Insights into [FeFe]-Hydrogenase Structure, Mechanism, and Maturation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Crystal Structure of Human Nicotinamide Riboside Kinase
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Insights into [FeFe]-Hydrogenase Structure, Mechanism, and Maturation
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
James A. Birrell, Olaf Rüdiger, Edward J. Reijerse, Wolfgang Lubitz 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Seisuke Yamashita, Kozo Tomita  Structure 
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Shaun K. Olsen, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
James A. Birrell, Olaf Rüdiger, Edward J. Reijerse, Wolfgang Lubitz 
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ski7 Is a GTP-Binding Protein Adopting the Characteristic Conformation of Active Translational GTPases  Eva Kowalinski, Anthony.
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
The Unmasking of Telomerase
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Structure of Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase B
Huiying Li, Michael R. Sawaya, F. Robert Tabita, David Eisenberg 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Molecular Similarity Analysis Uncovers Heterogeneous Structure-Activity Relationships and Variable Activity Landscapes  Lisa Peltason, Jürgen Bajorath 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Structural Basis for Kinase-Mediated Macrolide Antibiotic Resistance
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages R19-R23 (February 1999)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Presentation transcript:

Insights into [FeFe]-Hydrogenase Structure, Mechanism, and Maturation David W. Mulder, Eric M. Shepard, Jonathan E. Meuser, Neelambari Joshi, Paul W. King, Matthew C. Posewitz, Joan B. Broderick, John W. Peters  Structure  Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages 1038-1052 (August 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2011.06.008 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overview of [FeFe]-Hydrogenase Diversity, Structure, and Mechanism of Cluster Activation and Final Maturation The cartoon depicts various ferredoxin-like Fe-S cluster-binding domains, gas-diffusion pathways, and a maturation channel for H-cluster insertion that completes formation of an active [FeFe]-hydrogenase (right, CpI; PDB ID: 3C8Y). Elemental coloring scheme: C, gray; N, blue; O, red; Fe, rust; S, orange; unknown, magenta. All molecular figures were created in PyMOL (DeLano, 2002). Structure 2011 19, 1038-1052DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 [FeFe]-Hydrogenase CpI and Alignment of FeS Cluster-Binding Motifs of Representative [FeFe]-Hydrogenases The colored shapes depict different F-cluster compliments from a variety of organisms (see legend in upper right). The sequence motifs below allow for identification of F-cluster and H-cluster domains. The unique histidine-ligated [4Fe-4S] cluster of CpI (left, PDB ID: 3C8Y) is shown in (A), along with structures of 2× [4Fe-4S] (B) (PDB ID: 1BLU) and [2Fe-2S] ferredoxins (C) (PDB ID: 1AWD) that are structural analogs of CpI F-cluster domains. (D) depicts the thioredoxin-like [2Fe-2S] cluster-binding domain of Complex I subunit NuoE (PDB ID: 3IAS). Structure 2011 19, 1038-1052DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structural Models of H-cluster Oxidation States Representations were based upon the structural observations of the CO-inhibited state and presumed oxidized state of CpI (Peters et al., 1998; Lemon and Peters, 1999) and the reduced state of DdH (Nicolet et al., 2001). The blue arrow indicates the ligand-exchangeable site located at the distal Fe. The magenta “X” indicates the dithiolate bridgehead group that is likely to be CH2, NH/NH2+, or O. Structure 2011 19, 1038-1052DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Protein Environment of the H-cluster Dashes represent interactions of various residues (labeled) with the 2Fe subcluster and nonprotein ligands. The coordinates are from PDB ID: 3C8Y. Elemental coloring scheme: C, gray; N, blue; O, red; Fe, rust; S, orange; unknown, magenta. Structure 2011 19, 1038-1052DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Hypothetical Scheme for [FeFe]-Hydrogenase (HydA) H-Cluster Activation by Maturation Enzymes HydE, HydF, and HydG In the molecular representations of 2Fe subcluster precursors and the H-cluster, the magenta “X” indicates the dithiolate bridgehead group that is likely to be CH2, NH/NH2+, or O. Structure 2011 19, 1038-1052DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Structural Insights and Analysis of HydAΔEFG Maturation (A) Structural representation of HydAΔEFG from C. reinhardtii (PDB ID: 3LX4) and zoom of the active site [4Fe-4S] cluster environment. The representation is colored according to secondary structure with the two conserved loop regions colored violet. Residue numbering is according to NCBI GenBank accession number AAL23572.1. Elemental coloring scheme: C, green; N, blue; O, red; Fe, rust; S, orange. (B) Hypothetical visualization of 2Fe cluster incorporation by loop closure in HydAΔEFG. The loop linear interpolation (calculated with the Morph Server, http://www.molmovdb.org/molmovdb/morph/) begins at the open HydAΔEFG conformation (light violet) and ends at the closed homology of CpI conformation (dark violet). (C) Potential salt bridges that may contribute toward stabilization of CpI (PDB ID: 3C8Y). Elemental coloring scheme: C, green; N, blue; O, red; Fe, rust; S, orange; unknown, magenta. Structure 2011 19, 1038-1052DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Protein Channel for 2Fe Subcluster Insertion during [FeFe]-Hydrogenase Maturation (A) Transparent surface representation of HydAΔEFG (PDB ID: 3LX4) with channel-exposed residues represented as sticks. The [4Fe-4S] cluster (ball representation) present near the end of the channel is visible through the partial transparent surface rendering. (B) Superimposition of the two conserved loop regions (cartoon representation) showing structural rearrangement along with the 2Fe subcluster from CpI on HydAΔEFG (surface representation). Structure 2011 19, 1038-1052DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Spectroscopic Analysis of HydF in Different Genetic Backgrounds EPR spectra (top) are of photoreduced HydFΔEG (black trace, [4Fe-4S]+ signal with g‖ = 2.05 and g⊥ = 1.89 that overlaps a second axial signal attributed to a [2Fe-2S]+ cluster with g values of 2.01 and 1.96) and photoreduced HydFEG (blue trace, [4Fe-4S]+ signal with g‖ = 2.05 and g⊥ = 1.89). FTIR spectrum of HydFEG (bottom left) reveals metal-coordinated CO and CN− vibrations that are absent in HydFΔEG. These figures are reprinted with permission from PNAS (Shepard et al., 2010b). The hypothetical scheme (right) depicts the different FeS cluster states of HydFΔEG and HydFEG. Elemental coloring scheme: C, gray; N, blue; O, red; Fe, rust; S, orange; unknown, magenta. Structure 2011 19, 1038-1052DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Summary of the HydG Spectroscopic Data EPR spectra (bottom right) are of reduced reconstituted, active HydG (black trace, g = 2.03, 1.92, 1.90) and reduced reconstituted, active HydG in the presence of SAM (blue trace, gcluster1 = 2.02, 1.93, 1.91 and gcluster2 = 2.00, 1.87, 1.83), which indicates the presence of two [4Fe-4S]+ clusters. The graph (upper left) shows the timescale for formation of carboxyhemoglobin (Hb-CO) from deoxyhemoglobin, which is catalyzed by HydG through addition of SAM, tyrosine, and a reductant. The correlating UV-visible spectra (top right) show the disappearance of deoxyhemoglobin (blue trace) and appearance of carboxyhemoglobin (red trace) during the assay of HydG-catalyzed CO formation. These figures are reprinted with permission from Shepard et al. (2010a). Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society. Structure 2011 19, 1038-1052DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 Structure of Maturase HydE from T. maritima The representation depicts the (α/β)8 TIM barrel fold (inset; PDB ID: 3IIZ) and zoom of the active site cavity focusing on the site-differentiated [4Fe-4S] cluster that is ligated to SAM. Elemental coloring scheme: C, gray; N, blue; O, red; Fe, rust; S, orange. Structure 2011 19, 1038-1052DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.06.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions