Masaya Takahashi Japan Meteorological Agency

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report from JMA 17th GSICS Executive Panel, Biot, 2-3 June 2016 Masaya Takahashi on behalf of Kazumi Kamide Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteorological.
Advertisements

GSICS 2015 GDWG Breakout Session 1 Repository For GSICS Work Code Peter Miu EUMETSAT CMA, CNES, EUMETSAT, ISRO, IMD, JMA, KMA, NASA, NIST, NOAA, ROSHYDROMET,
GSICS Data and Products Servers Volker Gärtner (EUMETSAT) For GSICS Data Working Group.
2015 GSCIS annual meeting, March, 2015, New Delhi, India 1 GDWG Agenda Item New GSICS Products Masaya Takahashi, JMA CMA, CNES, EUMETSAT, ISRO, IMD,
2015 GSCIS annual meeting, March, 2015, New Delhi, India 1 GRWG Requirements Summary on Data, Products, and Tools - for GDWG Understanding Masaya.
JMA GDWG Report 1 Masaya Takahashi Meteorological Satellite Center / Japan Meteorological Agency (visiting scientist at EUMETSAT from Mar to Feb.
GSICS Coordination Center Report Fangfang Yu, Fuzhong Weng, Fred Wu and George Ohring NOAA/Center for Satellite Applications and Research 8 April, 2013.
2013 GSICS Joint Meeting, Williamsburg VA, USA, March GSICS Collaboration Servers Status: 2013 Peter Miu (EUMETSAT) CMA, CNES, EUMETSAT, ISRO,
2015 GSCIS annual meeting, March, 2015, New Delhi, India 1 GSICS Products' Content Access Study Proposal Zhe(Thomas) Xu, CMA CMA, CNES, EUMETSAT,
Marianne König, Tim Hewison, Peter Miu
Masaya Takahashi (JMA) and Sebastien Wagner (EUMETSAT)
GSICS Baseline Review: Tools – e.g. GSICS Bias Plotting Tool
DCC Product Requirements for GSICS Plotting Tool
GSICS Collaboration Servers Statuses and Updates
Strategy for combining corrections for VIS/NIR+IR channels and plotting tool S. Wagner, T. Hewison (EUM) M. Takahashi (JMA)
GDWG Agenda Item: Tools for GRWG activities
Summary of GDWG breakout session
Rob Roebeling, Peter Miu, and Sebastien Wagner
GSICS Collaboration Servers a Vehicle for International Collaboration Status 2011 Peter Miu EUMETSAT.
Review of EUMETSAT’s GEO-LEO Correction
Report from KMA 17th GSICS Executive Panel, Biot, 2-3 June 2016
Progress toward DCC Demo product
GDWG Agenda Item Existing netCDF Format Updates
GDWG Agenda Item THREDDS Directory Structure Updates
Spectral Response Function netCDF towards “GSICS Standard netCDF”
GDWG Agenda Item Repository for GSICS Work - Clarification on Archiving Masaya Takahashi, JMA CMA, CNES, EUMETSAT, ISRO, IMD, JAXA, JMA, KMA, NASA, NIST,
Doelling, Wagner 2015 GSICS annual meeting, New Delhi March 20, 2015
Requirements for GSICS Plotting Tool to support VIS/NIR products
Masaya Takahashi Meteorological Satellite Center,
GSICS Data Management and Availability to Users
Manik Bali, Larry Flynn NOAA/STAR
Masaya Takahashi (JMA), Peter Miu (EUMETSAT) and Ashi Mitra (IMD)
Drafting Requirements for Instrument Performance Monitoring Systems - Discussion from Data Management point of view Masaya Takahashi (JMA), Peter Miu (EUMETSAT),
GSICS Data Management and Availability to Users
Masaya Takahashi (JMA) and Sebastien Wagner (EUMETSAT)
Munn V. Shukla, Pradeep K. Thapliyal Space Applications Centre (ISRO)
JMA Agency Report 2017 Arata Okuyama, Masaya Takahashi and Hidehiko Murata Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteorological Agency.
Masaya Takahashi (JMA)
Annual GSICS Calibration Report for {Agency}
Masaya Takahashi (JMA), Dohyeong Kim (KMA),
Updating GSICS Plotting Tool to support VISNIR products
GSICS Coordination Center GSICS EP- Debrief
Update on GSICS Product Development
GIRO APPLICATION Current status and NEXT STEPS
Xiuqing Hu, Zhe Xu, Lin Chen
GSICS Product Plotting Web Tool Status: 2013
GDWG Joint Meeting Summary and Actions 2017
JMA Agency Report 2018 Masaya Takahashi, Yusuke Yogo and Hidehiko Murata Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteorological Agency.
Requirements on GSICS Plotting Tool to support VISNIR products
Summary of GDWG breakout session and Actions 2018
Technical aspects of the GIRO work: inputs from GRWG
Brief Report of GSICS-EP-18 (June 2017 in Jeju, Korea)
Status of the EUMETSAT GSICS DCC product
GDWG Fact Sheet - Information Presentation
GRWG+GDWG Web Meeting on Calibration Change Alerts
Masaya Takahashi (JMA)
Masaya Takahashi (JMA), Ashim Mitra (IMD) and Peter Miu (EUMETSAT)
Summary of 2019 GDWG breakout session
Implementation of DCC algorithm for MTSAT-2/Imager
GSICS Baseline Review: Product meta-data and structures
GSICS Server Upgrade - Requirements for New Deliverables
GSICS Collaboration Servers 2019
Proposal for a GSICS DCC product
GSICS Convention for Spectral Response Function files
GSICS Data Management Working Group Summary and Action Items
IASI / AIRS / CRIS cross-calibrations 5a 0:20
JMA Agency Report 2019 Masaya Takahashi, Yusuke Yogo and Kazuki Kodera
Masaya Takahashi Japan Meteorological Agency
Lunar Calibration Workshop Status of the preparation
Towards a GSICS DCC product...
Presentation transcript:

Masaya Takahashi Japan Meteorological Agency Visualization of GSICS Products on GSICS Plotting Tool - Current Status and User Requirements Masaya Takahashi Japan Meteorological Agency

Overview and Purpose Purpose of this talk To introduce GSICS Plotting Tool To introduce GRWG requirements and recent GDWG activities To discuss what GDWG can do in future

GSICS Plotting Tool http://gsics.tools.eumetsat.int/plotter/ GPRCs have their own product monitoring/plotting websites GSICS Plotting Tool: developed at EUMETSAT based on the requirements document (EUM/OPS/TEN/11/3804) Primary user of the plotting tool: product users, NOT developers Common look and feel (easy comparison among multiple products) Dynamical plotting (no need to prepare lots of figures) At present, GEO-LEO-IR is only supported

Recent Progress on Plotting Tool GRWG: Preparation of the requirements document Lead by Sebastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) Document was circulated to gsics-dev in Dec. 2017 and updated Implementation will be done under EUMETSAT’s MICMICS (Mission Integrated Calibration Monitoring Inter-Calibration System) The codes would be shared on GDWG GitHub repository (R.GRWG.2018.5g.1) GDWG: Updates of the tool by member agencies ISRO has supported NRTC files RAC (Re-Analysis Correction): 1 file contains whole time series of data NRTC (Near Real-Time Correction): 1 file contains info at one target time

Discussion Future collaborations among agencies To be discussed at 9p Need for re-considering the use of neteCDF’s Enhance Data Model – if GRWG requires?

NetCDF-4 Data Model New features: Groups and User-Defined Types For more information, see: https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/presentations/Rew/rew-egu.pdf New features: Groups and User-Defined Types http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/workshops/2011/datamodels/Nc4-uml.html

Use of netCDF-4 “grouping” function (Enhanced Data Model) SEVIRI vs. Aqua/MODIS VISNIR product This is NOT the GDWG recommendation because: It breaks backward compatibility Unknown whether it could be supported by existing GSICS Tools (e.g. THREDDS server, Plotting Tool) GDWG.2016.6g.2: JMA to investigate the impact of enhancement data model, use of grouping Delayed due to limited resources Combined result (DCC+Moon+…) Global attributes, Dimensions, Variables Method1 (Deep Convective Cloud) Global attributes, Dimensions, Variables Method2 (Moon) Global attributes, Dimensions, Variables Method3 (Desert) Global attributes, Dimensions, Variables

Reasons to use the classic model: When to Use the Enhanced Data Model – from 2011 Unidata NetCDF Workshop http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/workshops/2011/datamodels/Nc4-WhyUse.html Enhanced data model: offers rich features for structuring data, but breaks backward compatibility Classic model: simple, well-understood, and had been around for a long time a Reasons to use the classic model: Data using the classic model can be read by all existing netCDF software Writing programs for classic model data is easier Most or all existing netCDF conventions are targeted at the classic model Many great features, like compression, parallel I/O, large data sizes, etc., are available within the classic model Reasons to use the enhanced model: Complex data structures can be represented very easily in the data, leading to easier programming Description in the 2011 Unidata NetCDF Workshop website... If existing HDF5 applications produce or use these data, and depend on user-defined types, unsigned types, strings, or groups, then the enhanced model is required. In performance-critical applications, the enhanced model may provide significant benefits.

Backup Slides

Sample image of DCC inter-calibration results on the Plotting Tool Time series of MSG-2/SEVIRI vs. Aqua/MODIS DCC RAC product by EUMETSAT (S. Wagner) Monitored Instrument Gain [%] 0 1 2 3 4 Inter-calibration gain, scaled at the first result [%]

Plotting elements - IR/VNIR products This part could be the same in IR/VNIR products Different element is required for VNIR products Need multiple classes to handle different product types Need different interface IR: Brightness temperature [K] VNIR: Instrument trend [%]