Permanency Planning Modified Manual

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Definitions and Examples of Practices vs. Services in Child Welfare The Service Array Process The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
Advertisements

117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
Katie A. Agreement Child Welfare and Mental Health working together will provide:  Intensive home and community based mental health services to children.
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
Return to Parent (Reunification) AdoptionPLC Fit and Willing Relative APPLA
Understanding and Using CONCURRENT PLANNING To Achieve Permanency for Children and Youth
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
Child Welfare Practice Model
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
SEND Strategy Adrian Loades Executive Director, Children and Young People’s Services and Adult Social Care.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 Child Protection and Family Care Cora Hardy, LCSW Clinical Director Better Life Children.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
DFCS Department of Family and Children’s Services
Overview of Foster Care
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
2015 Annual Report February 9, 2016 Presenters:
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
IF CHILD IS MISSING FROM HOME
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
San Francisco Continuum of Care Reform Discussion
PIP effective January 1, 2017 & runs through December 31, 2018
Commit to Agency Mission and Values
Quality Case Practice Improvement
9/7/2018 DHHS | DSS |North Carolina Child Welfare Section PIP NC CW Manual Presentation to Children’s Services November 2017 Welcome everyone to.
North Carolina’s Program Improvement Plan Where are we?
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Case Management Pre-Service Curriculum Specialty Track
 Introduction Permanency Planning Meetings (PPMs) are held in addition to the Child’s Looked After Review to establish a child’s permanency pathway and.
2016 Child & Family Annual Report
Overview of Data from the Statewide FGDM Evaluation
GOT PERMANENCE? DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency
Place Matters Nothing Matters More to a Child Than a Place to Call Home 11/30/2018.
Pathways to Permanency: Safety, Permanency and Well-Being
Open Adoption Agreements
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
Place Matters Nothing Matters More to a Child Than a Place to Call Home 4/6/2019.
Insert Meeting Date and Presenters
Strategy
Centre of Excellence For Disabled Children and Families in York
Agenda Introductions What is a Unified Shelter Model?
Georgia DFCS Performance-Based Contracting
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
Human Trafficking and Child Welfare Services
Florida’s New Guardianship Assistance Program
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Permanency Planning Modified Manual NC Department of Health and Human Services Permanency Planning Modified Manual Erin Baluyot, Interim Adoption Services Manager Erin.Baluyot@dhhs.nc.gov 919-527-6369

Permanency Planning Requirements Case Staffing Twice a month for first 12 months; At least once a month thereafter Timeframes Family Services Agreement Transitional Living Plan Contacts Child (initial 7 day visit, monthly thereafter) Parent (face-to-face monthly for primary plan of reunification; if reunification is not the primary plan, monthly contact until TPR) Placement Provider (initial 7 day visit, monthly thereafter; both spouses and any other caretakers at least quarterly) Within 30 days; Review at 60 days; Every 90 days thereafter

Permanency Planning Requirements Shared Parenting Within 14 days Educational Stability Best Interest Determination (BID) Meeting within 5 school days

Family Services Agreement Timeframes: Developed within 30 days of the child entering custody; Reviewed and updated within 60 days of the child entering custody; and Reviewed and updated every 90 days thereafter throughout the life of the case. The Family Services Agreement can be developed during a Child and Family Team (CFT) meeting, or individually with the family.

Permanency Planning Review

Permanency Planning Review Purpose The Permanency Planning Review (PPR) is a team meeting designed to focus on both the child and the family. The meeting also includes an agency review of the case to ensure timely permanency is achieved.

Permanency Planning Review – Why Make Changes? Streamline the process Strengthen the purpose Drive better outcomes Family-centered principles

PPAT and CFT Process CFT FSA PPAT

Improving Outcomes Stability of Foster Care Placement (Permanency Outcome 1, Item 4) Permanency Goal for Child (Permanency Outcome 1, Item 5) Achieving Reunification, Guardianship, Adoption, or Other Planned Permanent Living Arrangement (Permanency Outcome 1, Item 6) Visiting with Parents and Siblings in Foster Care (Permanency Outcome 2, Item 8) Preserving Connections (Permanency Outcome 2, Item 9) Relationship of Child in Care with Parents (Permanency Outcome 2, Item 11)

Improving Outcomes Needs and Services of Child, Parents, and Foster Parents (Well-Being Outcome 1, Item 12) Child and Family Involvement in Case Planning (Well-Being Outcome 1, Item 13) Educational Needs of the Child (Well-Being Outcome 2, Item 16) Physical Health of the Child (Well-Being Outcome 3, Item 17) Mental/Behavioral Health of the Child (Well-Being Outcome 3, Item 18)

Permanency Planning Review Timeframes: Within 60 days of the child entering custody; Every 90 days thereafter throughout the life of the case; and When there is a change in the plan or family circumstance.

Benefit of Quarterly Meetings Increases focus on timely permanence (Permanency Outcome 1, Item 5); Increases review and appropriateness of permanent plans (Permanency Outcome 1, Item 6); Ensures concerted efforts to maintain family and community relationships for each child/youth (Permanency Outcome 2, Items 8, 9, and 11); Supports ongoing assessment of the well-being for child/youth, parents, and placement providers (Well-Being Outcome 1 & 2); Increases child and family involvement in case planning (Well- Being Outcome 1, Item 13); and Provides for a regular review of agency efforts to achieve permanency (Permanency Outcome 1, Item 6).

Permanency Planning Reviews FAMILY Progress on FSA Barriers / Safety Issues Family Time CHILD Continued Custody Placement Ongoing Needs Concurrent Planning Engage Family & Ensure Efforts are Made AGENCY Efforts to Achieve Permanency Services provided Services still needed

Participants in the PPR The following participants must be invited: The child’s parents (unless TPR has been granted); The child, if appropriate; The child’s placement provider; Natural supports identified by the family; Community resource persons; and The child’s GAL

Child and Family Team Meetings

Child and Family Team (CFT) Meetings For children in the custody of a child welfare agency, a CFT meeting must be held when: A change in the permanent plan occurs; There is a change in placement, or potential change in placement; and The family circumstances change and it is necessary to discuss the case as a team.

CFT Meetings Family, natural supports, & professionals Clear purpose and goal Engages the family Involves the family and their supports in decision-making and planning Team that guides the direction of the case

Family-Centered Values and Principles

Conducting a PPR using a Family-Centered Approach Family-Centered Practice System of Care Values Principles of Partnership Pre-Planning

Permanency Planning Review Process Child Family Team PERMANENCY ACHIEVED!

Child and Family Services Plan Teaming Structure NC Department of Health and Human Services Child and Family Services Plan Teaming Structure Lisa Cauley, State Child Welfare Director

Triple P Update NC Department of Health and Human Services Kristin O’Connor, Section Chief for Policy and Programs Kristin.oconnor@dhhs.nc.gov 919-527-6407

DSS Triple P Landscape Survey Triple P Partnership for Strategy and Governance 59 counties responded Employees Accredited 18 counties with at least 1 current employee 41 counties without current employee(s)

Counties Without Accredited Employee 32 (78%) interested in having an employee accredited in Triple P 40 (97.6%) interested in having Triple P as a service 20 (48.8%) refer clients to Triple P services

Barriers to Direct Service Delivery Not a priority (n=4, 9.8%) Lack of funding (n=14, 34.2%) Lack of capacity (n=21, 51.2%) Other (n=19, 46.3%) NCFAST Lack of staff/staff not trained Providing Nurturing Parenting Lack of need Not offered locally Unaware of option

Counties With Accredited Employee(s) 16 (88.9%) deliver Triple P as direct service Level 3 majority followed by Level 2 4 counties delivering Level 4 1 counties delivering Level 5 Program Areas: CPS In-Home CPS Assessment Foster Care Prevention

Next Steps Reissue survey Formalize survey results VOCA Share with NCACDSS and CSC LIA Coordinators Meeting with DPH, NCDSS and CSC Chairs Triple P implementation specialist for child welfare: FPG Contract VOCA Awaiting feedback on proposal Developing county application materials