Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jiang Wu, Bihua Bie, Hui Yang, Jijun J. Xu, David L
Advertisements

Timing and Specificity of Feed-Forward Inhibition within the LGN
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Motor Protein KIF1A Is Essential for Hippocampal Synaptogenesis and Learning Enhancement in an Enriched Environment  Makoto Kondo, Yosuke Takei, Nobutaka.
Covalent Modification of DNA Regulates Memory Formation
Cellular and Systems Reconsolidation in the Hippocampus
Protein synthesis inhibition and extinction:
Volume 83, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Xenon: no stranger to anaesthesia
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages (May 2005)
Shih-Chieh Lin, Miguel A.L. Nicolelis  Neuron 
Rachel Ludmer, Yadin Dudai, Nava Rubin  Neuron 
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages e5 (August 2017)
Volume 77, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Daphna Shohamy, Anthony D. Wagner  Neuron 
Masahiro Yasuda, Mark R. Mayford  Neuron 
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (October 2008)
Perirhinal-Hippocampal Connectivity during Reactivation Is a Marker for Object-Based Memory Consolidation  Kaia L. Vilberg, Lila Davachi  Neuron  Volume.
Hill-Aina Steffenach, Menno Witter, May-Britt Moser, Edvard I. Moser 
Nucleus Accumbens Neurons Are Innately Tuned for Rewarding and Aversive Taste Stimuli, Encode Their Predictors, and Are Linked to Motor Output  Mitchell.
Developmental Inhibition of Gsk3 Rescues Behavioral and Neurophysiological Deficits in a Mouse Model of Schizophrenia Predisposition  Makoto Tamura, Jun.
The Privileged Brain Representation of First Olfactory Associations
Activity in Both Hippocampus and Perirhinal Cortex Predicts the Memory Strength of Subsequently Remembered Information  Yael Shrager, C. Brock Kirwan,
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
R. Ellen Ambrose, Brad E. Pfeiffer, David J. Foster  Neuron 
Modeling Madness in Mice: One Piece at a Time
Hannah M. Bayer, Paul W. Glimcher  Neuron 
CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation  Joshua P.
Volume 82, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Consolidation Promotes the Emergence of Representational Overlap in the Hippocampus and Medial Prefrontal Cortex  Alexa Tompary, Lila Davachi  Neuron 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Neuronal Activity in Primate Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex Signals Task Conflict and Predicts Adjustments in Pupil-Linked Arousal  R. Becket Ebitz,
Dharshan Kumaran, Eleanor A. Maguire  Neuron 
Volume 81, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Extinction of Cocaine Self-Administration Reveals Functionally and Temporally Distinct Dopaminergic Signals in the Nucleus Accumbens  Garret D. Stuber,
Kevin Wood Bieri, Katelyn N. Bobbitt, Laura Lee Colgin  Neuron 
Hippocampal and Ventral Medial Prefrontal Activation during Retrieval-Mediated Learning Supports Novel Inference  Dagmar Zeithamova, April L. Dominick,
Higher-Order Conditioning Is Impaired by Hippocampal Lesions
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
The Rodent Hippocampus Is Essential for Nonspatial Object Memory
The Rodent Hippocampus Is Essential for Nonspatial Object Memory
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
Stéphanie Trouche, Jennifer M. Sasaki, Tiffany Tu, Leon G. Reijmers 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
New and Distinct Hippocampal Place Codes Are Generated in a New Environment during Septal Inactivation  Mark P. Brandon, Julie Koenig, Jill K. Leutgeb,
Manuela Piazza, Philippe Pinel, Denis Le Bihan, Stanislas Dehaene 
Farah D. Lubin, J. David Sweatt  Neuron 
Motor Skills Are Strengthened through Reconsolidation
Volume 129, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Ki A Goosens, Jennifer A Hobin, Stephen Maren  Neuron 
Cellular and Systems Reconsolidation in the Hippocampus
Traces of Experience in the Lateral Entorhinal Cortex
Learning in the Fast Lane: New Insights into Neuroplasticity
Transient Slow Gamma Synchrony Underlies Hippocampal Memory Replay
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)
Similarity Breeds Proximity: Pattern Similarity within and across Contexts Is Related to Later Mnemonic Judgments of Temporal Proximity  Youssef Ezzyat,
Sleep-Dependent Learning and Memory Consolidation
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 479-489 (May 2006) Memory Reconsolidation: Sensitivity of Spatial Memory to Inhibition of Protein Synthesis in Dorsal Hippocampus during Encoding and Retrieval  Richard G.M. Morris, Jennifer Inglis, James A. Ainge, Henry J. Olverman, Jane Tulloch, Yadin Dudai, Paul A.T. Kelly  Neuron  Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 479-489 (May 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.012 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental Design The series of procedures for the six experiments are depicted, together with intervals of time between training stages. Bilateral intrahippocampal drug infusions are depicted as syringe cartoons of two types. Open syringes are aCSF infusions; shaded syringes refer to either aCSF or anisomycin infusions across groups. Reactivation trials, extinction trials, and test probes were all procedurally identical but are named in relation to their distinct purpose within each study. Means ± 1 SEM. Neuron 2006 50, 479-489DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.012) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Protein Synthesis Analysis and Consolidation of Spatial Reference Memory—Experiment 1 Autoradiographic images of [14C]L-leucine localization reflect greater signal density over the cell bodies of hippocampal subfields in the absence of anisomycin. Representative brain sections were chosen to reflect the following: (A) Localized inhibition of protein synthesis in the dorsal hippocampus at the site of infusion on the left of the image (white regions). (B) In the same animal as (A), the limit of this inhibition, with near normal protein synthesis in the posterior and ventral hippocampus. (C) In a different animal, the maximal extent of neocortical involvement around the injection site. (D) In the consolidation control study, the time spent in the target quadrant during the first trial of each session's training is plotted for retrieval tests 1–6, the memory reactivation trial (test 7), and the postreactivation memory test (test 8). Drug infusions are given after each training session. Note that anisomycin-treated rats failed to show overnight memory of the location of the platform (chance = 25%). (E) First crossing latency (s) for the four trials of each session averaged across sessions 1–6. Animals treated with anisomycin after each session are capable of learning and show a striking reduction in latency between training trials 1 and 2. (F) The proportion of time spent in the target quadrant during new learning in the second context (water maze 2). No drug infusions are given. The previous anisomycin-treated animals can learn, catch up the previous aCSF group, and show equivalent levels of performance during retrieval tests 5 and 6. Means ± 1 SEM. Neuron 2006 50, 479-489DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.012) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Reconsolidation of Spatial Reference Memory and Infusion-Only Control—Experiments 2 and 3 (A) Time spent in the target quadrant during training, memory reactivation, and the retrieval test and 1 week test trials. The drug infusions occurred immediately after retrieval test 7 (memory reactivation). Anisomycin failed to disrupt memory tested on session 8. (B) In the infusion-only control task, drug infusions occurred on session 7, but exposure to the water maze was omitted. There was no change in performance in retrieval test 8 from that observed at the end of training, reflecting the omission of the memory reactivation/extinction trial. Means ± 1 SEM. Neuron 2006 50, 479-489DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.012) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Reconsolidation of 1 Day Memory (DMP) and Infusion-Only Control—Experiments 4 and 5 (A) Time spent in the target zone during training (sessions 1–6), the memory reactivation, and test probe trials. The drug infusions occurred immediately after probe test 7 (memory reactivation) scheduled 72 hr after session 6 (as in experiment 2). Anisomycin caused a clear disruption of memory to chance level (4%) when tested 1 day later. (B) The subset of animals that individually showed effective memory (twice chance level) during retrieval test 7. The decline to chance in test 8 is confirmed. (C) In the infusion-only control, which could be run within-subjects for the DMP task, drug infusions occurred on session 4, but exposure to the water maze was omitted. There was no effect of anisomycin in the absence of memory reactivation. Means ± 1 SEM. Neuron 2006 50, 479-489DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.012) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Extinction of Spatial Reference Memory—Experiment 6 Time spent in the target quadrant during training, and the subsequent extinction trials, memory test, and 1 week test probe trials. The drug infusions occurred immediately after the single session in which extinction trials 7–14 were scheduled. Both groups showed extinction of spatial memory in the retrieval test (session 15) relative to that shown in session 7 (both are first trials of the day) and compared to retrieval test 8 of experiment 2 above. There was no spontaneous recovery of spatial memory shown during the 1 week test. Means ± 1 SEM. Neuron 2006 50, 479-489DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.012) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions