by W. R. Binns, M. H. Israel, E. R. Christian, A. C. Cummings, G. A

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T.P. Idiart  and J.A. de Freitas Pacheco   Universidade de São Paulo (Brasil)  Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur (France) Introduction Elliptical galaxies.
Advertisements

Acceleration of GCR in stellar winds and the GCR 22 Ne/ 20 Ne source ratio N. Prantzos (Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris)
Compact remnant mass function: dependence on the explosion mechanism and metallicity Reporter: Chen Wang 06/03/2014 Fryer et al. 2012, ApJ, 749, 91.
ACE Real Time Solar Wind Data Available on the Web Real Time data from four ACE instruments is available from NOAA’s Space Environment Center within 5.
The Milky Way Galaxy. The Milky Way We see a band of faint light running around the entire sky. Galileo discovered it was composed of many stars. With.
Cosmic Rays Discovery of cosmic rays Local measurements Gamma-ray sky (and radio sky) Origin of cosmic rays.
MPBACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera 1.
Measurement of the Relative Abundances of the Ultra-Heavy Galactic Cosmic-Rays (30  Z  40) with TIGER Washington University in St. Louis B.F. Rauch,
Superbubbles, Wolf-Rayet Stars, and the Origin of Galactic Cosmic Rays W.R. Binns, M.H. Israel, L.M. Scott: Washington University M.E. Wiedenbeck: Jet.
26 June 2008SHINE, Zermatt, UT1 High-energy Elemental, Isotopic, and Charge-State Composition in 3 He-rich Solar Energetic Particle Events M.E. Wiedenbeck.
Space Science MO&DA Programs - September Page 1 SS It is known that the aurora is created by intense electron beams which impact the upper atmosphere.
Energy Spectrum C. O. Escobar Pierre Auger Director’s Review December /15/2011Fermilab Director's Review1.
Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.
Total photoabsorption on quasi free nucleons at 600 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, A.Ignatov, A.Lapik, A.Mushkarenkov, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL collaboratiion.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
Cosmic Ray Positron Fraction Observations during the A- Magnetic Solar Minimum John Clem and Paul Evenson* * Presenter AESOP Departing Esrange, Sweden.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Photograph of a single detector module. X-rays are incident from the top of.
Atoms, Molecules & Ions Isotopes and % Abundance
Figure 2. A comparison between the modern PMS spectral type-to-effective temperature conversion scales of Pecaut & Mamajek (2013, solid red line, labelled.
Figure 1. Left – a small region of a typical polarized spectrum acquired with the ESPaDOnS instrument during the MiMeS project. This figure illustrates.
35th International Cosmic Ray Conference
OB and Wolf-Rayet stars
Rick Leske, A. C. Cummings, C. M. S. Cohen, R. A. Mewaldt,
From: The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups
Energetic Particle Fluences from Solar Wind to Cosmic Ray Energies
Figure 1. A decay chain normalized by the total number of nuclei in the chain. The dashed line depicts e−1/t, where e is Euler number. From:
Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts
Rick Leske, A. C. Cummings, R. A. Mewaldt, and E. C. Stone
Toshiro Oda, Keiichi Namba, Yuichiro Maéda  Biophysical Journal 
by M. Della Negra, P. Jenni, and T. S. Virdee
CRaTER Science Requirements
Chiu Shuen Hui, Henry R. Besch, Keshore R. Bidasee  Biophysical Journal 
Accurate design of megadalton-scale two-component icosahedral protein complexes by Jacob B. Bale, Shane Gonen, Yuxi Liu, William Sheffler, Daniel Ellis,
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
Observations: Cosmic rays
Volume 93, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
Nuclear Transformations
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Death of Stars (for high mass stars)
by Michael J. Mina, C. Jessica E. Metcalf, Rik L. de Swart, A. D. M. E
by A. Dutton, A. E. Carlson, A. J. Long, G. A. Milne, P. U. Clark, R
Cascade Models of Synaptically Stored Memories
Responses of Collicular Fixation Neurons to Gaze Shift Perturbations in Head- Unrestrained Monkey Reveal Gaze Feedback Control  Woo Young Choi, Daniel.
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Direct imaging discovery of a Jovian exoplanet within a triple-star system by Kevin Wagner, Dániel Apai, Markus Kasper, Kaitlin Kratter, Melissa McClure,
Fig. 1 Double-raster plot demonstrating the timing of sleep in the chronic sleep loss and control protocols Double-raster plot demonstrating the timing.
by Jungwon Park, Hans Elmlund, Peter Ercius, Jong Min Yuk, David T
Chemistry 25.2.
by Asaf Inbal, Jean Paul Ampuero, and Robert W. Clayton
Fig. 6. Heterogeneous A1R and GIRK1/4 protein expression in human SAN and atria revealed by ex vivo molecular mapping. Heterogeneous A1R and GIRK1/4 protein.
Shock-Wave Exploration of the High-Pressure Phases of Carbon
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
by Katelyn M. Gostic, Monique Ambrose, Michael Worobey, and James O
Pair Instability Supernovae
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e6 (August 2018)
The Mars Pathfinder Atmospheric Structure Investigation/Meteorology (ASI/MET) Experiment by J. T. Schofield, J. R. Barnes, D. Crisp, R. M. Haberle, S.
by W. R. Binns, M. H. Israel, E. R. Christian, A. C. Cummings, G. A
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
by S. van Velzen, G. E. Anderson, N. C. Stone, M. Fraser, T. Wevers, B
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Scattering and Interference in Epitaxial Graphene
Fig. 1 Localization of GW and associated transient EM
Fig. 2 Spatial distribution of earthquake density derived from a catalog spanning 93 nights of the LB Array data set. Spatial distribution of earthquake.
Galactic Cosmic Ray Energy Spectrum for Fe from ~0
Energy penetration into arrays of aligned nanowires irradiated with relativistic intensities: Scaling to terabar pressures by Clayton Bargsten, Reed Hollinger,
Dislocation-accommodated grain boundary sliding as the major deformation mechanism of olivine in the Earth’s upper mantle by Tomohiro Ohuchi, Takaaki Kawazoe,
ACE Reveals Isotopic Composition of Interstellar Material
Evolution-informed forecasting of seasonal influenza A (H3N2)‏
Evidence of Cholesterol Accumulated in High Curvature Regions: Implication to the Curvature Elastic Energy for Lipid Mixtures  Wangchen Wang, Lin Yang,
Borislav Nedelchev et al. 2019
Presentation transcript:

Observation of the 60Fe nucleosynthesis-clock isotope in galactic cosmic rays by W. R. Binns, M. H. Israel, E. R. Christian, A. C. Cummings, G. A. de Nolfo, K. A. Lave, R. A. Leske, R. A. Mewaldt, E. C. Stone, T. T. von Rosenvinge, and M. E. Wiedenbeck Science Volume 352(6286):677-680 May 6, 2016 Published by AAAS

Fig. 1 CRIS instrument and data sample. CRIS instrument and data sample. (A) A cross-section drawing (not to scale) of the CRIS instrument is shown. There are four x,y planes of fibers; the top plane provides a trigger signal and the next three planes (x1y1,x2y2,x3y3) provide the trajectory. Beneath the fibers are four stacks of 15, 3-mm-thick silicon detectors (two stacks are visible in this side view). The central active regions of the silicon detectors are shown in blue, and guard rings used to veto side-exiting particles are in green. The detectors are grouped so that up to nine energy-loss signals (E1 to E9) are obtained for each particle entering one of the detector stacks. We use the dE/dx versus residual energy technique to determine the atomic number (Z), mass (A), and energy (E), of each cosmic ray. (B) Cross-plot of the sum of scaled energy losses of cosmic rays in detectors E1, E2, and E3 on the y axis versus the scaled energy loss in E4 on the x axis for a sample of particles stopping in E4, with both energies scaled by (sec θ)–1/1.7, where θ is the angle of incidence through the instrument. Clear “bands” are seen for each element extending from calcium through nickel. Within some of the element bands, traces for individual isotopes of that element can be seen. W. R. Binns et al. Science 2016;352:677-680 Published by AAAS

Fig. 2 Mass histograms of the observed iron and cobalt nuclei. Mass histograms of the observed iron and cobalt nuclei. (A) The mass histogram of iron nuclei detected during the first 17 years in orbit is plotted. Clear peaks are seen for masses 54, 55, 56, and 58 amu, with a shoulder at mass 57 amu. Centered at 60 amu are 15 events that we identify as the very rare radioactive 60Fe nuclei. There are 2.95 × 105 events in the 56Fe peak. From these data, we obtain an 60Fe/56Fe ratio of (4.6 ± 1.7) × 10−5 near Earth and (7.5 ± 2.9) × 10−5 at the acceleration source. (B) The mass histogram of cobalt isotopes from the same data set are plotted. Note that 59Co in (B) has roughly the same number of events as are in the 58Fe peak in (A). There is only a single event spaced two mass units to the right of 59Co, whereas there are 15 events in the location of 60Fe, which is two mass units from 58Fe. This is a strong argument that most of the 15 nuclei identified as 60Fe are really 60Fe, and not a tail of the 58Fe distribution. W. R. Binns et al. Science 2016;352:677-680 Published by AAAS

Fig. 3 Comparison of the 60Fe/56Fe ratio derived from measurements with models of supernova ejecta and stellar wind outflow in OB associations. Comparison of the 60Fe/56Fe ratio derived from measurements with models of supernova ejecta and stellar wind outflow in OB associations. Models of massive-star ejecta have been used to estimate the 60Fe/56Fe ratio evolution as a function of OB association age, including stellar lifetimes and radioactive decay of the ejected 60Fe. The blue dotted curve shows the ratio for nonrotating stars using yields calculated by (3) (W&H); the red-dashed and black solid curves are for nonrotating and rotating stars, respectively, using yields calculated by (4)(C&L). The black dashed line is our estimated ratio (RA) at the acceleration source derived from our measurements. Assuming that the composition at the acceleration source is 20% massive-star material and 80% normal interstellar medium material (supplementary materials), we obtain the massive-star production ratio (RMS) (red dashed line). The shaded areas indicate uncertainties (not including the massive-star mix fraction uncertainty). We have compared the maximum predicted ratio (age ~3.4 My) with our measured ratio and estimate an upper limit to the time between nucleosynthesis and acceleration of several million years. Combining this with the previous measurement of 59Ni (2), we conclude that the time between nucleosynthesis and acceleration is 105 years < T < several My. W. R. Binns et al. Science 2016;352:677-680 Published by AAAS