Julie Talbot, Steve Frolking

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rate-dependent Tipping Points in the Earth System Peter Cox Cat Luke, Owen Kellie-Smith University of Exeter.
Advertisements

Pirita Oksanen and Sandy Harrison, University of Bristol, School of Geographical Sciences Evolution of wetlands since the Last Glacial Maximum Acknowledgements.
1 On-line resource materials for policy making Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Learning how using.
Effects of Forest Thinning on CO 2 Efflux Peter Erb, Trisha Thoms, Jamie Shinn Biogeochemistry 2003: Block 1.
The Downscaled Climate Projection Has Arrived – NOW WHAT?
Identifying temporal patterns and controlling factors in methane ebullition at Sallie’s Fen, a temperate peatland site, using automated chambers Jordan.
Pirita O. Oksanen, University of Bristol, School of Geographical Sciences Searching for wetlands since the Last Glacial Maximum Acknowledgements Most basal.
Modeling of microscale variations in methane fluxes Anu Kettunen Jan 17th, 2003.
Jun-Aug/annual mean T precip.sum (degC) (mm) / / / / / / / /810 Jun-Aug/annual mean.
THE GAIA HYPOTHESIS EXPLORATION OF DAISYWORLD. What is the Gaia Hypothesis? Life itself is responsible for maintaining the stability of Earth’s climate.
Carbon dioxide cycling through the snowpack, implications of change Gareth Crosby.
Carbon Isotope Systematics in Soil. Soil Pathway Summary Organic matter finds it’s way into soils and decomposes SOM (Soil Organic Matter) is further.
Ecosystem processes and heterogeneity Landscape Ecology.
References 1. Zhang F.M., J.M. Chen, Y. Pan, R. A. Birdsey, S.H. Shen, W.M Ju, and L.M. He, Attributing carbon sinks in conterminous US forests to disturbance.
CARBON STOCKS IN TROPICAL FORESTS OF MEXICO Víctor J. Jaramillo 1, Angelina Martínez-Yrízar 2, Luz Piedad Romero-Duque 1, J. Boone Kauffman 3 & Felipe.
Plant Ecology - Chapter 14 Ecosystem Processes. Ecosystem Ecology Focus on what regulates pools (quantities stored) and fluxes (flows) of materials and.
SOME ASPECTS OF ACCUMULATED CARBON IN FEW BRYOPHYTE- DOMINATED ECOSYSTEMS: A BRIEF MECHANISTIC OVERVIEW Mahesh Kumar SINGH Department of Botany and Plant.
1. Ecological legacies are: Anything handed down from a pre-disturbance ecosystem (Perry 1994). The carry-over or memory of the system with regard to.
Climate change and the carbon cycle David Schimel National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder Colorado.
Summary of Research on Climate Change Feedbacks in the Arctic Erica Betts April 01, 2008.
Fire Ecology and Fire Regimes in Boreal Ecosystems Oct 19, 2010.
T. J. Bohn, J. O. Kaplan, and D. P. Lettenmaier EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 14, 2015.
A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v. 3.0) A. D. Friend, A.K. Stevens, R.G. Knox, M.G.R. Cannell. Ecological Modelling.
BIOME-BGC estimates fluxes and storage of energy, water, carbon, and nitrogen for the vegetation and soil components of terrestrial ecosystems. Model algorithms.
Soil temperature response to global warming: implications for carbon content from thawing permafrost soils in North America Dominik Wisser 1, Sergei Marchenko.
Soil 2 – Soil Formation.  Soil is formed from the weathering of rocks.  Weathering: the breaking down of parent material (rock).  There are 3 types.
Simulated Interactions of Soil Moisture, Drought Stress, and Regional Climate in the Amazon Basin Scott Denning 1, Jun Liu 1, Ian Baker 1, Maria Assun.
Abiotic Factors And their Effects on the Ecosystem (c )(6)(A)
Modeling Modes of Variability in Carbon Exchange Between High Latitude Ecosystems and the Atmosphere Dave McGuire (UAF), Joy Clein (UAF), and Qianlai.
Succession 11/3. Succession Succession- the increase in complexity of the structure and species composition of a community over time. When you have a.
Effects of Rising Nitrogen Deposition on Forest Carbon Sequestration and N losses in the Delaware River Basin Yude Pan, John Hom, Richard Birdsey, Kevin.
How Plants Grow & Respond to Disturbance. Succession & Disturbance  Community change is driven by successional forces: Immigration and establishment.
How Plants Grow & Respond to Disturbance. Succession & Disturbance  Community change is driven by successional forces: Immigration and establishment.
Site Description This research is being conducted as a part of the Detritus Input and Removal Treatments Project (DIRT), a cross-continental experiment.
Importance of Recent Shifts in Soil Thermal Dynamics on Growing Season Length, Productivity, and Carbon Sequestration in Terrestrial High-Latitude Ecosystems.
Coupling between fire and permafrost Effects of permafrost thaw on surface hydrology between better- drained vs. poorly- drained ecosystems Consequences.
Empirical determination of N critical loads for alpine vegetation William D. Bowman, Julia L. Gartner, Keri Holland, and Magdalena Wiedermann Department.
SOIL ORGANIC MATTER: Can the LTER network be leveraged to inform science and policy?
How often and under what circumstances does wetland drying or thawing of permafrost cause a change in ecosystem state? How often and under what circumstances.
AAG 2010 Washington DC Savanna Vegetation Changes as Influenced by Climate in East Africa Gopal Alagarswamy, Chuan Qin, Jiaguo Qi, Jeff Andresen, Jennifer.
Carbon balance in a heterogeneous cutover bog in the Jura Mountains. Estelle Bortoluzzi, Daniel Epron, Daniel Gilbert, Alexandre Buttler.
Features and performance of the NCAR Community Land Model (CLM): Permafrost, snow, and hydrology David Lawrence NCAR / CGD Boulder, CO.
Climate Sensitivity of Thinleaf Alder Growth in Interior Alaska: Implications for N-Fixation Inputs to River Floodplains Dana Nossov 1,2, Roger Ruess 1,
Moisture Controls on Trace Gas Fluxes From Semiarid Soils Dean A. Martens and Jean E. T. McLain SWRC – Tucson and Water Conservation Laboratory – Phoenix.
Hydro-Thermo Dynamic Model: HTDM-1.0
Detecting Thresholds How to detect thresholds? Major state changes (talik formation), first order understanding of ecosystem function (WT controls on peatland.
Above and Below ground decomposition of leaf litter Sukhpreet Sandhu.
1 UIUC ATMOS 397G Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change Lecture 18: Nitrogen Cycle Don Wuebbles Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Illinois,
THE FUTURE CLIMATE OF AMAZONIA Carlos Nobre 1, Marcos Oyama 2, Gilvan Sampaio 1 1 CPTEC/INPE, 2 IAE/CTA LBA ECO São Paulo / 2005 November.
Changes in Ecosystems: Ecological Succession Pete HamiltonSandringham College.
Succession Syllabus – Describe the concept and processes of succession in a named habitat – Explain the changes in energy flows, gross and.
Arctic RIMS & WALE (Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System & Western Arctic Linkage Experiment) John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running.
Response of the mean global vegetation distribution to interannual climate variability Michael Notaro Associate Scientist Center for Climatic Research.
Interannual Variations in Methane Emissions and Net Ecosystem Exchange in a Temperate Peatland Claire Treat Mount Holyoke College Research and.
Ecological Succession-a series of changes that occur in a community over time Primary succession- changes that occur in an area where no ecosystem previously.
Ecological Succession
Samuel T. Dunn 1, 2, Andrew G. Bunn 3, John D. Schade 1
Export of dissolved organic carbon from peatlands under elevated carbon dioxide levels Crystal Lebreton.
Hydraulic Redistribution of Soil Water in a Drained Loblolly Pine Plantation: Quantifying Patterns and Controls over Soil-to-Root and Canopy-to-Atmosphere.
Regional analyses of aboveground net primary production (ANPP):
Ecosystem Demography model version 2 (ED2)
Ecological Succession
Rangeland Principles (Rem 151)
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of pinyon-juniper and ponderosa pine forests is shown for the southwestern United States. Red dots indicate location of.
Bell Ringer A biologists compares how different ecosystems undergo succession. She divides the series of events that happen during primary and secondary.
Moisture Controls on Trace Gas Fluxes From Semiarid Soils
Bell Ringer A biologists compares how different ecosystems undergo succession. She divides the series of events that happen during primary and secondary.
Rangeland Soil Carbon: State of Knowledge
Models of emissions from savannas
Presentation transcript:

Exploring the limits of peatland stability using a peat accumulation model Julie Talbot, Steve Frolking Earth System Research center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, USA julie.talbot@unh.edu Introduction Results Northern peatlands are likely to be exposed over the 21st century to a rate of change in climatic conditions and a frequency of disturbances not previously experienced in the Holocene. Northern peatland carbon stocks are large and potentially vulnerable, since several key climatic variables that are expected to change (i.e., precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, temperature, growing season duration, fire, permafrost thaw) influence peatland net carbon exchange, either directly or via hydrological or vegetation feedbacks. However, the vulnerability of peatlands to external forcing is not well understood, and the widespread persistence of peatlands through the Holocene indicates that they have a relatively high degree of inherent stability. We test the impact of different disturbances on peatland stability (as indicated by the continued capacity of peatlands to accumulate carbon) and we explore the role of vegetation characteristics in mitigating the impact of these disturbances. Peat accumulation was simulated for a bog and a fen subjected to different disturbance scenarios. All simulations were driven by a stochastic precipitation model constrained by a precipitation reconstruction for southern Quebec (Muller et al. 2003), with an average of 900 mm per year over the 8500 years of simulation. Base case - bog Bog development scenario leading to an accumulation of 5.5 m of peat (310 kg C m-2). The peat gets “enriched” in moss as it gets buried down the profile, due to the recalcitrant nature of moss litter (especially Sphagnum) . Mosses account for 36% of total cumulative NPP, but for 62% of remaining peat mass at the end of the simulation. Same parameterization as (a), but where all vascular plant productivity is allocated to aboveground components, showing that roots seem to “record” climate variations better than aboveground biomass. Peat accumulation is 15% less (in kg C m-2) than in (a). Same parameterization as (a), but a gradual drying is imposed starting at year 6000 (linear increase in evapotranspiration reaching 25% by year 8500). This leads to a halt in peat accumulation, with an overall 18% reduction in accumulated C by the end of the simulation compared to (a). Same parameterization as (c), but where moss die-off accompanies the onset of drying (moss NPP replaced by vascular NPP). This scenario indicates that moss can be an important component factor in the resiliency of peatlands when facing drying. Peat accumulation is reduced by 28% compared to (a) and 12% compared to (c). Base case - fen Persistent fen (from rich to poor) development scenario, leading to an accumulation of 4.5 m of peat (233 kg C m-2). The precipitation driver is similar to the bog scenario, but the impacts of periodic droughts are more severe in terms of peat loss, although the recovery from these losses is also faster. Same parameterization as (e), but a gradual drying is imposed starting at year 6000 (linear increase in evapotranspiration reaching 25% by year 8500). The system continues to accumulate carbon at a steady rate for the first 1000 years of gradual drying, but once a threshold is reached and a period of lower precipitation occurs, the destabilization is very fast, leading to a 15% overall reduction in accumulated C by year 8500. Peatlands are a good example of self-regulating ecosystems, as they can exhibit remarkable stability over several millennia, both in terms of vegetation structure and productivity, and carbon accumulation. Vegetation reconstructions (for example Hugues and Barber, 2003) show such vegetation composition stability, but also show that peatlands can experience rapid changes in their structure and function, such as the fen-bog transition. Hence, peatlands could experience rapid changes in the future given the right set of conditions. No roots Drying @ yr 6000 Drying @ yr 6000 The Holocene Peat Model (HPM) Summary Allocating all vascular plant biomass to aboveground parts reduces peat accumulation. Increased shrub plant growth in drier periods is recorded in peat over time because of the root litter input – there is no such record when only aboveground biomass is considered. Mosses, especially Sphagnum species, seem to be crucial to prevent peat loss in dry conditions in bogs. Peat accumulation in the simulated fen is more sensitive to dry periods, although the potential for fast recovery is higher because of the high productivity of fen plant assemblages. For all scenarios, the deeper peat is relatively isolated from the ‘recent’ climate and other perturbations. Future work Including temperature as a driver and nutrient dynamics. Improving fen representation, including the dynamic, process-based modeling of the fen-bog transition. Testing for a number of sites in different climatic settings and at different stages of development. HPM (Frolking et al. 2010) is a one-dimensional model simulating peat accumulation at an annual time step as the net balance between above- and below-ground productivity and litter or peat decomposition. The basic model structure is two coupled differential equations that simulate the dynamic interaction between accumulating peat and accumulating water, based on the annual plant litter input, decomposition and annual water balance. The model is driven by time series of annual precipitation. The litter inputs are disaggregated in different plant functional types (currently up to 13, including different types of bryophytes, grasses, forbs, sedges, shrubs and trees). The litter input and relative contribution of the plant functional types are determined based on peat depth (as a proxy for nutrient status and acidity) and water table depth. Drying @ yr 6000, no moss Moss fraction of remaining peat Water table depth relative to peat surface References Frolking S, Roulet NT, Tuittila E, Bubier JL, Quillet A, Talbot J, Richard PJH. 2010. A new model of Holocene peatland net primary production, decomposition, water balance, and peat accumulation. Earth System Dynamics 1:1-21. Hugues PDM, Barber KE. 2003. Mire development across the fen-bog transition on the Teifi floodplain at Tregaron Bog, Ceredigion, Wales, and a comparison with 13 other raised bogs. Journal of Ecology 91: 253-264. Muller S, Richard PJH, Guiot J, Debeaulieu J, Fortin D. 2003. Postglacial climate in the St. Lawrence lowlands, southern Québec: pollen and lake-level evidence. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 193: 51-72.