Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Das_Figure S1 USP15 USP4 USP11 49% 60% 39 % 71 % 52 % 54 %
Advertisements

Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 16, Pages (August 2011)
Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
The PDZ Protein Canoe Regulates the Asymmetric Division of Drosophila Neuroblasts and Muscle Progenitors  Stephan Speicher, Anja Fischer, Juergen Knoblich,
Centrosome Amplification Can Initiate Tumorigenesis in Flies
The TRIM-NHL Protein TRIM32 Activates MicroRNAs and Prevents Self-Renewal in Mouse Neural Progenitors  Jens C. Schwamborn, Eugene Berezikov, Juergen A.
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Spyros Goulas, Ryan Conder, Juergen A. Knoblich  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Golgi Outposts Shape Dendrite Morphology by Functioning as Sites of Acentrosomal Microtubule Nucleation in Neurons  Kassandra M. Ori-McKenney, Lily Yeh.
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Mechanisms of Asymmetric Stem Cell Division
Partner of Numb Colocalizes with Numb during Mitosis and Directs Numb Asymmetric Localization in Drosophila Neural and Muscle Progenitors  Bingwei Lu,
Flies without Centrioles
Li E. Cheng, Wei Song, Loren L. Looger, Lily Yeh Jan, Yuh Nung Jan 
Overexpressing Centriole-Replication Proteins In Vivo Induces Centriole Overduplication and De Novo Formation  Nina Peel, Naomi R. Stevens, Renata Basto,
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Apical/Basal Spindle Orientation Is Required for Neuroblast Homeostasis and Neuronal Differentiation in Drosophila  Clemens Cabernard, Chris Q. Doe  Developmental.
Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages (August 2012)
Naoyuki Fuse, Kanako Hisata, Alisa L. Katzen, Fumio Matsuzaki 
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2006)
The Centriolar Protein Bld10/Cep135 Is Required to Establish Centrosome Asymmetry in Drosophila Neuroblasts  Priyanka Singh, Anjana Ramdas Nair, Clemens.
DFezf/Earmuff Maintains the Restricted Developmental Potential of Intermediate Neural Progenitors in Drosophila  Mo Weng, Krista L. Golden, Cheng-Yu Lee 
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Nicholas R. Smith, Kenneth E. Prehoda  Molecular Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2017)
Chun-Pyn Shen, Lily Y Jan, Yuh Nung Jan  Cell 
Maintenance of Miranda Localization in Drosophila Neuroblasts Involves Interaction with the Cognate mRNA  Anne Ramat, Matthew Hannaford, Jens Januschke 
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 20, Pages (October 2010)
Epicardial Spindle Orientation Controls Cell Entry into the Myocardium
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
The Microtubule Plus End-Tracking Proteins mal3p and tip1p Cooperate for Cell-End Targeting of Interphase Microtubules  Karl Emanuel Busch, Damian Brunner 
Regulation of MBK-2/Dyrk Kinase by Dynamic Cortical Anchoring during the Oocyte-to- Zygote Transition  Michael L. Stitzel, Ken Chih-Chien Cheng, Geraldine.
Analysis of partner of inscuteable, a Novel Player of Drosophila Asymmetric Divisions, Reveals Two Distinct Steps in Inscuteable Apical Localization 
Michelle S. Lu, Kenneth E. Prehoda  Developmental Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 107, Issue 2, Pages (October 2001)
Shigeki Yoshiura, Nao Ohta, Fumio Matsuzaki  Developmental Cell 
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Sarah E. Siegrist, Chris Q. Doe  Cell 
LGN Blocks the Ability of NuMA to Bind and Stabilize Microtubules
Wenxiang Meng, Yoshimi Mushika, Tetsuo Ichii, Masatoshi Takeichi  Cell 
PP2A Antagonizes Phosphorylation of Bazooka by PAR-1 to Control Apical-Basal Polarity in Dividing Embryonic Neuroblasts  Michael P. Krahn, Diane Egger-Adam,
Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages (August 2001)
Mi Hye Song, L. Aravind, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Kevin F. O'Connell 
Inscuteable and Staufen Mediate Asymmetric Localization and Segregation of prosperoRNA during Drosophila Neuroblast Cell Divisions  Peng Li, Xiaohang.
Apical Complex Genes Control Mitotic Spindle Geometry and Relative Size of Daughter Cells in Drosophila Neuroblast and pI Asymmetric Divisions  Yu Cai,
Dan T. Bergstralh, Holly E. Lovegrove, Daniel St Johnston 
Volume 14, Issue 20, Pages (October 2004)
Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  Stefan Hümmer, Thomas U. Mayer  Current.
Volume 122, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 731-742 (June 2006) The Drosophila NuMA Homolog Mud Regulates Spindle Orientation in Asymmetric Cell Division  Sarah K. Bowman, Ralph A. Neumüller, Maria Novatchkova, Quansheng Du, Juergen A. Knoblich  Developmental Cell  Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 731-742 (June 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.005 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Evolutionary Conservation of NuMA (A) Shared molecular architecture of the NuMA sequence homologs in human (H.s.), fly (D.m.), and worm (C.e.). Red boxes: CH domain. Loops: coiled-coil segment, with the length indicated by numbers near the underlying brackets. Orange ellipses: the highly conserved C-terminal motif involved in Pins and microtubule binding. Shaded orange: graded similarity extending from the ellipse region. Green bar: the fragment of Mud cloned for Mud-C constructs. The percentage of sequence identity (% id) as well as sequence similarity (% sim) are indicated for the N-terminal CH domain and the C-terminal conserved motif. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of NuMA homologs. A neighbor joining tree based on a multiple sequence alignment of the N-terminal CH domain of the two worm (C.e.) paralogs, LIN-5 and F01G10.05, and the candidate NuMA orthologs in human (H.s.), mouse (M.m.), chicken (G.g.), frog (X.l.), zebrafish (D.r.), sea urchin (S.p.), fly (D.m.), and beetle (T.c.) is shown. Analysis was performed with PHYLIP (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Developmental Cell 2006 10, 731-742DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.005) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Mud Is in a Complex with Pins and Gαi (A) Protein extracts (input) and immunoprecipitations (IPs) with anti-Gαi antibody from untransfected Drosophila S2 cells or cells transfected with Myc-Mud-C. Myc-Mud-C and Pins coprecipitate with Gαi. (B) GST-Pins coupled to glutathione Sepharose beads can coprecipitate Mud-C, which was in vitro translated in the presence of 35S-methionine. (C) IP with anti-Pins antibody from an embryo extract. Mud coprecipitates with Pins. (D) IPs with anti-GFP antibody from S2 cells transfected with Myc-Mud-C and either Pins-TPR-GFP or GFP-Pins-GoLoco. Myc-Mud-C coprecipitates with Pins-TPR-GFP, but not with GFP-Pins-GoLoco. (E) GST-Mud-C coupled to glutathione Sepharose beads coprecipitates His-tagged human Pins-TPR. Developmental Cell 2006 10, 731-742DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.005) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mud Associates with Microtubules (A) Microtubule sedimentation assay. Immunoblots of fractions from supernatant, S, cushion, C, and pellet, P. S2 cells were transfected with Myc-Mud-C, lysed, and incubated on ice to depolymerize microtubules. High-speed supernatant from the lysate (input) was incubated in the presence or absence of taxol and GTP, then subjected to centrifugation through a sucrose cushion. With the addition of taxol and GTP, microtubules and associated proteins separate into a pellet. The pellet contains α-tubulin, Eb1, Pins, and Myc-Mud-C. (B) Representative fields from a solution microtubule formation assay. (C) Quantification of solution microtubule formation assays. Microtubules in ten microscope fields were counted, and the average number of microtubules per field is plotted. The error bars are the standard error of the mean. Developmental Cell 2006 10, 731-742DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.005) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Spindle Orientation Defects in mud Mutant Neuroblasts (A–C) Wild-type third instar mushroom body neuroblasts, stained with Miranda (green), Centrosomin (red), and phospho-Histone H3 (blue), have Miranda crescents tightly aligned with centrosomes at (A) metaphase. From (B) anaphase through (C) telophase, Miranda segregates into a single small daughter cell. (D–F) Miranda crescents in mud mutant neuroblasts are mispositioned relative to the centrosomes at (D) metaphase. (E) Symmetric distribution of Miranda begins in anaphase and occurs in 4% of the observed telophase neuroblasts. (F) Note the equal size of these daughter cells. Mushroom body neuroblasts were identified by using OK107-GAL4-driven expression of CD8-GFP. (G) Schematic for measurement of spindle orientation. (H–K) Apicobasal neuroblast polarity is unaffected in mud mutants. Like (H and J) wild-type neuroblasts, (I) mud mutant neuroblasts generate opposing crescents of Inscuteable (red) and Miranda (green), as well as crescents of aPKC (green) in (K) metaphase. (L and M) The cell fate determinant Brat forms crescents that are not coordinated with the spindle in mud mutants. (N and O) Mitotic spindles show no gross morphological defects in mud mutant neuroblasts. (P) Quantification of spindle orientation. The plot is generated from a random sample of angles from wild-type or mud mutant neuroblasts measured as depicted in (G). The scale bars in (A)–(O) are 5 μm. Developmental Cell 2006 10, 731-742DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.005) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mud Localization in Neuroblasts (A–D) Embryonic neuroblasts stained for Mud (green) and Pins (red). (A) Mud and Pins concentrate apically beginning at delamination. Colocalization and apical enrichment is maintained through (B) interphase and (C) metaphase, when Mud decorates the spindle poles. (D) Mud is inherited by the neuroblast in telophase. (E and F) The enrichment of Mud on the apical cortex of (E) wild-type neuroblasts is lost in (F) pins mutants. (G and H) Mud (green) and Pins (red) localize basolaterally in (G) wild-type epithelial cells. (H) In the presence of Inscuteable, Pins and Mud relocalize apically. The scale bars in (A)–(H) are 5 μm. Developmental Cell 2006 10, 731-742DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.005) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Overproliferation in mud Mutant Brains (A and B) Excess mushroom body neuroblasts in mud mutants. OK107-GAL4-dependent CD8-GFP expression marks the mushroom body lineage (outline). In wild-type, four large mushroom body neuroblasts (arrowheads in [A′]), which express Miranda (red), weakly express CD8-GFP (green), and do not express Prospero (blue), are in a cluster of Kenyon cells that express high levels of CD8-GFP. (B) mud mutant Kenyon cells do not cluster on the surface as in (A) wild-type. The number of mushroom body neuroblasts > 10 μm in diameter is increased in mud mutant larvae. (C) Quantification of mean mushroom body neuroblast number. (D and E) Excess neuroblasts in the posterior brain hemisphere of mud mutants. Miranda (green)-positive, Prospero (red)-negative neuroblasts > 10 μm in diameter are overrepresented in (E) mud mutant brains compared to (D) wild-type control. Note the strong overall Miranda expression and increased brain size in mud mutants. (F) Quantification of mean neuroblast number in the posterior brain hemisphere of third instar larvae. (G and H) Excess neuroblasts in mud mutants express the neuroblast marker Deadpan. (I and J) The number of neuroblasts incorporating BrdU is increased in mud mutant brains. (K) mud mutant larval brains contain increased numbers of Kenyon cells. (L and M) Mushroom body morphology in adult mud mutant escapers is defective. Green: OK107-GAL4-driven CD8-GFP. (L) The Kenyon cell and calyx region (bracket), dorsal axonal projections (β and β′ lobes, blue outline), and medial axonal projections (α, α′, and γ lobes, red outline) are visible in wild-type brains. (M) In mud mutants, the Kenyon cell and calyx region are larger (bracket), and only the medially projecting γ lobe (red outline) is present. (N) Quantification of mean Kenyon cell number in adult brains. Error bars are standard error of the mean. Scale bars are 10 μm in (A) and (B) or 50 μm in (D), (E), (G), (H)–(J), (L), and (M). Developmental Cell 2006 10, 731-742DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.005) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 A Model for Mud Function in Asymmetric Cell Division (A) Mud (blue) links Pins (yellow) and Gαi (orange) to the astral microtubules of the mitotic spindle. The spindle is misoriented in mud mutants, but the polarity of Inscuteable (red) and Miranda (green) is unaffected. (B) Pins and heterotrimeric G proteins regulate spindle orientation, cell size asymmetry, and the apical localization of Inscuteable and the Par complex. Mud is required for spindle orientation, but not for the other functions. Developmental Cell 2006 10, 731-742DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.005) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions