Firefly luciferase: the structure is known, but the mystery remains

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Advertisements

Luciferase Luciferase is an enzyme that catalyzes production of light from luciferin in the presence of Mg2+-ATP and oxygen. The reaction of this enzyme.
Luke D Sherlin, John J Perona  Structure 
Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Ubiquitination Accomplished: E1 and E2 Enzymes Were Not Necessary
Mechanism and Substrate Recognition of Human Holo ACP Synthase
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Closing the gap on DNA ligase
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Lionel Costenaro, J. Günter Grossmann, Christine Ebel, Anthony Maxwell 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Crystal structure of mammalian purple acid phosphatase
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the Soluble Form of Equinatoxin II, a Pore-Forming Toxin from the Sea Anemone Actinia equina  Alekos Athanasiadis, Gregor Anderluh,
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (October 1999)
Thomas Weber, Mohamed A Marahiel  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Structure of a Human Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate 3-Kinase
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
Base excision repair enzyme family portrait: integrating the structure and chemistry of an entire DNA repair pathway  Sudip S Parikh, Clifford D Mol,
A Subdomain Swap Strategy for Reengineering Nonribosomal Peptides
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Regulation of protein phosphatase-1
Error-Prone DNA Polymerases
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
A Putative Mechanism for Downregulation of the Catalytic Activity of the EGF Receptor via Direct Contact between Its Kinase and C-Terminal Domains  Meytal.
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Crystal Structure of 4-Amino-5-Hydroxymethyl-2- Methylpyrimidine Phosphate Kinase from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.3 Å Resolution  Gong Cheng, Eric M.
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
The structure of adenylosuccinate lyase, an enzyme with dual activity in the de novo purine biosynthetic pathway  Eric A Toth, Todd O Yeates  Structure 
Crystal Structure of Eukaryotic DNA Ligase–Adenylate Illuminates the Mechanism of Nick Sensing and Strand Joining  Mark Odell, Verl Sriskanda, Stewart.
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Helicase structures: a new twist on DNA unwinding
Crystal structure of diisopropylfluorophosphatase from Loligo vulgaris
Back to the Future with Ubiquitin
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Structure of Human Cytosolic Phenylalanyl-tRNA Synthetase: Evidence for Kingdom- Specific Design of the Active Sites and tRNA Binding Patterns  Igal Finarov,
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages R19-R23 (February 1999)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (July 2008)
A Delocalized Proton-Binding Site within a Membrane Protein
Presentation transcript:

Firefly luciferase: the structure is known, but the mystery remains Thomas O Baldwin  Structure  Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 223-228 (March 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00026-3

Figure 1 Two orthogonal stereoviews of the surface of firefly luciferase, depicting an ‘anvil and hammer’ motif. Both views show the large N-terminal ‘anvil’ domain below the smaller C-terminal ‘hammer’ domain. The two views are the front view (top) and the right side view (bottom), obtained by rotating the front view through 90° to the left about the vertical axis. The color coding is the same as that used by Conti et al. [13], and indicates the domains and subdomains. The C-terminal domain (yellow) is the only domain composed exclusively of residues that are contiguous in the amino acid sequence, residues 440–544. The three subdomains of the N-terminal anvil consist of stretches that are not contiguous within the overall sequence. Subdomain A (blue) consists of residues 77–222 and 399–405. Subdomain B (purple) consists of residues 22–70 and 236–351. Subdomain C (green) consists of residues 4–10, 363–393 and 418–434. It appears that the active center comprises residues between the anvil and hammer, and it is suggested that the active center forms by movement of these two domains together following substrate binding [13]. (Figure courtesy of Peter Brick.) Structure 1996 4, 223-228DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00026-3)

Figure 2 Alignment of the amino acid sequences, reported by Devine et al. [49], of the luciferases of Photinus pyralis (P.p), Luciola mingrelica (L.m), L. cruciata (L.c), L. lateralis (L.l), and the green-emitting strain of the click beetle (CbG). Also shown in this alignment is the 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (CoA). References to the sequences are given in [49]. The numbering at the top refers to the sequence of the luciferase from P. pyralis. The extent of conservation at each position is indicated by the following color code: red=fully conserved in all six sequences; pink=2 different amino acids; green=3 different amino acids, and blue=4–6 different amino acids. At positions where a deletion has occurred in one or more of the proteins, the corresponding residues in the other proteins are shown in black. Structure 1996 4, 223-228DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00026-3)

Figure 3 Proposed mechanism of the firefly bioluminescence reaction. The carboxylate group of firefly luciferin (I) is activated by reaction with ATP to form the adenylated luciferin (II). The α proton is lost, allowing reaction with molecular oxygen to yield (III). Cleavage of the dioxetanone ring (IV) yields the excited state of oxyluciferin (V). Structure 1996 4, 223-228DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00026-3)

Figure 4 Comparisons of representative reactions catalyzed by members of the firefly luciferase family of enzymes. Reaction (a) is catalyzed by firefly luciferase [8]; reaction (b) by 4-coumarate CoA:ligase [37]; reaction (c) by gramicidin S synthetase I and tyrocidine synthetase [31,32]; and reaction (d) by 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate-AMP ligase [29]. Structure 1996 4, 223-228DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00026-3)

Figure 4 Comparisons of representative reactions catalyzed by members of the firefly luciferase family of enzymes. Reaction (a) is catalyzed by firefly luciferase [8]; reaction (b) by 4-coumarate CoA:ligase [37]; reaction (c) by gramicidin S synthetase I and tyrocidine synthetase [31,32]; and reaction (d) by 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate-AMP ligase [29]. Structure 1996 4, 223-228DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00026-3)

Figure 4 Comparisons of representative reactions catalyzed by members of the firefly luciferase family of enzymes. Reaction (a) is catalyzed by firefly luciferase [8]; reaction (b) by 4-coumarate CoA:ligase [37]; reaction (c) by gramicidin S synthetase I and tyrocidine synthetase [31,32]; and reaction (d) by 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate-AMP ligase [29]. Structure 1996 4, 223-228DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00026-3)

Figure 4 Comparisons of representative reactions catalyzed by members of the firefly luciferase family of enzymes. Reaction (a) is catalyzed by firefly luciferase [8]; reaction (b) by 4-coumarate CoA:ligase [37]; reaction (c) by gramicidin S synthetase I and tyrocidine synthetase [31,32]; and reaction (d) by 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate-AMP ligase [29]. Structure 1996 4, 223-228DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00026-3)