Relationships Between Activities, Participation, Personal Factors, Mental Health, and Life Satisfaction in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury Christel M. van Leeuwen, MSc, Marcel W. Post, PhD, Paul Westers, PhD, Lucas H. van der Woude, PhD, Sonja de Groot, PhD, Tebbe Sluis, MD, Hans Slootman, MD, Eline Lindeman, PhD Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 82-89 (January 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.203 Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Simplified theoretical model of Rapkin and Schwartz.26 Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 82-89DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.203) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Path model of relationships between activities, participation, mental health, and life satisfaction. All standardized path coefficients, similar to β values in ordinary multiple regression analysis, were significant at P<.05 and can be interpreted in the usual way. R2 = adjusted R2. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 82-89DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.203) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Path model of relationships between activities, participation, antecedents, mental health, and life satisfaction. All standardized path coefficients, similar to β values in ordinary multiple regression analysis, were significant at P<.05 and can be interpreted in the usual way. R2 = adjusted R2. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 82-89DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.203) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 4 Path model of relationships between activities, participation, antecedents, appraisals, mental health, and life satisfaction. All standardized path coefficients, similar to β values in ordinary multiple regression analysis, were significant at P<.05 and can be interpreted in the usual way. Correlations (range, .21–.33) existed among the 3 appraisals, but were not shown for the clarity of the figure. R2 = adjusted R2. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 82-89DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.203) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions