Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Advertisements

John Hines, Michael Groll, Margaret Fahnestock, Craig M. Crews 
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Synthetic Strategies for Studying Embryonic Development
Disarming Bacterial Type IV Secretion
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Polina D. Kehayova, David R. Liu  Chemistry & Biology 
Yalei Chen, Melissa M. Rolls, William O. Hancock  Current Biology 
Adding Specificity to Artificial Transcription Activators
Finding the Missing Code of RNA Recognition by PUF Proteins
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Grigory S. Filonov, Vladislav V. Verkhusha  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Protein Interaction Analysis Provides a Map of the Spatial and Temporal Organization of the Ciliary Gating Zone  Daisuke Takao, Liang Wang, Allison Boss,
Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
John Hines, Michael Groll, Margaret Fahnestock, Craig M. Crews 
Xianfeng Morgan Xu, Tea Meulia, Iris Meier  Current Biology 
Biofilm Inhibitors that Target Amyloid Proteins
Fuqing Wu, David J. Menn, Xiao Wang  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Grigory S. Filonov, Vladislav V. Verkhusha  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Jennifer J Kohler, Carolyn R Bertozzi  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Long-Range Directional Movement of an Interphase Chromosome Site
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
A Subdomain Swap Strategy for Reengineering Nonribosomal Peptides
Mutations in Human ARF Exon 2 Disrupt Its Nucleolar Localization and Impair Its Ability to Block Nuclear Export of MDM2 and p53  Yanping Zhang, Yue Xiong 
Charlene Depry, Sohum Mehta, Ruojing Li, Jin Zhang  Chemistry & Biology 
AKT/PKB Signaling: Navigating the Network
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 5-11 (January 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Ligand Control of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Activity: New Insights
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 122, Issue 2, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Minus-End-Directed Motor Ncd Exhibits Processive Movement that Is Enhanced by Microtubule Bundling In Vitro  Ken'ya Furuta, Yoko Yano Toyoshima  Current.
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
High-Affinity Auxin Transport by the AUX1 Influx Carrier Protein
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Physcomitrella patens Auxin-Resistant Mutants Affect Conserved Elements of an Auxin- Signaling Pathway  Michael J. Prigge, Meirav Lavy, Neil W. Ashton,
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Iwr1 Directs RNA Polymerase II Nuclear Import
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (May 1999)
Ligand-Regulated Peptides: A General Approach for Modulating Protein-Peptide Interactions with Small Molecules  Brock F. Binkowski, Russell A. Miller,
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages e5 (February 2018)
Discovery of Antagonist Peptides against Bacterial Helicase-Primase Interaction in B. stearothermophilus by Reverse Yeast Three-Hybrid  Laurence Gardiner,
Uma B. Karadge, Minja Gosto, Matthew L. Nicotra  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Mark S. Dunstan, Debraj GuhaThakurta, David. E. Draper, Graeme L. Conn 
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (June 2007)
Maria Spies, Stephen C. Kowalczykowski  Molecular Cell 
Minus-End-Directed Motor Ncd Exhibits Processive Movement that Is Enhanced by Microtubule Bundling In Vitro  Ken'ya Furuta, Yoko Yano Toyoshima  Current.
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (June 2018)
Gα12 and Gα13 Interact with Ser/Thr Protein Phosphatase Type 5 and Stimulate Its Phosphatase Activity  Yoshiaki Yamaguchi, Hironori Katoh, Kazutoshi Mori,
Rapamycin-Dependent Interaction between TOR-FRB Domain and Hs FKBP12
Presentation transcript:

Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 99-107 (January 2006) Rapamycin Analogs with Differential Binding Specificity Permit Orthogonal Control of Protein Activity  J. Henri Bayle, Joshua S. Grimley, Kryn Stankunas, Jason E. Gestwicki, Thomas J. Wandless, Gerald R. Crabtree  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 99-107 (January 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.10.017 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 C20-Methallylrapamycin Binds Specifically to a Mutant Frb Domain Containing Phe at Amino Acid 2101 (A) Schematic diagram of rapamycin- or rapalog-directed transcription switch. FKBP12 is fused to the yeast Gal4 DNA binding domain, which is tethered to reporter plasmid DNA containing Gal4-specific DNA recognition elements. In the absence of drug, transcription of secreted bacterial alkaline phosphatase is low. Inclusion of rapalog recruits Frb fused to a VP16 transcriptional activation domain to the promoter and SeAP transcription is stimulated. (B–F) SeAP activity in transfected COS cells containing the transcriptional switch and stimulated with increasing concentrations of rapamycin (squares) or C20-methallylrapamycin (C20-Marap; triangles). Frb-VP16 constructs are denoted above the graphs in single-letter amino acid code indicating positions 2095, 2098, and 2101 with (B) utilizing Lys2095, Thr2098, and Trp2101 (the wild-type) and (C) Pro2095, Leu2098, and Phe 2101 (aka Frb∗). Residues mutated from the wild-type are red and italicized. Error bars represent ± 1 SD. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 99-107DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.10.017) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Discrete Frb Binding Specificities Are Conferred by Modification of Rapamycin (A) Chemical structures of rapamycin, C20-Marap and C16-(S)-butylsulfonamidorapamycin (BS-Rap). (B–D) SeAP reporter activity in the rapalog-dependent transcriptional switch plotted at increasing concentrations of rapamycin (squares), C20-Marap (triangles), or C16-BSrap (circles) with the Frb variant PLF (B), KTW (C) or KTF (D). Error bars represent ± 1 SD. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 99-107DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.10.017) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Binding Specificity of Bumped Rapalogs Depends on Variation at Frb Amino Acids 2098 and 2101 (A) Chemical structures of C16-(S)-3-methylindolerapamycin (C16-iRap) and C16-(S)-7-methylindolerapamycin (AP21967/C16-AiRap). (B) SeAP reporter assays were performed with Frb variants KTW, KLW, KTF, and KLF with increasing concentrations of C20-Marap (red), C16-BSrap (orange), C16-iRap (green), and AP21967 (black). Results are plotted as the inverse of the EC50 for the drug-Frb variant combination in megamolar scale. Low (or zero) values thereby indicate a high EC50. ∗Interaction too weak to be calculated. Error bars represent ± 1 SD. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 99-107DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.10.017) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Orthogonal Control of GSK-3β Subcellular Localization with Specific Rapalogs FKBP-GSK-3β-GFP is coexpressed with Frb(TLW)-NES and Frb(KTF)-NLS. GFP is visualized in transiently transfected COS1 cells without stimulation where GSK-3β is localized to both cell compartments (A) or with 1 hr stimulation with (B) 10 nM C16-BSrap, (C) 10 nM C20-Marap, or (D) 10 nM rapamycin. Illustrations beneath each figure depict the drug-selective recruitment of either TLW-exp or KTF-imp to FKBP-GSK-3β to direct nuclear import or export. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 99-107DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.10.017) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Summary of Alterations at Amino Acids 2098 and 2101 in Frb that Underlie the Specificity of Given Rapalogs (A) Different Frb varients are listed in illustated form with “X” representing amino acid 2095. The relative strength of interaction with the rapalogs listed on the right is indicated by the thickness of the line. (B) Ribbon diagram of the crystal structure of the Frb-rapamycin complex [22] with the amino acids altered in this study space-filled as indicated along with rapamycin (gray). Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 99-107DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.10.017) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Schematics of Applications for Orthogonal Control of Protein Function with Rapalogs (A) Selective recruitment of FKBP-NES “exporter” protein to Frb-tagged fusions with specific rapalogs and Frb variants. C20-Marap selectively exports an Frb(KTF)-protein target (left), while BS-rap selectively exports a Frb(KTW)-protein fusion (right). (B) Selective stabilization of protein targets fused to unstable Frb variants. Fusion of protein targets to Frb (KLF) or Frb (PLW) leads to their degradation. Both Frb variants can interact and be stabilized by C16-iRap by recruitment of FKBP. Replacement of C16-iRap with C20-Marap (upper) or C16-BSrap permits the continued stabilization of only the target capable of maintaining specific interaction with the Frb variant and the rapalog. Chemistry & Biology 2006 13, 99-107DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.10.017) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions