The Reliability and Validity of the Physiological Cost Index in Healthy Subjects While Walking on 2 Different Tracks Rachel C. Graham, BSc, Nicola M. Smith, BSc, Claire M. White, PhD Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 86, Issue 10, Pages 2041-2046 (October 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.04.022 Copyright © 2005 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Track 1: a 20-m wider figure of eight track. Track 2: a 12-m elongated tear-drop figure of eight track. Abbreviation: r, radius in meters. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005 86, 2041-2046DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2005.04.022) Copyright © 2005 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 (A) Bland-Altman plots for intrarater reliability on the 20-m track. Dashed lines indicate 95% limits of agreement (−0.15, 0.17). (B) Bland-Altman plots for intrarater reliability on the 12-m track. Dashed lines indicate 95% limits of agreement (−0.16, 0.13) Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005 86, 2041-2046DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2005.04.022) Copyright © 2005 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 (A) Bland-Altman plots for interrater reliability on the 20-m track. Dashed lines indicate 95% limits of agreement (−0.25, 0.2). (B) Bland-Altman plots for interrater reliability on the 12-m track. Dashed lines indicate 95% limits of agreement (−0.14, 0.18). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005 86, 2041-2046DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2005.04.022) Copyright © 2005 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions