Collaborations Are Key to the Growth of Your Registry

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 American Public Health Association 132 nd Annual Meeting Elaine Vowels, PhD Fern Johnson-Clarke, PhD Carl W. Wilson, MPH Building Public Health Data.
Advertisements

Kansas Trauma System Advisory Committee on Trauma
Thinking Outside the Box: Linking an Immunization Registry with Schools Tina Ellis Coyle RECIN Immunization Registry Marshfield Clinic Marshfield, Wisconsin.
Kentucky Immunization Registry. The Kentucky Immunization Registry (KYIR) is a computer based repository and tracking system implemented by the Kentucky.
Florida SHOTS Florida State Health Online Tracking System.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response Division of Strategic National Stockpile Ben Erickson Public Health Analyst Inventory Management Tracking,
Improving the Translation of Evidence-Based Recommendations of Client Reminder/Recall for Childhood Immunizations Gary Wheeler, MD, Principal Investigator.
Regional Early Childhood Immunization Network (RECIN) Producing and Measuring Quality Outcomes for At-Risk Children Tina Ellis Coyle Marshfield Clinic.
Presentation to: Presented by: Date: Developing Shared Goals in Public Health, Coalition Building, and District Partnership Success Chronic Disease University.
MAKING AN IMPACT Collaborations Are Key to the Growth of Your Registry ODH logo.
What to do before you have a Registry?: Provider Preparation Presentation to 2002 National Immunization Registry Conference October 28-30, 2002 Philadelphia.
Illinois Coalition for School Health Centers Keeping Students Healthy and Ready to Learn School Health Initiatives Midwestern Regional Meeting July 23,
VERMONT: a State Example of Building Coordinated Services for Young Children Carlota Schechter Consultant, Help Me Grow National Center Connecticut Children’s.
Registry Marketing and Recruitment Making Contact Is One Thing, Managing Contacts Is Something Else.
Beth Rowe-West, BSN, RN Branch Head NC Immunization Branch.
Implementation of an Elementary School-located Influenza Vaccination Program with Billing of Third-Party Payers 44 th National Immunization Conference.
Mark V. Francesconi Vaccine Manager, Immunization Program Rhode Island Department of Health.
Improving Reporting and IIS-Based Coverage by Conducting VFC Accountability Through an IIS: The New York City Experience Michael Andreas Hansen, MPH, Melissa.
A Healthier Tomorrow Begins Today National Immunization Conference 2004.
RECIN Intervention- Working Collaboratively to Raise Immunization Rates.
Towards a National eHealth Strategy Regional Symposium on E-government and IP Dubai - UAE November 2004.
GRITS – Katrina Project Thomas M. Moss GRITS Manager NIC 2006.
Occhd.org Aundria Goree, MPH Community Health Administrator Oklahoma City-County Health Department Public Health in Emergency Departments:
Common Threads: Immunization and Well Child Completion Rates Jeff Neccuzi, Director Division of Immunization Services Bureau for Public Health May 17,
Ohio’s Immunization Coalitions Many Voices - One Unified Message Cindy Modie, RN Chair, Consortium for Healthy and Immunized Communities (CHIC) Program.
M. Irigoyen, S. Findley, K. Stambaugh, O. Peña, R. Jenders, M. Chitu
Division of Vital Records Business Updates October 11, 2016
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
Health and Homelessness
Draft Primary Care Strategy
Q & A Overview of the Coalition Surge Test (CST)
Amari Pearson-Fields, PhD, MPH1 and Tasha B. Moses, MPA2
Send Final PPT by Wed 9am. (866) ID: , Leader PIN: 4869
TB- HIV Collaborative activities in Romania- may 2006 status
Missouri Behavioral Health Independent Practice Association (IPA)
Presentation for the SCTR Scientific Retreat on Aging Related Research
Enrique Ramirez1, Julie Morita1
Descriptive Analysis of Performance-Based Financing Education Project in Burundi Victoria Ryan World Bank Group May 16, 2017.
Virginia’s Stay on Track Daycare Initiative
LINKS SCHOOL NURSE MODULE April 14, 2016
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Collaboration
Developing Clinic Based Case Management & Care Coordination
The importance of administrative data in the era of SDGs
Childhood Immunization Rates
The Brookings Institution
MediTrax is A complete PAPERLESS software solution
New Mexico Department of Health Immunization Program
That Help Your Registry Grow With Participating Providers
Daniel Hopfensperger Program Manager Wisconsin Immunization Program
Women’s Health Care and Education Coalition
SCHS and Health Statistics
Evaluating STD Free! Processes
The Canterbury Clinical Network
Presenter Name Affiliation Date
That Help Your Registry Grow With Participating Providers
Texas Inclusion Activities Overview
Benefits and Steps – A Case Example in Wyoming
Strategies for Private Provider Participation in Registries
Healthy people living, working, and playing in Baltimore County
Brief In-Office Demonstrations Yield High Enrollment Rates
Keys to Housing Security
National Immunization Conference
Utilizing Immunization Registries in Local Public Health Accreditation
Implementing Sláintecare
Evaluation of the San Diego County Baby Track Program
The Futures Initiative Creating the Future of CDC for the 21st Century
The Strategic Value of Using Grant Funds for EHR/HIE Training and Certification for all Stakeholders in a Community By: Kim Woods, Project Director Western.
Auditing Techniques for Ensuring Quality Data in a Registry
Bringin' Them Out of the Woodworks: H1N1 and NYSIIS Participation
Presentation transcript:

Collaborations Are Key to the Growth of Your Registry MAKING AN IMPACT Collaborations Are Key to the Growth of Your Registry

Laurie Dietsch, MPH Immunization Registry Coordinator Jose Rodriguez Director Project L.O.V.E. Love Our Kids…Vaccinate Early!

4DTaP:3Polio: 1MMR* 1MMR*:3HIB Ohio 76.3 74.7 Cuyahoga 74.0 72.8 Immunization Rates for Children 19-35 Months of Age National Immunization Survey, Q1/2001-Q4/2001 4DTaP:3Polio: 1MMR* 1MMR*:3HIB Ohio 76.3 74.7 Cuyahoga 74.0 72.8 Franklin (Columbus) 79.3 78.3 Rest of State 76.2 74.5

OHIO Population of State = 11.4 million* Cleveland = 478,000 Cincinnati = 331,000 Columbus = 702,000 Annual Birth Cohort = 155,700** Franklin County (Columbus) = 17,400 * U.S. Census Data 2000, ** Ohio Department of Health Vital Statistics

Project L. O. V. E. (Love Our Kids. Vaccinate Early Project L.O.V.E. (Love Our Kids...Vaccinate Early!) is a unique partnership between Franklin County hospitals, area physicians, City of Columbus and Franklin County Health Departments, local businesses and community organizations, whose goal is to assure that Franklin County 2 year-olds are fully immunized.

Project L.O.V.E. Two Primary Goals Market an Immunization Registry among central Ohio physicians in order to establish a centralized source of individual immunization records across the county and state Maintain and improve current immunization levels throughout the general population of Franklin County

Three Options Develop System Locally Buy HII or STC? ODH Money to develop AND sustain Technical upkeep Buy HII or STC? Money to purchase AND Maintenance Not “our” system Web-based ODH “Free” for us Our input made the system Strengths and Weaknesses Fit

STRENGTHS State – ODH Local – PLOVE/CHD IMPACT SIIS Local Contacts National/CDC Support Technical Staff and Resources Sustainability Privacy/Security/ Confidentiality Power and Influence Local – PLOVE/CHD Local Contacts Local Name Recognition for Coalition and Marketing Capability Funding for Marketing End User Perspective Not as Many Funding Constraints Incentive Due to Low Immunization Rates

Negatives Negative History (Trust Issues) Change in Leadership Getting to Know Each Other Communication Difficulties Technical vs Non-technical Tunnel Vision Misunderstandings Limited Staffing Different Perspective State vs Local Fear of Making “Another” Mistake

Positives Successful State and Local Partnership Immunization Registry Complimenting Strengths and Weaknesses Communication is More Open Different Perspectives State vs Local Improved Relations System That is User-Friendly and FREE

Public and Private Collaboration October 2002 - Prepare for Post Smallpox Event Thanksgiving - Phase 1 Pre-event Smallpox Plan Pre-event Vaccination System (PVS) Unknown system Keep the data locally and transmit to PVS IMPACT SIIS Public and Private Collaboration Increased Project LOVE Managed Data Component for Central Region

Central Ohio Region Phase I Collaboration 15 Counties 18 Health Departments 24 Hospitals* 4 Clinic Locations 2 in Franklin County 2 in Surrounding Counties * 2 Hospitals were not eligible to have Response Teams

Data Component Registries Play Major Role In BT Organized a Data Team *Trained Them On Both Systems PVS and IMPACT SIIS Can’t Receive Vaccine Without Signed Security Agreement for Registry Tracked Vaccine Recorded Temperature Logs

3 Levels of Collaboration Private Sector AMCI, Orkand and Pilot State Public Health ODH contract to develop and pilot BT component Certification from CDC Central Region Offered to Pilot and Double Enter Cost Survey

BT Component for Registry Scanning technology that meets the CDC requirements for tracking the administration of vaccinia vaccine two-dimensional bar coding software scan unique identifying information from a person’s driver’s license directly into a web-enabled registry Handhelds, laptops, printers and a wireless network

Project L.O.V.E. and the Central Ohio Smallpox Region is piloting the utilization of these scanners in order to determine the system’s ability to obtain the following objectives: To create a system that quickly and accurately records patient demographics and immunization data for all smallpox vaccine recipients to a web-enabled system utilizing scanning technology, enabling us to meet the demand of 11 million people within 10 days. To determine if the new technology can improve accuracy in a bioterrorism prevention immunization campaign. To determine the cost savings achieved through the implementation of this technology. To determine if the same technology can be incorporated into the daily immunization activity found in practices.

Without collaboration… Very few would be using the Registry Registry would not be user friendly Phase I would not have worked as well The pilot would have failed Ohio registry would have missed the chance to be involved with BT from the beginning We wouldn’t be as secure going into Phase II

If the registry is implemented successfully it will occur quietly If the registry is implemented successfully it will occur quietly. However, if the registry is not implemented successfully, it will be heard loudly.

QUESTIONS?