Presented To: College Planning Council

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
Advertisements

October Priority 8 Review Team 8: Planning Subcommittee M. DesVignes, D. Kinney, J. Moore, M. Siegel, R. Tillberg Collect and use data systematically.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Presentation for Flex Day June 7, 2011 LATTC Accreditation
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SUSTAINABLE CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT.
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SETTING THE STAGE Planning for BC’s Future 2015—2018.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
College Planning Council 8 June Accreditation Standard 1 Standard 1: The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes.
Convocation Opening Address College of Sequoias Welcome&Introductions.
A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.
Dr. Otto W.K. Lee President August 27, 2015 Celia Parra, Student Speaker, 2015 Commencement.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
August Priority 7 Review Team 7: Planning Subcommittee R. Hall-Allen, M. DesVignes, J. Moore, R. Romali, R. Tillberg Increase the resources available.
Strategic Planning System Sacramento City College Strategic Planning System ….a comprehensive system designed to form a reliable, understood system for.
Accreditation 2015 Update: Harbor’s Assessment-based Planning System (HAPS) Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
College of Business California State University, Monterey Bay February 28, 2014 College of Business Committee Structure: Preparing for AACSB.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Planning 101 Overview of integrated planning at SCC
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Unit Planning : Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set Standards with College Planning and Resource.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Unit Planning : Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set Standards with College Planning and Resource.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
Updated Strategic Plan Presented to Reedley College Fall Classified Assembly Marilyn Behringer September 28, 2011.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
Lead-Off Batter: Applying New Accjc standards
Committee Orientation
COD Institutional Effectiveness Process (IEP)
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
Educational Master Plan
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
IEPI Indicators Workshop
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
LAVC Strategic plan Progress Report
27 February 2017 College Planning Council
Presented To: SLO Symposium
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
Presented To: College Planning Council
Academic Affairs Cluster 10 December 2015
Los Angeles Trade Technical College Institutional Self Evaluation Report Presented to the Institutional Effectiveness and Student Success Committee.
Strategic Planning: The External Environment
Accreditation Standard 1: Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: The College Mission & The 2015 Student Success Scorecard.
Chairs and Managers Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
Strategic Planning: The External Environment
Educational Master Plan
Cañada College Full-Time Equity Director Position
Presented To: College Planning Council
South Seattle Community College
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Planning and Goal-Setting
Academic Affairs Cluster 28 May 2015
Office of Institutional Effectiveness November 4, 2014
Overview of Program Review Categories
Unit Planning Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
Accreditation follow-up report
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
Presented To: College Planning Council
Foothill College Strategic Objective - Governance
In the Spirit of Student Success
Presentation transcript:

Achieving the College Mission: Evaluating the College Strategic Educational Master Plan Presented To: College Planning Council By: Office of Institutional Effectiveness 29 January 2018

The Harbor College Mission: Newly Revised College Mission Statement (CPC approved 9/11/17) Los Angeles Harbor College serves our diverse community by providing access to associate and transfer degrees, certificates, economic and workforce development, and basic skills instruction. We promote equity, diversity, and student success through academic programs and support services that ensure our students become productive members o OLD: Los Angeles Harbor College promotes access and student success through associate and transfer degrees, certificates, economic and workforce development, and basic skills instruction. Our educational  programs and support  services meet the needs of diverse communities as measured by campus institutional learning outcomesf a global society.

Background SEMP articulates the college mission Achievement of the SEMP = Achievement of the college mission SEMP Revised Summer 2015 Aligned with District Strategic Plan (being renewed this year) Includes measures defined by District, State, Legislative and Federal requirements Revisions adopted July 2015 SEMP Provides Foundation for Planning and Evaluation Efforts Basis for Program Review and Unit Planning Includes measures for Institution-set Standards and Targets (ACCJC and IEPI)

Progress toward SEMP implementation Program Review 2.0/Unit Planning Pilot completed, Fall 2015 All clusters participated Unit planning process recommendations identified and approved Institution-set standards for student achievement established College-wide Unit Planning process initiated, Spring 2016 All clusters and units participating Completion requirements defined and approved HAPS records all Assessment and Unit Planning results College-wide Annual Program Review/Unit Planning Process Cycle Completed Fall 2017 2nd Year Annual Cycle Completed Resource allocation in process for 2017-18

CPC Responsibilities Annually: SEMP Cycle (2014-17): Oversee and maintain SEMP Oversee planning processes Integrate cluster and unit priorities to develop annual priorities for the college based on achievement of the SEMP Use Annual priorities to guide resource allocation processes SEMP Cycle (2014-17): Evaluate achievement of the college mission Renew SEMP based on college progress (annual reviews, external priorities) Identify goals, objectives and measures to add or remove

Mission/SEMP Revision Framework Particpation Coverage Outcome achievement CPC meeting 1/22 and Retreat 1/29 STEP 1: Review & Evaluation of 2014-17 SEMP District SWOT District SMP (1/22) Other external initiatives/requirements CPC Retreat 1/29 STEP 2: Assess External Environment Existing SEMP + External Scan/District SMP = New/revised SEMP Proposed 1/22, discussed 1/29, approved 2/12 STEP 3: Create new/revised SEMP

Mission/SEMP Achievement Evaluation Framework Participation Are all Operational Units of the college participating? Are Operational Units participating appropriately? Coverage Are all Goals, Objectives and Measures addressed? Is the amount of coverage appropriate? Outcome Achievement Are the activities to address SEMP goals being completed?

SEMP Achievement Measurement Methodology HAPS Records Unit Plans and Outcome Assessment Activities Program Review/Unit Planning process results provide the data Validation process not yet complete TO DO: Integrate program review, unit planning and resource allocation processes All results are self-reported Units create and update activities documented in HAPS Data will change over time Results are a “snapshot” in time (June 23, 2016) Numbers will change; percentages are used to “normalize” changing numbers The goal is to complete all activities by the end of the SEMP cycle (2014-17)

SEMP Participation Results   100% Complete Advance to next year Discontinued Abandoned Incomplete Total Cluster Count Percent Academic Affairs 154 41.8% 135 36.7% 38 10.3% 11 3.0% 30 8.2% 368 100.0% Administrative Services 20 76.9% 2 7.7% 0.0% 26 Student Services 119 82.6% 3 2.1% 4 2.8% 15 10.4% 144 Grand Total 293 54.5% 140 26.0% 42 7.8% 16 47 8.7% 538

SEMP Participation Evaluation Is the college effort/participation appropriate? Are there any recommendations?

College Coverage Results   Academic Affairs Admin Services Student Services Total SEMP Goal Count Percent Goal 1: Access and Preparation for Success 17 21.3% 0.0% 63 78.8% 80 100.0% Goal 2: Teaching and Learning for Success 294 82.8% 61 17.2% 355 Goal 3: Organizational Effectiveness 34 64.2% 10 18.9% 9 17.0% 53 Goal 4: Resources and Collaboration 1 4.3% 14 60.9% 8 34.8% 23 Other Requirement 20 80.0% 2 8.0% 3 12.0% 25 (blank) Grand Total 368 68.4% 26 4.8% 144 26.8% 538

College Coverage Evaluation Is the college effort/participation appropriate? Are there any recommendations?

SEMP Outcome Achievement   100% Complete Advance to next year Discontinued Abandoned Incomplete Total SEMP Goal Count Percent Goal 1: Access and Preparation for Success 66 82.5% 5 6.3% 3 3.8% 1 1.3% 80 100.0% Goal 2: Teaching and Learning for Success 162 45.6% 118 33.2% 26 7.3% 11 3.1% 38 10.7% 355 Goal 3: Organizational Effectiveness 29 54.7% 8 15.1% 20.8% 5.7% 2 53 Goal 4: Resources and Collaboration 21 91.3% 0.0% 4.3% 23 Other Requirement 15 60.0% 7 28.0% 4.0% 25 (blank) Grand Total 293 54.5% 140 26.0% 42 7.8% 16 3.0% 47 8.7% 538

SEMP Progress Evaluation Did the college achieve its goals? Are there any recommendations?

Please Complete the Evaluation Survey Results will be summarized for next CPC meeting Was the SEMP Useful? What has changed (external scan)? SEMP redo or revision?