 Return to #1 or proceed forward

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numerical Weather Prediction Parametrization of Diabatic Processes Cloud Parametrization 2: Cloud Cover Richard Forbes and Adrian Tompkins
Advertisements

Numerical Weather Prediction Parametrization of Diabatic Processes Clouds (1) Cloud Microphysics Richard Forbes and Adrian Tompkins Cloud.
Olivier Geoffroy Parameterization of precipitation in boundary layer clouds at the cloud system scale Pier Siebesma, Roel Neggers RK science lunch, 05/10/2010.
Simulating cloud-microphysical processes in CRCM5 Ping Du, Éric Girard, Jean-Pierre Blanchet.
Cloud microphysics modeling: the state of the art Wojciech W. Grabowski Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory NCAR, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Microphysics and the simulation of MCSs in the TWP. Progress in the representation of Mesoscale Convective Systems (MCS) within cloud-resolving models.
Steven Siems 1 and Greg McFarquhar 2 1 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 2 University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA Steven Siems 1 and Greg McFarquhar.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
By : Kerwyn Texeira. Outline Definitions Introduction Model Description Model Evaluation The effect of dust nuclei on cloud coverage Conclusion Questions.
Simulation of Cloud Droplets in Parameterized Shallow Cumulus During RICO and ICARTT Knut von Salzen 1, Richard Leaitch 2, Nicole Shantz 3, Jonathan Abbatt.
Global Aerosol Microphysics With TOMAS Peter J. Adams Acknowledgments: Win Trivitayanurak GEOS-CHEM User’s Meeting April 7, 2009 Center for Atmospheric.
Dennis P. Lettenmaier Alan F. Hamlet JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Clouds and Climate: Forced Changes to Clouds SOEE3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 4 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds.
Two-Moment Aerosol Microphysics (TOMAS) Development GEOS-CHEM User’s Meeting 4-6 April 2005 Funding: NSF / NASA Peter Adams Kaiping Chen Jeffrey Pierce.
Three Dimensional SBM in MM5 Two Case Studies: Florida Simulation of Sea Breeze (7/27/91): Comparison with FTMS, TMIS California: Orographic Precipitation.
ENVI3410 : Lecture 8 Ken Carslaw
Ultrafine Particles and Climate Change Peter J. Adams HDGC Seminar November 5, 2003.
Motivation Sensitivity of Precipitation to Aerosol Concentration. (Based partly on 2 d results). Theory: Precipitation occurring in a “maritime” airmass.
Cloud Microphysics SOEE3410 : Lecture 4 Ken Carslaw Lecture 2 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds Cloud microphysics.
Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002 Large-Eddy Simulation Andreas Chlond Department Climate Processes.
Acknowledgments This research was supported by the DOE Atmospheric Radiation Measurements Program (ARM) and by the PNNL Directed Research and Development.
Microphysics Parameterizations 1 Nov 2010 (“Sub” for next 2 lectures) Wendi Kaufeld.
Aerosol Microphysics: Plans for GEOS-CHEM
Russ Bullock 11 th Annual CMAS Conference October 17, 2012 Development of Methodology to Downscale Global Climate Fields to 12km Resolution.
An Example of the use of Synthetic 3.9 µm GOES-12 Imagery for Two- Moment Microphysical Evaluation Lewis D. Grasso (1) Cooperative Institute for Research.
Course description ATS 441 / 541 Refer to syllabus.
Aerosols in WRF-CHEM Eric Stofferahn George Mason University _07:00:00 (UTC)
Monthly Precipitation Rate in July 2006 TRMM MMF DIFF RH84 New Scheme 3.3 Evaluate MMF Results with TRMM Data Zonal Mean Hydrometeor Profile TRMM TMI CONTROL.
Corrective Dynamics for Atmospheric Single Column Models J. Bergman, P. Sardeshmukh, and C. Penland NOAA-CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center With special.
Morrison/Gettelman/GhanAMWG January 2007 Two-moment Stratiform Cloud Microphysics & Cloud-aerosol Interactions in CAM H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR),
RICO Modeling Studies Group interests RICO data in support of studies.
Betty Croft, and Randall V. Martin – Dalhousie University, Canada
Ice in the Atmosphere W+H 6.5; S+P Ch. 17 Start with some terminology –Warm clouds = T > 0 ºC (= K) –Cold clouds = T < 0 ºC Cold clouds may or may.
Cloud Microphysics Liz Page NWS/COMET Hydromet February 2000.
IACETH Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science Cirrus Clouds triggered by Radiation Fabian Fusina ETH - Zurich 1 st EULAG Workshop - 9th October.
Formation of cloud droplets from supersaturated vapor
Wanda R. Ferrell, Ph.D. Acting Director Climate and Environmental Sciences Division February 24, 2010 BERAC Meeting Atmospheric System Research Science.
Cumulus Parameterization in the Context of Turbulence Studies February Jean-Louis Brenguier - Météo-France Physical Processes & Issues Aerosol.
Particle Size, Water Path, and Photon Tunneling in Water and Ice Clouds ARM STM Albuquerque Mar Sensitivity of the CAM to Small Ice Crystals.
COSMO General Meeting, WG3-Session, 7 Sep Cloud microphysics in the COSMO model: New parameterizations of ice nucleation and melting of snow.
Modeling. How Do we Address Aerosol-Cloud Interactions? The Scale Problem Process Models ~ 10s km Mesoscale Models Cloud resolving Models Regional Models.
Cloud Object Analysis and Modeling of Cloud-Aerosol Interactions and Cloud Feedbacks with the Combined CERES and CALIPSO Data Kuan-Man Xu NASA Langley.
Cloudnet Workshop April 2003 A.Tompkins 1 Changes to the ECMWF cloud scheme  Recent package of changes for 25r3:  COMPLETE REWRITE OF NUMERICS FOR CLOUD.
Towards parameterization of cloud drop size distribution for large scale models Wei-Chun Hsieh Athanasios Nenes Image source: NCAR.
SIMULATION OF AEROSOL EFFECTS ON CONVECTIVE CLOUDS UNDER CONTINENTAL AND MARITIME CONDITIONS Alexander Khain, Andrei Pokrovsky and Daniel Rosenfeld Institute.
Parameterization of cloud droplet formation and autoconversion in large-scale models Wei-Chun Hsieh Advisor: Athanasios Nenes 10,Nov 2006 EAS Graduate.
COPE PRESENTATION Process Modeling and Ice Nuclei.
1 Detailed Microphysical Model Simulations of Freezing Drizzle Formation Istvan Geresdi Roy Rasmussen University of Pecs, Hungary NCAR Research funded.
B3. Microphysical Processes
Probing clouds: why its necessary to use multiple instruments.
Putting the Clouds Back in Aerosol-Cloud Interactions
Investigating Cloud Inhomogeneity using CRM simulations.
Process work on the coupling of
Ice Microphysics in CAM
Hugh Morrison & Jason A. Milbrandt JAS (2015), p
Clouds and Large Model Grid Boxes
H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR) , S. Ghan (PNL)
Simulation of the Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds
OBR: Cloud Physics Research
5. Formation and Growth of Ice Crystals
Ice Clouds in the Atmopshere
Group interests RICO data required
Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science (ICAS)
A. Gettelman, X. Liu, H. Morrison, S. Ghan
CIRRUS IN LEM & LARGE-SCALE MODELS
Breakout Group B: summary Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation Science Objectives Chemistry/aerosol distinct differences in key terms in aerosol budgets in different.
Betsy Berry and Jay Mace University of Utah
Group interests RICO data in support of studies
Physics and Dynamics of Clouds and Precipitation (Cloud Microphysics)
How does rime accretion rate (RAR) influence charge transfer?
Presentation transcript:

 Return to #1 or proceed forward What is needed for a parameterization to be successful: Theory and detailed process modeling to focus on specific param elements Conduct simulations using the process models for the entire relevant range of thermodynamical and dynamical conditions; evaluate using obs  Develop new param, guided by theory and statistics, from process model simulations 4. Test new param in parcel models, CRMs, SCMs (including linkages to other parameterizations); evaluate using obs  5. Conduct sensitivity studies to see if the complexity of new param can be reduced (or needs to be increased) 6. Incorporate new param into a mesoscale model; evaluate using obs  7. Incorporate new param into GCM, assess impact of param on the model climate; evaluate using obs  8. Conduct GCM sensitivity studies to understand how param alters sensitivity  Return to #1 or proceed forward

Dual Moment Bulk Microphysical Models Microphysical elements that need parameterizing : • Liquid drop nucleation • Ice particle nucleation • Diffusional growth • Liquid droplet size spectra • Ice crystal size spectra • Fall speed • Particle collection and aggregation • Subgrid-scale supersaturation fluctuations Key issue is to get the microphysical elements interacting correctly with the aerosols to produce the correct indirect effect and getting new parameterizations into GCMs