Workshop on School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety on Regulatory Infrastructure Development Project (RIRP) Module 2.4 Responsibilities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Advertisements

Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority
Environmental Management System (EMS)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Responsibility for Radiation Safety Day 8 – Lecture 4.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
ISO General Awareness Training
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
OHSAS 18001: Occupational health and safety management systems - Specification Karen Lawrence.
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
1 - Issuing regulations Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework for Safety (GSR – Part 1) Requirement 1: National policy and strategy for safety The.
Approaches for forest certification System versus performance ? Presentation prepared by Pierre Hauselmann for the WWF / WB Alliance Capacity building.
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation protection and the Safety of Radiation sources PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection.
Occupational Health and Safety
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
ISO 14001:2004, Environmental Management System
IAEA 1 - Issuing regulations Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework for Safety (GSR – Part 1)GSR – Part 1 Requirement 1: National policy and strategy.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety Vienna, November 2012 Rules and responsibilities of the regulatory body Jiří Veselý, SONS, Czech republic.
IAEA REGULATION RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION IN ARMENIA Ashot Mnatsakanyan Head of Radiation Safety Department Armenian Nuclear Regulatory Authority.
Prime Responsibility for Radiation Safety
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “National legislation and licensing” Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo da Vinci”
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
IAEA School of Drafting Regulations Transportation regulations in Republic of Latvia Radiation Safety Centre (RSC) Marcis Slavinskis Vienna, 3-14 November.
IAEA 1 - Issuing regulations a, b The regulators of transport in Republic of Belarus are Department of supervision for the safe industrial activities and.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
AuthorizationAuthorization. Authorization Objectives To provide understanding of the authorization process and the procedures for its implementation.
IAEA 1 - Issuing regulations Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework for Safety (GSR – Part 1)GSR – Part 1 Requirement 1: National policy and strategy.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations November.
Radiation Safety Regulations
Regulatory framework for the transport of radioactive material in Europe and problems caused by illicit trafficking Dangerous Goods and Special Cargoes.
Radiation Safety Regulations Part VIII: Management requirements and other requirements.
ISO 9001:2015 Subject: Quality Management System Clause 8 - Operation
OHSAS Occupational health and safety management system.
Workshop on Accreditation of Bodies Certifying Medical Devices Kiev, November 2014.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Need for a Regulatory program.

School of Drafting Regulations Transportation regulations in
2-6 June 2014 Panama City, Panama
Regulatory Control Training Workshop Regulatory Cooperation Forum
Module Planned exposure situations Public exposure (GSR Part 3)
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Vesa Tanner European Commission Directorate-General Energy
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Actions After Finding an Orphan Radioactive Source
Training Course on Integrated Management System for Regulatory Body
Safety and Security of Radiation Sources
United Kingdom arrangements for national registers of radioactive sources Ian Streatfield IAEA International Workshop on National Registers of Radiation.
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
Regulatory Control Training Workshop Regulatory Cooperation Forum
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Regulatory Infrastructure and Transport Safety Section
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes
Radiation Safety Information Management System (RASIMS)
FARID Abdelmounim National Centre for Radiation Protection Morocco
Presentation transcript:

Workshop on School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety on Regulatory Infrastructure Development Project (RIRP) Module 2.4 Responsibilities for Compliance with Transport Regulations 15 – 19 December 2014 Vienna Bill Brach

OBJECTIVE This module describes the regulatory compliance obligations of the individuals and institutions engaged in the transport of radioactive material, and the basic functions of the competent authority for assuring that those obligations are met. At the end of the module the participants should know the responsibilities of the various parties concerned with transport of radioactive material and the consequences of non-compliance.

REGULATORY RESPONSIBILITIES Primary responsibility for compliance lies with consignors. Regulations also assign responsibilities to carriers. Specific responsibilities of consignors and carriers may vary from country to country. Other users of the regulations (e.g. designers; manufacturers; consignees; competent authorities etc.) also have responsibilities.

CONSIGNOR Consignor: Any person, organization or government which prepares a consignment; May be operator of the facility from where the consignment originates; or Person or organization identified as consignor in transport documents responsible for preparing consignment in accordance with regulatory requirements.

CONSIGNOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES The consignor should ensure that – An adequate quality assurance programme is established, implemented and reviewed, A radiation protection programme is established, implemented and reviewed, Workers are suitably trained commensurate with their duties, Applicable approval certificates are obtained from Competent Authorities.

CONSIGNOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED) The consignor should also ensure that – Notification of shipment, where applicable, has been provided to the competent authority, The package used meets design criteria, The content of the package is properly characterised, The content of the package is consistent with its type and conforms to regulatory requirements.

CONSIGNOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED) The consignor should further ensure– The radioactive material is properly packaged, Containment is closed, fastened and where appropriate tested, Surface radiation levels are compliant, Transport index conforms to regulatory requirements, Non fixed contamination levels conform to regulatory requirements, The package is properly marked and labelled.

CONSIGNOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED) Finally, the consignor should ensure– Transport documents conform to regulatory requirements, Information to carrier is provided (e.g. contingency arrangements) as required by regulations, That they consult with other users of the IAEA regulations, as necessary, in order to fully discharge their duties.

IS THE LABELLING PROPER?

ARE LABELLING REQUIREMENTS MET? Other Dangerous Goods Additional labels as required for other dangerous goods. Non-applicable Labels All labels not relating to the package content must be removed.

CARRIER’S RESPONSIBILITIES The Carrier should: ensure that an adequate quality assurance programme is established, implemented and reviewed, ensure that a radiation protection programme is established, implemented and reviewed, ensure that workers are suitably trained commensurate with their duties, accept packages only if the transport documents are correct and complete, maintain the records of shipments for such period of time as may be specified by the competent authority, provide adequate facilities for the in transit storage of packages if applicable.

CARRIER’S RESPONSIBILITIES (CONTINUED) The Carrier should: Segregate packages from occupied areas and undeveloped films, etc, Comply with the limits on accumulation of packages during in-transit storage and carriage, Deliver packages to correct destination, Implement special instructions, if any, provided by the consignor in respect of the package, and Inform the consignor and initiate the appropriate response measures if a non compliance during carriage is observed.

CONSIGNEE’S RESPONSIBILITIES Consignee should : Inform consignor (and when needed the carrier and competent authority) and Initiate appropriate response measures in case of non-compliance on receipt of a consignment

COMPETENT AUTHORITY’S RESPONSIBILITIES The Competent Authority should— Create and maintain the regulatory framework , Establish safety principles and criteria, Operate an effective compliance assurance programme, Ensure compliance with regulations by the consignor, carrier and consignee, Develop, establish and maintain a system to discharge its duties.

COMPETENT AUTHORITY’S RESPONSIBILITIES The Competent Authority should also— Conduct periodic assessment of radiation dose in transport, Issue appropriate approval certificates, when technically justified and Assign Competent Authority identification marks.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF OTHER USERS Other users must be responsible for – Design of material / packaging Manufacture material / packaging Maintenance and servicing of reusable packagings Repair of packagings

NON-COMPLIANCE In case of non-compliance Consignor should be informed of the non- compliance by carrier or consignee. Carrier, consignor or consignee, as appropriate, should: Take steps to mitigate consequences of non- compliance, Investigate the causes, circumstances and consequences, Remedy causes and circumstances that led to non- compliance, and Communicate to the relevant competent authority.

NON-COMPLIANCE (CONTINUED) In case of non-compliance Communication to the consignor and competent authority should be made as soon as practicable but immediately whenever an emergency exposure situation has developed or is developing.

INTROSPECTION Is it required that in the event of non-compliance with any limit in these Regulations applicable to radiation level or contamination the carrier, consignor or consignee, as appropriate, shall investigate the non- compliance and its causes, circumstances and consequences? Is it required that the consignor, carrier or the consignee communicate to the relevant Competent Authority(ies) on the causes of the non-compliance and on corrective or preventive actions taken or to be taken? Does the CA or its authorized representatives investigate the reported instances of non-compliance?

INTROSPECTION What is the mechanism for investigating and informing the authorities about an instance of non- compliance with the regulations for the safe transport of radioactive material?

CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE Potential consequences of non-compliance with the regulations are – Radiological consequences Other consequences

RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES Non-compliance Radiological consequence Radiation levels exceed limits Potential exposure to persons Non-fixed contamination levels exceed limits Potential internal exposure Improper marking and labeling Inappropriate package handling and potential exposure to persons Improper segregation of consignments Improper criticality safety evaluation Unsafe condition / Potential exposure to persons

OTHER CONSEQUENCES Non-compliance Other consequence Inadequate tie-down Potential loss of package from conveyance Improper segregation from films Films unusable due to fogging Incorrect documentation or package labeling Delayed or denied shipments

INTROSPECTION Is there a mechanism for maintaining consistency of enforcement actions? Is the primary purpose of an enforcement programme to carry out punitive action rather than to foster compliance with the Transport Regulations? Is the competent authority responsible for enforcement of the Transport Regulations?

IN EFFECT ... Checking non-compliance is one effective method of compliance assurance. A mechanism should be in place to identify and report non-compliance and track the implemented action plan for ensuring that compliance assurance is achieved and maintained.

IN EACH CASE.. ...all the relevant requirements of SSR 6 must be complied with.

SUMMARY Compliance is the responsibility of consignor, carrier consignee and other identified users. Competent authority has to assure compliance. Consequences of non-compliance may include damage to persons, property and the environment (radiological consequences, other consequences). Hence compliance with regulations is essential.

Drafting Regulations for Your Country

Overview Options for Transport Regulations Referencing Existing International Standards/Regulations Incorporation of All Regulatory Provisions Determination of Approach to Drafting of Regulations Questions?

Options for Transport Regulations There are two basic approaches to the introduction of regulations for safe transport of radioactive material (A) Referencing out to other international regulatory vehicles (TS-R-1/SSR-6, ADR, ADN, etc.) Example: (FANR-REG-13, Ver 0) (B) Including all provisions explicitly in your regulations Examples: United Kingdom (No. 1093 from 2002) United States (10CFR Part 71)

Referencing Existing International Standards/Regulations May be the least complicated approach May make for very succinct regulations Citing of external regulations should be done in such a way that the revision of the cited regulations does not require the national regulations to be re-issued In general, should include the following: A statement that radioactive material may not be transported unless it is in accordance with the regulations

Referencing Existing International Standards/Regulations, cont. Also should include: Assignment of authority/responsibility The IAEA regulations are not enforceable, and therefore an assignment of responsibility for the various provisions in the regulations is necessary. Definition of the Competent Authority (CA) (or authorities, if more than one) and their responsibility/responsibilities Clear defining of exceptions to the referenced standards/regulations Clear defining of powers of enforcement and, if appropriate to the country legislation, the penalties that may be imposed for noncompliance

Referencing Existing International Standards/Regulations, cont. Further to include: A description of national emergency arrangements Requirement to report incidents /accidents to the CA Including timescales for notification Includes a definition of what is a reportable incident or accident (or theft) [See 2002 UK Regulations No. 1093 Part XII, definition of “notifiable event”]

Incorporation of All Regulatory Provisions These regulations will: Include all applicable provisions directly in the rule/regulation/legislation (elements discussed in previous slides) provide definitions for all terms of importance (those that may need a “legal” definition) clearly assign responsibility and/or authority for key provisions May follow same general format of international regulatory provisions May refer to other National legislation or national or international standards as needed

Determination of Approach to Regulations National policy or practices of the national legislative body may dictate which approach will need to be pursued Be mindful that not all provisions of the international regulations/standards will be applicable to the situation in a given country The passage of a “general” law related to the regulation of transport could place implementation of the law into the hands of the competent authority (CA) A CA could then decide whether to issue regulations and/or guidance on safe transport

Determination of Approach to Regulations, cont. For some countries, a combination of the previously described approaches may be the best solution Ultimately, a country must decide what approach is going to work the best for the circumstances in their country to institute a reasonable and enforceable version of regulations for transport. The IAEA can provide guidance in the process of drafting your national regulations.

Questions? Thank you