Sensory Convergence Solves a Motion Ambiguity Problem

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soyoun Kim, Jaewon Hwang, Daeyeol Lee  Neuron 
Advertisements

Heterogeneous Coding of Temporally Discounted Values in the Dorsal and Ventral Striatum during Intertemporal Choice  Xinying Cai, Soyoun Kim, Daeyeol.
Attention Narrows Position Tuning of Population Responses in V1
Do Motoneurons Encode the Noncommutativity of Ocular Rotations?
Heather L. Dean, Maureen A. Hagan, Bijan Pesaran  Neuron 
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Signal, Noise, and Variation in Neural and Sensory-Motor Latency
A Sparse Object Coding Scheme in Area V4
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Reaches to Sounds Encoded in an Eye-Centered Reference Frame
Heather L. Dean, Maureen A. Hagan, Bijan Pesaran  Neuron 
Cristopher M. Niell, Michael P. Stryker  Neuron 
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Ingvars Birznieks, Richard M. Vickery  Current Biology 
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
The Primate Cerebellum Selectively Encodes Unexpected Self-Motion
A Neural Signature of Divisive Normalization at the Level of Multisensory Integration in Primate Cortex  Tomokazu Ohshiro, Dora E. Angelaki, Gregory C.
Volume 81, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Michael L. Morgan, Gregory C. DeAngelis, Dora E. Angelaki  Neuron 
A Neural Mechanism for Sensing and Reproducing a Time Interval
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Differential Impact of Behavioral Relevance on Quantity Coding in Primate Frontal and Parietal Neurons  Pooja Viswanathan, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Hannah M. Bayer, Paul W. Glimcher  Neuron 
Cascaded Effects of Spatial Adaptation in the Early Visual System
Responses of Collicular Fixation Neurons to Gaze Shift Perturbations in Head- Unrestrained Monkey Reveal Gaze Feedback Control  Woo Young Choi, Daniel.
Cortical Mechanisms of Smooth Eye Movements Revealed by Dynamic Covariations of Neural and Behavioral Responses  David Schoppik, Katherine I. Nagel, Stephen.
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Gamma and the Coordination of Spiking Activity in Early Visual Cortex
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Do Motoneurons Encode the Noncommutativity of Ocular Rotations?
Xiaodong Chen, Gregory C. DeAngelis, Dora E. Angelaki  Neuron 
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Effects of Locomotion Extend throughout the Mouse Early Visual System
Huihui Zhou, Robert Desimone  Neuron 
Liu D. Liu, Christopher C. Pack  Neuron 
A General Principle of Neural Arbor Branch Density
Volume 28, Issue 15, Pages e5 (August 2018)
Independent Category and Spatial Encoding in Parietal Cortex
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages e5 (August 2017)
Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages (March 2016)
Jean Laurens, Hui Meng, Dora E. Angelaki  Neuron 
Ryan G. Natan, Winnie Rao, Maria N. Geffen  Cell Reports 
Bassam V. Atallah, William Bruns, Matteo Carandini, Massimo Scanziani 
Adaptation can explain evidence for encoding of probabilistic information in macaque inferior temporal cortex  Kasper Vinken, Rufin Vogels  Current Biology 
Timescales of Inference in Visual Adaptation
Daniel E. Winkowski, Eric I. Knudsen  Neuron 
Orbitofrontal Cortex Uses Distinct Codes for Different Choice Attributes in Decisions Motivated by Curiosity  Tommy C. Blanchard, Benjamin Y. Hayden,
Inhibitory Actions Unified by Network Integration
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Does Neuronal Synchrony Underlie Visual Feature Grouping?
Attention Reorients Periodically
Short-Term Memory for Figure-Ground Organization in the Visual Cortex
MT Neurons Combine Visual Motion with a Smooth Eye Movement Signal to Code Depth-Sign from Motion Parallax  Jacob W. Nadler, Mark Nawrot, Dora E. Angelaki,
Encoding of Oscillations by Axonal Bursts in Inferior Olive Neurons
Encoding of Stimulus Probability in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex
When Correlation Implies Causation in Multisensory Integration
Biased Associative Representations in Parietal Cortex
Daniela Vallentin, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
The Postsaccadic Unreliability of Gain Fields Renders It Unlikely that the Motor System Can Use Them to Calculate Target Position in Space  Benjamin Y.
Marie P. Suver, Akira Mamiya, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Coupled Oscillator Dynamics of Vocal Turn-Taking in Monkeys
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Orbitofrontal Cortex Uses Distinct Codes for Different Choice Attributes in Decisions Motivated by Curiosity  Tommy C. Blanchard, Benjamin Y. Hayden,
Maxwell H. Turner, Fred Rieke  Neuron 
Dopamine Neurons Can Represent Context-Dependent Prediction Error
Presentation transcript:

Sensory Convergence Solves a Motion Ambiguity Problem Aasef G. Shaikh, Andrea M. Green, Fatema F. Ghasia, Shawn D. Newlands, J. David Dickman, Dora E. Angelaki  Current Biology  Volume 15, Issue 18, Pages 1657-1662 (September 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.009 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental Protocol and Neuronal Examples Stimuli (A–D) and neural responses evoked before (E–H) and after (I–L) semicircular canal inactivation during the four movement protocols: translation only, tilt only, tilt − translation, and tilt + translation (see schematic drawings). Htrans, linear sled position (leftward positive); Htilt, roll tilt position (right-ear-down positive). Trans accel and Net accel (M–P) illustrate the corresponding inertial and net gravitoinertial acceleration, respectively. Gray and black lines superimpose in (C) and (M). Data recorded in a rhesus monkey during 0.5 Hz motion in darkness. Current Biology 2005 15, 1657-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.009) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Summary of Neural Activities Using “Response Ratios” These were computed as the peak response modulation during each of the tilt − translation, tilt-only, and tilt + translation conditions divided by the respective response during translation-only motion. (A) Predictions for afferent-like neurons that encode net acceleration (dashed line) and translation-encoding neurons (solid line). (B–E) Response ratios from each cell (thin gray lines) in the FN and VN, as well as population averages (solid line) in normal and canal-inactivated animals. Current Biology 2005 15, 1657-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.009) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Correlation Analysis of Neural Activities Histograms, plotted separately for normal (A) and canal-inactivated (B) animals, illustrate the distribution of partial correlation coefficients for the A model (top) and T model (right), separately for neurons in the FN and VN (gray and open bars, respectively). The median of the population is shown with the perpendicular gray and black lines. The scatter plot illustrates the z scores corresponding to the partial correlation coefficients for the A (abscissa) and T (ordinate) model fits to each neuron. Dotted lines define regions where: (1) the A model provided significantly better fits than the T model (z > 2.33, p < 0.01, area down/right of dotted lines); (2) the T model provided better fits than the A model (area up/left of dotted lines); and (3) the cells were not selective for either model (between the dotted lines). Each symbol corresponds to a cell from either the FN or VN (gray and open symbols, respectively). Current Biology 2005 15, 1657-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.009) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Relationship between Model Coefficients Data plotted illustrate the k1 and k2 coefficients (decomposed into gain and phase) for neurons in the normal (A) and canal-inactivated (B) animals. Each symbol corresponds to a cell in VN (open circles) or FN (gray squares). Black (VN) and gray (FN) solid lines illustrate linear regressions for gain ([A] VN slope [95% confidence intervals] = 1.07 [0.76, 1.56]; FN slope = 1.16 [0.83–1.61]; [B] VN slope = 0.16 [0.10, 0.21]; FN slope = 0.21 [0.14–0.29]) and phase ([A] VN slope = 0.90 [0.76, 1.03]; FN slope = 0.88 [0.80–0.95]; [B] VN slope = 0.74 [0.45, 1.13]; FN slope = 1.04 [0.81–1.31]). Dotted lines illustrate the unity-slope lines. Current Biology 2005 15, 1657-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.009) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions