Conducting Knowledge Application Lessons By 4th Grade Reading

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Advertisements

Discourse and Mathematical Argumentation in the Classroom Wednesday, June 6, 2012.
K–12 Session 4.3 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 3: Looking for the Practices through Observation Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core.
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
Chapter 11 Instructional Procedures © Taylor & Francis 2015.
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Classroom Discussions: Math Discourse in Action
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
Common Core State Standards. Instructional Shifts Implementation of the Common Core State Standards College & Career Ready Students Data.
Moving to LDC in Chemistry. What is LDC? An Instructional Framework that builds in the instructional shifts that move us toward common Core Implementation.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Institute for Collaborative Research in Education, Assessment, and Teaching Environments for STEM NGSS Resources by CREATE for STEM Institute MSU licensed.
Brandon Graham Putting The Practices Into Action March 20th.
Writing Instruction Across Content Areas CCL- May 8, 2015.
 Update on Math Initiatives - Redux Principals’ Meeting October 24, 2013.
A Network Approach To Improving Teaching and Learning Center Point High School Instructional Rounds in Education.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
Writing an LDC Module Step-by-Step Guidance 10/16/20151.
Michigan State Assessments: What Do Families Need to Know?
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Tier I: Implementing Learning Walks & Instructional Rounds OrRTI Conference Tara M. Black, M.Ed. May 9,
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
Mathematics Instruction In the Age of Common Core State Standards.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
Intentional - Purposeful - Explicit NOT SCRIPT Don’t need more prescription but more precision. Precision requires: 1.Teachers know students 2.Teachers.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Incorporating Instructional Design into Library Instruction Classes NEFLIN Live Online July 7, 2011.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Casimir Middle School TUSD Transition to the Common Core.
In the Age of Common Core. Close Reading of text involves an investigation of a short piece of text, with multiple readings done over multiple instructional.
Planning a unit on sound using the principles of GPS. GPS Glossary.
MAKING THINKING VISIBLE Feb 6, 2012 Partnership for Professional Practice.
Collaboration to Refine and Enhance Science Teaching (CREST) Welcome Teachers! Thursday, January 28, 2016.
Design Question 4 – Element 22
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Helping Students Examine Their Reasoning
Learning Goals & Targets
Dr Max Walsh Science Learning in the 21st Session 2 OUTCOMES-BASED EDUCATION (OBE) Its Implications for Science Investigatory.
ELEMENTS OF AN IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY
Writing in Math: Digging Deeper into Short Constructed Responses
Organizing Students for Cognitively Complex Tasks
Focus Element Helping Students Examine Similarities and Differences
Focus Element Helping Students Examine Their Reasoning
What: Determine the utility of Thinking Routines to pursue our goal of increasing student understanding. Why: An apparent lack of thinking on the part.
The Importance of Technology in High School Science
Teaching the Common Core Using the Math Practices
COMMON CORE AND THE LIBRARIAN
EDU 645 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 645 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
EDU 645 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Instructional Rounds Peninsula School District
Session 4 Objectives Participants will:
New Teacher Workshop PLE October 2010.
Setting Instructional Outcomes
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Wallkill Central School District OPEN HOUSE
Helping Students Generate and Test Hypotheses
Wallkill Central School District OPEN HOUSE
Planning and Preparation
Conducting Practicing and Deepening Lessons Chapter 4- 3rd Grade Math
Helping Students Generate and Test Hypotheses
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
PLT Review Session: Preparing for Case Studies!
Assignment 4 My Final Concept Map Student: Kizzy-Anne Boatswain
Elementary Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

Conducting Knowledge Application Lessons By 4th Grade Reading Chapter 5 Conducting Knowledge Application Lessons By 4th Grade Reading

1. Why is unassisted discovery an ineffective instructional tool, and for what reasons is enhanced discovery more powerful?  Unassisted discovery is an ineffective instructional tool because students are pretty much left to their own devices in their exploration of specific declarative or procedural knowledge.  Enhanced discovery is a more powerful instructional tool because students learn the content as a result of well-planned direct instruction lessons and practicing and deepening lessons

2. What behaviors do students exhibit when strategies for engaging them in cognitively complex tasks produce the desired effects? What purpose does engaging students in these tasks serve?  Students are clearly engaged in their cognitively complex task. Students can explain the conclusions they have generated. Students can defend their conclusions. Students have produced artifacts from their cognitively complex task. These tasks require students to think deeply about the content and to apply what they have learned in novel situations.

3. How does a teacher’s role shift when he or she provides students with resources and guidance to help them engage with cognitively complex tasks?  The teacher’s role shifts from providing new content (which is his or her role during direct instruction) or orchestrating the ways students are analyzing content (which is his or her role during practicing and deepening lessons) to providing support as students work with some relative independence on knowledge application task.

4. In your own words, describe how claims are distinct from facts 4. In your own words, describe how claims are distinct from facts. Provide an example of a claim a student has brought up in your classroom and how the student could have supported the claim with facts.  A claim is your opinion about something.  A fact can be proven.   My example would be that Cindy claimed Johnny had her pencil. Cindy could have supported her claim by stating the color of her pencil, the color of the eraser, and that her mother had written her name on all of her pencils with a permanent marker, thus providing proof of her claim.

5. What design question relates to implementing knowledge application lessons, and how can teachers transform the elements related to this design area into focused planning questions?  The design question pertaining to implementing knowledge application lessons is, After presenting new content, how will I design and deliver lessons that help students generate and defend claims through knowledge application? The three elements that pertain to this design area provide specific guidance regarding this overall design question.  Teachers can easily turn these elements into more focused planning questions. Element 12 :How will I engage students in cognitively complex tasks? Element 13:  How will I provide resources and guidance? Element 14:  How will I help students generate and defend claims?

6. What is backing, and why is backing the area of greatest need among an argument structure’s components? Describe a classroom situation in which you could incorporate prompting students to demonstrate backing.  Backing is providing evidence that supports our reasons that makes us think at deeper levels.  It requires a higher level of rigor that teachers rarely ask students to demonstrate.  This type of thinking is at the core of effective learning, or the gradual accumulation of an integrated set of concepts, generalizations, and principles that occurs through a disciplined execution of the process of argumentation. An example of a  simple classroom situation might involve prompting students to demonstrate backing the teacher’s decision to have indoor recess when the outside temperature is below 50 degrees.