Emily Joo, Mark C. Surka, William S. Trimble  Developmental Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Das_Figure S1 USP15 USP4 USP11 49% 60% 39 % 71 % 52 % 54 %
Advertisements

Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Bifocal Is a Downstream Target of the Ste20-like Serine/Threonine Kinase Misshapen in Regulating Photoreceptor Growth Cone Targeting in Drosophila  Wenjing.
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
The Rb-Related p130 Protein Controls Telomere Lengthening through an Interaction with a Rad50-Interacting Protein, RINT-1  Ling-Jie Kong, Alison R. Meloni,
RhoGDI Is Required for Cdc42-Mediated Cellular Transformation
Autoinhibition of c-Abl
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
A Rac-cGMP Signaling Pathway
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
p53 Stabilization and Transactivation by a von Hippel-Lindau Protein
Amy Shaub Maddox, Lindsay Lewellyn, Arshad Desai, Karen Oegema 
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
Stuart W. Hicks, Guillaume Charron, Howard C. Hang, Jorge E. Galán 
Grb2 Is a Key Mediator of Helicobacter pylori CagA Protein Activities
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Robert L.S Perry, Maura H Parker, Michael A Rudnicki  Molecular Cell 
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Targeting of the RhoGEF Ect2 to the Equatorial Membrane Controls Cleavage Furrow Formation during Cytokinesis  Kuan-Chung Su, Tohru Takaki, Mark Petronczki 
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 115, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Vanessa Brès, Tomonori Yoshida, Loni Pickle, Katherine A. Jones 
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin  Jennifer Landino, Ryoma.
WNK1 Phosphorylates Synaptotagmin 2 and Modulates Its Membrane Binding
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (March 2012)
Shijiao Huang, Danming Tang, Yanzhuang Wang  Developmental Cell 
Rnd Proteins Function as RhoA Antagonists by Activating p190 RhoGAP
The Role of NEDD1 Phosphorylation by Aurora A in Chromosomal Microtubule Nucleation and Spindle Function  Roser Pinyol, Jacopo Scrofani, Isabelle Vernos 
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Michelle M. Ng, Fred Chang, David R. Burgess  Developmental Cell 
FAK-Mediated Src Phosphorylation of Endophilin A2 Inhibits Endocytosis of MT1-MMP and Promotes ECM Degradation  Xiaoyang Wu, Boyi Gan, Youngdong Yoo,
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Virus-Induced Abl and Fyn Kinase Signals Permit Coxsackievirus Entry through Epithelial Tight Junctions  Carolyn B. Coyne, Jeffrey M. Bergelson  Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 14, Pages (July 2009)
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Centrosome-Associated NDR Kinase Regulates Centrosome Duplication
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Wenxiang Meng, Yoshimi Mushika, Tetsuo Ichii, Masatoshi Takeichi  Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Activation of a Signaling Cascade by Cytoskeleton Stretch
Dual Detection of Chromosomes and Microtubules by the Chromosomal Passenger Complex Drives Spindle Assembly  Boo Shan Tseng, Lei Tan, Tarun M. Kapoor,
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Grb2 Is a Key Mediator of Helicobacter pylori CagA Protein Activities
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  Stefan Hümmer, Thomas U. Mayer  Current.
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages (June 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Mammalian SEPT2 Is Required for Scaffolding Nonmuscle Myosin II and Its Kinases  Emily Joo, Mark C. Surka, William S. Trimble  Developmental Cell  Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 677-690 (November 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.001 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 SEPT2 Associates with Myosin II (A) Confocal images of CHO-K1 cells transfected with GFP-myosin IIA (green) and treated with or without 3 μM cytochalasin D (CD). Endogenous SEPT2 and F-actin were visualized by immunostaining with anti-SEPT2 antibody (red) and staining with Alexa 633-phalloidin (blue), respectively. In the bottom row, a representative ring (hatched box) is shown in inset. (B) Confocal images of isolated stress fibers stained with anti-SEPT2 antibody (green) and myosin II (green). F-actin was visualized by staining with rhodamine-phalloidin (red). (C) Western blot of pull-downs of native myosin II using SEPT2/6/7 subcomplex immobilized on Ni-sepharose beads. 1% of the input and 33% of the pull-downs were loaded and the blots were probed with anti-myosin II antibody or anti-his antibody. (D) Western blot of pull-downs of native SEPT2 using myosin II fragment (CCFL) immobilized on glutathione-sepharose beads. 1% of the input and 33% of the pull-downs were loaded and the blots were probed with anti-SEPT2 antibody or anti-GST antibody. (E) Western blot of a SEPT9 immunoprecipitate probed with anti-myosin IIA antibody. 2% of the input and 10% of the immunoprecipitates were loaded. Bars represent 10 μm. Developmental Cell 2007 13, 677-690DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.001) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 SEPT2 Directly Binds to Myosin IIA between Amino Acid 1339-1630 (A) Schematic diagram of myosin IIA showing the N-terminal head region that binds actin, the middle portion composed of coiled-coil region, and the C-terminal tail region, important for dimerization/polymerization of the heavy chain. Numbering of the amino acids indicate the approximate domain boundaries. Not to scale. (B) Truncations of the coiled-coil domain of myosin IIA (CCFL, CCT1-CCT5) were tested for SEPT2 binding. All constructs generated for the binding study have N-terminal GST fusion tags. The relative ability of each construct to bind SEPT2 is summarized on the right. The indicated area of CCT3 (CCT3-pt) is used as a control. (C) Representative western blots of pull-downs of soluble SEPT2 using the indicated truncation of the myosin coiled-coil domain immobilized on glutathione-agarose at a molar ratio of 2:1, respectively. 0.5% of the input and 50% of the pull-downs were loaded and the blots were probed with anti-SEPT2 antibody. (D) Representative western blots showing in vitro pull-downs of soluble SEPT2 or SEPT2Δcoiled-coil and CCFL immobilized on glutathione-agarose beads at a molar ratio of 2:1, respectively. 1% of the input and 20% of the pull-downs were loaded and the blots were probed with anti-SEPT2 antibody. (E) Representative western blot of Ni-sepharose pull-downs of native myosin II protein in the presence or absence of CCT5 or CCT3-pt. Peptides were added at a 10-fold molar excess. 0.5% of the input (lanes 1–3) and 100% of the pull-downs (lanes 4–9) were loaded and blots were probed with anti-myosin II antibody or anti-SEPT6 antibody. Developmental Cell 2007 13, 677-690DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.001) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 CCT5 Dissociates SEPT2 from Actin Stress Fibers (A) Representative micrographs of isolated stress fibers from CHO-K1 cells exposed to CCT5 or CCT3-pt followed by immunostaining with antibodies against SEPT2 or myosin II (green). F-actin (red) was visualized by staining with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin. 0.5μM of each protein was incubated with the isolated stress fibers. (B) CCT5 and CCT3-pt were tagged with the myc epitope and transfected in CHO-K1 cells. These peptides were identified by immunostaining with anti-myc antibody (red) and endogenous SEPT2 was detected using anti-SEPT2 antibody (green). (C) CHO-K1 cells were transduced with 1 μM of TAT-CCT5 or TAT-CCT3-pt for 1.5 hr. Endogenous SEPT2 was identified by using anti-SEPT2 antibody (green), and filamentous actin was visualized by staining with rhodamine conjugated phalloidin (red). Bars represent 10 μm. Developmental Cell 2007 13, 677-690DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.001) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Dissociation of SEPT2 from Myosin II Alters Myosin II Activity and Increases the Number of Binucleated Cells (A) Representative western blots of CHO-K1 whole-cell lysates prepared after incubating cells with PBS, the TAT-CCT3-pt, or TAT-CCT5 for 1.5 hr. Each lysate was probed with antibodies against the indicated proteins. (B) Quantification of the western blots showing relative levels of myosin II, MYPT1, pMYPT1, SEPT2, SEPT9, MLC, pMLC, and ppMLC. Each experiment was done a minimum of three times, normalized to PBS transduction. The error bars reflect the standard deviation. ∗p < 0.05. (C) Representative western blots of CHO-K1 whole-cell lysates prepared after transfecting with nonspecific shRNAi (shRNAi Scramble) or shRNAi silencing SEPT2. Each lysate was probed with antibodies against the indicated proteins. (D) A representative recording of cell division shown over time depicting cells that were transduced with the TAT-CCT5 or TAT-CCT3-pt. Recordings were started at the beginning of karyokinesis. The number on each panel indicates the time elapsed from the starting point, expressed in minutes. Arrows indicate the ingressed furrow while the arrowhead highlights the asymmetric regression of the ingressed cleavage furrow. For a full QuickTime movie, refer to Movies S1 and S2. (E) Quantification of binucleated cells transduced with the TAT-CCT5 or TAT-CCT3-pt. Minimum of 300 mitotic competent cells were counted. Mean values of binucleation of cells treated with PBS, TAT-CCT3-pt, and TAT-CCT5 were 13.29 ± 2.9, 14.78 ± 1.0, and 45.3 ± 5.6, respectively. Experiments were done a minimum of 3 times and the error bars represent the standard deviation. ∗p < 0.05. Developmental Cell 2007 13, 677-690DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.001) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Myosin IIA Dissociates from SEPT2 and Myosin II Kinases during Cytokinesis (A and B) CHO-K1 cell stably transfected with SEPT2-GFP and tdTomato-myosin IIA undergoing cytokinesis that is not treated (A) or transduced with TAT-CCT5 (B). A single confocal slice through the middle of the cell is shown. Numbers in each panel represent time elapsed in min from the starting point. (C) Blow-up images of the last panel of part (B). The boxed area, what appears to be the center of the regressed cleavage furrow, is shown at a higher magnification. (D) Confocal slice of a fixed mitotic CHO-K1 cell stably transfected with SEPT2-GFP (green) and tdTomato- myosin IIA (red) transduced with TAT-CCT5. DNA was visualized by staining with Hoechst (blue). The boxed area, depicting the cleavage furrow, is shown at a higher magnification. (E) Representative CHO-K1 cells stably expressing SEPT2-GFP (green) and td-Tomato-myosin IIA (red) transduced with TAT-CCT5. The plasma membrane was visualized by staining with Alexa-fluor 633 conjugated wheat germ agglutinin (blue). F-actin was visualized by staining with Alexa-fluor 633 conjugated phalloidin (blue) and anillin was immunostained using anti-anillin antibody (blue). (F) Representative CHO-K1 cells stably expressing SEPT2-GFP and td-Tomato-myosin IIA, transduced with TAT-CCT5 and immunostained with antibodies against CRIK or ROCK (blue). Bars represent 10 μm. Developmental Cell 2007 13, 677-690DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.001) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 SEPT2 Knockdown Recapitulates the Loss of Myosin II and Transfection of DD-MLC Renders Cells Resistant to CCT5 (A) CHO-K1 cells transiently transfected with shRNAi SEPT2 (top panels) or siRNA SEPT2 (bottom panels). Transfected cells were identified by GFP or immunostaining with anti-SEPT2 antibody (green). Myosin II or CRIK was visualized by immunostaining with anti-myosin II antibody or anti-CRIK antibody, respectively (red). F-actin and DNA were visualized by staining with Alexa-fluor 633 conjugated phalloidin (blue) and Hoechst (teal), respectively. (B) CHO-K1 cells were first transfected with myc-DD-MLC, myc-WT-MLC, or myc-AD-MLC, followed by TAT-CCT5 transduction. Transfected cells were identified by immunostaining with antibody specific for myc eptitope (red) and SEPT2 was visualized by immunostaining with anti-SEPT2 antibody (green). F-actin was visualized by staining with Alexa-fluor 633 conjugated phalloidin (blue). (C) Quantification of binucleated cells transfected with different MLC constructs then transduced with TAT-CCT5. Minimum of 100 mitotic competent cells were counted in each experiment. Mean values of binucleation of cells transfected with myc-DD-MLC, myc-WT-MLC, and myc-AD-MLC, then transduced with TAT-CCT5 were 17.9% ± 2.7%, 25.3% ± 3.7% and 43.79% ± 3.28, respectively. Experiments were done 3 times and the error bars represent the standard deviation. ∗p < 0.05. Bars represent 10 μm. Developmental Cell 2007 13, 677-690DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.001) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 CCT5 Also Inhibits Myosin Activation in Dividing Cells (A) Representative confocal micrographs of CHO-K1 cells stably expressing SEPT2-GFP (green) and td-Tomato-myosin IIA (red) that were transduced with TAT-CCT5 or TAT-CCT3-pt. ppMLC-S18T19 was visualized by immunostaining with anti-ppMLC-S18T19 antibody (teal). DNA was visualized by staining with Hoechst (blue). The same experimental conditions were applied in acquiring all of the images. Bar represents 10 μm. (B and C) A model for SEPT2 as a molecular platform scaffolding myosin II and CRIK/ROCK to ensure a precise spatiotemporal activation of myosin II. During normal cell divisions the septin complex is localized to the cleavage furrow and provides a molecular platform for myosin II and CRIK/ROCK. This brings the enzyme and its substrate into close proximity, facilitating di-phosphorylation of myosin II, which in turn stabilizes the midbody and permits abscission to proceed. In the presence of the CCT5 peptide, the septins are displaced from myosin, inhibiting di-phosphorylation and destabilizing the midbody, resulting in regression of the cleavage furrow. Developmental Cell 2007 13, 677-690DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.001) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions