Maternal psychosocial consequences of twins and multiple births following assisted and natural conception: a meta-analysis Olga van den Akker, Gianina-Ioana Postavaru, Satvinder Purewal Reproductive BioMedicine Online Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 1-14 (July 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.04.009 Copyright © 2016 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram summarizing the study selection stages. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2016 33, 1-14DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.04.009) Copyright © 2016 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Forest plot for depression. Difference in means for depression in studies comparing mothers of assisted reproductive technology multiples with mothers of assisted reproductive technology singletons. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2016 33, 1-14DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.04.009) Copyright © 2016 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Forest plot for stress. Difference in means for stress in studies comparing mothers of assisted reproductive technology multiples with mothers of assisted reproductive technology singletons. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2016 33, 1-14DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.04.009) Copyright © 2016 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 4 Forest plot for psychological distress. Difference in means for distress in studies comparing mothers of assisted reproductive technology multiples with mothers of natural conception multiples. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2016 33, 1-14DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.04.009) Copyright © 2016 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 5 Forest plot for depression. Difference in means for depression in studies comparing mothers of assisted reproductive technology multiples with mothers of natural conception multiples. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2016 33, 1-14DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.04.009) Copyright © 2016 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions