Shelton School District Hi Cap Program Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Gifted and Talented Task Force Presentation to the Howell Township Board of Education March 29, 2006.
Advertisements

MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
Campus Improvement Plans
Full-Day Kindergarten Proposal Where Students Dare to be Remarkable Pomfret Community School.
Carroll County Public Schools Gifted & Talented. On February 28 th, 2012, the Maryland State Board of Education approved regulations that set the minimum.
Curriculum Leadership Institute (CLI) Academic Program Governance.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
1 Proposed Changes to the Accreditation Process CDE Briefing for the Colorado State Board of Education March 5, 2008.
New Jersey School Boards Association – Serving Local Boards of Education Since 1914 The Law and Gifted and Talented Education Compliance and Advocacy for.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
October 12, College- and Career-Ready Expectations for All Students 2. State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support.
Strong Schools, Strong Communities Strategic Plan Implementation Process and Roles Saint Paul Public Schools has designed the following process and roles.
July 2011 Apr Dec May-June Aug. 2011June Winter 2010 Mar Board Study Session on Equity that included student panel, Q&A and.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.
10/12/20151 Fillmore Middle School Fillmore Unified School District School Site Council (SSC)
D62 Response to Intervention
11 School Board Monitoring Report: Capacity Update Arlington Public Schools April 29, 2010.
District/School Alignment Plan Proposal. Academic Goal 1: Plaucheville Elementary School will meet the Fundamental Practice Level or above in the.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Third Grade Guarantee. Overview of the requirements of the Third Grade Reading Guarantee. Implications of the Third Grade Guarantee for Worthington City.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Shelton School District Hi Cap Program Review Results and Recommendations for April 29, 2014.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Proposal for Learning Center at White Hill Presentation December 2009.
Middle School Program Revision Proposal Bristol School Administration October 5, 2011.
Morris School District Grade 4 and 5 Math Grouping Alternative BOE Approved June 2015.
Parent Information Meeting Gifted & Talented Education Pam Cernocky, Gifted Education Coordinator Eau Claire Area School District ,
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
Shoreline’s Highly Capable Program
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
ANNUAL TITLE IA PARENT MEETING
K-12 Extended Studies Services Program Evaluation
Special Review Team Required Actions October 23, 2011
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
HIGHLY CAPABLE PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
Division of Talent and Performance
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Writing the Response to Intervention (RtI) District Plan
Parent & Family Engagement Policy
Academically Intellectually Gifted Program
Program Evaluation Leading & Learning Spring 2016
Parent Satisfaction/Engagement Survey
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Parental Involvement Policy
Recommendation to the Board of Directors: New District Assessments
Title One Program Evaluation
Parent Informational Meeting
Welcome to <School Name> School
Parent & Family Engagement Policy
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Roles and Responsibilities
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I, Part A Parents and Families
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I, Part A Parents and Families
Gateway High School-Alt.Ed Annual Title 1 Parent Workshop
Roles and Responsibilities
Essential Elements: Schools-to-Watch Program
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I, Part A Parents and Families
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Georgia’s State Plan Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Understanding Grade Level Reconfiguration
At-Risk Updates School Board Report,
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I, Part A Parents and Families
Valley Robotics Academy Board Report
Wahluke School District Highly Capable Information Night
Georgia’s State Plan Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
MASSAPEQUA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Board of Education Goals
Groveton ES Our Local Level iv Journey
Harmony School of Excellence-El Paso Annual Title I Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Shelton School District Hi Cap Program Review Results and Recommendations for 2014-15 April 29, 2014

New Requirements Beginning with 2014-15 school year all districts are required to provide highly capable programs and services for students in Grades K-12 Districts must submit a Board approved program plan to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction Districts must have clearly defined written nomination, screening, assessment, and selection procedures that use multiple objective criteria for identification of students requiring services Districts must provide a continuum of services to students from grades K-12 Each district is required to assign appropriate values to Hi Cap students in Skyward, which uploads to the state information system (CEDARS)

The Mindshift The Hi Cap Program is not a “place” with a fixed number of slots to fill Highly Capable Students should have options from a continuum of services that best meet their specific, individual needs Hi Cap not a categorical program – it is part of the basic education program Each building will need to adjust their RTI systems and program offerings in significant ways to provide appropriate services for highly capable students

Program Review/Plan Process Convene a study committee representing all schools Review current programs and services Develop an understanding of new requirements Attend conferences, webinars, and workshops to learn about research and best practices in education of highly capable students Hold parent/community forums and disseminate surveys (paper and online) to gather input Survey students at each level to gather input Develop district plan based on research, best practices, and student/parent/community feedback Have plan reviewed by program evaluation expert and develop strategy to ensure program goals are met

Conclusions from Research We should provide opportunities for Hi Cap students to be with their intellectual peers We need a broader set of options and services to better meet the needs of all Hi Cap students, including more systematic options for acceleration We should have options at each grade level and school so students do not need to leave their home school for services We need a better system of communication about available services We need to provide professional development to all staff about how to meet the needs of Hi Cap students

Transition Plans 2014-2015 Develop improved communications protocols Identify students grades K, 2, 5 – continue or re-enroll students in grades 6-12 and flag in Skyward/CEDARS Improve opportunities for enrichment through RTI intervention groupings and enrichment academies Implement new advanced classes at Middle School/Junior High School Provide professional development for staff and plan/prepare for implementation of cluster groupings in 2015-16 Complete obligations for 4/5 self contained class Pilot Iowa Acceleration Scale (IAS) for whole grade acceleration Develop procedures for early entrance to Kindergarten Initiate Advisory Committee for Program Monitoring and Evaluation

Transition Plans 2015-2016 Continue to identify students and flag in Skyward/CEDARS Implement early entrance to Kindergarten Possibly transition 4/5 self contained class Implement cluster classes as feasible in grades 1-7 Consider full implementation of Iowa Acceleration Scale at all grades K-8 Continue to provide professional development to staff on critical issues Continue Advisory Committee Monitoring/Evaluation of new program options (make adjustments as necessary)

Cost Considerations 1.0 FTE 4/5 self contained teacher (2014-15 -- $80,000 in current budget) 1.0 FTE Advanced Academic Program Facilitator (in addition to existing 4/5 teacher, or eliminate 4/5 position and create K-12 program facilitator position for 2015-16 -- $80,000 new) Purchase of instructional materials (tiered interventions and/or enrichment academies -- TBD) Purchase of testing instruments ($10 – 15,000) Professional development -- TBD Expenditures other than an additional 1.0 FTE for 2014-15 can be absorbed within existing Teaching and Learning budget

Committee Recommendations The Hi Cap Study Committee recommends approval of the Shelton School District Advanced Academic Program Plan on April 29, 2014 Once the plan is approved, staff will begin communications and procedures for identification of students for advanced academic services in 2014-15 The Hi Cap Study Committee recommends adoption of the proposed policies (2190 and 2195), preferably on or before June 24, 2014 The Hi Cap Study Committee recommends adoption of new instructional materials to provide RTI interventions for highly capable students at grades K-7, preferably on or before June 24, 2014 (to be determined) The Hi Cap Study Committee recommends addition of an Advanced Academic Program Facilitator position, either through addition of 1.0 FTE in 2014-15, and/or restructuring of 4/5 teacher position in 2015-16

Questions?