The Revised Common Rule

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Open Library June 4, 2004 Informed Consent Process and Federal Regulations That Must Be Met to Waive Informed Consent Tracey Craddock Regulatory Compliance.
Advertisements

Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager Radford University.
Institutional Review Board Guidance.  Independent Ethics Committee  Ethical Review Board  Research Ethics Committee 2.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
National Cancer Institute (NCI) Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) Research Studies UCSF HRPP Submission Process Overview Tuesday, December.
University of Nebraska – Lincoln Office of Research Responsibility What information does the IRB need? How do they make their decisions? May 19, 2009 Institutional.
IRB Monthly Investigator Meeting Columbia University Medical Center IRB October 11, 2005.
Unlocking the Mystery of General Information Reporting Research Compliance Administration Training Presentation Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Presenter:Heather.
Educational Research and the VCOM Institutional Review Board
ORO Reviews: Frequent Findings Related to IRBs Bob Brooks Associate Director Research Compliance Education and Policy VHA Office of Research Oversight.
New IRB Guideline Changes and Converting to eIRB - Suggestions for Maintaining Compliance. Ramesh Ghodgaonkar, BPHARM, MSITS, MSB, MBA Betsy Johnson, BA.
IRB Board Education Session 6 How Consent Regulations are Implemented in INSPIR Mary Banks Director, Office of the IRB June -July 2005.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
 The IRB application  The Review Process  Summary of Protocol  Appendixes  Informed Consent  Recruiting materials  Research Instruments  Other.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
Office of Research Integrity and Compliance March 2011.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Western Oregon University INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
EXPEDITED PROTOCOL REVIEW AN IRB INFOSHORT APRIL 2013.
PRIMER: Human Subjects, Past, Present, and Future Susan Metosky, Arizona State University Debra Murphy, Arizona State University.
Introduction to the HRPP and IRB Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Office.
Christine Yalda, J.D., Ph.D. Chair, Human Research Review Committee Grand Valley State University.
Faculty Advisor Responsibilities
ClinicalTrials.gov Requirements
Conditional IRB Approval
Brief Overview of IRB and Human Subject Protections Issues at the University of Richmond Dr. R. Kirk Jonas Chair, University of Richmond Institutional.
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Upcoming Changes to the Common Rule
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
IRB reporting updates.
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
Final Rule Material: Overview
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
Baruch College HRPP Office
The 2018 Human Subject Rules
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
2018 New Human Subject Regulations Informed Consent
Public Comment Webinars January 14, 2015 and January 15, 2015
Overview of Changes to the Common Rule
AAHRPP + IRB Update Michael Mahoney
2018 New Human Subject Regulations Approval Periods & Review Categories January 2018 Version 1.
Changes to Exempt Categories
Overview of Important Changes to the Final Rule
Anca Miron, PhD IRB Chair, UW Oshkosh Kelly Schill, BS, CIP
Common Rule Changes to Consent and Template
Understanding the Planned Changes to the Federal Policy on Protection of Human Subjects (the Common Rule) Megan Kasimatis Singleton, JD, MBE, CIP Assistant.
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
The 2018 Human Subject Rules
Secondary Research with Identifiable Information and Biospecimens
Informed Consent (SBER)
Expedited Status Update January 14, 2019
An Introduction to Regulatory Changes to Human Subjects Research
Overview of Important Changes to the Final Rule
Oct 16th, 2018 January 2019.
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Overview of Changes to Human Subjects Research Regulations
What are the Major Changes to the IRB under the Final Common Rule?
Everything You Wanted to Know about UOPX IRB
The 2018 Human Subject Rules
Does My Project Require HRPP/IRB Review?
Human Participants Research
I’m doing a project; how do I know if I need to go through the IRB?
Changes to the Common Rule and Single IRB (sIRB)
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Common Rule
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

The Revised Common Rule Institutional Review Board

The Common Rule The Common Rule = Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects AKA: 45 CFR Part 46 Initially published in 1991, amended in 2005 Revised again in 2017  Implemented 2019 The Revised Common Rule (RCR) Effective January 21, 2019 Includes: Modifications and additions to exempt research categories Greater freedom for IRBs to set review policies, especially for exempt categories of research and for continuing review Changes to informed consent documents

NMSU IRB POLICY Although we recognize that the RCR provides new guidelines and greater freedom for what constitutes “research” (i.e., what is “exempt” from IRB review) …and we recognize that some activities are no longer considered research under Revised Common Rule …The NMSU IRB will continue to review all activities that might be considered human subjects research IRB will continue to make decisions regarding what is/is not exempt from IRB review

WHAT SHOULD BE SUBMITTED TO IRB? *All projects that might be considered research projects must be submitted to the IRB* Note: Revised Common Rule research category changes apply ONLY to exempt research. There is NO change to the expedited categories under the revised common rule

*Potentially Exempt from Review Certain scholarly and journalistic activities (oral history) Certain public health surveillance activities Criminal justice activities Authorized operation activities in support of national security missions. *(Again) NMSU IRB will make the determination of whether or not projects are exempt from review.

Changes to Exempt Categories Link: compliance.nmsu.edu/irb

RCR Informed Consent There are several major changes to the general requirements for the informed consent in the RCR Applies to Expedited and Full Board Review The intent of these changes is to promote autonomy among prospective research participants Add template (here it is)

Informed Consent Information needs to be presented in sufficient detail and organized and presented in a way that facilitates an understanding of why one might, or might not, want to participate. A new consent form template in compliance with the Revised Common Rule is available on the website. For an efficient and timely review, we strongly recommend using the provided template. Include website language

Change to Reporting Requirements Continuations NMSU IRB transitioning from “continuing reviews” to “annual status reports” For all approved exempt and expedited protocols Limited information will be required: Team members Human Subject Training Brief summary Starting date Updates or problems encountered Summary of findings Last approved consent form Protocol modifications, final reports, and adverse event reports will remain unchanged

When do (did) the changes take effect? For new protocols: Protocols submitted after January 21, 2019 must conform to the new guidelines For currently approved protocols Protocols that are continuing to enroll participants will be required to have a new consent form submitted with a status report or protocol modifications, whichever comes first Researchers should begin using the new consent form after approval by the IRB.

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Vice President for Research/Graduate School Office of Research Integrity and Compliance compliance.nmsu.edu 575-646-7177 ovpr@nmsu.edu