A Role for Ran-GTP and Crm1 in Blocking Re-Replication

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alain Verreault, Paul D Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
Advertisements

Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
Plk1 Controls the Nek2A-PP1γ Antagonism in Centrosome Disjunction
JNK1 Phosphorylation of Cdt1 Inhibits Recruitment of HBO1 Histone Acetylase and Blocks Replication Licensing in Response to Stress  Benoit Miotto, Kevin.
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages (September 1998)
Cdk2 Kinase Is Required for Entry into Mitosis as a Positive Regulator of Cdc2–Cyclin B Kinase Activity  Thomas M Guadagno, John W Newport  Cell  Volume.
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 1999)
Activating and Silencing the Mitotic Checkpoint through CENP-E-Dependent Activation/Inactivation of BubR1  Yinghui Mao, Ariane Abrieu, Don W. Cleveland 
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages (October 1996)
Regulated Chromosomal DNA Replication in the Absence of a Nucleus
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
A Mechanism for Inhibiting the SUMO Pathway
Arginine Methylation of STAT1 Modulates IFNα/β-Induced Transcription
Ben Hodgson, Anatoliy Li, Shusuke Tada, J. Julian Blow  Current Biology 
Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
The Spindle Checkpoint Kinase Bub1 and Cyclin E/Cdk2 Both Contribute to the Establishment of Meiotic Metaphase Arrest by Cytostatic Factor  Brian J Tunquist,
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Polina Iakova, Samir S Awad, Nikolai A Timchenko  Cell 
Alain Verreault, Paul D Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Plk1 Controls the Nek2A-PP1γ Antagonism in Centrosome Disjunction
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Control of β-Catenin Stability
Jianbo Yue, James E. Ferrell  Current Biology 
Theodora Agalioti, Guoying Chen, Dimitris Thanos  Cell 
The APC/C Subunit Mnd2/Apc15 Promotes Cdc20 Autoubiquitination and Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Inactivation  Scott A. Foster, David O. Morgan  Molecular.
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Initiation of Eukaryotic DNA Replication
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
CENP-E as an Essential Component of the Mitotic Checkpoint In Vitro
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Claspin, a Novel Protein Required for the Activation of Chk1 during a DNA Replication Checkpoint Response in Xenopus Egg Extracts  Akiko Kumagai, William.
tRNA Binds to Cytochrome c and Inhibits Caspase Activation
NGF Signaling from Clathrin-Coated Vesicles
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Richard W. Deibler, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
GTP Hydrolysis by Ran Is Required for Nuclear Envelope Assembly
Cdc18 Enforces Long-Term Maintenance of the S Phase Checkpoint by Anchoring the Rad3-Rad26 Complex to Chromatin  Damien Hermand, Paul Nurse  Molecular.
Role of Importin-β in the Control of Nuclear Envelope Assembly by Ran
John M Schmitt, Philip J.S Stork  Molecular Cell 
Dimethylfumarate Specifically Inhibits the Mitogen and Stress-Activated Kinases 1 and 2 (MSK1/2): Possible Role for its Anti-Psoriatic Effect  Borbala.
Condensins, Chromosome Condensation Protein Complexes Containing XCAP-C, XCAP-E and a Xenopus Homolog of the Drosophila Barren Protein  Tatsuya Hirano,
Thiocolchicoside inhibits TNF-dependent IκBα phosphorylation, IκBα degradation, p65 phosphorylation, and p65 nuclear translocation. Thiocolchicoside inhibits.
HURP Is Part of a Ran-Dependent Complex Involved in Spindle Formation
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (September 2006)
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Deregulated Replication Licensing Causes DNA Fragmentation Consistent with Head- to-Tail Fork Collision  Iain F. Davidson, Anatoliy Li, J. Julian Blow 
TFIIA Regulates TBP and TFIID Dimers
RhoA GTPase Regulates B Cell Receptor Signaling
Kei-ichi Shibahara, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
SIRT1 Regulates the Function of the Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome Protein
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Functional Coupling of Capping and Transcription of mRNA
Meiotic Inactivation of Xenopus Myt1 by CDK/XRINGO, but Not CDK/Cyclin, via Site- Specific Phosphorylation  E. Josué Ruiz, Tim Hunt, Angel R. Nebreda 
Andreas Mayer, William Wickner, Albert Haas  Cell 
Unassembled Ig Heavy Chains Do Not Cycle from BiP In Vivo but Require Light Chains to Trigger Their Release  Marc Vanhove, Young-Kwang Usherwood, Linda.
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (January 2005)
Role for cyclin-dependent kinase 2 in mitosis exit
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Presentation transcript:

A Role for Ran-GTP and Crm1 in Blocking Re-Replication Ryuji Yamaguchi, John Newport  Cell  Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages 115-125 (April 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00200-9

Figure 1 RanT24N Restores MCM Loading in NPE and Fully Formed Nuclei (A) Analysis of chromatin bound proteins in egg extracts. Sperm chromatin was incubated in egg cytosol (lane 1) or NPE (lanes 2–5) with 20 μM of RanT24N (lane 4) or wild-type Ran (lane 5) for 30 min. No chromatin was added to the sample in lane 2. Chromatin bound proteins were isolated and analyzed by Western blotting. (B) RasN17 did not restore MCM loading in NPE. Sperm chromatin was incubated in NPE with 20 μM of the indicated proteins. Lane 1, untreated; lane 2, RanT24N; lane 3, RasN17. (C) Treatment of NPE with RanGAP and RanBP1 restored MCM loading. Sperm chromatin was incubated either in egg cytosol (lane 1), NPE (lane 2), or NPE pretreated with 50 ng/μl of RanGAP and RanBP1 for 30 and 90 min (lanes 3 and 4, respectively). No DNA was added to NPE in the last sample (lane 5). Chromatin bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting. We note that with 30 min preincubations, a small amount of MCM was observed associating with chromatin (data not shown). (D) Sperm chromatin was incubated with purified membranes either with cytosol depleted of MCM7 (lanes 2–6) or depleted cytosol mixed with 1/2 volume of complete cytosol (lane 1) for 2 hr. In samples five and six, 50 μg/ml of GST-Kip were added. During the first 2 hr, samples were removed and examined. Nuclear growth rates did not vary greatly from sample to sample. After 2 hr when large intact nuclei had formed, 1/2 volume of complete cytosol was added to samples three, four, and six. Samples two and five were processed for chromatin isolation. After a further 30 min incubation, 20 μM of RanT24N was added to sample four, and incubation continued for another 30 min At 3 hr, samples one, three, four, and six were processed. Cell 2003 113, 115-125DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00200-9)

Figure 2 RanT24N Induced Re-Replication of Sperm Chromatin (A) Time course of DNA synthesis. 30,000 sperm chromatin was incubated in 10 μl of cytosol for 30 min, followed by addition of 25 μl of NPE supplemented with either 20 μM of RanT24N or an equal volume of PBS. Reactions were stopped at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min, and amounts of DNA synthesized were measured. (B) The samples were prepared as in (A), in the presence of 400 μM BrdUTP, and after 120 min the DNA products were analyzed by CsCl gradients. Fraction 1 is at the top of the tube and fraction 19 at the bottom. Cell 2003 113, 115-125DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00200-9)

Figure 3 RanT24N Induces Re-Initiation in G2 Nuclei Chromatin bound proteins in reconstituted nuclei. Sperm chromatin was incubated in low-speed egg extracts for the indicated time. At 110 min, 2 μM of RanT24N was added to the extract in one sample. (A) Samples were made with α32PdATP and 400 μM BrdUTP and processed for DNA replication assays. Inserts: analysis of RanT24N-treated sample by CsCl gradient fractionation. HH and HL indicate positions of Heavy-Heavy and Heavy-Light chains, respectively. (B) Nuclear proteins (top) and chromatin bound proteins (bottom) were isolated at the indicated times and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-MCM7 antibody. Cell 2003 113, 115-125DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00200-9)

Figure 4 RanQ69L Inhibits MCM Loading (A) High concentrations of Ran-GTP are inhibitory for MCM loading. Sperm chromatin was incubated for 30 min in egg cytosol containing 0–20 μM Ran-GTP (lanes 1–3) or 20 μM RanQ69L loaded with GTP (lane 4). In a separate experiment, 20 μM of either GTP or H-RasQ61L loaded with GTP were added to the samples six and seven, respectively. Along with the untreated sample (lane 5) and a sample containing no DNA (lane 8), chromatin was isolated and chromatin-associated proteins analyzed by Western blotting. (B) RanQ69L inhibited DNA replication while RanT24N induced re-replication. Sperm chromatin was incubated in cytosol for 30 min either with 20 μM RanQ69L-GTP (sample two), 20 μM of RanT24N (sample three), or without addition (sample one). Following this, 2.5 volumes of NPE was added and the reaction continued for 2 more hours before DNA synthesis was assayed. (C) Left: preincubation with Kip blocks the inhibitory effect of RanQ69L. Cytosol was preincubated without (lanes 1 and 2) or with (lanes 3 and 4), 50 μg/ml of GST-Kip for 30 min. Sperm chromatin was added to all samples and RanQ69L-GTP to samples in lanes 2 and 3 and incubated for another 30 min. Chromatin-associated proteins were isolated and analyzed by Western blots. Right: once bound to chromatin, MCM is stable. Sperm chromatin incubated in cytosol for 30 min was isolated and reincubated in cytosol lacking MCM7 for 30 min In sample six, 20 μM of RanQ69L-GTP was added. In sample 7, 50 μg/ml of GST-Kip was added. Chromatin bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting. Cell 2003 113, 115-125DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00200-9)

Figure 5 Crm1 and Ran-Q69L Form a Complex with MCM (A) RanQ69L and Crm1 coprecipitate with MCM7. 5 μg of the indicated antibody conjugated to protein A-sepharose was mixed with 20 μl of cytosol. Samples three and four also contain 20 μM of RanQ69L-GTP. After 30 min of gentle agitation, beads were washed four times in PBS, resuspended in 100 μl of SDS buffer, and 20 μl were analyzed by Western blotting. (B) Anti-MCM7 antibody precipitation was performed as above in the presence of radiolabeled Crm1 added to NPE. Sample one contained buffer. Sample two, 20 μM RanT24N. Sample three, 20 μM of RanBP1 and RanGAP plus 50μg/ml of GST-Kip for 30 min. Sample four is an immunoprecipitated from a nonspecific rabbit IgG. (C) Top: Western blotting of Xenopus egg cytosol (lane 1) and Crm1-depleted cytosol (lane 2), probed with anti-Crm1 antibody. Bottom: sperm chromatin was incubated in Crm1-depleted cytosol (lane 1), Crm1-depleted cytosol with 20 μM RanQ69L (lane 2), and Crm1-depleted cytosol supplemented with recombinant Crm1 protein at endogenous levels (lane 3). No sperm chromatin was added to sample four. After 30 min, sperm chromatin was isolated, and samples were analyzed by Western blotting. Cell 2003 113, 115-125DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00200-9)

Figure 6 The Geminin-Cdt1 Pathway Is Independent of the Ran-GTP Pathway (A) Geminin is present at very low levels in egg cytosol: Western blotting of 1 μl of cytosol (lane 1) and 1 μl of NPE (lane 2) by anti-geminin antibody. (B) Geminin inhibition is reversed by Cdt1, but not by Kip, while RanQ69L inhibition is reversed by Kip, but not by Cdt1. Sperm chromatin was incubated with either 80 nM geminin (lanes 2–4) or 20 μM RanQ69L-GTP (lanes 5–7) for 30 min. Samples three and six also contain 200 nM Cdt1. Samples four and seven were preincubated with 50 μg/ml of GST-Kip. Chromatin from all samples was isolated and analyzed by Western blotting. Cell 2003 113, 115-125DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00200-9)

Figure 7 A Model for Ran-GTP-Induced MCM Inhibition In S phase nuclei, cyclin-kinase activity phosphorylates MCM, and this modification causes it to associate with Ran-GTP and Crm1. The formation of this complex sequesters MCM and prevents it from binding to chromatin, thereby inhibiting re-replication. Cell 2003 113, 115-125DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00200-9)