Akira Shimizu, Kazuhiko Yamada, David H. Sachs, Robert B. Colvin 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Advertisements

Volume 72, Issue 7, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 74, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 77, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Osteopontin expression in acute renal allograft rejection
Persistent rejection of peritubular capillaries and tubules is associated with progressive interstitial fibrosis  Akira Shimizu, Kazuhiko Yamada, David.
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 1998)
Y.-H.H. Lien, K.-C. Yong, C. Cho, S. Igarashi, L.-W. Lai 
Expression of the C-C chemokine receptor 5 in human kidney diseases1
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Chronic rejection of mouse kidney allografts
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 74, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Treatment of early mixed cellular and humoral renal allograft rejection with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil  Q. Sun, Z-H. Liu, Z. Cheng, J. Chen,
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 81, Issue 9, Pages (May 2012)
VEGF receptor 2 blockade leads to renal cyst formation in mice
Yang Wang, Yi Ping Wang, Yuet-Ching Tay, David C.H. Harris 
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Hepatocyte growth factor suppresses interstitial fibrosis in a mouse model of obstructive nephropathy  Shinya Mizuno, Kunio Matsumoto, Toshikazu Nakamura 
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 69, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Role of CD8+ cells in the progression of murine adriamycin nephropathy
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Proteasome inhibitor-based therapy for antibody-mediated rejection
Regulatory interactions of αβ and γλ T cells in glomerulonephritis
Local macrophage proliferation in human glomerulonephritis
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages (September 1999)
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
The C5a receptor has a key role in immune complex glomerulonephritis in complement factor H–deficient mice  Jessy J. Alexander, Lee Chaves, Anthony Chang,
Mechanisms of tolerance induction and prevention of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in miniature swine: The effect of augmentation of donor antigen load 
Erratum: SLE: translating lessons from model systems to human disease
Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist is protective in podocyte injury-associated sclerosis  H.-C. Yang, L.-J. Ma, J. Ma, A.B. Fogo 
Volume 72, Issue 7, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 74, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Emerging role of B cells in chronic allograft dysfunction
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 76, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
The more or less ‘pristine’ renal allograft biopsy
A sphingosine-1-phosphate type 1 receptor agonist inhibits the early T-cell transient following renal ischemia–reperfusion injury  L.-W. Lai, K.-C. Yong,
Alex B. Magil, Kathryn Tinckam  Kidney International 
Presentation transcript:

Intragraft events preceding chronic renal allograft rejection in a modified tolerance protocol  Akira Shimizu, Kazuhiko Yamada, David H. Sachs, Robert B. Colvin  Kidney International  Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages 2546-2558 (December 2000) DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00440.x Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Graft function in the progression (•) and the recovery (○) groups. In the progression group, four animals developed long-term loss of graft function. In the recovery group, four animals showed a transient elevation in plasma creatinine (Cr) 18 to 40 days post-transplant, but gradually improved and had stable renal function remaining thereafter. Kidney International 2000 58, 2546-2558DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00440.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Recovery group. Recovery from acute rejection (type II) is shown with PAS (×125; A–D) and CD3+ stains (×250; E–H) on days 18 (A and E), 30 (B and F), 60 (C and G), and 100 (D and H). A diffuse mononuclear cell and CD3+ cell infiltrate is seen with tubulitis, acute allograft glomerulopathy, and endarteritis at day 18. Thereafter, the T cells diminish, and allografts recover from acute rejection leaving minimal interstitial fibrosis by day 100. Kidney International 2000 58, 2546-2558DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00440.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Recovery group. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen+ (PCNA+) cells (A and E), PCNA and CD3+ cells (B and F), interleukin-2 receptor+ (IL2R+) cells (C and G), and immunoglobulin G (IgG) deposition (D and H) in renal allografts on days 18 (A–D) and 60 (E–H). Many proliferating and activated infiltrating cells, numerous proliferating T cells, and intense glomerular IgG deposition are seen on day 18; however, these progressively diminish after acute rejection by day 60 [A and E: PCNA stain, ×400; B and F: double stain with PCNA (black) and CD3 (brown), ×800; C and G: IL2R stain, ×500; D and H: IgG stain, ×400]. Kidney International 2000 58, 2546-2558DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00440.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Progression group. The development of chronic rejection is shown with PAS (×125; A–D) and CD3 (×250; E–H) stains on days 18 (A and E), 30 (B and F), 60 (C and G), and 100 (D and H). Acute rejection (type II) occurs with a diffuse mononuclear cell and CD3+ cell infiltrate, tubulitis, acute allograft glomerulopathy, and endarteritis at day 18. The cell infiltrate continues with the development of allograft glomerulopathy and arteriopathy at day 30 to day 60. Subsequently, typical histologic chronic rejection develops by day 100. Kidney International 2000 58, 2546-2558DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00440.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Graft infiltrating cells. The graft (A) CD3+, (D) CD8+, (E) CD4, and (B) CD2+ cell, and macrophage infiltrate continues in the progression group (•) and gradually resolves in the recovery group (○). The number of each subset (excluding CD21+ B cells, F) in the progression group is significantly higher than in the recovery group between day 30 to day 100, but the proportion of each subset is similar. (C) Macrophages. (A–F) Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. Kidney International 2000 58, 2546-2558DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00440.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Progression group. PCNA+ cells (A and E), PCNA and CD3+ cells (B and F), IL2R+ cells (C and G), and IgG deposition (D and H) on days 18 (A–D) and 60 (E–H). Many proliferating and activated infiltrating cells, numerous proliferating T cells, and intense glomerular IgG deposition are seen on day 18. Thereafter, these continue by day 60 with the development of chronic rejection [A and E: PCNA stain, ×400; B and F: double stain with PCNA (block) and CD3 (brown), ×800; C and G: IL2R stain, ×500; D and H: IgG stain, ×400]. Kidney International 2000 58, 2546-2558DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00440.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Percentage of PCNA+ (A), IL2R+ (B), and TUNEL+ (C) graft infiltrating cells in the progression (•) and the recovery (○) groups. Mononuclear cell proliferation and activation persist in the progression group by day 100, and these cells are significantly higher in the progression group between day 30 and day 100. The frequency of TUNEL+ infiltrating cells in the progression group is slightly higher than in the recovery group, although the difference is statistically significant only at day 100. (A and B) Values are expressed as mean ± SD. (C) Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Kidney International 2000 58, 2546-2558DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00440.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Apoptosis in graft infiltrating cells in the progression group on day 60. TUNEL stain (×500; A) and double stain with TUNEL method (black) and CD3 (brown, ×800; B) show the numerous TUNEL+ apoptotic infiltrating cells (arrow) and TUNEL+ CD3+ apoptotic infiltrating T cells (arrow). Kidney International 2000 58, 2546-2558DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00440.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Double stain with TUNEL method (black) and CD3 (brown) in tubulitis (A and E), glomerulopathy (B and F), peritubular capillaries (C and G), and endarteritis (D and H) in the progression (A–D) and the recovery (E–H) groups on day 60 (×900). In the progression group, numerous TUNEL+ cells (arrow) are observed with many CD3+ cell infiltration. However, less prominent CD3+ cells and TUNEL+ cells are seen in the recovery group. Kidney International 2000 58, 2546-2558DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00440.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 TUNEL+ cells in tubules (A), glomeruli (B), peritubular capillaries (C), and arteries (D) in the progression (•) and the recovery (○) groups. TUNEL+ graft parenchymal cell injury continues in the progression group, and the number of TUNEL+ cells is significantly higher than in the recovery group on day 60. In the recovery group, TUNEL+ cells progressively reduce by day 100. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Kidney International 2000 58, 2546-2558DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00440.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 Circulating anti-donor reactive cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL; A) and anti-donor class I IgM (B) and IgG (C) in the progression (•) and the recovery (○) groups. Cell-mediated ML assay (A) shows that the anti-donor CTL reactivity is higher in the progression group by day 60 (effector:target ratio is 100:1). Flow cytometric analysis for detection of the anti-donor class I antibody (B and C) shows that transient anti-donor class I IgM and IgG in serum are seen in the recovery group. However, anti-donor class I IgG production continued through day 60 in the progression group. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Kidney International 2000 58, 2546-2558DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00440.x) Copyright © 2000 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions