GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION OF PESTICIDE USAGE STATISTICS A summary

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to measure the CMEF R2 Indicator about Gross Value Added in agricultural holdings without reliable accounting data ? A methodological proposal applied.
Advertisements

10. Workshop ERFP Uppsala, June 4, 2005 ERFP collaboration with EU - Lobbying in Bruxelles Hermann Schulte-Coerne.
Existing EU Regulations concerning pesticide statistics and Latvia experience in pesticide statistics Guna Karlsone, CSB of Latvia.
Sudan Experience on Poverty Survey Somaia K.E.Omer Date 7-8 Aug بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
State Plant Protection Service 26 September 2007 ISTAMBUL 2005 Transition Facility Programme PESTICIDES USE SURVEY IN LITHUANIA Danguolė Krepštulienė,
Fulfilment of requirements of the Regulation No 1185/2009 regarding agricultural and non agricultural use of pesticides in Latvia Guna Karlsone, CSB of.
NOMIRACLE, ISPRA 8-9 June Emission estimates for pesticides due to agricultural praxis Steen Gyldenkærne and Peter B. Sørensen National Environmental.
Scot Exec Course Nov/Dec 04 Survey design overview Gillian Raab Professor of Applied Statistics Napier University.
Agriculture’s Dual Challenge of Delivering Food While Protecting the Environment Tamsin Cooper A Future for a Strong CAP – European Symposium.
ICON-Institute Public Sector1 Overview of experiences in Slovenia and Hungary Riga, July 2007 Transition Facility Statistical Cooperation Programme.
ICON-Institute Public Sector1 The project “Pesticide indicators” and the use of PPP’s in the context of the new Regulation on PPPs Riga, July 2007.
Transition Facility Multi-Beneficiary Statistical Co-operation Programme 2005 Lot 2: Pesticide Indicators Survey on Pesticide Use on Wheat Crops.
13-Jul-07 Pesticide Usage Surveys Examples of calculations: doses – area treated.
ICON-Institute Public Sector1 Important aspects of data processing and presenting format Vilnius, 5-6 September 2007 Transition Facility Statistical Cooperation.
Istanbul 13-14th September, 2007 Marios A.Adamides Plant Health Inspection Service Dep. Of Agriculture Min. of Agriculture Cyprus Workshop on Pesticide.
Central Statistical Office of Poland State Plant Health and Seed Inspection Service Plant Protection Institute, Sośnicowice Branch 1 The First Workshop.
Pesticide use survey in Lithuania 2007 PESTICIDES USE SURVEY IN LITHUANIA SURVEY CROP – WINTER WHEAT Danguolė Krepštulienė, Statistics Lithuania Darius.
Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic 1 Pesticide Indicators Pesticide Indicators Transition Facility Multi-Beneficiary Statistical Cooperation Programme.
2nd Joint Workshop on Pesticide Indicators Pesticide Usage Survey on Wheat in Hungary Zsuzsanna Szabó Hungarian Central Statistical Office September.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Regional aggregation of statistics on water abstraction and use Seminar on water statistics for countries in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia.
COMPLIMENTARY TEACHING MATERIALS Farm Business Management: The Fundamentals of Good Practice Peter L. Nuthall.
Typical farms and hybrid approaches
Graham Brookes, Farzad Taheripour, and Wallace E. Tyner
Community level data Technical session 15 Regional Roundtable on
Community level data Technical session 15 Regional Roundtable on
Linking Population and Housing Censuses with Agricultural Censuses
Session 1 – Study Objectives
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTIVITY
Chapter Eight: Quantitative Methods
Multi-Beneficiary Statistical Co-operation Programme 2005
Linking Population and Housing Censuses with Agricultural Censuses
Introduction on Institutional Setting Istanbul, September 2007
Task Force on Material Flow Accounts 3-4 May 2012
Expert visit Bratislava, – Part 2
State Plant Health and Seed Inspection Service
Recommendations on survey implementation
Working Party on Regional Statistics 1-2 October 2012
PESTICIDE USAGE SURVEY IN TURKEY
Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Land Use and Forestry
FINAL REPORT PLAN PILOT PROJECT: Transition Facility Multi-Beneficiary
5.2 draft European Statistical Work Programme 2013
New Regional Indicators
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes
The main results of the Pesticides Survey
High level seminar on the implementation of the
3rd Joint Workshop on Pesticide Indicators
PHARE and TF Missions: main findings
Pesticide Usage Surveys
United Nations Statistics Division
Session 4 – From pilot to regular surveys: the costs aspects Introduction: cost impact of possible design strategies Malta, January 2008 Transition.
Statistics in the Enlargement context
Objectives, Scope and Structure of Country Reports
Relevance of GNB for CAP monitoring and evaluation system
Teodora Brandmuller Head of Section – Regional and urban statistics
Workshop on Pesticide Indicators
ICT Market Follow up in Morocco Market Observatory/ANRT MOROCCO
Data entry and Data management
2005 Transition Facility Programme
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 26
NIVA - Norwegian Institute for Water Research
AEI where DG AGRI is in the lead
Sub-Group “Agriculture and Environment”
1st Joint Workshop Pesticides Statistics
SMALL AREA ESTIMATION FOR CITY STATISTICS
ICON-Institute Public Sector
National level Objective:
STEPS Site Report.
Presentation transcript:

GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION OF PESTICIDE USAGE STATISTICS A summary Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

Sound information on changes in use over time Rationale Growing demand within the EC for meaningful and accurate statistics on pesticide use Target of EC’s 5th and 6th Environmental Action Programme; “further reduce impact of pesticides on human health and the environment, in particular from plant protection products used in agriculture” Sound information on changes in use over time Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

Specific Pesticide Usage Survey Key problem Reduction in volume is meaningless with regard to risk if new active substances have lower rates per hectare reductions in the weight, not in reduction of use or risk. Impact assessment with traditional Sales statistics and their reductions in weight used is less meaningful Specific Pesticide Usage Survey Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

Role of statistics Representative Comprehensive Objective Reliable Sustainable Comparable in time and space Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

New regulation Main objective of the new Regulation is; To ensure that comparable data are collected In all the Member States Calculate harmonised risk indicators Measure the progress made; Sustainable use of plant protection products Throughout the Community. Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

Chapters in the manual 1. Methods of collection 2. Defining the crops to be surveyed 3. Frequency of surveys (see 10) 4. Data requirements 5. Sample selection 6. Establishing a regional breakdown 7. Establishing farm size groups 8. Establishing the sample 9. Producing national estimates 10. Defining the survey period 11. Additional information 12. Pesticide classification Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

Any combination is possible 1. Methods of collection Personal visits Telephone interviews Postal surveys (e-mail) Spraying records from all users of pesticides Not mentioned Web application Indirect methods; FADN, administrative record, technical ratios Any combination is possible Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

2. Selection of crops (see 4.) 4 Selection criteria Variation in importance of crop by area grown (ha) Variation in importance of crop by area treated (ha) (sum of number of treatments) Variation in importance of crop by weight of pesticide (active substance) applied (ton) Variation in importance of crop by average rate of pesticide use (kg/treated ha) Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

3. Frequency of the survey New regulation proposes: Annual for statistics on the placing on the market 5 years-period for usage statistics Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

4. Data requirements (see 2.) Making any survey worthwhile, minimum number of parameters required Essential data to collect for each Crop; Area grown The product applied Amount used or rate of application Area treated Important, not essential: Biological control method, Timing Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

5. Sampling For a sound sample we need true population Census Farm register Sampling should initially be stratified by region (see 6.) The sampling unit may be: Farm single crop on a farm field of a particular crop a field Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

Must aggregate to administrative (NUTS) regions and National levels 6. Regional breakdown Regionalisation is only useful for cross comparison; Between (similar) regions in the country Between (similar) regions with other countries With other statistics (e.g. FSS/Census, FADN, Production, EAA) Breakdown in; Homogeneity in land use and climate pressures Areas of similar agro-environmental characteristics Must aggregate to administrative (NUTS) regions and National levels Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

7. Farm size groups Not comparable Pesticide usage may (assumption) vary with farm size on the same crop due to; Equipment used Administration Trained staff Economic/Financial Classification; Land use e.g. 5 size classes ESU (1200 Euro) Not comparable Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

8. The sample Sampling should aim to select farms from representative numbers within each regional and/or size group. Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

9. National estimates Average use per hectare for each pesticide on each crop (within each region) Multiplying this by the total area grown (within each region) If stratified by size A raising factor for each cell, which is equal to the total area of farms within that cell divided by the total area of farms sampled within that cell Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

11. Additional information Countries should consider which aspects of the demands outlined in the introductory section are of most relevance Consider collecting any further information Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

11. Additional information Crop type Variety Crop stage Formulation and method of application Spray round Target species or reason for use Crop rotation Drilling method Sowing date & harvest date Crop covers Mulches Age of crop Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

12. Pesticide classification To allow meaningful comparisons of usage data between countries (regions, other surveys etc.) pesticides should be classified into; Fungicides Herbicides Insecticides Molluscicides Growth regulators “Other pesticides” Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

Tackling pesticide usage = Tackling any survey Conclusion Tackling pesticide usage = Tackling any survey Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005

GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION OF PESTICIDE USAGE STATISTICS A summary Multi-Beneficiary Transition Fascility and Statistical Cooperation programme 2005