Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Munirathinam Sundaramoorthy, James Terner, Thomas L Poulos  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Crystal Structure of Maltose Phosphorylase from Lactobacillus brevis
Crystal structure of mammalian purple acid phosphatase
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Modular Recognition of RNA by a Human Pumilio-Homology Domain
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Crystal Structure at 2.8 Å of an FcRn/Heterodimeric Fc Complex
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
Solution Structure of the Core NFATC1/DNA Complex
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Munirathinam Sundaramoorthy, James Terner, Thomas L Poulos  Structure 
Recognition of a TG Mismatch
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Quentin Vicens, Eric Westhof  Structure 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
The 1.8 Å crystal structure of catechol 1,2-dioxygenase reveals a novel hydrophobic helical zipper as a subunit linker  Matthew W Vetting, Douglas H Ohlendorf 
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Melissa S Jurica, Raymond J Monnat, Barry L Stoddard  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structure of Carnitine Acetyltransferase and Implications for the Catalytic Mechanism and Fatty Acid Transport  Gerwald Jogl, Liang Tong  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Yi Mo, Benjamin Vaessen, Karen Johnston, Ronen Marmorstein 
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1995)
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Carlos R. Escalante, Leyi Shen, Dimitris Thanos, Aneel K. Aggarwal 
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Structure of the InlB Leucine-Rich Repeats, a Domain that Triggers Host Cell Invasion by the Bacterial Pathogen L. monocytogenes  Michael Marino, Laurence.
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Crystal Structure of Hyaluronidase, a Major Allergen of Bee Venom
Restriction Enzyme BsoBI–DNA Complex
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Presentation transcript:

Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman, Christoph W Müller  Structure  Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 343-356 (March 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00722-0

Figure 1 Multiple Sequence Alignment and DNA Binding Sites of T-Box Transcription Factors (A) Sequence alignment of the T-box domains of human TBX3 (SwissProt accession number O15119), TBX1 (O43435), TBX2 (Q13207), TBX4 (P57082), TBX5 (Q99593), TBX6 (O95947), and the T protein from mouse (P20293) and Xenopus laevis (Xbra; P24781). Sequence numbering and secondary structure elements for TBX3 and Xbra are given above and below the sequences, respectively. For the other T-box domain sequences, the numbering of the first residue of each line is provided. Identical residues are depicted on a light yellow background. TBX3 and Xbra residues involved in interaction with the DNA or with the second monomer are depicted on blue and magenta backgrounds, respectively. Point mutations observed in UMS (TBX3) and HOS (TBX5) patients are marked in green. (B) DNA duplex present in the TBX3/DNA complex crystals containing the palindromic DNA binding site aligned with half-sites found in promoters of target genes of T-box transcription factors. The 20 base pair palindromic binding sequence is drawn in a box. The dyad is indicated by a black circle. Target sequences for mouse and human FGF, eFGF, Bix4, TRP-1, and POMC genes are denoted in the 5′–3′ direction. One half-site of the original palindromic binding site and bases in target sites conserved with respect to the original half-site are depicted in yellow. For the eFGF-proximal and Bix4-distal sites, no direct binding of T-box factors has been demonstrated [24]. Structure 2002 10, 343-356DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00722-0)

Figure 2 Structure of the TBX3/DNA Complex (A) Ribbon diagram of a human TBX3 monomer bound to its DNA target site. Secondary structure elements are labeled, and helices, strands, and loops are depicted in turquoise, red, and gray, respectively. Figures 2A, 3A, 3B, and 5 were produced with the program SETOR [40]. (B) Stereodiagram of the superposition of the Cα backbone of the TBX3 monomer with Xbra (thick and thin lines, respectively). (C) Final 2Fo−Fc electron density at 1.5σ showing the recognition of G:C base pair 5 by Arg130 and Phe283 in the major and minor groove, respectively. Structure 2002 10, 343-356DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00722-0)

Figure 3 DNA Recognition by Human TBX3 (A) Interactions between one TBX3 monomer and one half-site. The view corresponds to Figure 2A. Depicted are all TBX3 residues involved in hydrophobic and polar interactions with one half-site of the palindrome. (B) Interaction of Arg284 with backbone carbonyls of Ile274 and Asn277 connecting helix 310C with helix α3. (C) Schematic diagram of the interactions between one monomer and one DNA half-site. Polar and hydrophobic interactions are indicated by arrows and dashed lines, respectively. Residues involved in polar interactions and residues contacting the DNA only through hydrophobic interactions are drawn on red and blue labels, respectively. Structure 2002 10, 343-356DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00722-0)

Figure 4 Minor Groove Width and Water Structure (A) Schematic diagram of minor groove width and the water molecules present in the minor groove. Depending on minor groove width, phenylalanine side chains Phe279 and Phe283 (depicted as red squares) and the backbone carbonyl of residue 279 (yellow label) displace one or two water molecules (green spheres). Distances between phosphorous atoms across the minor groove are given in Angstroem. (B) Minor and major groove width of TBX3 (thick lines) and Xbra (thin lines) per base step. Groove widths were calculated according to [43]. Major groove width for base step k between strands I and II: (P(I)k+2)−(P(II)k−2); minor groove width for base step k: 1/2((P(I)k+1−P(II)k−2)+(P(I)k+2−P(II)k−1)). The P(I)k+1−P(II)k−2, P(I)k+2−P(II)k−1 distances across the minor groove are given in (A). Major and minor groove widths for B-form DNA of 17.4 and 10.8 Å, respectively are indicated by horizontal lines. These values are based on crystal structures of oligonucleotides [39]. Structure 2002 10, 343-356DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00722-0)

Figure 5 Quaternary Structures of TBX3 and Xbra T-Box Domains Bound to DNA (A) Ribbon diagram of the two TBX3 T-box domains bound to the palindromic DNA duplex. View perpendicular to the DNA axis and the noncrystallographic dyad. The two monomers are depicted in light gray and black. The two arrows indicate the rotations of both monomers in opposite directions with respect to the two monomers in the Xbra/DNA complex. The rotation axis runs at an angle of about 45° through the points of contact formed by Phe279 and Phe283, marked by asterisks in both monomers. (B) Stereodiagram of the two TBX3 monomers bound to palindromic DNA superimposed with the Xbra/DNA complex. Human TBX3 and Xbra are depicted in magenta and green, respectively. Only the DNA duplex of the TBX3/DNA complex is depicted. In both complexes, the central 12 DNA phosphates of both strands were superimposed (rms24 P atoms = 0.95 Å). View along the dyad of the complex. The direction of the rotational axis is depicted. (C) View along the DNA axis. Structure 2002 10, 343-356DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00722-0)

Figure 6 Monomer/Monomer Contacts in the Xbra/DNA and TBX3/DNA Complexes (A) Stereodiagram of the monomer/monomer contacts observed in the Xbra/DNA complex. (A) and (B) were produced with the program MOLSCRIPT [42]. With respect to Figure 5B, the model was rotated clockwise by about 45°. (B) Monomer/monomer contacts observed in the human TBX3/DNA complex. Structure 2002 10, 343-356DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00722-0)