Essentials (+) User Guides Data Sharing and Letters of Access under BPR (Regulation (EU) No 528/2012) CA Meeting 13 November 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES FOR THE AWARD OF CONCESSION/PPP CONTRACTS.
Advertisements

Cefic model SIEF Agreement: benefits and practical aspects CEFIC Legal Aspects of REACH Issue Team (LARIT) June 2009.
Community Facility Loans/Grants Architect Flow Chart Owner has need for project. RD Area Office is contacted. RD visits project site and discusses project.
Decision making for AIR active substances
TUTORIAL Grant Preparation & Project Management. Grant preparation What are the procedures during the grant preparations?  The coordinator - on behalf.
National Quality Framework Self-assessment and Quality Improvement Planning Podcast Series: 2 April 2012 Draft and Confidential 1.
The new EU legal framework for e-procurement: Expectations and Prospects Conference ‘E-procurement and Public Spending: Status, Opportunities and Prospects’
Verification Analyst Qualifications Verification Agencies Workshop 5-8 September 2006 Facilitator: Theo Lombard.
Experiences with registrations - 5 years on the road On the REACH Road 23 November 2011 Kevin Pollard ECHA – Dossier Submission and Dissemination.
Final core presentation, 05/01/2001 A European new joint initiative between: A.I.S.E (International Soap, Detergent and Maintenance Products Association)
Implementation of EU Electronic Communication Directives.
Finding a PPP Partner Essential EU Law Considerations Bernard Wilson Maribor, 18 January 2005 Bernard Wilson Maribor, 18 January 2005.
An agency of the European Union Presented by: Emer Cooke and Truus Janse-de Hoog Update on Transparency Progress report from HMA/EMA TF on Transparency.
HiLumi LHC is co-funded by the EU FP7 Capacities Programme, Grant Agreement Svet Stavrev (EU Projects Office, CERN) Administrative Manager 17.
EuropeAid Delegated Co-operation November EuropeAid 2 SUMMARY BACKGROUND TO CO-FINANCING AND DELEGATED COOPERATION INDIRECT CENTRALISED MANAGEMENT.
CHEMSTEWARDS SOCMA COMPLIANCE MORE FOR MEMBERS - VISIT SIEF and Consortium Management Issues under REACH Dr. C. T. Helmes Senior Director.
Funded by the European Commission WHAT MAKES A GOOD PROPOSAL?
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
Trade in electricity The treatment of electricity forwards in the German BoP Deutsche Bundesbank Balance of Payments Working Group, November 2012.
EMTA General Meeting Prague May 2012 Round table on PSO Regulation 1370/2007 “Two years after enforcement, where are we? How efficient is the regulation?
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Creating the environment for business Assessment of the Implementation by the Member States of the IPPC Directive Advisory Group Meeting Friday 13 th January.
We personally care 31 May 2016 – Working Group on Cosmetic Products EU Cosmetics Regulation – Article 15.2 Criteria for exempting CMR1A and 1B from being.
2echa.europa.eu/reach-2018 Purpose of this presentation This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency, to assist.
ICORD 2006 Kerstin Westermark Md, PhD, Assoc. prof. COMP Chairperson.
1 Package on food improvement agents Food additives Food enzymes Flavourings Common procedure Developments since earlier consultation.
Freely available sources of legal information
Subcontracting funding rules: scenarios
WP3 - Evaluation and proposal selection
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Content of Tender Dossier Instructions to Tenderers
Initial project results: Annex 6 – 20 Sept 2016
Senior Executive Officer
Safeguards- Feedback on Safeguards ED-2 and Task Force Proposals
CHAPTER 7 Audit Planning and Documentation
CRE8TIVE KO Meeting, Rome Italy Quality Assurance
BUYING QUALITY PRIVATE SECURITY SERVICES
MANCP Network Document on Performance Objectives & Indicators
REACH 2018 Get organised with your co-registrants –
Vytenis Andriukaitis European Commissioner for Health and Food Safety
UA – Same biocidal product SPC translation review
Micro data linking – call for proposal item 12 of the agenda
Dispute Settlement under the Indian Model BITs
Dissemination November 2018
Management of product authorizations for in situ cases
Management of product authorization for in situ cases (IGS)
EU legislation on noise emission in the environment by equipment for use outdoors: latest developments European Commission DG Internal Market, Industry,
FP7 SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS
Information session SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 22/05/2013 José M. Jiménez.
Information session SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-WATER-INNO-DEMO "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 24/06/2013.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN FP7
Jozsef Szlezak & Pawel Kazmierczyk (EEA)
State of play endocrine disruptors
Negotiations for Joint Ventures
State of play in the EU for criteria to identify endocrine disruptors
Proposal submission and evaluation
Revision of the technical annexes of the BPR
TRTR Briefing September 2013
BUSINESSEUROPE The Confederation of European Business
COGAIN Kick-Off 5-6 September, 2004 FINANCIAL GUIDELINES
BPR AS Review Programme
External aspects of social security coordination
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
Legal regulation of mediation and involved institutions: Lithuania
Competitive Dialogue/Competitive Procedure with Negotiation
Action Plan following the Active substance workshop
Examples of agreements
eContentplus 2007 Work Programme
Presentation transcript:

Essentials (+) User Guides Data Sharing and Letters of Access under BPR (Regulation (EU) No 528/2012) CA Meeting 13 November 2014

Summary Introduction Methodology General overview of the Data Sharing User Guide General overview of the Letters of Access User Guide Template Documents Points for Consideration/Discussion

Introduction Fieldfisher is a law firm with significant experience in chemicals regulation, including biocidal products rules and regulations In August 2014, the European Commission awarded contracts to a consortium led by Fieldfisher The consortium is made up of: CEFIC (the European Chemical Industry Council) AISE (the International Association for Soaps, Detergents and Maintenance Products) UEAPME (the European Association of Craft, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises)

Introduction The contracts require the consortium to draft three sets of EU guidance under the BPR The documents are intended for all companies, in particular SMEs, with practical guidance on: Data Sharing under the BPR (a document of around 50 pages) Letters of Access under the BPR (20-30 pages) Consortium under the BPR (20-30 pages) The Guides will be finalised by mid-January 2015 for publication at the end of that month A first draft will be submitted to the Commission on 18 November 2014

Introduction Each guide is being designed to be as user-friendly as possible and will include: Description of the law and what is required under it Flow-charts Take-away documents Dos and Don’ts documents Templates (amongst others, Letter of Access template and Consortium agreement template)

Methodology Three principal aspects: Regular meetings with our partners and the European Commission in order to receive their input/comments on the drafting as it progresses European Commission has kept the Agency in the loop On-going Surveys to receive input from SMEs (clients of Fieldfisher and member companies of our partners) Survey prior to drafting (completed) Comments from SMEs on first draft of guides (completed) Comments to be received on final version of guides (to be completed) Input (eventually) to be received from other third parties (other stakeholders, including law firms) after 18 November 2014

General overview of the Data Sharing User Guide What is the Data Sharing User Guide and how it will help? Why impose data sharing? Aims to be achieved by the Guide 2. Essentials + of the new BPR What is the BPR and who needs to follows its rules? 3. New data sharing rules What data must/may be shared and when are the obligations triggered under the BPR? The data sharing rules What practical steps should the prospective applicant and data owner take?

General overview of the Data Sharing User Guide Data sharing rules The type of negotiations that the parties must enter into; and the way that compensation for data sharing can be calculated The possible outcomes of the negotiations Successful – Article 63(1) BPR Unsuccessful – Article 63(3) BPR Competition law considerations Information flows and consortium activities SME Considerations Annexes Multiple take away documents

General overview of the Letters of Access User Guide 1. What is a Letter of Access in the context of the BPR? Obligation to share data under the BPR 2. When do you need a Letter of Access under the BPR? Product authorisation Inclusion in the Article 95 List Active substance approval What you should be aware of as a prospective applicant and a data owner 4. The process for obtaining a Letter of Access

General overview of the Letters of Access User Guide 5. Access rights The scope of access Conditions relating to the use of the data 6. Compensation for data sharing Fair, transparent and non-discriminatory treatment How to calculate fair compensation 7. How the Agency/MSCAs will use a Letter of Access 8. Template Letter of Access 9. Dos and Don'ts

Template Documents Data sharing agreement template Template Confidentiality Agreement Template Letter to Data Owner asking for data sharing negotiations Template Letter of Access

Points for Consideration/Discussion The concept of a “generic” Letter of Access Acceptability (Article 61(1) BPR) Consequential rights under Article 95(4) BPR Tailor-made Letters of Access SMEs would like the template LoA to state that the data can be used in a number of applications - e.g. for read-across Revocation of a Letter of Access (Article 62(2) BPR) Consequences for authorisation versus Article 95 BPR listing Special cases of Letters of Access Biocidal Product Family Consortia

Points for Consideration/Discussion Article 62 (2) BPR: How can the prospective applicant know which data is needed (e.g., if no draft CAR is available)? Which dossier requirements will the Agency apply to be included on the Article 95 BPR List? What about future data on existing active substances where the review is ongoing? Article 63 (1) BPR: How are deposits viewed? What are MSCAs’ expectations in terms of how long negotiations should take? Special treatment / due consideration for SMEs Reduced compensation; payment facilities? More flexible interpretation of the law on data sharing, Letters of Access, etc.? Definition of SMEs