Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Control of Cdc28 CDK1 by a Stress-Induced lncRNA
Steven J. Petesch, John T. Lis  Cell 
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Virginie Faure, Stéphane Coulon, Julien Hardy, Vincent Géli 
Histone Modifications Associated with Somatic Hypermutation
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (May 2017)
Epigenetic Silencing of the p16INK4a Tumor Suppressor Is Associated with Loss of CTCF Binding and a Chromatin Boundary  Michael Witcher, Beverly M. Emerson 
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Andrew W Snowden, Philip D Gregory, Casey C Case, Carl O Pabo 
TFIIH Subunit Alterations Causing Xeroderma Pigmentosum and Trichothiodystrophy Specifically Disturb Several Steps during Transcription  Amita Singh,
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Spatial and Temporal Recruitment of Androgen Receptor and Its Coactivators Involves Chromosomal Looping and Polymerase Tracking  Qianben Wang, Jason S.
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
P53 Functions through Stress- and Promoter-Specific Recruitment of Transcription Initiation Components before and after DNA Damage  Joaquı́n M Espinosa,
Histone Modifications Associated with Somatic Hypermutation
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
The Proteasome Restricts Permissive Transcription at Tissue-Specific Gene Loci in Embryonic Stem Cells  Henrietta Szutorisz, Andrew Georgiou, László Tora,
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2016)
Epigenetic Control of the S100A6 (Calcyclin) Gene Expression
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
A Transcription-Independent Role for TFIIB in Gene Looping
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Short Telomeres in ESCs Lead to Unstable Differentiation
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
Uncoupling Promoter Opening from Start-Site Scanning
Sang-Hyun Song, Chunhui Hou, Ann Dean  Molecular Cell 
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages e4 (February 2017)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Formation of the Androgen Receptor Transcription Complex
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
The Proteasome Restricts Permissive Transcription at Tissue-Specific Gene Loci in Embryonic Stem Cells  Henrietta Szutorisz, Andrew Georgiou, László Tora,
A Splicing-Independent Function of SF2/ASF in MicroRNA Processing
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Georgina Berrozpe, Gene O. Bryant, Katherine Warpinski, Mark Ptashne 
Lack of Transcription Triggers H3K27me3 Accumulation in the Gene Body
Presentation transcript:

Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 622-632 (August 2012) XPG and XPF Endonucleases Trigger Chromatin Looping and DNA Demethylation for Accurate Expression of Activated Genes  Nicolas Le May, Delphine Fradin, Izarn Iltis, Pierre Bougnères, Jean-Marc Egly  Molecular Cell  Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 622-632 (August 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.050 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 XPG and XPF Are Necessary for Concomitant Recruitment of Transcription Machinery at Promoter and Terminator upon RARβ2 Induction Schematic representation of the RARβ2; the amplicons at the −65 kb, Pro, Ter, and +323 kb regions are indicated (upper panel). Relative RARβ2 mRNA expression monitored over time by qPCR from t-RA-treated ShXPG, ShXPF, ShXPA HeLa cells, and the corresponding Ctrl1 and Ctrl2 control cells (left panels). Error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent experiments. Western blotting analyses of XPG, XPF, XPA, and TBP were performed from chromatin extracts of ShXPG, ShXPF, ShXPA HeLa cells and their corresponding controls (left panels). TBP is used as a positive nuclear marker. ChIP monitoring the t-RA-dependent occupancy of RAR, pol II, TFIIB (A1-4, B1-4, C1-4, D1-4, E1-4), XPA, XPG, XPF, and CTCF (A5-8, B5-8, C5-8, D5-8, E5-8) on RARβ2 locus from ShXPG (B1-8), ShXPF (D1-8), ShXPA (E1-8), and the corresponding control (Ctrl1, Ctrl2) chromatin extracts at 0, 3, and 6 hr upon t-RA induction as indicated. A1-4, A5-8—E5-E8 are aligned under the corresponding region of the RARβ2 gene being probed. Each series of ChIP is representative of at least two independent experiments as indicated by standard deviation, and values are expressed as percentage of the input. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 622-632DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.050) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 CTCF Is Necessary for Concomitant Recruitment of Transcription Machinery at Promoter and Terminator upon RARβ2 Induction Schematic representation of the RARβ2; the amplicons at the −65 kb, Pro, Ter, and +323 kb regions are indicated (upper panel). Relative RARβ2 mRNA expression monitored over time by qPCR from t-RA-treated SiCTCF HeLa cells, and the corresponding Ctrl3 control cells (left panel). Error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent experiments. Western blotting analyses of CTCF and TBP were performed from chromatin extracts of SiCTCF HeLa cells and the corresponding control (left panel). TBP is used as a positive nuclear marker. The t-RA-dependent occupancy of RAR, pol II, TFIIB (A1-4, B1-4), XPA, XPG, XPF, and CTCF (A5-8, B5-8) was monitored by ChIP on RARβ2 locus using SiCTCF (B1-8) and Ctrl3 (A1–A8) chromatin extracts at 0, 3, and 6 hrs upon t-RA induction. A1-4, A5-8—B5-B8 are aligned under the corresponding region of the RARβ2 gene being probed. Each series of ChIP is representative of at least two independent experiments as indicated by standard deviation, and values are expressed as percentage of the input. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 622-632DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.050) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 XPG and XPF Are Involved in CTCF-Induced RARβ2 Gene Looping Schematic representation of the quantitative chromatin conformation capture (q3C) (upper panel). Two probes were designed at Ter (gray square) and M1 (green square) of RARβ2 gene. These probes were used to investigate the associations between the different elements including upstream (−65 kb, Pro), intronic (M1, M2), and downstream (Ter, +257 kb, +323 kb, +385 kb) regions as indicated by the black (Ter probe) and red (M1 probe) arrows. q3C assays were performed using crosslinked and HindIII-digested chromatin from Ctrl1, ShXPG, ShXPA, ShXPF, and siCTCF HeLa cells at 0, 3, and 6 hr post-t-RA treatment (10 μM). The bar chart (y axis) shows the enrichment of PCR product (%) normalized to the enrichment within the human xpb gene (=100%), as illustrated in Figure S2G. Each PCR was performed at least three times and averaged as indicated by standard deviation. Signals were normalized to the total amount of DNA used, estimated with an amplicon located within a HindIII fragment in RARβ2 gene (see the Experimental Procedures). Molecular Cell 2012 47, 622-632DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.050) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Endonuclease Activity of XPG and XPF Is Required for Gene Looping Relative RARβ2 mRNA expression monitored by quantitative PCR from XPG/WT (A1), XPG/E791A (A1), XPF/WT (B1), XPF/D676A (B1) cells at 0, 1, 3, 6, 8, and 10 hr post-t-RA treatment. Error bars represent the standard deviation of three independent experiments. ChIP monitoring of the t-RA-dependent occupancy of RAR, pol II, XPA, XPG, XPF, and CTCF at Pro and Ter regions of RARβ2 gene from XPG/WT (A2-3), XPG/E791A (A4-5), and XPF/WT (B2-3), XPF/D676A (B4-5) chromatin extracts as indicated. Each series of ChIP is representative of two independent experiments. Intrachromosomal interactions between Ter and upstream/downstream elements of RARβ2 gene are as follows: q3C assays were performed using crosslinked, HindIII-digested chromatin from t-Ra-treated XPG/WT or XPG/E791A (C) and XPF/WT or XPF/D676A (D) fibroblasts at 0, 3, and 6 hr. These independent graphs represent a measure of the association between the upstream −65 kb; Pro; the intronic M1 and M2 elements; and the downstream +257 kb, +323 kb, and +385 kb regions to either the terminal region (Ter Probe) or the intronic region (M1 Probe, see Figures S2E and S2F) as a negative control. Each PCR was performed at least three times and averaged as indicated by standard deviation. Signals were normalized to the total amount of DNA used, estimated with an amplicon located within a HindIII fragment in RARβ2 gene. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 622-632DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.050) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 XPG and XPF Are Required for DNA Breaks and DNA Demethylation at Pro and Ter, Respectively Detection of DNA break at −65 kb, Pro, Ter, and +323 kb of the RARβ2 locus from Ctrl1, ShXPG (A1), Ctrl2, ShXPA, ShXPF (B1), XPG/WT, XPG/E791A and XPF/WT, XPF/D676A (C1), Ctrl3, SiCTCF (D1) t-RA-treated cells. DNA breaks are detected first through the incorporation of Biotin-dUTP via a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) reaction and second via a ChIP approach. DNA fragments containing DNA breaks are immunoselected by Biotin antibodies and analyzed by qPCR. Each series of Bio-ChIP is representative of three independent experiments as indicated by standard deviation, and values are expressed as percentage of the input. Analysis of the unmethylation of DNA (UnMedIP) at −65 kb, Pro, Ter, and +323 kb of the RARβ2 locus from Ctrl1, ShXPG (A2), Ctrl2, ShXPA, ShXPF (B2), XPG/WT, XPG/E791A XPF/WT, XPF/D676A (C2), Ctrl3, SiCTCF (D2) t-RA-treated cells. UnMedIP was performed using the UnMethylCollector kit (Active Motif). MseI-digested genomic DNA was selected using magnetic beads conjugated with CXXC domains, and the resulted samples containing unmethylated DNA were analyzed by qPCR. Each series of UnMedIP is representative of two independent experiments as indicated by standard deviation, and values are expressed as percentage of the input. BioChIP and UnMedip were performed at the indicated times except for XPG/WT, XPG/E791A, XPF/WT, and XPF/D676A (T[h] corresponds to the peaks of factors recruitment in Figures 3A2–3B5). (E) Schematic representation of the methylated (open circle) or unmethylated (closed circle) CpG dinucleotides (in red) and DNA breaks (closed triangle) along the RARβ2 promoter for WT (red), XPG/E791A (light blue), and XPF/D676A (dark blue) cells. DNA breaks were localized at Pro by pyrosequencing the samples generated by Bio-ChIP. The methylated status of CpG dinucleotides at Pro was measured using bisulfite converted genomic DNA from XPG/WT, XPG/E791A and XPF/WT, XPF/D676A fibroblasts and pyrosequencing. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 622-632DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.050) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 A Role for XPG and XPF in the CTCF-Dependent Gene Looping for Optimal Gene Expression Upon ligand induction, nuclear receptor (NR) targets its responsive element (RE). The transactivation complex is then formed at the promoter (PRO) including the arrival of GTFs (IIA, IIB, IIE, IIF, IIH) and pol II. After the formation of the PIC, NER factors (XPA, XPG, and XPF/ERCC1) are sequentially recruited (step 1). XPG (red arrow) initiates DNA break (dotted DNA) and demethylation (meC-C) at PRO (step 2), thus favoring the CTCF recruitment and gene looping between PRO and the terminator TER (step 3); concomitantly, XPF (red arrow) induces DNA break (dotted DNA) and DNA demethylation at TER. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 622-632DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.050) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions