Analysis of fluid transport pathways and their determinants in peritoneal dialysis patients with ultrafiltration failure  A. Parikova, W. Smit, D.G. Struijk,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peritoneal transport assessment by peritoneal equilibration test with 3.86% glucose: A long-term prospective evaluation V. La Milia, P. Pozzoni, G. Virga,
Advertisements

Acid-base profile in patients on PD
Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis
A skeptical view of assisted home peritoneal dialysis
Improved patient/technique survival and peritonitis rates in patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis when compared to continuous ambulatory.
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Tumoral calcinosis in a peritoneal dialysis patient
F.H. Bender, J. Bernardini, B. Piraino  Kidney International 
Beta blockers in the management of chronic kidney disease
Linear and logistic regression analysis
Acid-base profile in patients on PD
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Long-term follow-up of patients randomized to biocompatible or conventional peritoneal dialysis solutions show no difference in peritonitis or technique.
Use of icodextrin in high transport ultrafiltration failure
Impact of new dialysis solutions on peritonitis rates
Volume 72, Issue 8, Pages (October 2007)
Superior dialytic clearance of β2 microglobulin and p-cresol by high-flux hemodialysis as compared to peritoneal dialysis  H. Yoshida, K. Yokoyama, K.
Incremental peritoneal dialysis: Effects on the choice of dialysis modality, residual renal function and adequacy  G. Viglino, L. Neri, S. Barbieri  Kidney.
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 1998)
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Glucose sparing in peritoneal dialysis: Implications and metrics
Ali K. Abu-Alfa, John Burkart, Beth Piraino, Joe Pulliam, Salim Mujais 
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Fluid overload and residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis: the proof of the pudding is in the eating  Wim Van Biesen, Achim Jörres  Kidney International 
Response to is the reduction in urea distribution volume over time in clinically stable dialysis patients real?  S. Andrulli, S. Di Filippo, F. Locatelli 
Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Cross-sectional validity of a modified Edmonton symptom assessment system in dialysis patients: A simple assessment of symptom burden  S.N. Davison, G.S.
S.G. John, N.M. Selby, C.W. McIntyre  Kidney International 
F.H. Bender, J. Bernardini, B. Piraino  Kidney International 
V. La Milia, M. Limardo, G. Virga, M. Crepaldi, F. Locatelli 
A new era in phosphate binder therapy: What are the options?
Volume 73, Pages S81-S86 (April 2008)
Volume 70, Issue 11, Pages (December 2006)
What really happens to people on long-term peritoneal dialysis?
Paricalcitol therapy for secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients on maintenance hemodialysis previously treated with calcitriol: A single-center crossover.
Volume 73, Pages S5-S17 (April 2008)
Volume 73, Pages S94-S101 (April 2008)
Volume 70, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Improved patient/technique survival and peritonitis rates in patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis when compared to continuous ambulatory.
Blood pressure targets in hemodialysis patients
Volume 76, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
The third World Kidney Day: Looking back and thinking forward
Tumoral calcinosis in a peritoneal dialysis patient
Water-only pores and peritoneal dialysis
Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Microbiology and outcomes of peritonitis in North America
Nephrology Crossword: Peritoneal Dialysis
Future of icodextrin as an osmotic agent in peritoneal dialysis
Profiling of peritoneal ultrafiltration
Volume 73, Pages S72-S75 (April 2008)
Higher serum C-reactive protein predicts short and long-term outcomes in peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis  N.-Y. Zalunardo, C.-L. Rose, I.W.Y.
A skeptical view of assisted home peritoneal dialysis
Quality of life in peritoneal dialysis patients: Decline over time and association with clinical outcomes  Sr. Anne B. Bakewell, Rob M. Higgins, Mair.
Peter G. Blake, Arsh K. Jain, Sechelle Yohanna  Kidney International 
Organ transplantation goes to the movies
Volume 70, Pages S84-S90 (November 2006)
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Quantification of free water transport in peritoneal dialysis
Volume 70, Issue 3, Pages (August 2006)
Review of clinical trial experience with icodextrin
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 72, Issue 11, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 70, Issue 10, Pages (November 2006)
The International Pediatric Peritonitis Registry: Starting to walk
E.F. Vonesh, J.J. Snyder, R.N. Foley, A.J. Collins 
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of fluid transport pathways and their determinants in peritoneal dialysis patients with ultrafiltration failure  A. Parikova, W. Smit, D.G. Struijk, R.T. Krediet  Kidney International  Volume 70, Issue 11, Pages 1988-1994 (December 2006) DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001861 Copyright © 2006 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Fluid transport determinants and their relation to the duration of PD. (a) osmotic conductance to glucose and (b) ultrafiltration coefficient. (c) FWT within the first hour and (d) reflection coefficient for glucose. In all panels, Group I – non-UFF (□), Group I UFF (•), Group II (▴), and Group III (▪) are shown. In the cases when the significant correlation between transport determinant and PD duration was found, the regression line is depicted. Kidney International 2006 70, 1988-1994DOI: (10.1038/sj.ki.5001861) Copyright © 2006 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Peritoneal fluid kinetics for the group of patients without UFF treated for less than 2 years and three groups of patients with UFF. (a) Fluid kinetics of patients in Group I – non-UFF (upper panel) and Group I – UFF (lower panel), (b) fluid parameters of Group II, and (c) fluid transport in Group III. In all panels, the total TCUF during the 4h dwell (•), net ultrafiltration (▴), lymphatic absorption (▪), the transport through the small pores (□), and the FWT (○) are shown. Kidney International 2006 70, 1988-1994DOI: (10.1038/sj.ki.5001861) Copyright © 2006 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions