Top Threshold at the ILC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Filimon Gournaris - 15/4/051 Luminosity Spectrum & Top Quark Threshold Studies at the ILC Filimon Gournaris 4C00 Project.
Advertisements

Gyöngyi Baksay Florida Institute of Technology
Regina Demina, University of Rochester 02/08/2012 Forward-backward asymmetry in top-antitop production in proton-antiproton collisions.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Top Physics at the Tevatron Mike Arov (Louisiana Tech University) for D0 and CDF Collaborations 1.
01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL1 Multiparameter Fits in tt Threshold Scan Manel Martinez, IFAE (Barcelona) Ramon Miquel, LBNL (Berkeley) Introduction. The.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
1 Jet Energy Studies at  s=1 TeV e + e - Colliders: A First Look C.F. Berger & TGR 05/08.
 s determination at LEP Thorsten Wengler University of Manchester DIS’06, Tsukuba, Japan.
The Number of Light Neutrino Families ● Physics motivation for measurement ● Direct / indirect searches for ● Analysis methodology for ● Single photon.
Measurement of α s at NNLO in e+e- annihilation Hasko Stenzel, JLU Giessen, DIS2008.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
ESFA/DESY LC Workshop 1 Klaus Mönig and Jadranka Sekaric Klaus Mönig and Jadranka Sekaric DESY - Zeuthen MEASUREMENT OF TGC IN e  COLLISIONS AT TESLA.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
Top threshold Monte Carlo generator Stewart Boogert John Adams Institute Royal Holloway, University of London Filimon Gournaris (Ph.D student and majority.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Trilinear Gauge Couplings at TESLA Photon Collider Ivanka Božović - Jelisavčić & Klaus Mönig DESY/Zeuthen.
14-18 November, PrahaECFA/DESY Linear Collider Workshop 1 TRILINEAR GAUGE COUPLINGS AT PHOTON COLLIDER - e  mode DESY - Zeuthen Klaus Mönig and Jadranka.
Neutral Current Deep Inelastic Scattering in ZEUS The HERA collider NC Deep Inelastic Scattering at HERA The ZEUS detector Neutral current cross section.
Contents 1. Introduction 2. Analysis 3. Results 4. Conclusion Presice measurement of the Higgs-boson electroweak couplings at Linear Collider and its physics.
Precision Cross section measurements at LHC (CMS) Some remarks from the Binn workshop André Holzner IPP ETH Zürich DIS 2004 Štrbské Pleso Štrbské Pleso.
A Luminosity Detector for the Future Linear Collider Ronen Ingbir Prague Workshop HEP Tel Aviv University.
HEP Tel Aviv University LumiCal (pads design) Simulation Ronen Ingbir FCAL Simulation meeting, Zeuthen Tel Aviv University HEP experimental Group Collaboration.
Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1.
Top/QCD program (b) Higher Order EW + QCD Fixed order vs resummed Normalization (and peak position) stabilised by higher orders; –summation of leading.
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
2° ILD Workshop Cambridge 11-14/09/08 The sensitivity of the International Linear Collider to the     in the di-muon final state Nicola D’Ascenzo University.
Ivan Vitev & The First Precise Determination of Quark Energy Loss in Nuclei Ivan Vitev (PI), Ming Liu (Co-PI), Patrick McGaughey, Benwei Zhang T-16 and.
Jets and α S in DIS Maxime GOUZEVITCH Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole Polytechnique – CNRS/IN2P3, France On behalf of the collaboration On behalf of.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
On the possibility of stop mass determination in photon-photon and e + e - collisions at ILC A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna) K.Moenig.
LCWS 05 1 Experimental studies of Strong Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in gauge boson scattering and three gauge boson production P.Krstonosic Work done.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences.
RHIC-PV, April 27, 2007 M. Rijssenbeek 1 The Measurement of W ’s at the CERN and FNAL hadron colliders W ’s at RHIC ! W ’s at CERN – UA2 W ’s at FNAL -
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
Boogert and Miller; Luminosity Measurement questions; calorimeter-related. 1 Luminosity Measurement questions; calorimeter-related Stewart Takashi Boogert.
Model Independent Measurements Jon Butterworth University College London MCnet school Spa, Belgium September 2015.
IFIC. 1/15 Why are we interested in the top quark? ● Heaviest known quark (plays an important role in EWSB in many models) ● Important for quantum effects.
1 Impact de l’effet faisceau-faisceau sur la precision de la mesure de la luminosité à l’ILC Cécile Rimbault, LAL Orsay SOCLE,19-20 Novembre 2007, Clermont-Ferrand.
A T : novel variable to study low transverse momentum vector boson production at hadron colliders. Rosa María Durán Delgado The University of Manchester.
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Explore the new QCD frontier: strong color fields in nuclei
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Precision measurements of electroweak parameters at the HL-LHC
Triple Gauge Couplings and Polarization at the ILC
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
An Important thing to know.
DIS 2004 XII International Workshop
Barbara Mele Sezione di Roma
Leptonic Structure Functions of Photons
Electroweak Results from DØ
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Strong Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from
ILC Baseline Design: Physics with Polarized Positrons
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Monte-Carlo event generation for CEPC
COMPTON SCATTERING IN FORWARD DIRECTION
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
b-Quark Production at the Tevatron
Presentation transcript:

Top Threshold at the ILC The top quark threshold @ the ILC* * or any other future e-e+ collider Top Threshold at the ILC Filimon Gournaris University College London 01.04.2008 IoP HEPP Annual Meeting Lancaster University

Why top quark precision ? 2004; mt=178.3 4.3; PDG 2007; mt=170.9 1.8 Moves best fit mh by > 30 GeV. Very sensitive. Updated from DJ Miller EuroTeV talk Strong dependence on SM parameters and beyond.. Achievable precision (?): Dictated by : Luminosity Spectrum? Energy Spectrometers? Detector? Theory? Sven Heinemeyer et al IoP HEPP 2008 F. Gournaris

ttbar threshold @ the ILC One of the important ILC physics targets. At the ILC top quarks offer a unique QCD system : Perturbative (non relativistic) QCD applicable since Gt > LQCD -> no hadronization. Classically cannot be produced when total energy < 2mt Quantum effects smear sharp threshold Binding between top and anti-top Also clean experimental environment, well understood backgrounds Threshold scan: Vary the beam energy (Precisely measure the beam energy) Count the number of top-antitop events Precision on beam energy goes directly into the measurement Complications arise due to the luminosity spectrum ( ILC  LEP ) 2mt s [GeV] Top pair rate IoP HEPP 2008 F. Gournaris

Luminosity Spectrum At the ILC the beam energy at the IP gets smeared by various energy loss mechanisms Centre of mass energy variation, three main sources: Initial State Radiation (ISR) Calculable to high precision in QED Accelerator Beam Spread Intrinsic machine energy spread, typically (Gaussian !? ) ~0.1 % Beamstrahlung Beam-beam effect due to strong bunch magnetic fields, causing electrons to radiate. ~ 1 % The luminosity spectrum (measurement) only provides the x distribution but not what x is !! (need upstream/downstream energy spectrometer) IoP HEPP 2008 F. Gournaris

ttbar threshold simulations The luminosity spectrum effectively smears the ttbar threshold cross-section. For extracting precision physics out of threshold scans at the ILC, a good knowledge of the luminosity spectrum and the absolute energy scale are needed. IoP HEPP 2008 F. Gournaris

But we can do better… [T.Teubner et al.] Up to now only ‘brute force’ folding and fitting simulations exist (Boogert - FG, Martinez - Miquel etc) For precise understanding of the top threshold we need to go to fully differential simulations, event generation etc. Can see the effects of the luminosity spectrum in detail. Also… top momentum distribution sensitive to Mt and as Gives info independent of Gt measurement. Different correlations than in Need to use both and to measure Mt and as AFB independent of Mt, sensitive to as and Gt. Sensitivity to Z, W, g couplings : Affect angular distributions and top polarization Anomalous couplings -> EW/QCD effects (new physics ?) IoP HEPP 2008 F. Gournaris

ttbar threshold event generator MCs on the market not precise enough for ttbar threshold (need to include all QCD effects etc.) TOPPIK (Hoang & Teubner) is best available theoretical description : NNLO NR-QCD including differential quantities NNLL total cross-section & NLO rescattering corrections Main problem with TOPPIK is speed (>1.5sec per calculation) New generator works with multidimensional interpolations on a TOPPIK produced look-up table which gives a factor of 105 speedup (details in [FG and Boogert, LCWS ‘07 talk and proceedings] ) Perform monte carlo integration using FOAM/VEGAS Decay top quarks into W+W-bbar Kinematic checks Give to Pythia for hadronization… Event Generator Apply beam effects using realistic Luminosity Spectrum With guidance from Thomas Teubner (Liverpool Theory) NNLO Cross section + differential quantities ds/dp , Ppeak, AFB etc NLO rescattering corrections NNLL renormalization group improved total Cross section (only) Modify Green’s functions Scale total Cross section reduces theoretical uncertainty Based on fast multidimensional interpolation IoP HEPP 2008 F. Gournaris

ttbarMC distributions All generator distributions are as expected.. The hadronization part is also complete and follows the recipe of pandora_pythia hence the important checks are only at the parton level Next step (already underway) is to repeat the previous luminosity spectrum impact studies using the full generator (parton level) and do the mass/width/as fits on the full distributions.. IoP HEPP 2008 F. Gournaris

Summary and Outlook This is a benchmark measurement for any future e-e+ collider. Also methodology and luminosity spectrum issues the same for most other threshold scan measurements (W+W-, SUSY etc) The method and tools for a detailed and conclusive study are finally here. Now what remains is to ‘turn the crank’ for determining the luminosity spectrum impact on the top threshold There is progress also in luminosity spectrum extraction and related systematics studies but not reported in this talk (12min never enough).. Final part of this study will be quick (i.e. SIMDET) ILD study of ttbar reconstruction performance and (time permitting) luminosity spectrum detector reconstruction study. We are trying to define : Effect of luminosity spectrum (solo and extracted) on full differential threshold measurements Luminosity spectrum extraction precision needed and method validation Precision needed to be matched by the absolute beam energy measurements (upstream/downstream energy spectrometers) In some way these studies also constraint the acceptable accelerator parameter plane.. (at least at the ttbar threshold)… For results look out at the next big ILC conference (and for publication in autumn ?) IoP HEPP 2008 F. Gournaris

BACK UP IoP HEPP 2008 F. Gournaris

example ttbarMC distributions IoP HEPP 2008 F. Gournaris

Bhabha Acolinearity Bhabha scattering to monitor lumi spectrum e+e- -> e+e-(n)g High enough rate (statistics) Two approximate reconstruction methods: Only uses angles of scattered electron and positron Based on assumption of single photon radiation Frary-Miller K. Mönig IoP HEPP 2008 F. Gournaris

Simulation (for spectrum extraction) Define accelerator beam (linac simulation?) Simulate beam-beam effects Get beamstrahlung from GuineaPig and/or parametrize (CIRCE) Will come back to this ! Generate bhabha scattering with BHWIDE (BHabha WIDE angle monte carlo) Apply beam-beam effects to bhabhas Analyze / Extract spectrum IoP HEPP 2008 F. Gournaris

IoP HEPP 2008 F. Gournaris