Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Advertisements

Biochemical Specialization within Arabidopsis RNA Silencing Pathways
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 135, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
CMTR1 methyltransferase stimulates DHX15 helicase activity.
The RecF Protein Antagonizes RecX Function via Direct Interaction
Neurexins Are Functional α-Latrotoxin Receptors
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (June 2002)
Commitment to Splice Site Pairing Coincides with A Complex Formation
ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 
Zheng Pu, Scott B Lovitch, Elizabeth K Bikoff, Emil R Unanue  Immunity 
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Direct Observation of Single MuB Polymers
Zheng Pu, Scott B Lovitch, Elizabeth K Bikoff, Emil R Unanue  Immunity 
Branden Wolner, Stephen van Komen, Patrick Sung, Craig L. Peterson 
Ashton Breitkreutz, Lorrie Boucher, Mike Tyers  Current Biology 
Transcriptional Fidelity and Proofreading by RNA Polymerase II
Role of the regulatory domain of the EGF-receptor cytoplasmic tail in selective binding of the clathrin-associated complex AP-2  Werner Boll, Andreas.
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Scott Gradia, Samir Acharya, Richard Fishel  Cell 
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
The Coordinated Functions of the E
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
DNA-Induced Switch from Independent to Sequential dTTP Hydrolysis in the Bacteriophage T7 DNA Helicase  Donald J. Crampton, Sourav Mukherjee, Charles.
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Nbs1 Converts the Human Mre11/Rad50 Nuclease Complex into an Endo/Exonuclease Machine Specific for Protein-DNA Adducts  Rajashree A. Deshpande, Ji-Hoon.
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Functional Recognition of the 5′ Splice Site by U4/U6
IFN-γ Represses IL-4 Expression via IRF-1 and IRF-2
Replisome Assembly at oriC, the Replication Origin of E
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (August 2004)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Benjamin Misselwitz, Oliver Staeck, Tom A Rapoport  Molecular Cell 
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
James Fishburn, Neeman Mohibullah, Steven Hahn  Molecular Cell 
Michael J. Lee, Henrik G. Dohlman  Current Biology 
SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Requires Changes in DNA Topology
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
Mammalian 26S Proteasomes Remain Intact during Protein Degradation
Functional Coupling of Capping and Transcription of mRNA
Michael T Marr, Jeffrey W Roberts  Molecular Cell 
An SOS Inhibitor that Binds to Free RecA Protein: The PsiB Protein
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Inhibition of Msh6 ATPase Activity by Mispaired DNA Induces a Msh2(ATP)-Msh6(ATP) State Capable of Hydrolysis-Independent Movement along DNA  Dan J. Mazur,
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
A RecA Filament Capping Mechanism for RecX Protein
Presentation transcript:

ParB-Stimulated Nucleotide Exchange Regulates a Switch in Functionally Distinct ParA Activities  Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell  Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 427-434 (August 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00594-4

Figure 1 ParB Functions as a Nucleotide Exchange Factor for the ParA ATPase (A) Purified ATP-bound ParA (1.8 μM, lanes 1–8) was preincubated (30 s, 4°C) with nonradioactive nucleotides (100 μM) as indicated and chased with 500 nM [α-32P]ATP (A) and ParB (1.8 μM, lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9). The samples were UV-crosslinked for 30 s at 4°C, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by autoradiography. (B) The experiment was repeated as before except that the slowly hydrolyzable analog [γ-35S]ATP (1.2 μM) was used for the chase. For both experiments, lane 9 contained all the reaction components except ParA. (C) The experiment was repeated as in (B) except that ParA was preincubated in nonradioactive ATPγS (100 μM) and 500 nM [α-32P]ATP was used for the chase. (D) ParA (300 nM) was incubated for 30 s at 30°C with increasing concentrations of ATP (0–100 μM) in the presence or absence of ParB (300 nM). A function of the initial rate of ATP hydrolysis is plotted versus the log of the ATP concentration (Hill plot) in the presence and absence of equimolar ParB. The standard deviation from three independent experiments was less than 3.1%. (E) Kinetic data for ParA-catalyzed ATP hydrolysis reactions at saturating substrate concentration (100 μM). Shown is a comparison of ParA purified in the presence of ATP or ADP and incubated with or without ParB. All assays were conducted three separately purified ParA preparations (standard deviation less than 3.0% without ParB and less than 2.5% with ParB). (F) Kinetic model of ParA-catalyzed ATP hydrolysis. The data presented suggest that ParB stimulates the catalytic rate constant (k3) through the enhancement of nucleotide exchange. This rate is a composite of the intrinsic hydrolysis rate plus the rate of release of product (ADP). Molecular Cell 2002 10, 427-434DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00594-4)

Figure 2 ParB Regulates ParA Single-Stranded DNA Binding Activity by Nucleotide Exchange A biotinylated, 26 nt single-stranded oligonucleotide containing sequences from the gidABparAB operon promoter region was immobilized on a streptavidin sensor chip and used in surface plasmon resonance (SPR) experiments to determine if ParA binds to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). A typical sensorgram is shown for injections of: (A) ATP-bound ParA; (B) ADP-bound ParA premixed with 0, 375 nM, or 750 nM of the same ssDNA as that immobilized to the sensor chip as a competitor; (C) ADP-bound ParA mixed with 750 nM of 3 random ssDNA competitors; (D) ADP-bound ParA and ADP-bound ParA premixed with ATP; (E) ParB control; (F) ADP-bound ParA premixed with ParB; and (G) ADP-bound ParA premixed with ParB and ATP. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 427-434DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00594-4)

Figure 3 ParB-DNA Complex Formation Is Influenced by the Nucleotide-Bound State of ParA A biotinylated 26 bp double-stranded oligonucleotide containing sequence of the ParB binding site within the gidABparAB operon promoter region was immobilized on a streptavidin sensor chip and used to investigate the effects of ParA on ParB DNA binding activity by SPR. A typical sensorgram is shown for injections of: (A) ParB and ParB with bovine serum albumin; (B) ParB premixed with equimolar ADP-bound ParA; (C) ParB premixed with equimolar ATP-bound ParA; and (D) ParB premixed with 0, 0.15 μM, 0.75 μM, or 1.5 μM ATP-bound ParA. In panels (E) and (F), ParB was prebound to the sensor chip, and 5 μl of 1.5 μM (E) bovine serum albumin (in buffer A) or (F) ParA-ATP was injected. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 427-434DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00594-4)

Figure 4 Effect of Increased Intracellular ParA Concentration on ParB DNA Binding Activity and ParA-ATP/ParA-ADP Ratio (A) Pulse-chase experiments were performed on cultures of C. crescentus strain NA1000, carrying gidA-lacZ reporter fusion (a) and NA1000 containing the reporter fusion and a multi-copy plasmid with parA under the control of a xylose-inducible promoter (b). Xylose was added in order to induce parA expression; a portion of the culture was removed at various times. Proteins were pulse-labeled and β-galactosidase was immunoprecipitated. Plotted is the relative transcription rate (in percent) over time following xylose addition. The inset of the graph shows the data from the phosphorimager. (B) The subcellular localization of ParB was assayed in C. crescentus cells harboring a xylose-inducible parA. Portions of the culture were removed at various times following the addition of xylose, and the cells were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence microscopy. Polar ParB foci are only present at time = 0 hr and are indicated by arrows. (C) Ratio of ParA-ATP/-ADP in mid-log cultures and following ParA overexpression. Cultures of C. crescentus either with or without a xylose-inducible parA were grown for five generations in low phosphate media to mid-log phase in the presence of 32PO43−. ParA was immunoprecipitated, and radioactive nucleotides recovered from immunoprecipitated ParA were separated by TLC and visualized by autoradiography. A control chromomatogram using pre-immune serum is also shown. (D) Quantitation of the intracellular ParA-ATP/ADP ratio. The developed nucleotides on the TLC plates shown in (C) were quantitated for the amount of radioactivity present by phosphorimager analysis and compared to the intracellular ATP levels. The percentages represent the mean values from at least three different experiments. The standard deviation in all cases was less than 4.0%. Molecular Cell 2002 10, 427-434DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00594-4)