Positron timing scan for 4 ns bunch spacing using BSM23E

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sub-ps bunch length measurements at the JLab FEL with coherent transition radiation (CTR) and “Martin-Puplett” interferometer Pavel Evtushenko, JLab 
Advertisements

Data analysis BTF 23 e 24 mag 05 T1 T2 500MeV electrons Repetition Rate 50 Hz Pulse Duration 1-10 ns Current/pulse 1 to 8 particles σ XY ~2mm Max Electronic.
Ulrich RaichLinac-4 instrumentation day May 2007 Longitudinal Bunch Shape Monitor U. Raich.
Calibration commissioning 16/01/2003: Extended ‘Normal mode’ 282 columns 22/01/2003: TOTAL forward and reverse scans ~11:00-12:15 23/01/2003:Earth stare.
01/07/2005 SN 1 of 16 Esti mation of HOM Power in the Interaction Region of ILC Sasha Novokhatski Session “Beam RF Effects” ILC MDI Workshop SLAC January.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting July 18, 2007.
21 December 2009 ECLOUD Simulations for Measurements of December 2009 / J.A.Crittenden 1/1 ECLOUD Simulations for Measurements of 19/20 December.
1 times table 2 times table 3 times table 4 times table 5 times table
Demonstration of the Beam loading compensation (Preparation status for ILC beam loading compensation experiments at ATF injector in this September) (PoP.
1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.
LHC 23 June :07: Started injection cleaning with B1. 08:13: Fault on MKI B2. –MKI Beam 2 in P8 had a breakdown at 07:49 during the SoftStart process.
SLAC fDIRC data processing for Hawai’i electronics (SLAC experiment T-492 ) Larry Ruckman & Gary Varner Instrumentation Development Laboratory (ID-Lab)
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.
Tables Learning Support
N. Saoulidou, Fermilab1 Study of the QIE Response & Calibration (Current Injection CalDet & Development of diagnostic tools for NearDet N.Saoulidou,
SRS Calibration Part II: Dynamic Range, Signal/Noise, Pulse Shape and Timing Jitter + initial results from scan of FIT zigzag board Michael Phipps, Bob.
1 Timing of the calorimeter monitoring signals 1.Introduction 2.LED trigger signal timing * propagation delay of the broadcast calibration command * calibration.
Benchmarking simulations and observations at the LHC Octavio Domínguez Acknowledgments: G. Arduini, G. Bregliozzi, E. Métral, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte and.
Synchrotron frequency shift as a probe of the CERN SPS reactive impedance s HB2014 – 11/13/14 A. Lasheen, T. Argyropoulos, J. Esteban Müller, D. Quartullo,
Status of ECLOUD Simulations for the Shielded Button Measurements
STA 291 Spring 2010 Lecture 19 Dustin Lueker.
Effect of changes for running at lower energies following the Physics Questions Committee’s Status Report provided to the SB2009 Working Group of Detector.
Electron Cloud Measurement Summary for the April 2014 Run
Andrei Shishlo ORNL SNS Project Florence, Italy November 2015
CLOCK measurements.
CCD Image Processing …okay, I’ve got a bunch of .fits files, now what?
MKD Waveform Measurements
Test for Goodness of Fit
LHAASO-WCDA: Design & Performance
First Look at Modeling Photoelectron Energy Distribution for a 2
Quantitative Skills : Graphing
First Attempt to Simulate the Shielded Button Measurements with ECLOUD
Times Tables.
Time calibration workshop 1517 May 2017, Amsterdam M. de Jong
Latches and Flip-flops
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
©G Dear 2009 – Not to be sold/Free to use
Database Implementation Issues
File organization and Indexing
Chapter 11: Indexing and Hashing
Also on behalf of V. Senaj & L. Ducimetière
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
The Post Correspondence Problem
Pulsar Data II Single-Pulse Plots
e+/e- Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
Electron cloud studies at CESR
DATABASE IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
e- tunes-witness bunch 42
md-NUV PET project meeting
Fitting to a Normal Distribution
Pulsar Data II Single-Pulse Plots
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Chicane and Bunch Spacing Scans
Imperial laser system and analysis
Lesson
Database Implementation Issues
Rise and Fall of Mali Empire
3 times tables.
6 times tables.
Modified at -
e+/e- Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
Preliminary Analysis of April 24, 2006 CESR Bunch Measurements
Chapter 11: Indexing and Hashing
e+ tunes-witness bunch 42
Database Implementation Issues
Powering scheme for Hollow Electron Lens
First Name Last Name, First Name Last Name, First Name Last Name
Electron mode A B C D > 4 GeV e- θ g e- DR α PS
Presentation transcript:

Positron timing scan for 4 ns bunch spacing using BSM23E 430 counts 100 counts April-2007

Positron timing scan (file 2077) for 4 ns bunch spacing using BPM6W1 Timing table for file 2077 Note that the legend refers to bunches which would normally have 14 ns bunch spacing Tglob was obtained using a parabolic fit in gnuplot April-2007

Electron timing scans for 4 ns bunch spacing using BPM6W1 1535 counts April-2007

BSM (SN005) response using modified FE filter 458 counts 1093 counts = 10 ns If one takes the 1093 counts as a calibration for 10 ns, the 458 counts would correspond to 4.19 ns (in stead of 4 ns). Note however that the Lecroy pulse generator used, produces pulses with rise and fall times than can not be set smaller than 0.9 ns (actual pulse length may be over 3 ns !) 7-Jun-2007