Magnetic Tweezer System Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tendon.
Advertisements

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS
November 14, 2013 Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) Benjamin Leonard Post-Doctoral Research Associate Third Body Modeling Using a Combined.
Traction Assays for Studies of Cell Mechanotransduction V. Damljanović 1, B. Lagerholm 1, M. Dembo 2 & K. Jacobson 1 1 Cell & Developmental Biology, University.
Optical Tweezers F scatt F grad 1. Velocity autocorrelation function from the Langevin model kinetic property property of equilibrium fluctuations For.
Determination of Grain Boundary Stiffness Hao Zhang 1, Mikhail Mendelev 1,2 and David Srolovitz 1 1 PRISM, Princeton University 2 Ames Laboratory.
ENGR 225 Section Saint-Venant’s Principle When loading is applied at a point on a body, it tends to create a stress distribution that becomes.
The Multiple Regression Model Hill et al Chapter 7.
Constraining and size effects in lead-free solder joints
Princeton University Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering The Effect of Inclination on Grain Boundary Mobility Hao Zhang; Mikhail I. Mendelev;
EXAMPLE 1 Apply the distributive property
Young’s Modulus - an extension to Hooke’s Law Main Questions: –Why are mechanical properties important for engineers? –How is Young’s modulus related to.
Mechanical Testing.
BIO-MATERIALS. STRUCTURE OF BIO-MATERIALS AND BIO- COMPATIBILITY STRUCTURE OF BIO-MATERIALS AND BIO- COMPATIBILITY IMPLANT MATERIALS IMPLANT MATERIALS.
CHE 333 Class 14 True Stress True Strain Crystalline Processes During Deformation.
Protein Adsorption Affects Osteoblast- Glass Adhesion Strength as Measured by Colloidal Probe Atomic Force Microscopy Jackson Cahn Whitman College.
Mechanicial Properties of Materials
Manufacturing Processes
Creep, compaction and the weak rheology of major faults Norman H. Sleep & Michael L. Blanpied Ge 277 – February 19, 2010.
Springs Have out Target Guide Worksheet: Significant digits part 2
Force Microscopy of Non-adherent Cells: A Comparison of Leukemia Cell Deformability Michael J. Rosenbluth, Wilbur A. Lam, and Daniel A. Fletcher Biophysical.
Magnetic Tweezer System Development
Magnetic Tweezer System Development Jason Sherfey Senior BME, Vanderbilt University Probing mechanical properties across multiple scales Advisor: Dr. Franz.
Chapter 17 Notes Properties of Matter. Properties of Solids Density- how tightly packed the atoms of a substance are Hardness- resistance to scratching.
Force Microscopy of Nonadherent Cells: A Comparison of Leukemia Cell Deformability Rosenbluth, Lam, and Fletcher (2006) Presented by: Aisha Bobb-Semple.
Topic 10: Cell Mechanics 4/26/07 BE112b. Collagenous Tissue Testing: Summary of Key Points Tissue testing considerations include –Various possible configurationsconfigurations.
Topic 12: Cell Mechanics. David Rogers, Vanderbilt University Cells are dynamic, constantly reorganizing their cytoskeleton.
Viscoelasticity – 1 Lumped Parameter Models for time-dependent behavior DEQ’s as Constitutive Equations.
Today, we will study data obtained using three techniques: Micropipette aspiration Force range: 10 pN – 1000 nN soft cells hard cells Optical tweezers.
Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Mechanical Compromise of Partially Lacerated Flexor Tendons J Biomech Eng. 2012;135(1):
Defect-Defect Interaction in Carbon Nanotubes under Mechanical Loading Topological defects can be formed in carbon nanotubes (CNTs) during processing or.
Capturing Size Effect in Unidirectional Fiber Composites Employing Stochastic Finite Element Simulations By Thomas Bilodeau Advisor: Dr. Fertig May 2,
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Effects of Elastic Fiber Protein Insufficiency and Treatment on the Modulus.
2.2 Materials Materials Breithaupt pages 162 to 171.
Nanoindentation.
The prototype of high stiffness load cell for Rockwell hardness testing machine calibration according to ISO :2015 M Pakkratoke1 and T Sanponpute2.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Biomechanics Class 6: HSSP MIT.
True Stress True Strain Crystalline Processes During Deformation.
Structure-Property Linkages of Aluminum Foams
Volume 95, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
Bipedal Locomotion in Crawling Cells
Figure 1. Histograms of pull-off force values for three different amino acids and silicon at a loading rate of 5.5 nN/s (pH 6.8). The most probable force.
Guillaume T. Charras, Mike A. Horton  Biophysical Journal 
Substrate Viscosity Enhances Correlation in Epithelial Sheet Movement
Franziska Vielmuth, Marie-Therès Wanuske, Mariya Y
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Jeffrey G. Jacot, Andrew D. McCulloch, Jeffrey H. Omens 
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Tensile Properties of Single Desmin Intermediate Filaments
Mechanical Forces of Fission Yeast Growth
(A) Growth curves of strains at 30°C in SPP medium or SPP supplemented with 15 μM paclitaxel or 10 μM oryzalin. (A) Growth curves of strains at 30°C in.
Mechanics on Myocardium Deficient in the N2B Region of Titin: The Cardiac-Unique Spring Element Improves Efficiency of the Cardiac Cycle  Joshua Nedrud,
Bart Smeets, Maxim Cuvelier, Jiri Pešek, Herman Ramon 
Volume 97, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Mechanical properties of metals Stress and Strain in metals
PDT 153 Materials Structure And Properties
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Focal Adhesion Kinase Stabilizes the Cytoskeleton
E.M. Darling, Ph.D., S. Zauscher, Ph.D., F. Guilak, Ph.D. 
Energy.
Conformational Changes and Signaling in Cell and Matrix Physics
SAM transport by Gap4 in S. cerevisiae cells.
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Jeffrey G. Jacot, Andrew D. McCulloch, Jeffrey H. Omens 
Dynamic Role of Cross-Linking Proteins in Actin Rheology
Presentation transcript:

Magnetic Tweezer System Development Probing mechanical properties across multiple scales Jason Sherfey Senior BME, Vanderbilt University Advisor: Dr. Franz Baudenbacher

Force displacement measurements on magnetic beads linked to the cell surface through E-Cadherin 1 nN 1 2 3 displacement [mm] Time [s] F T=0 s T=1.5 s Fit to Mechanical Analog Extract Model parameter

Force-Displacement Curves MDCK cells Wild-type P120 Knockout

Viscosity (Pa-s-m) N = 10

Elasticity (Pa-m) N = 10

Relaxation Time (s) N = 10

Viscosity (Pa-s-m) Elasticity (Pa-m) Relaxation Time (s) p = 0.364 0.0020 0.0044 Wild-type MDCK 0.0019 0.0038 P120 Knockout MDCK Standard Deviation Mean p = 0.364 No significant difference in WT & KO Viscosities Elasticity (Pa-m) 0.0088 0.0217 Wild-type MDCK 0.0106 0.0118 P120 Knockout MDCK Standard Deviation Mean p = 0.0028 WT Elasticity is significantly larger than KO Relaxation Time (s) 0.0006 0.0421 Wild-type MDCK 0.0725 P120 Knockout MDCK Standard Deviation Mean p = 0.0010 WT Relaxation Time is significantly faster than KO N = 10 cells

Conclusions The stiffness and relaxation time constants are significantly different in p120 knockout and wild-type MDCK cells. 2. The stiffness decreases & relaxation time slows down when p120 expression is reduced in MDCK cells.

Strain Hardening Stiffness (Pa-m) The stiffness of the adhesion protein linker system increases when stress is repeatedly applied. Pull  Wild-type Cell 1 0.0132 2 0.0152 3 0.0193 4 0.0249   Knockout Cell 0.0051 0.0063 0.0081