Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Eeva K. Leinala, Peter L. Davies, Zongchao Jia  Structure 
Moses Prabu-Jeyabalan, Ellen Nalivaika, Celia A. Schiffer  Structure 
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
The Crystal Structure of the Human Hepatitis B Virus Capsid
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Glycerol Dehydrogenase
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Crystal Structures of a Novel Ferric Reductase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus and Its Complex with NADP+  Hsiu-Ju Chiu, Eric.
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Recognition of a TG Mismatch
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
The 1.9 Å Structure of α-N-Acetylgalactosaminidase
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Binding Dynamics of Isolated Nucleoporin Repeat Regions to Importin-β
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Structural Elements of an Orphan Nuclear Receptor–DNA Complex
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Collagen Stabilization at Atomic Level
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Yi Mo, Benjamin Vaessen, Karen Johnston, Ronen Marmorstein 
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Minsun Hong, Mayuree Fuangthong, John D. Helmann, Richard G. Brennan 
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
The crystal structure of an intact human Max–DNA complex: new insights into mechanisms of transcriptional control  P Brownlie, TA Ceska, M Lamers, C Romier,
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Structural Insights into the Mode of Action of a Pure Antiestrogen
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of the Oxygen Sensor in Bacillus subtilis
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Molecular Dynamics Simulation of a Synthetic Ion Channel
Presentation transcript:

Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 187-194 (January 2002) Structure of Ocr from Bacteriophage T7, a Protein that Mimics B-Form DNA  M.D Walkinshaw, P Taylor, S.S Sturrock, C Atanasiu, T Berge, R.M Henderson, J.M Edwardson, D.T.F Dryden  Molecular Cell  Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 187-194 (January 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00435-5

Figure 1 The X-Ray Crystallographic Structure of Ocr (A) A typical portion of the 2Fo–Fc electron density map contoured at 1.5 σ. (B) Stereo view of the ocr dimer. Residues defining the first and last residues of the four helices are labeled: Helix A (Y7 to Y24), Helix B (H34 to A44), Helix C (Y49 to M56), and Helix D (V77 to L105). The crystallographic 2-fold axis relating the two subunits of the dimer (colored red and blue) lies in the plane of the paper. The side chains of the six residues involved in van der Waals contacts between the dimer subunits are shown (Ala50, Phe53, Ser54, Met56, Ala57, and Val77). (C) Stereo view of the ocr dimer (rotated 90° with respect to [B]). Annotation is the same as in (B). The 2-fold axis points into the plane of the paper. The six residues forming the hydrophobic interface are located mainly on helix C. (D) The dimer interface. The view of the interface is along the 2-fold axis (as in [C]). The complementarity of shape of the two subunits (colored blue and red) is depicted by the dotted Connolly surface. Five of the six residues within van der Waals contact distance are shown. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 187-194DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00435-5)

Figure 2 DNA Bending Induced by Specific Binding of EcoKI as Visualized Using Atomic Force Microscopy (A) The histogram shows the distributions of bend angles for DNA with specifically bound EcoKI enzyme complexes. Only complexes containing EcoKI located in the center of the DNA fragment were considered. EcoKI was found to induce bending by 46° ± 2° (n = 150) (mean ± standard error). (B) The histogram shows the distribution of bend angles for naked DNA fragments. These were nominally straight over the same region as occupied by EcoKI with a distribution mean of 0° ± 3° (n = 50). The distributions are truncated at 0°, as the direction of the bending was not determined. (C–E) AFM images of specifically bound EcoKI complexes on 292 bp DNA fragments. The protein is the bright spot located in the middle of the bent DNA fragments. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 187-194DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00435-5)

Figure 3 Superposition of Two 12 bp B-DNA Molecules on the Ocr Dimer (A) The view is identical to that in Figure 1C. A least squares fit of phosphate groups of the B-DNA complex (pdb code 1BNA) was made onto 12 carboxyl groups of ocr (see text) giving an rms fit of 1.9 Å (The pairs of amino acid side-chain and phosphate used in the fit are labeled). The phosphorus atoms are colored yellow, and oxygen atoms of the phosphate groups are colored purple. The 12 carboxyl groups are colored red (oxygen) and black (carbon). The sugar backbones of the DNA dimer chains are colored in two shades of green, and the base pairs are omitted for clarity. (B) The view is identical to that in Figure 1B and colored as in (A). The 2-fold axis lies in the plane of the paper. The vectors describing the direction of the fitted DNA (17) on both halves of the dimer are drawn as black lines. Their intersection gives a bend angle of 33.6°. Molecular Cell 2002 9, 187-194DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00435-5)