Introduction to the Water Quality Analysis Modeling System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Contaminant Fate WG 5 Year Plan RMP CFWG Meeting January 15, 2008.
Advertisements

Measuring Water Pollution
Part III Solid Waste Engineering
Chapter 3 Dynamic Modeling.
Introduction to the WASP Interface
HydroQual Capabilities for Pathways Analysis in Support of Natural Resource Damage Assessment.
Chapter 3 Steady-State Conduction Multiple Dimensions
7/18/05 Interdisciplinary Modeling for Aquatic Ecosystems Curriculum Development Workshop Water Quality Modeling John J. Warwick, Director Division of.
Introduction to GW contamination and
CE4505 – Surface Water Quality Engineering CE4505 Surface Water Quality Engineering Modeling Lecture 2. Model Development.
CE5504 – Surface Water Quality Modeling CE5504 Surface Water Quality Modeling General Lecture 2. Model Development.
Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP)
Introduction to the WASP Interface. Watershed & Water Quality Modeling Technical Support Center Introduction to WASP Interface Input File Control Run.
CSE 425: Industrial Process Control 1. About the course Lect.TuLabTotal Semester work 80Final 125Total Grading Scheme Course webpage:
Bioseparation Dr. Kamal E. M. Elkahlout Chapter 3 Mass transfer.
Collaborative Meeting on Modeling Mercury in Freshwater Environments January 19, 2006 Niagara Falls, NY Overview of Watershed and Water Body Models for.
Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras Advanced Transport Phenomena Module 2 Lecture 4 Conservation Principles: Mass Conservation.
Environmental Modeling Steven I. Gordon Ohio Supercomputer Center June, 2004.
Introduction to Modeling Unit V, Module 21A. Developed by: Hagley Updated: May 30, 2004 U5-m21a-s2 Module 21 Introduction to Modeling  This module has.
BsysE595 Lecture Basic modeling approaches for engineering systems – Summary and Review Shulin Chen January 10, 2013.
Watershed & Water Quality Modeling Technical Support Center WASP7 Course Introduction to the WASP7 Toxics Models.
Conceptual Modelling and Hypothesis Formation Research Methods CPE 401 / 6002 / 6003 Professor Will Zimmerman.
Working With Simple Models to Predict Contaminant Migration Matt Small U.S. EPA, Region 9, Underground Storage Tanks Program Office.
Introduction to WASP7 Eutrophication Module
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
State Agency Needs for Remote Sensing Data Related to Water Quality By Bob Van Dolah Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural.
Team  Spatially distributed deterministic models  Many hydrological phenomena vary spatially and temporally in accordance with the conservation.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Process and System Characterization Describe and characterize transport and transformation phenomena based reactor dynamics ( 반응공학 ) – natural and engineered.
Advanced Higher Computing Science
Chapter 3 Data Representation
Sustainable Development Goal for Water: Indicator 6.3.2
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology
Presentation to Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission March 31, 2010
TMDL Modeling Toolbox Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) Tim Wool US EPA - Region 4.
OVERVIEW Impact of Modelling and simulation in Mechatronics system
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
AQUATOX v. 3.1 Host Institution/URL
I CHEMISTRY.
Distribution and components
SPS1. Obtain, evaluate, and communicate information from the Periodic Table to explain the relative properties of elements based on patterns of atomic.
US Environmental Protection Agency
Test Drive Results and Revisions of the New Stream Restoration Crediting Protocols Bill Stack & Lisa Fraley-McNeal December 2, 2013.
Advanced Contaminant-Transport Techniques
Water Pollution and Treatment
Elizabeth River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
Development of TracMyAir Smartphone App for Predicting Exposures to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone Michael Breen,1 Yadong Xu,1 Catherine Seppanen,2 Sarav Arunachalam,2.
CE5504 Surface Water Quality Modeling
TEM – Lecture 2 Basic concepts of heat transfer:
Chemical Equations and Reactions
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
LDAT workshop Jim White.
James River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
Introduction to WASP7 Eutrophication Module
Analysis models and design models
VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005
Smart Integration Express
Computer Modeling Vadose Zone Models Groundwater Flow Model
Modeling Approaches Chapter 2 Physical/chemical (fundamental, global)
Introduction to the WASP Interface
Fundamentals of Energy Balances
Dissolved Oxygen Processes
Chapter 5 Architectural Design.
APPLICATION OF LINEAR ALGEBRA IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Chemical Equations and Reactions
Lecture 16 Multiphase flows Part 1.
Hydrology Modeling in Alaska: Modeling Overview
Quantum One.
Modeling Water Treatment Using the Contaminant Transport Module
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the Water Quality Analysis Modeling System WASP Version 7.0 April, 2005 WASP 7 Course

US EPA Disclaimer Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for presentation, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. WASP 7 Course

Course Objectives Modeling Principles Modeling Theory Processes in WASP Limitations of process descriptions Modeling Practice Using the WASP Interface Using WASP for real-world problems Case Study Applications of WASP Discussion of Data Needs WASP 7 Course

Basic Principle of Mechanistic Models Laws of Conservation Conservative properties are those that are not gained or lost through ordinary reactions. Therefore we can account for any change by simply keeping track of all those processes that can cause change Examples of conservative properties Mass (water mass, constituent mass) Momentum Heat WASP 7 Course

Three Dimensional Transport Equation Control Volume z y x WASP 7 Course

Box Model Approach Numerical solution allows greater flexibility as to processes considered (i.e. eutrophication, toxics, etc.) Allows greater flexibility as to segmentation Flows and mixing coefficients are obtained from Field data Hydrodynamic models (which produce output that can be read by WASP) WASP 7 Course

Box Modeling Approach Boxes The boxes have no defined shape, so can be fit to any morphometry The boxes can be “stacked” so the approach can be applied to 0 dimensions (1 box) or 1, 2 or three dimensional systems WASP 7 Course

WASP Modeling Framework Input BMD Eutrophication Conservative Toxicant MOVEM Stored Data Hydro Model Preprocessor/Data Server Mercury Binary Model Output Graphical Post Processor Models Hydrodynamic Interface Exported Model Results Messages WASP Modeling Framework CSV, ASCII Output Organic Toxicants Heat Binary Wasp Input File (wif) WASP 7 Course

WASP7 Water Quality Modules Eutrophication (eutro.dll) DO, BOD, nutrients, phytoplankton, periphyton Simple Toxicant (toxi.dll) Partitioning and first order decay Simple metal or organic chemical, solids Non-Ionic Organic Toxicants (toxi.dll) Detailed fate processes, reaction products, solids Organic Toxicants (toxi.dll) Detailed fate processes, ionization, reaction products, solids Mercury (mercury.dll), slightly altered from toxi.dll Hg0, HgII, MeHg, solids HEAT (heat.dll) full/equilibrium heat balance + pathogens WASP 7 Course

Organic Chemical Model WASP Structure WASP Transport Bookkeeping Organic Chemical Model Eutrophication Model Mercury Model Kinetics WASP 7 Course

Systems (i.e., State Variables) WASP Terminology 1 2 3 4 5 6 Segments NH3 NO3 DO BOD Chla OPO4 Systems (i.e., State Variables) Calculated Variables BOD Decay Rate Growth Rate, etc. WASP 7 Course

WASP Systems: Conventional Water Quality Modules EUTRO Dissolved oxygen CBOD (three forms) Phytoplankton Periphyton Detritus (C, N, P) Dissolved organic nitrogen Ammonia/ammonium Nitrate Dissolved organic phosphorus Orthophosphate Salinity Solids Sediment Diagenesis HEAT Temperature Salinity Coliform Conservative 1 and 2 WASP 7 Course

WASP Systems: Toxicant Modules Simple Toxicant Chemical Silts/Fines Sands Biotic solids Organic Toxicants (both non-ionizing and ionizing) Chemical 1 Chemical 2 Chemical 3 Mercury Elemental, Hg0 Divalent, HgII Methyl, MeHg Silts/Fines Sands Biotic solids WASP 7 Course

Potential WASP Time Scales Steady Seasonal Monthly Daily/Hourly WASP 7 Course

WASP Advantages and Features Network Flexibility Applicable to most water body types at some level of complexity Most Water Quality Problems Conventional Water Quality: DO, eutrophication, heat Toxicant Fate: organics, simple metals, mercury Separation of Processes Transport Kinetics External Links to Models and Spreadsheets Two Solution Techniques Simple/Quick – Euler Complex/Flux Limiting -- COSMIC WASP 7 Course

WASP External Linkages Loading Models SWMM HSPF LSPC NPSM PRZM GBMM Bioaccumulation BASS FCM-2 WASP Hydrodynamic Models EFDC DYNHYD EPD-RIV1 SWMM External Spreadsheets ASCII Files Windows Clipboard WASP 7 Course

WASP Limitations Does not handle some variables and processes: Mixing zone processes Non aqueous phase liquids (e.g., oil spills) Segment drying (mudflats, flood plains) Metals speciation reactions (special module, META4, not part of general WASP release) Potentially large external hydrodynamic files Separate eutrophication and toxicant fate modules Cannot readily be run in batch mode Automatic calibration programs Monte Carlo programs WASP 7 Course

WASP is a Variable Complexity Modeling System When building a water body model, adjust complexity to match the problem. More Complex Aquatic Systems More Complex Chemical Behavior More Complex Management Questions WASP 7 Course

Development of Complexity in Water Quality Modeling Applications Dominic Di Toro A model is more like a than a WASP 7 Course

Iterative Model Development Process General Conceptual Model Site-Specific Initial Screening Mathematical Model (usually simple) Evolving Operational Mathematical Model (usually more complex) Available Data (Preliminary Data Collection) Project Data Collection Model evaluation, Post-audit data WASP 7 Course

How Complex Should Final Computational Model Be? Proper model complexity is driven by: The complexity of the environmental system. The complexity of the pollutants of concern. The management questions and related need for accuracy. Consequences for overly simple model: Miss key processes and extrapolate inaccurately. May not address relevant management questions. May not be defensible to adversarial review. Insufficiently adaptable to changing management requirements. Consequences for overly complex model: Adds unnecessary data collection and computational burdens. Adds to uncertainty. Shifts focus away from problem solutions to endless analysis. WASP 7 Course

Management-Related Questions Requiring More Complex Models What are the spatial and temporal distributions of target pollutants (particularly in mixed-media environments) under various management scenarios? What are the relative contributions of various sources of pollutants over time? What are the likely pollutant attenuation trajectories and times to recovery under various management scenarios? What are the relative effects of transient or extreme events, such as spills or storms? What are the possible effects of poorly understood environmental events? WASP 7 Course

Goal of Model Complexity Albert Einstein “Make things as simple as possible, but not any simpler.” WASP 7 Course