Development of the freeze–thaw processing technique for disaggregation of indurated mudrocks and enhanced recovery of calcareous microfossils by Alice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The remains or evidence of a
Advertisements

Measuring Species Diversity. Think about whats ahead... Discuss in pairs the title of this section. What do you think it is about? Do you know anything.
Fossil Biodiversity Distribution as a Habitat Mapping Tool Erin Arnold Antarctic CRC/IASOS.
Essential Questions How do igneous rocks form?
 Simpson's Diversity Index is a measure of diversity. In ecology, it is often used to quantify the biodiversity of a habitat. It takes into account the.
Communities: Quantifying community structure. Mary E. Allen Hartwick College.
Rarefaction and Beta Diversity James A. Danoff-Burg Dept. Ecol., Evol., & Envir. Biol. Columbia University.
Community Attributes Kenneth M. Klemow, Ph.D. Wilkes University Kenneth M. Klemow, Ph.D. Wilkes University.
Intro to Igneous Rocks.
Calculating Diversity Class 3 Presentation 2. Outline Lecture Class room exercise to calculate diversity indices.
Spent 22 Months Collecting Fine Scale Data on the Composition & Abundance of Bat Species in Caatinga & Edaphic Cerrado Biomes of Northeastern Brazil COMMUNITY.
Measuring Diversity.
WEATHERING and EROSION WEATHERING: The processes at or near the Earth’s surface that can cause rocks and minerals to break down. There are two types of.
Community Ecology - Module 5 Dr. James Danoff-Burg Columbia University.
Species diversity Species diversity: variation in types of organisms present in a community Components of species diversity species richness: number of.
BIOSTRATIGRAPHY: Age Dating & Correlation GEOL 3213.
Extent and Mask Extent of original data Extent of analysis area Mask – areas of interest Remember all rasters are rectangles.
Biodiversity and Measuring Abundance Lab Manual Chapters 3, 7, and 13.
Biodiversity. Average Size Measure all trees in a transect or quadrat. Produce a size-frequency histogram to show the size distribution. Can also calculate.
BIOSTRATIGRAPHY: Age Dating & Correlation GEOL 3213.
Measurement of Biological Diversity: Shannon Diversity Index and Shannon’s Equitability Comparing the diversity found in two or more habitats.
A blast from the past Combustion: when fuel burns, water and carbon dioxide are the products. Sometimes is a hydrocarbon fuel (contains carbon and hydrogen)
Fluid Sampling and Hydrates. Group Members:  Mohammad Afaq Akbar(23)  Nisar Ali(39)  Saif Ur Rehman(43)  Shahnawaz(46)  Uzair Ahmed Khan(49)
Diversity indices Alpha diversity indices Log Alpha Log-Normal Lambda
Calculating Atomic Mass
Section 1: What are igneous rocks?
Biodiversity Variety of life
Biodiversity Variety of life
H.W. # 6 Study pp Ans. ques. p. 189 # 28a,d; # 29a,c
GL4 E1 Key Idea 2 b ii SEDIMENTARY ROCKS
Effective water quality management through the use of algal indices as water quality indicator
10.3 Percent Composition Def: Relative amounts of the different elements in a compound What percent of water is hydrogen? oxygen?
Weathering of Rocks.
Introduction… no notes from this slide…
2.3 Measuring Biotic Components of the system
Percentage Composition
LAKE AND STREAM METRICS
RELATIVE AGES OF ROCKS Chapter 7-1.
AGENDA Reading Preview 12.1 Fill-in Notes 12.1 Power notes
Measuring Biodiversity
Sampling methods.
Chapter Menu Lesson 1: Relative Ages of Rocks
Volume 21, Issue 18, Pages (September 2011)
Module 25 Weathering and Soil Science
Measure of diversity.
A graphing calculator is required for some problems or parts of problems 2000.
By Mrs.Soheir Zaki Abdel-Fattah
Species diversity indices
Vocabulary Percent Composition -
Percent Composition.
Journal of the Geological Society
Jay-Hyun Jo, Clay Deming, Elizabeth A. Kennedy, Sean Conlan, Eric C
Gianniantonio Petruzzelli Francesca Pedron
Structure of benthic microbial communities of residential and industrial land use types before and after two rain events in urban waterways are shown.
COMMUNITY ANALYSIS.
Species Diversity Two factors define species diversity:
Measuring biodiversity
Volume 27, Issue 17, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Obstructed Diffusion in Phase-Separated Supported Lipid Bilayers: A Combined Atomic Force Microscopy and Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching Approach 
Altered mycobiota and bacterial-fungal correlation in AS patients receiving different therapeutic regimens. Altered mycobiota and bacterial-fungal correlation.
Hypotheses (motivate these in your introduction, discuss them in your discussion in the context of the results) There are patterns of association between.
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (September 2018)
Pradeep Reddy Marri, PhD, Debra A. Stern, MS, Anne L
Defective NOD2 peptidoglycan sensing promotes diet‐induced inflammation, dysbiosis, and insulin resistance Unweighted UniFrac principal coordinates analysis.
Unit 3: Natural Resources
by Apoorv Shanker, Chen Li, Gun-Ho Kim, David Gidley, Kevin P
Species diversity: rarefaction, evenness and indices
BIOLOGY 2404a 2009 Lecture 4 Vegetation sampling.
Bell Ringer How do plant roots prevent soil erosion?
Comparison of 16S sequencing and shallow shotgun recovery of species-level taxa. Comparison of 16S sequencing and shallow shotgun recovery of species-level.
Presentation transcript:

Development of the freeze–thaw processing technique for disaggregation of indurated mudrocks and enhanced recovery of calcareous microfossils by Alice E. Kennedy, and Angela L. Coe Journal of Micropalaeontology Volume 33(2):193-203 September 30, 2014 © 2014 The Authors

The relative hazards, risks and safety of chemicals commonly used for the breakdown of organic-rich mudrocks for the extraction of microfossils. The relative hazards, risks and safety of chemicals commonly used for the breakdown of organic-rich mudrocks for the extraction of microfossils. Alice E. Kennedy, and Angela L. Coe Journal of Micropalaeontology 2014;33:193-203 © 2014 The Authors

Percentage weight of original sample processed for each size fraction for the four methods for the six samples processed. Percentage weight of original sample processed for each size fraction for the four methods for the six samples processed. Alice E. Kennedy, and Angela L. Coe Journal of Micropalaeontology 2014;33:193-203 © 2014 The Authors

Histogram showing the percentage disaggregation of samples to less than 500 µm from the four different methods. Histogram showing the percentage disaggregation of samples to less than 500 µm from the four different methods. Alice E. Kennedy, and Angela L. Coe Journal of Micropalaeontology 2014;33:193-203 © 2014 The Authors

Histogram showing the percentage composition of the fractions smaller than 500 µm and its distribution between the <63 µm clay fraction and 63–500 µm fraction from which the foraminifera could be extracted. Histogram showing the percentage composition of the fractions smaller than 500 µm and its distribution between the <63 µm clay fraction and 63–500 µm fraction from which the foraminifera could be extracted. The histogram shows, for all samples, Method 4 and Method 4 combined with Method 2; it also shows for samples MD-170 and Tse 00.60 only, Method 4 combined with high-pressure water spray (PW). The 63–500 µm fraction from Method 4 was used to test for further clay removal through the addition of Method 2 for samples MA-13, MD-78, MD-146 and MD-166/Tse 00.61 and through pressure washing for samples MD-170 and Tse 00.60. For samples MD-170 and Tse 00.60 a new aliquot of the samples was used to test Method 4 combined with Method 2. Alice E. Kennedy, and Angela L. Coe Journal of Micropalaeontology 2014;33:193-203 © 2014 The Authors

Raw foraminifer presence and abundance data. Alice E. Kennedy, and Angela L. Coe Journal of Micropalaeontology 2014;33:193-203 © 2014 The Authors

The fossil abundance and diversity in the 63–500 µm residue picked to 10 g or 300 individuals (whichever was sooner). The fossil abundance and diversity in the 63–500 µm residue picked to 10 g or 300 individuals (whichever was sooner). Alice E. Kennedy, and Angela L. Coe Journal of Micropalaeontology 2014;33:193-203 © 2014 The Authors

Histogram showing the abundance of foraminifera and line graph showing the number of species for each of the samples processed by each of the methods. Histogram showing the abundance of foraminifera and line graph showing the number of species for each of the samples processed by each of the methods. Alice E. Kennedy, and Angela L. Coe Journal of Micropalaeontology 2014;33:193-203 © 2014 The Authors

The diversity of foraminifer assemblages in picked sedimentary rock using the Simpson, Margalef, Shannon H, Menhinick and Fisher alpha indices as well as the dominance and evenness for each sample calculated using PAST software. The diversity of foraminifer assemblages in picked sedimentary rock using the Simpson, Margalef, Shannon H, Menhinick and Fisher alpha indices as well as the dominance and evenness for each sample calculated using PAST software. Alice E. Kennedy, and Angela L. Coe Journal of Micropalaeontology 2014;33:193-203 © 2014 The Authors

The abundance and predicted abundance of foraminifera in the residue. Alice E. Kennedy, and Angela L. Coe Journal of Micropalaeontology 2014;33:193-203 © 2014 The Authors

The predicted number of foraminifera in the 63–500 µm fraction assuming the initial processed weight was 100 g and that the entire sample which was successfully disaggregated was picked for foraminifera. The predicted number of foraminifera in the 63–500 µm fraction assuming the initial processed weight was 100 g and that the entire sample which was successfully disaggregated was picked for foraminifera. Alice E. Kennedy, and Angela L. Coe Journal of Micropalaeontology 2014;33:193-203 © 2014 The Authors

(a) SEM image of a pyritized microgastropod processed with H2O2 showing pitting and dissolution damage. (a) SEM image of a pyritized microgastropod processed with H2O2 showing pitting and dissolution damage. (b) SEM image of pyritized microgastropod processed by freeze–thaw. Alice E. Kennedy, and Angela L. Coe Journal of Micropalaeontology 2014;33:193-203 © 2014 The Authors

SEM images of the foraminifer Eoguttulina liassica (Strickland, 1864): (a) pyritized, and processed with H2O2; (b) pyritized, and processed without H2O2; (c) non-pyritized, and processed without H2O2. SEM images of the foraminifer Eoguttulina liassica (Strickland, 1864): (a) pyritized, and processed with H2O2; (b) pyritized, and processed without H2O2; (c) non-pyritized, and processed without H2O2. Alice E. Kennedy, and Angela L. Coe Journal of Micropalaeontology 2014;33:193-203 © 2014 The Authors

Relative cost and processing time for each method tested in this paper. Alice E. Kennedy, and Angela L. Coe Journal of Micropalaeontology 2014;33:193-203 © 2014 The Authors