Reovirus FAST Protein Enhances Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Oncolytic Virotherapy in Primary and Metastatic Tumor Models  Fabrice Le Boeuf, Simon Gebremeskel,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Advertisements

Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Jennifer R. Hamilton, Gayathri Vijayakumar, Peter Palese  Cell Reports 
Brian Hutzen, Chun-Yu Chen, Pin-Yi Wang, Les Sprague, Hayley M
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Targeting an Oncolytic Influenza A Virus to Tumor Tissue by Elastase
Recombinant mumps virus as a cancer therapeutic agent
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Insertion of the Type-I IFN Decoy Receptor B18R in a miRNA-Tagged Semliki Forest Virus Improves Oncolytic Capacity but Results in Neurotoxicity  Tina.
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Incorporation of the B18R Gene of Vaccinia Virus Into an Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus Improves Antitumor Activity  Xinping Fu, Armando Rivera, Lihua.
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Combination of IAP Antagonists and TNF-α-Armed Oncolytic Viruses Induce Tumor Vascular Shutdown and Tumor Regression  Shawn T. Beug, Stephanie J. Pichette,
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Hannah Chen, Padma Sampath, Weizhou Hou, Stephen H. Thorne 
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Fig. 7. mRIPO therapy restricts tumor growth and produces antigen-specific antitumor immunity. mRIPO therapy restricts tumor growth and produces antigen-specific.
Thomas S. Griffith, Elizabeth L. Broghammer  Molecular Therapy 
Melissa B. Uccellini, Adolfo García-Sastre  Cell Reports 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Shrimp miR-34 from Shrimp Stress Response to Virus Infection Suppresses Tumorigenesis of Breast Cancer  Yalei Cui, Xiaoyuan Yang, Xiaobo Zhang  Molecular.
Lukxmi Balathasan, Vera A
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Sangeet Lal, Corey Raffel  Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Chemovirotherapy of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma by Combining Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus GLV-1h68 with nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine  Eike Binz, Susanne.
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Newly Characterized Murine Undifferentiated Sarcoma Models Sensitive to Virotherapy with Oncolytic HSV-1 M002  Eric K. Ring, Rong Li, Blake P. Moore,
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Valerie Künzi, Patrick A
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Sindbis Viral Vectors Transiently Deliver Tumor-associated Antigens to Lymph Nodes and Elicit Diversified Antitumor CD8+ T-cell Immunity  Tomer Granot,
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Oncolytic Virus-initiated Protective Immunity Against Prostate Cancer
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
MRNA Vaccine with Antigen-Specific Checkpoint Blockade Induces an Enhanced Immune Response against Established Melanoma  Yuhua Wang, Lu Zhang, Zhenghong.
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2014)
Cowpox Virus: A New and Armed Oncolytic Poxvirus
Development of a Safe and Effective Vaccinia Virus Oncolytic Vector WR-Δ4 with a Set of Gene Deletions on Several Viral Pathways  Ernesto Mejías-Pérez,
The Enhanced Tumor Specificity of TG6002, an Armed Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus Deleted in Two Genes Involved in Nucleotide Metabolism  Johann Foloppe, Juliette.
Abscopal Effect in Non-injected Tumors Achieved with Cytokine-Armed Oncolytic Adenovirus  Riikka Havunen, João M. Santos, Suvi Sorsa, Tommi Rantapero,
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Deletion of Apoptosis Inhibitor F1L in Vaccinia Virus Increases Safety and Oncolysis for Cancer Therapy  Adrian Pelin, Johann Foloppe, Julia Petryk, Ragunath.
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Reovirus FAST Protein Enhances Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Oncolytic Virotherapy in Primary and Metastatic Tumor Models  Fabrice Le Boeuf, Simon Gebremeskel, Nichole McMullen, Han He, Anna L. Greenshields, David W. Hoskin, John C. Bell, Brent Johnston, Chungen Pan, Roy Duncan  Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics  Volume 6, Pages 80-89 (September 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.omto.2017.08.001 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics 2017 6, 80-89DOI: (10. 1016/j. omto Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 VSV-p14 Induces Syncytium Formation and Enhances Virus Dissemination and Yield (A) Schematic of recombinant VSV containing gene insertions encoding either GFP or the p14 FAST protein. (B) Vero cells were mock-infected or infected with the indicated recombinant viruses at an MOI of 0.1 and Giemsa-stained at 24 hpi to detect syncytium formation. (C) As in (B), using the supernatant from infected cultures to determine the virus yield by plaque assay at the indicated times post-infection. Results are mean ± SEM from duplicate experiments. *p < 0.05 compared with VSV-GFP. Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics 2017 6, 80-89DOI: (10.1016/j.omto.2017.08.001) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 VSV-p14 Has Enhanced Oncolytic Activity in Breast Cancer Spheroids (A) 4T1 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells growing as spheroids were mock-infected or infected with 1 × 105 PFU/mL recombinant VSV-GFP or VSV-p14, and phase-contrast images of the infected spheroids were captured at 24 hpi. Arrows indicate large membrane blebs induced by VSV-p14. Scale bar, 200 μm. (B) As in (A), quantifying virus yields in the supernatants (mean ± SEM from n = 3 experiments) at the indicated times post-infection by TCID50 in permissive Vero cells (left panels), or quantifying percent cell viability at 24 hpi (mean ± SD of a representative experiment in quadruplicate; n = 2–4 experiments at 24–40 hpi) using a phosphatase assay (right panels). *p < 0.05 compared with VSV-GFP. Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics 2017 6, 80-89DOI: (10.1016/j.omto.2017.08.001) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 VSV-p14 Slows Growth of Primary Mammary Tumors and Improves Survival (A) Syngeneic 4T1 subcutaneous mammary tumors were established in BALB/c mice, and 10 days later animals were mock-treated or treated by one intravenous injection of VSV-GFP or VSV-p14 (1 × 108 PFU) followed by three intratumoral injections at the same virus dose (n = 5 per treatment group). (B) Tumor size was monitored over time, and average tumor volumes ± SEM were calculated for each treatment group. Statistical analysis used ANOVA to compare the treatment groups. *p < 0.05 compared with control; †p < 0.05 compared with VSV-GFP. (C) Survival data were assessed by a log rank test. *p < 0.05 compared with control. Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics 2017 6, 80-89DOI: (10.1016/j.omto.2017.08.001) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 VSV-p14 and VSV-GFP Show Similar Biodistribution and Safety Profiles Subcutaneous 4T1 mammary tumors were established in BALB/c mice; then animals were treated with one intravenous injection (1 × 108 PFU) of VSV-p14 or VSV-GFP. (A and B) Mice were sacrificed at (A) 24 hpi (n = 3 per treatment group) or (B) 48 hpi (n = 2 per treatment group), tumors and the indicated organs were harvested, and virus titers were quantified by plaque assay. Results are the average titer per gram of tissue ± SEM. Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics 2017 6, 80-89DOI: (10.1016/j.omto.2017.08.001) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 VSV-p14 Demonstrates Better Protection against Metastatic Disease Compared with VSV-GFP (A) Subcutaneous 4T1 mammary tumors were established in BALB/c mice, and primary tumors were resected on day 12. Mice were treated on days 13, 15, and 17 with PBS, VSV-GFP, or VSV-p14 (n = 5 per group). Survival data were assessed by a log rank test. *p < 0.016 compared with PBS; †p < 0.016 compared with VSV-GFP. (B) CT26LacZ colon carcinoma cells (2 × 105 cells) were injected intravenously into BALB/c mice to establish lung metastases. Animals were injected intravenously with PBS (control, n = 8) or with 1 × 107 PFU of VSV-p14 (n = 8) or VSV-GFP (n = 7) on days 3, 5, and 7; lungs were removed 7 days following the last virus injection; and the mean numbers ± SEM of surface lung metastases were visually quantified following staining of the excised lungs for β-galactosidase. *p < 0.05 compared with control. Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics 2017 6, 80-89DOI: (10.1016/j.omto.2017.08.001) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 VSV-p14 Induces Activation of Splenic T Cells and NK Cells 4T1 tumor-bearing mice (n = 9–10 per treatment group) received one intravenous injection of PBS (control) or VSV-p14 or VSV-GFP (1 × 108 PFU) on day 12, followed by similar intratumoral inoculations on days 13, 14, and 15. Spleen cells were isolated 24 hr following the final injection. The mean ± SEM number of splenic CD4 T cells (CD4+ TCRβ+), CD8 T cells (CD8+ TCRβ+), NKT cells (CD1d-tetramer+ TCRβ+), and NK cells (CD49b+ TCRβ−) (top row) and the expression of CD69 by CD4 T cells, CD8 T cells, NKT cells, and NK cells (bottom row) were assessed by flow cytometry. *p < 0.05 compared with control. Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics 2017 6, 80-89DOI: (10.1016/j.omto.2017.08.001) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 VSV-p14 Increases the Frequency of Activated T Cells in the Tumors and Draining Lymph Node 4T1 tumor-bearing mice (n = 9–10 per treatment group) received one intravenous injection of PBS (control) or VSV-p14 or VSV-GFP (1 × 108 PFU) on day 12, followed by similar intratumoral inoculations on days 13, 14, and 15. The draining lymph node and tumors were isolated 24 hr after the final injection. The mean ± SEM number of CD4 T cells (CD4+ TCRβ+) and CD8 T cells (CD8+ TCRβ+) in the draining lymph node and tumors (top row), or the frequency of the same cells expressing the early activation marker CD69+ was assessed using flow cytometry. *p < 0.05 compared with control; †p < 0.016 compared with VSV-GFP. Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics 2017 6, 80-89DOI: (10.1016/j.omto.2017.08.001) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions