S3B OLCI Lunar Observations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GOME-2 FM3 (Metop-A) Instrument Review, EUMETSAT, Darmstadt, June 2012 Slide: 1 Rűdiger Lang, Rose Munro, Antoine Lacan, Richard Dyer, Marcel Dobber, Christian.
Advertisements

Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
2015 GSCIS annual meeting, March, 2015, New Delhi, India Application of GIRO to Himawari-8/AHI Hidehiko Murata and Masaya Takahashi Meteorological.
NASA NPP-SDS VCST NPP VIIRS On-Orbit Calibration Using the Moon J. Fulbright a, Z. Wang a, and X. Xiong b a SSAI (formerly with Sigma Space), Greenbelt,
A.K. Mitra, Shailesh Parihar, S.K. Peshin Ministry of Earth Sciences
PLEIADES Lunar Observations Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie
Future eumetsat missions: MTG/FCI, MTG/UVNS and EPS-SG/METimage
Description of the giro ON THE DETAILS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
PREPARATION OF THE GiRO executable
Calibrating the METEOSAT SEVIRI solar channels using lunar observations Sébastien Wagner (1) Bartolomeo Viticchie (1), Tom Stone (2), Tim Hewison(1), Gary.
EUMETSAT’s Lunar Calibration Capabilities
Lunar observation data set preparation
JMA lunar calibration report [MTSAT-2 and GMS-5]
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
Second Joint GSICS-IVOS Lunar Calibration Workshop
Toward a wider use of the Moon for In-flight Characterization
Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration with D. Doelling (NASA)
Technical Expectations from Organizers & Participants B. Fougnie, S
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu and Tom Stone
Concept study GOME-2/AVHRR radiance inter-comparison
The ROLO Lunar Calibration System Description and Current Status
GOES-16 ABI Lunar Data Preparation to GIRO
An Overview of MODIS Reflective Solar Bands Calibration and Performance Jack Xiong NASA / GSFC GRWG Web Meeting on Reference Instruments and Their Traceability.
Sébastien Wagner (1) Tom Stone (2), Gary Fowler (1), Tim Hewison (1)
Data Preparation for Using the ROLO / GIRO Model
Lunar Calibration activities
MODIS Lunar Calibration Data Preparation and Results for GIRO Testing
Lunar data preparation for FY-2
Update on Advancing Development of the ROLO Lunar Calibration System
CALIBRATION over the Moon An introduction to « POLO »
MODIS Characterization and Support Team Presented By Truman Wilson
Toru Kouyama Supported by SELENE/SP Team HISUI calibration WG
Data Preparation for ASTER
PREPARATION OF THE GiRO executable
Example of sensitivity analysis Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie
Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) Tom Stone (USGS)
Update on the GIRO Benchmark
Outcome of the Second Joint GSICS/IVOS Lunar Calibration Workshop
Lunar reflectance model based on SELENE/SP data
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
S-NPP Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Lunar Calibration using GSICS Implementation of the ROLO model (GIRO) for Reflective Solar Bands.
Lunar data preparation for PROBA-V
GOES Imager Lunar Calibration: Angular Variation of the Scan Mirror Visible Reflectivity Fangfang Yu (ERT, Xiangqian Wu(NOAA/NESDIS), Tom Stone(USGS),
National Satellite Meteorological Centre
Moving toward inter-calibration using the Moon as a transfer
GIRO APPLICATION Current status and NEXT STEPS
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
Lunar Observation Data for GIRO Landsat–8 Operational Land Imager
Definition of a benchmark for the GIRO
Inter-calibration of the SEVIRI solar bands against MODIS Aqua, using Deep Convective Clouds as transfer targets Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration.
Lu Zhang, Peng Zhang , Xiuqing Hu, Lin Chen
Presentation Overview
Status of the EUMETSAT GSICS DCC product
Lunar Observation Activities with a Small Satellite and a Planetary Exploration Satellite. Hodoyoshi-1 Hayabusa-2 Toru Kouyama, AIST
Lunar Calibration Workshop Wrap up, next steps and list of actions
Current Status of ROLO and Future Development
An introduction of FY2 and its Lunar calibration
Moving toward inter-calibration using the Moon as a transfer
Traceability of the GIRO to the ROLO: Definition of a benchmark
Lunar calibration of COMS visible channel using GIRO
SRF Retrieval Using VIIRS/AIRS/IASI radiances
Inter-band calibration using the Moon
goes-16/17 abi lunar calibration
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
Toward a synergy between on-orbit lunar observations
MERIS Level 1b processing Ludovic Bourg
Lunar Calibration Workshop Status of the preparation
Presentation transcript:

S3B OLCI Lunar Observations S. Wagner In collaboration with A. Burini, M. De Bartolomei, B. Fougnie, O. Hautecoeur, T. Hewison, E. Kwiatkowska, B. Viticchie

OLCI : some basics… Across track = 740 detectors Source : ESA web site

OLCI : some basics… Across track = 740 detectors Source : ESA web site Source : ESA web site Imaging CCD = Spatial x Spectral content Digital processing  21 bands (+ 1 smear band) over the spatial dimension

OLCI : some basics… Cyan = MERIS heritage Yellow = new bands Source : ESA web site Source : ESA web site Cyan = MERIS heritage Yellow = new bands

OLCI : some basics… Only camera to see the Moon Very narrow bands Source : ESA web site Source : ESA web site Only camera to see the Moon Very narrow bands Cyan = MERIS heritage Yellow = new bands

Moon observation with S3B OLCI Manoeuvre performed on July 27, 2018 Purpose: Straylight correction analysis (ESA / ACRI) Moon calibration (EUMETSAT) Acquisition  between ~5:20 UTC and ~5:25 UTC Moon phase : -6.46 degrees Viewing camera = Camera 4 Extract from the original image

Data preparation for the GIRO Irradiance = 1 𝑂𝑆𝐹 𝑖 𝑑 Ω 𝑑 ∙ 𝐿 𝑖,𝑑 i = lines (along track) d = detector index Ω 𝑑 = solid angle for each detector = (αn - αn-1) . βn 𝐿 𝑖,𝑑 = radiance OSF = oversampling αn αn-1 βn f

Data preparation for the GIRO Irradiance = 1 𝑂𝑆𝐹 𝑖 𝑑 Ω 𝑑 ∙ 𝐿 𝑖,𝑑 i = lines (along track) d = detector index Ω 𝑑 = solid angle for each detector = (αn - αn-1) . βn 𝐿 𝑖,𝑑 = radiance OSF = oversampling

Data preparation for the GIRO Oversampling = ellipse fitting + axis ratio (moon is assumed round) Not ideal but ok for first-order assessment Proper calculation needed using integration time + acquisition geometry Example: Band 1

Data preparation for the GIRO - oversampling Inter-band variability peak-to-peak ~1.5% (excluding Oa21) Band 21 (without and with enhanced contrast) Very clean (not perfect) signal for Bands 1 to 20 Band 21 shows clearly the limitation of the method

Data preparation for the GIRO Acquisition time for the Moon = interpolation of the time to the central moon acquisition (~5:22UTC) Satellite position calculated at that time, using orbit propagation  J2000 reference frame Spectral response functions: 2 cases Mean SRF SRF for camera 4, detector at the Moon center

Data preparation for the GIRO Full set envelop for camera 4 Channel SRF (all cameras) SRF “sensing” the Moon Set of SRF for the imagette

Results – OLCI vs GIRO irradiance

Results – OLCI vs GIRO irradiance Relative bias

MODIS and Pleiades vs “ROLO” X. Xiong et al., SPIE Proceedings Vol. 9241, 2014 Slightly larger biases than observed for MODIS and PLEIADES

Results – OLCI vs GIRO normalised irradiance OLCI observation GIRO simulation

Results – OLCI vs GIRO normalised irradiance GIRO drops down whereas OLCI has a smooth behaviour Flatter spectral behaviour for OLCI OLCI observation GIRO simulation Significant difference with a change in convexity for the GIRO, not seen with OLCI

Results – OLCI vs GIRO normalised irradiance

Results – OLCI vs GIRO normalised irradiance GIRO and SCIA in agreement GIRO drops down whereas OLCI has a smooth behaviour  also observed in SCIA

Conclusions and way forward Good quality of the acquisitions Some spectral behaviours may require further investigations Results for Oa21 not understood yet Reducing the uncertainties on the measurements Oversampling factor  ellipse fitting shows some variability + does not work for Oa21 What about the straylight corrections + offset levels ?  Image reprocessing? Uncertainties on the GIRO simulations SRFs used by the GIRO (first assessment show a limited impact, but varies from band to band) Reflectance spectrum smoothing mechanism: investigation on the internal GIRO mechanics to check the model behaviour for very narrow SRFs (Oa13 at 2.5nm, Oa14 at 3.75nm and Oa15 at 2.5nm). OLCI QWG recommended performing more lunar observations with S3A and S3B for all cameras (29-30 Nov 2018).

Applicability of the method to SLSTR data still to be assessed What about SLSTR? Applicability of the method to SLSTR data still to be assessed S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6

What about SLSTR? Just a simple try…

Thank you

Werhli Spectrum as implemented in the GIRO