the m-value constant at 2.77 kcal·mol−1·M−1 (see the Experimental Procedures). Structure 2008 16, 705-714DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.02.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Refolding and Unfolding of Wild-Type InlB and Two Variants (A and B) Kinetic refolding and unfolding traces of InlB (wild-type, black), N_I22V (gray), and 6_L18V (cyan). (A) Refolding was initiated by rapid dilution of urea from 3 M to 0.2 M. Refolding data were fitted with double-exponential functions (solid lines) according to Equation 1. (B) Unfolding was initiated by rapid addition of urea from 0 M to 2.95 M. Unfolding data were fitted with a single-exponential function (solid lines) according to Equation 1. For clarity, only every tenth data point (circles) is shown in each panel. Structure 2008 16, 705-714DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.02.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Chevron Plots for L18 Variants of InlB Urea dependence of fluorescence-monitored rate constants for the fast refolding and unfolding phases (circles) and the slow refolding phase (squares) of N_I22V (gray), 1_I18A (red), 2_L18A (orange), 3_L18V (gold), 4_L18V (green), 5_L18A (blue), 6_L18V (cyan), and 7_L18A (purple). Solid and dashed colored lines show results of fitting a three-state kinetic model to the data (see the Experimental Procedures). The black lines in each panel correspond to the fit to the urea dependences of the refolding and unfolding rate constants for wild-type InlB (Courtemanche and Barrick, 2008). Structure 2008 16, 705-714DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.02.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Chevron Plots for the N-Terminal Variants of InlB Urea dependence of fluorescence-monitored rate constants for the fast refolding and unfolding phases (circles) and the slow refolding phase (squares) of the N-terminal variants. Chevron plots are arranged in columns by the repeat in which the substitution was made, and in rows by the position of the substituted residue. Solid and dashed colored lines show results of fitting a three-state kinetic model to the data (see the Experimental Procedures). The black lines in each panel correspond to the fit to the urea dependences of the refolding and unfolding rate constants for wild-type InlB (Courtemanche and Barrick, 2008). Structure 2008 16, 705-714DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.02.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 ϕ Values for the Folding and Unfolding of InlB Variants (A and B) (A) Folding and (B) unfolding ϕ values associated with substitutions in the N-terminal capping motif (gray), repeat 1 (red), repeat 2 (orange), repeat 3 (gold), repeat 4 (green), repeat 5 (blue), repeat 6 (cyan), and repeat 7 (purple) of InlB. Bars corresponding to ϕ values associated with L2V, N10L, I12V, D14N, and L18A/V variants contain crosshatch patterning, diagonal stripes, light shading, horizontal stripes, and solid shading, respectively. Because the substitution 3_I12V resulted in too small a destabilization to satisfy our criteria for ϕ-value analysis, ϕ values for 3_I12A are shown. Structure 2008 16, 705-714DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.02.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Folding and Unfolding Transition State Ensembles of InlB (A and B) Ribbon diagrams of InlB (Marino et al., 1999) with residues color saturated (A) blue and (B) red (hsb scheme) to match ϕ values for the folding and unfolding reactions, respectively. Shading for residues with negative ϕ values was set to zero saturation. Shading for adjacent residues was set by interpolation. The figure was generated by using Molscript (Kraulis, 1991). Structure 2008 16, 705-714DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.02.015) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions