Unexpected progression to high gradient in paradoxical low flow-low gradient aortic stenosis Sylvestre Maréchaux, Pierre-V. Ennezat, Riadh Rihani, François Delelis, Anne-Laure Castel, Christophe Tribouilloy International Journal of Cardiology Volume 178, Pages 265-267 (January 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.103 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 M-mode imaging of the LV with end-diastolic diameter (LV EDD), interventricular septum thickness (IVSth) and posterior wall thickness (PWth) at end-diastole (A), LV ejection fraction (EF) and stroke volume (SV) index by Simpson method (B), global longitudinal strain (GLS, C), LV stroke volume (SV) index by Doppler (D), mean pressure gradient (MPG) and aortic valve jet velocity (Vmax) (E) and magnified aspect of the aortic valve in parasternal long axis view with left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) (F). International Journal of Cardiology 2015 178, 265-267DOI: (10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.103) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Aortic valve jet velocity (Vmax) and mean pressure gradient (MPG) at baseline, 26 and 32month follow-up. International Journal of Cardiology 2015 178, 265-267DOI: (10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.103) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions