Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Advertisements

Voltage-Dependent Hydration and Conduction Properties of the Hydrophobic Pore of the Mechanosensitive Channel of Small Conductance  Steven A. Spronk,
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Crystal Structure of Maltose Phosphorylase from Lactobacillus brevis
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Po-Chao Wen, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical Journal 
Shozeb Haider, Gary N. Parkinson, Stephen Neidle  Biophysical Journal 
The Influence of Amino Acid Protonation States on Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Bacterial Porin OmpF  Sameer Varma, See-Wing Chiu, Eric Jakobsson 
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
G. Fiorin, A. Pastore, P. Carloni, M. Parrinello  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2001)
Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of the ATP/apo State of a Multidrug ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Provide a Structural and Mechanistic Basis for the.
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Loredana Vaccaro, Kathryn A. Scott, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Karunesh Arora, Tamar Schlick  Biophysical Journal 
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Intrinsic Bending and Structural Rearrangement of Tubulin Dimer: Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Coarse-Grained Analysis  Yeshitila Gebremichael, Jhih-Wei.
Activation of the Edema Factor of Bacillus anthracis by Calmodulin: Evidence of an Interplay between the EF-Calmodulin Interaction and Calcium Binding 
Grischa R. Meyer, Justin Gullingsrud, Klaus Schulten, Boris Martinac 
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Dielectric Properties of Proteins from Simulation: The Effects of Solvent, Ligands, pH, and Temperature  Jed W. Pitera, Michael Falta, Wilfred F. van.
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Karina Kubiak, Wieslaw Nowak  Biophysical Journal 
Structure and Dynamics of Zymogen Human Blood Coagulation Factor X
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Yinon Shafrir, Stewart R. Durell, H. Robert Guy  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages 977-988 (February 2007) Structure and Molecular Mechanism of Bacillus anthracis Cofactor-Independent Phosphoglycerate Mutase: A Crucial Enzyme for Spores and Growing Cells of Bacillus Species  Masatoshi Nukui, Luciane V. Mello, James E. Littlejohn, Barbara Setlow, Peter Setlow, Kijeong Kim, Terrance Leighton, Mark J. Jedrzejas  Biophysical Journal  Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages 977-988 (February 2007) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.093872 Copyright © 2007 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Sequence analysis and production of B. anthracis iPGM. (a) Alignment of sequences of B. anthracis and B. stearothermophilus iPGMs. The overall sequence identity is 78%; however, in the phosphatase domain the identity increased to 79%, and for the transferase domain decreased to 74%. Conserved residues are marked by an asterisk, the residues of the catalytic site are marked by solid circles with the exception of catalytic Ser-61, which is marked by a solid triangle. (b) Electrophoretic analysis. Coomassie brilliant blue stained 10% SDS-PAGE gel: lane 1, protein molecular mass standards; lane 2, 3s mg of purified B. anthracis iPGM. Biophysical Journal 2007 92, 977-988DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.093872) Copyright © 2007 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Three-dimensional structure of B. anthracis iPGM. (a) Overall ribbon representation of the molecule. This single peptide chain molecule assumes a two-domain structure with phosphatase and transferase domains. These domains are connected by two short peptide linkers, linker1 and 2. The structure is color coded by secondary structure elements: helices, red; β-sheets, yellow; and loops, green. Both N- and C-termini are labeled. The active site residues are shown in a ball and stick fashion (color-coded by element: carbon, green; oxygen, red; and nitrogen, blue). These residues belong to the two separate domains, phosphatase and transferase. For catalysis, these domains must move within reach of one another. The total of 13 amino acid residues take part in catalysis together with two essential Mn2+ ions, Mn1 and Mn2, and one water molecule, Wat. (b) Coordination spheres of catalytic Mn2+ ions. The coordination sphere of both the Mn2+ ions differs from that of distorted square pyramidal observed for B. stearothermophilus iPGM bound to PGA. For the B. anthracis iPGM without PGA, Mn1 assumes a distorted square pyramidal coordination but the apex has moved from NE2 of His-461 to a different ligand. Mn2 is in distorted octahedral coordination, altered from a distorted square pyramidal coordination, with the apex at OG of Ser-61. The atoms occupying the apex positions are NE2 of His-406 for Mn1 (distorted square pyramidal coordination), and OD1 of Asp-11 and OD2 of Asp-443 for Mn2 (distorted octahedral coordination). (c) Structure of catalytic site of B. stearothermophilus iPGM. This iPGM was crystallized with both domains close together with its catalytic residues in functional positions as during enzyme catalysis. A 3PGA substrate/product molecule is also shown. The residue numbering scheme follows that of B. anthracis iPGM enzyme plus one (i.e., B. anthracis Ser-61 is equivalent to B. stearothermophilus Ser-62). The coordination spheres of both Mn2+ ions were also depicted utilizing thin lines. The coordination geometry for both ions is distorted square pyramidal with NE2 of His-462 and OG of Ser-62 occupying the apex positions for Mn1 and Mn2, respectively (6). Biophysical Journal 2007 92, 977-988DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.093872) Copyright © 2007 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Comparison of iPGM structures and their dynamic properties. (a) Structural differences between structures of iPGMs of Bacillus species illustrated by DynDom analysis. Two domains (red and blue) are connected by hinge regions colored green. The arrow represents the axis of rotation of the two domains relative to each other. The structural difference between the two structures may be represented as a near pure rotation about the green hinge residues with negligible independent translation. (b) Stereo view of a superposition between the open (dark blue; based on the B. anthracis iPGM structure) and closed (red; based on the B. stearothermophilus iPGM structure) crystal structures and the average structure obtained from the stable portion of the open trajectory (cyan). The structures were superimposed using Cα atoms of the phosphatase domain alone. It is clear that the significant divergence of the average trajectory structure (cyan) from the initial open structure (dark blue) was not in the direction of the closed structure (red). (c) Superposition between the open structure and its average trajectory structure rotated 90° with respect to the orientation in a. 2PGA is presented in green. The difference between the average open structure during MD and the starting open crystal structure corresponds to a twisting of the phosphatase and mutase domains. Biophysical Journal 2007 92, 977-988DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.093872) Copyright © 2007 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Geometric analyses of the simulations of open B. anthracis and closed B. stearothermophilus iPGM structures. (a) Cα RMS differences to open and closed structures. RMS values calculated using all Cα atoms. The open, closed, and closed (ligand artificially removed) simulations are compared to their respective starting structures in the black, green, and cyan traces, respectively. These traces show that the closed structure is stable during the simulation and only marginally less so when its ligand has been removed. In contrast, the open simulation stabilizes at a conformation significantly different (RMSD of ∼0.5nm) from the crystal structure. The upper traces, colored red, blue, and orange for the open, closed, and closed (ligand removed) (model structures) simulations show the cross comparisons of open simulations with closed structures and vice versa. They show that the fluctuations during the MD simulations do not cause the open simulations to more closely approximate the closed structures and vice versa. (b) Cα-Cα distances (nm) indicating the degree of closure of the catalytic site. For the simulation of closed B. stearothermophilus enzyme they are Lys-364 to Arg-153 (blue) or Lys-364 to Arg-264 (green). In the open B. anthracis simulation, the corresponding distances are Lys-363 to Arg-152 (black) and Lys-363 to Arg-263 (red). These distances measure the degree of closure of the catalytic site at the local level. They show that the catalytic site of the closed simulation remains closed throughout (green and blue traces), whereas the catalytic site of the open simulation is more conformationally variable but shows no tendency to close. (c) Additional Cα-Cα distances (nm) indicating the degree of closure of the catalytic site. The distances shown correspond to those depicted in panel b but measure the separation of the side-chain atoms Lys NZ and Arg CZ (nm) rather than the separation of their Cα atoms. Biophysical Journal 2007 92, 977-988DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.106.093872) Copyright © 2007 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions