IEEE Comments on aq PAR and 5C

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE tvws Submission September 2009 Stanislav Filin et al, NICTSlide 1 Comments to WS coexistence draft PAR Notice: This document.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0085r2 Submission July 2011 Gerald Chouinard, CRCSlide Response to Comments received on the proposed a PAR and 5C Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE Comment #1 from WG Comment: In Section 5.2.b two examples of spectrum resource measurements are given: PER and.
CSD for P802.1AS-REV WG Wednesday, 05 November 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /xxxr0 Submission May 2004 Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 IEEE Wireless Interworking with External Networks (WIEN)
Doc.: IEEE /0271r4 Submission March 2015 Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)Slide 1 Comments on TGay PAR and CSD Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0498r0 Submission April 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Modifications to the 60GHz PAR & 5 C’s Proposal Date:
1 6/3/2003 IEEE Link Security Study Group, June 2003, Ottawa, Canada Secure Frame Format PAR: 5 Criteria.
Doc.: IEEE leci SGLECIM November 2010 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPAN) Submission Title:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0319r0 March 2014 Jon Rosdahl, CSRSlide Proposed PAR Review March 2014 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /0860r0 Submission July 2010 Jon Rosdahl, CSRSlide 1 Comments for p New PAR – July 2010 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE ulp Submission Slide 1 May 2012 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
IEEE Std Proposed Revision Purpose, Scope & 5 Criteria.
PAR Review - Agenda and Meeting slides - March 2016
Comments on WUR SG PAR and CSD
Response to Official Comments
Comments on HT PAR & 5 Criteria
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2012
VHTL6 task group work plan proposal (VHTL < 6 GHz)
Proposed SFD Text for ai Link Setup Procedure
Interworking Study Group Justification
P802.11aq Waiver request regarding IEEE RAC comments
P802.11aq Waiver request regarding IEEE RAC comments
VHT SG PAR Feedback from Individuals
P802.11aq Pre-Association Service Discovery Summary
IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area NetworksTM
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
P802.11aq Pre-Association Service Discovery Summary
P802.11aq Pre-Association Service Discovery Summary
Technical Requirements for IEEE ESS Mesh Networks
TGaq Design Options Date: Authors: January 2013
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: z PAR/CSD Comments Responses Date.
Submission Title: [SGLECIM PAR & 5C comment resolution November 2010]
TGaq Design Options Date: Authors: March 2013 March 2013
WIEN Study Group Proposed Roadmap
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
Submission Title: [SGLECIM PAR & 5C comment resolution November 2010]
doc.: IEEE <492> <month year> November 2015
Submission Title: [Proposal on PAR and 5C draft for BAN]
Listen to Probe Request from other STAs
PAR Comments Date: Authors: July 2010 May 2010
MAC address assignment in IEEE through IEEE aq
Submission Title: [Proposal on PAR and 5C draft for BAN]
Proposal for HT PAR Title, Scope and Purpose
Proposed text for HTSG draft PAR and 5 Criteria
Submission Title: [SGLECIM PAR & 5C comment resolution November 2010]
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
Proposed text for HTSG draft PAR and 5 Criteria
March 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: z PAR/CSD Comments Responses Date.
Jan Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PAR and CSD document discussion] Date Submitted:
900 MHz ISM Band Date: Authors: January 2010 Month Year
Comments on Sub 1 GHz license-exempt operation
comments on Pending 802 PARs – July 2011
TGaq Design Options Date: Authors: March 2013 March 2013
March 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: z PAR/CSD Comments Responses Date.
Submission Title: [VHT liaison report] Date Submitted: [15 May 2008]
Comments for p New PAR – July 2010
PAR Review - Agenda and Meeting slides - March 2016
IEEE Comments on aq PAR and 5C
Input on WUR PAR Scope Date: Authors: July 2016
P802.11aq Waiver request regarding IEEE RAC comments
P802.11aq Waiver request regarding IEEE RAC comments
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2012
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
The Need for an AP Functional Description
Response to Official Comments
Interest for HDR extension to a
July 2004 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Merger Proposal #2 Affirmation of Commitment.
Presentation transcript:

IEEE 802.21 Comments on 802.11aq PAR and 5C Month 20xx doc.: IEEE 802.21-02/xxxr0 IEEE 802.21 Comments on 802.11aq PAR and 5C XXXX, His Company

Month 20xx doc.: IEEE 802.21-02/xxxr0 PAR- Section 5.2.b 5.2.b. Scope of the Project: “This amendment defines modifications to the IEEE 802.11 standard, above the physical layer (PHY), …” Comment: Does this mean it could be done at a layer higher than MAC layer? Would suggest to revise the scope as follows: “This amendment defines modifications to the IEEE 802.11 standard, at the MAC layer, ….” XXXX, His Company

Month 20xx doc.: IEEE 802.21-02/xxxr0 PAR- Section 5.2.b 5.2.b. Scope of the Project: “ .. enable delivery of pre-association service information discovery by IEEE 802.11 stations (STAs).” Comment#1: ‘delivery of pre-association service information discovery’ is a bit confusing. Suggest to delete the word discovery after information. Comment#2 : Will ‘pre-association service information’ be delivered securely? If not, it should state that this information will be provided in unprotected manner. XXXX, His Company

PAR- Section 5. 4 5.4 Purpose: “This standard also offers regulatory bodies a means of standardizing access to one or more frequency bands for the purpose of local area communication” Comment: The above sentence is not at all understandable.

Month 20xx doc.: IEEE 802.21-02/xxxr0 PAR- Section 5.5 Need for the Project: “This amendment would look at basic advertising approaches for services .....” Comment#1: What are “basic advertising approaches”? Need some clarity here. Comment #2: Do not understand why amendment would look at approaches rather than providing a solution. XXXX, His Company

5C – a) Broad sets of applicability Month 20xx doc.: IEEE 802.21-02/xxxr0 5C – a) Broad sets of applicability Broad sets of applicability: “With the growth of WLAN technology, discovery  will become an increasingly larger issue in public ….”   Comment: Not clear what type of discovery is mentioned here? Need to be a bit more explicit describing the type of discovery. The PAR mentions only discovery of services. XXXX, His Company

5C – a) Broad Sets of applicability Month 20xx doc.: IEEE 802.21-02/xxxr0 5C – a) Broad Sets of applicability a) Broad sets of applicability: “A pre-association discovery mechanism will increase the range of services and market reach of IEEE 802.11 devices”. Comment: ‘discovery mechanism’ is a broad generic term. It should mention discovery mechanism of what information. For example, “discovery mechanism on information related to......” XXXX, His Company

5C – b) Multiple vendors and numerous users Month 20xx doc.: IEEE 802.21-02/xxxr0 5C – b) Multiple vendors and numerous users b) Multiple vendors and numerous users: “They perceive the need to standardize a pre-association discovery mechanism for IEEE 802.11 devices.”  Comment: Again ‘discovery mechanism’ is a broad generic term. It should mention discovery mechanism of what information. For example, “discovery mechanism on information related to......” XXXX, His Company

5C – Technical Feasibility Month 20xx doc.: IEEE 802.21-02/xxxr0 5C – Technical Feasibility b) Proven technology, reasonable testing: “All of the end components of the technology are in use today, although the pre-association discovery mechanism has not been developed yet. ”  Comment: Is the above statement correct? Pre-association network discovery mechanism exists today. Suggest to change “the pre-association discovery mechanism” as “the pre-association service discovery mechanism” XXXX, His Company