Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Advertisements

Volume 24, Issue 19, Pages (October 2014)
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (November 2017)
Yalei Chen, Melissa M. Rolls, William O. Hancock  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2009)
Drosophila Katanin-60 Depolymerizes and Severs at Microtubule Defects
Volume 93, Issue 9, Pages (November 2007)
Stephen R. Norris, Marcos F. Núñez, Kristen J. Verhey 
History-Dependent Catastrophes Regulate Axonal Microtubule Behavior
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 19, Pages (October 2014)
Asymmetric Microtubule Pushing Forces in Nuclear Centering
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Hiroshi Makino, Roberto Malinow  Neuron 
Single-Molecule Microscopy Reveals Plasma Membrane Microdomains Created by Protein-Protein Networks that Exclude or Trap Signaling Molecules in T Cells 
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Yitao Ma, Dinara Shakiryanova, Irina Vardya, Sergey V Popov 
Fuqing Wu, David J. Menn, Xiao Wang  Chemistry & Biology 
Force-Induced Bidirectional Stepping of Cytoplasmic Dynein
Linda Balabanian, Christopher L. Berger, Adam G. Hendricks 
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Mixed Microtubules Steer Dynein-Driven Cargo Transport into Dendrites
Zhang-Yi Liang, Mark Andrew Hallen, Sharyn Anne Endow  Current Biology 
Jefferson D. Knight, Joseph J. Falke  Biophysical Journal 
Homodimeric Kinesin-2 KIF3CC Promotes Microtubule Dynamics
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
She1-Mediated Inhibition of Dynein Motility along Astral Microtubules Promotes Polarized Spindle Movements  Steven M. Markus, Katelyn A. Kalutkiewicz,
Susanne Bechstedt, Gary J. Brouhard  Developmental Cell 
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Architecture Dependence of Actin Filament Network Disassembly
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
The Fission Yeast TACC Protein Mia1p Stabilizes Microtubule Arrays by Length- Independent Crosslinking  Rahul Thadani, Yuen Chyao Ling, Snezhana Oliferenko 
Measuring Pushing and Braking Forces Generated by Ensembles of Kinesin-5 Crosslinking Two Microtubules  Yuta Shimamoto, Scott Forth, Tarun M. Kapoor 
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (February 2016)
Li Xu, Anthony Bretscher  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Minus-End-Directed Motor Ncd Exhibits Processive Movement that Is Enhanced by Microtubule Bundling In Vitro  Ken'ya Furuta, Yoko Yano Toyoshima  Current.
Dynein Tethers and Stabilizes Dynamic Microtubule Plus Ends
Cecile Bats, Laurent Groc, Daniel Choquet  Neuron 
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Three-Step Model for Polarized Sorting of KIF17 into Dendrites
Volume 99, Issue 7, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
HURP Is Part of a Ran-Dependent Complex Involved in Spindle Formation
Actin-Filament Stochastic Dynamics Mediated by ADF/Cofilin
Felix Ruhnow, Linda Kloβ, Stefan Diez  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 23, Pages (December 2008)
Minus-End-Directed Motor Ncd Exhibits Processive Movement that Is Enhanced by Microtubule Bundling In Vitro  Ken'ya Furuta, Yoko Yano Toyoshima  Current.
The Kinesin-8 Kif18A Dampens Microtubule Plus-End Dynamics
Control of the Initiation and Termination of Kinesin-1-Driven Transport by Myosin-Ic and Nonmuscle Tropomyosin  Betsy B. McIntosh, Erika L.F. Holzbaur,
Susanne Bechstedt, Kevan Lu, Gary J. Brouhard  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 23, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e6 (December 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Jennifer Y. Hsiao, Lauren M. Goins, Natalie A. Petek, R. Dyche Mullins 
Measuring Pushing and Braking Forces Generated by Ensembles of Kinesin-5 Crosslinking Two Microtubules  Yuta Shimamoto, Scott Forth, Tarun M. Kapoor 
Marko Kaksonen, Yidi Sun, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Self-Organization of Minimal Anaphase Spindle Midzone Bundles
Joshua S. Weinger, Minhua Qiu, Ge Yang, Tarun M. Kapoor 
Volume 16, Issue 19, Pages (October 2006)
XMAP215 Is a Processive Microtubule Polymerase
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages 1713-1717 (November 2008) Microtubule-Driven Multimerization Recruits ase1p onto Overlapping Microtubules  Lukas C. Kapitein, Marcel E. Janson, Siet M.J.L. van den Wildenberg, Casper C. Hoogenraad, Christoph F. Schmidt, Erwin J.G. Peterman  Current Biology  Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages 1713-1717 (November 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.046 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Ase1-GFP Dimers Diffuse along Single MTs (A) Stabilized and biotinylated microtubules are immobilized on a hydrophobic surface that is coated with biotinylated BSA and further blocked with Pluronic. Streptavidin is used as a linker. (B) Frames from a time-lapse recording showing diffusion of ase1-GFP (0.45 nM) along a line that corresponds with the position of an immobilized MT. Scale bar represents 2 μm. (C) Cumulative histogram of initial fluorescence intensities of isolated surface-immobilized spots of ase1-GFP (n = 271), dimeric Kinesin-GFP (n = 198), and tetrameric Eg5-GFP (n = 264). Insert shows step-wise bleaching of isolated spots of ase1-GFP. (D) Distribution of initial fluorescence intensities of isolated spots of ase1-GFP adsorbed to glass. The average intensity is 351 ± 19 (SEM, n = 41). (E) Distribution of the initial fluorescence intensities of isolated spots of ase1-GFP bound to MTs as in (A). The average intensity is 410 ± 18 (SEM, n = 52). (F) Eight representative tracks of moving ase1-GFP spots along MTs. (G) Mean squared displacement (MSD) calculated from 54 ase1-GFP tracks. The solid line is a fit to a straight line: MSD = 2Dτ + offset, with diffusion constant, D = 5.5 ± 0.5 × 104 nm2 s−1. Mean squared displacement (MSD ± SEM) calculated from 54 ase1p-GFP tracks. (H) Plot of the fraction of mobile ase1-GFP spots that was still visibly attached to a MT after observation time t. The average binding time, tavg = 11 ± 2 s, is obtained from the time constant of a single exponential fit (solid line). Plot of the fraction of mobile ase1p-GFP spots that were still visibly attached to a MT (±SEM) after observation time t. Current Biology 2008 18, 1713-1717DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.046) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Ase1-GFP Multimerization on the MT Lattice (A) Still frame showing the effect of an increased ase1-GFP concentration (4.5 nM). Ase1-GFP decorates MTs as bright and immobile multimers. (B) Intensity distribution of ase1-GFP multimers, normalized by the measured intensity of single ase1-GFP dimers. The average intensity corresponds to 18 ± 4 ase1-GFP dimers (SEM, n = 50). (C) Average fluorescence intensity (±SEM) of bound ase1-GFP per unit MT length as a function of ase1-GFP concentration. The first part of the curve appears linear (as indicated by the linear fit through the first three data points), but at higher ase1p concentrations, the fluorescence intensity increases nonlinearly, indicating cooperative binding. Error bars smaller than the symbol size are not drawn. (D) Kymograph of a MT incubated with ase1-GFP at a high concentration (4.5 nM). Events of ase1-GFP dimers binding to a multimer directly out of solution are marked with an arrow. (E) Kymograph of ase1-GFP along a MT at an intermediate concentration (1.5 nM). After initial binding, individual dimers exhibit lattice diffusion in between multimers. Multimers are photobleached because of prolonged exposure. (F) Examples of dimers that bound to a multimer after lattice diffusion or released from a multimer (top right and bottom center). Scale bars represent 2 μm. Current Biology 2008 18, 1713-1717DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.046) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Specific ase1-GFP Multimerization between Two MTs (A) Free-floating, nonbiotinylated MTs are added to the experiment described in Figure 1A. Subsequently, these become bundled by ase1-GFP to biotinylated MTs immobilized at the surface. Individual and overlapping MTs can be studied next to each other. (B) Video frame showing two partially overlapping rhodamine-labeled MTs at intermediate ase1-GFP concentration (1.5 nM). (C) Video frame of the ase1-GFP distribution along the MTs in (B). Ase1-GFP accumulates as numerous bright multimers at the section of overlap. Individual MTs are almost empty. (D) Kymograph showing the dynamics of ase1-GFP multimers between the overlapping MTs in (B). Scale bar represent 2 μm. Current Biology 2008 18, 1713-1717DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.046) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Ase1-GFP Dynamics and Domain Analysis in COS7 Cells (A) COS7 cell simultaneously expressing Cherry-tubulin (left) and full-length ase1-GFP (right). Bright localization of ase1-GFP coincides with induced regions of MT overlap. (B) Enlargement of a cell region with nonbundled MTs (left, average of 20 frames) with corresponding ase1-GFP dynamics show in a kymograph (right). (C) Enlargement of bundled MTs (left, average of 20 frames) with corresponding ase1-GFP dynamics shown in a kymograph (right). Ase1-GFP localizes as less mobile spots that bind for a prolonged time. Prior to kymography, movies were filtered by convolution with the kernel described in [16]. (D) The N terminus of ase1p (aa 1–290 tagged with GFP) does not bind to MTs in COS7 cells. Bundling of MTs is not induced. (E) A construct without N terminus (aa 290–731, tagged with GFP) binds homogenously along MTs. Bundling of MTs is not induced. (F) A construct lacking the C terminus (aa 1–515, tagged with GFP) accumulates at overlapping MTs similar to the full-length protein. (G) Summary of truncation experiments in COS7 cells. Multimer formation is assayed with kymography of overlapping MTs. (H) Cartoon illustrating ase1 behavior in different geometries at different concentrations. Top: ase1 dimers diffuse faster and detach more rapidly on a single MT than between two crosslinked MTs. Middle and bottom: ase1 dimers form multimers on microtubules. At high ase1 concentrations (bottom), this happens both on single and bundled MTs; at lower concentrations (middle), multimerization occurs only between MT bundles. Scale bars represent 5 μm. Current Biology 2008 18, 1713-1717DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.046) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions