Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
Advertisements

Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
The Gemin6-Gemin7 Heterodimer from the Survival of Motor Neurons Complex Has an Sm Protein-like Structure  Yingli Ma, Josée Dostie, Gideon Dreyfuss, Gregory.
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Ryan C. Wilson, Meghan A. Jackson, Janice D. Pata  Structure 
Error-Prone DNA Polymerases
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Noncatalytic Assembly of Ribonuclease III with Double-Stranded RNA
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ski7 Is a GTP-Binding Protein Adopting the Characteristic Conformation of Active Translational GTPases  Eva Kowalinski, Anthony.
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Structural Role of the Vps4-Vta1 Interface in ESCRT-III Recycling
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (May 2004)
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 1417-1427 (September 2008) Structure of RapA, a Swi2/Snf2 Protein that Recycles RNA Polymerase During Transcription  Gary Shaw, Jianhua Gan, Yan Ning Zhou, Huijun Zhi, Priadarsini Subburaman, Rongguang Zhang, Andrzej Joachimiak, Ding Jun Jin, Xinhua Ji  Structure  Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 1417-1427 (September 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.06.012 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overall Structure of E. coli RapA On the top, the domain organization of RapA is shown with boundaries (residue numbers in the sequence). In the middle, the domain arrangement is shown schematically by two views of the molecule related to each other by a 180° rotation around the vertical axis. On the left, right, and bottom, the folds of individual domains and a cluster of four domains (1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B, which form the ATPase core of the enzyme) are illustrated. Both the orientation and the scale of the individual domains and the ATPase core are optimized for best viewing. The Ntd contains two sub-domains, NtdA and NtdB, which share the same fold. The Linker3 is illustrated as a stick model (C, gray; N, blue; O, red) outlined with the composite annealed omit map (green net, 2Fo - Fc, contoured at 1.0 σ). The Spacer and the Ctd exhibit novel folds. The sulfate ion bound to the ATPase core is shown as a sphere model. The color scheme used here (Ntd in red, Linker1 in black, 1A in blue, 1B in cyan, Linker2 in green, 2A in yellow, 2B in orange, Linker3 in magenta, Spacer in green and Ctd in gray) is also used in other figures. Structure 2008 16, 1417-1427DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.06.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure and Sequence Characteristics of RapA (A) Stereoview shows the Cα trace of RapA. Every twentieth Cα position is labeled with the tenth Cα position between every two labels indicated with a sphere. The domain structure of the protein is color-coded as in Figure 1. The sulfate ion is shown as a stick model in black. (B) Sequence of RapA with secondary structure elements indicated above. One N-terminal residue and six C-terminal residues were not observed. Underlined are the six functional motifs located in the RecA-like domains 1A and 2A of the ATPase core. Structure 2008 16, 1417-1427DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.06.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 RecA-like Architecture and the Six Conserved Functional Motifs (A–D) The RacA-like architecture of DExx box helicase PcrA in complex with DNA and an ATP analog (PDB entry 2PJR), ZfRad54 in complex with a sulfate ion (PDB entry 1Z3I), SsRad54 in complex with dsDNA (PDB entry 1Z63), and E. coli RapA in complex with a sulfate ion are illustrated as Cα traces on the basis of the superposition of domain 1A. Domain 1A is shown in blue and 2A in yellow. Indicated in red are the six functional motifs, the sequences of which are shown in (E). The ATP and SO4 are shown as stick models while DNA molecules as tubes. (E) Structure-based sequence alignment for the six functional motifs in PcrA•ATP•DNA, ZfRad54•SO4, SsRad54•DNA, and RapA•SO4. Amino acid residues highlighted in red are also shown in red in (A—D). The functional motifs are labeled in (D) only. The roles (interactions) of the six functional motifs are predicted on the basis of helicase structures (Caruthers and McKay, 2002). Structure 2008 16, 1417-1427DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.06.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The ATPase Core of Swi2/Snf2 Proteins RapA and Rad54 (A–D) Domains 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B in the ATPase core of E. coli RapA, ZfRad54 (PDB entry 1Z3I), SsRad54•DNA (PDB entry 1Z63), and E. coli Mfd (PDB entry 2EYQ) are illustrated as surface representation. The dsDNA in (C) is shown as a tube-and-stick model. Structure 2008 16, 1417-1427DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.06.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Hypothetical Model of the RapA•ATP•dsDNA Complex (A) The ATPase core of RapA (ribbon diagram in the same color scheme defined in Figure 1) is shown with superimposed dsDNA (tube-and-stick model) from the SsRad54•DNA structure (PDB entry 1Z63), and the ATP (stick model) and a portion of ssDNA (tube-and-stick model) from the PcrA•ATP•DNA structure (PDB entry 3PJR). The SsRad54 and the PcrA are not shown for clarity. (B) The RapA•ATP•dsDNA model suggests a role of domain 2B in ATP-binding-associated advancement of dsDNA for Swi2/Snf2 proteins. In this view, the ATP molecule is not visible. The white arrow suggests the transporting direction of DNA; the black arrow suggests the translocation direction of the ATPase core along the minor groove of dsDNA. For clarity, only the ATPase core is shown instead of the full-length structure. Structure 2008 16, 1417-1427DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.06.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 RapA Facilitates the Release of RNAP in an In Vitro DNA Template-Switch Transcription Assay The reaction was started (as time 0) by the addition of NTPs into a preincubated complex of RNAP and a plasmid DNA containing pTac (the first template) either in the presence (+) or absence (−) of RapA; and at various times as indicated, an equal molar amount of another plasmid DNA containing λPL (as a second template) was added, followed by 1-hr incubation for the reaction to complete. The transcripts for pTac and λPL are indicated. The RNAI transcript from a relatively weak promoter present in both plasmids is also indicated. Structure 2008 16, 1417-1427DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.06.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Gel Filtration Analyses: RapA and σ70 Compete for Binding to CORE In Vitro The loaded protein mixture is indicated in the lane on the far right (ON). The positions for subunits of CORE, RapA, and σ70 are indicated. The concentration of each purified protein used in the representative set of experiments was 1 μM. (A) RapA + CORE. (B) (RapA + σ70) + CORE. RapA and σ70 were premixed on ice followed by incubation with CORE at room temperature for 15 min. (C) (RapA + CORE) + σ70. RapA and CORE were premixed and incubated at room temperature for 15 min, followed by the addition of σ70 and incubation at room temperature for another 15 min. (D–F) Controls of the experiment for CORE, σ70, and RapA, respectively. Structure 2008 16, 1417-1427DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.06.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions