Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated for the stimuli used in the experiment, centered on the background; following ... Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Figure 1 Measured differences in preference for the stimulus colors chosen for the experiment. The total percent chosen for each color averaged across.

Advertisements

Figure 1 Experimental arena to study female locations in response to a green LED. The LED was switched on in the LED ... Figure 1 Experimental arena to.

Figure 1 Female receptivity in the Playback Experiment

Figure 1 Waveforms of example stimuli illustrating how within-individual variation was manipulated. Invariant signals ... Figure 1 Waveforms of example.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Figure 1 Survival plot showing the detection rate of experimental hosts as the proportion butterflies still searching ... Figure 1 Survival plot showing.

Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals during the last 5000 time steps of 2 example simulations, without (a) or with (b) ... Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals.

Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific effect relative to active aggression but not display behavior in dominant males. ... Figure 4 ROMs have a morph-specific.

Figure 1 We consider a scenario where the distributions of signals under safe or dangerous situations mean that a ... Figure 1 We consider a scenario where.

Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs per gram = epg) (A through C) and corresponding infection probabilities estimated by ... Figure 1 Fecal egg counts (eggs.

Figure 1 Data-selection process

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the experimental design.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access

Figure 1 Relationships between probability of prey discard and each parameter explored. To show the most robust ... Figure 1 Relationships between probability.

Figure 5 The effect of the spider color morph encountered by honeybees in Experiment 2 on the proportion of honeybees ... Figure 5 The effect of the spider.

Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios of 13 active ingredients used against a fall armyworm population collected in Puerto ... Fig. 1. Relative potency ratios.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment in female zebra finches shortly after a second injection with either tetanus toxoid ... Figure 1 Mean (±SE) egg investment.

Figure 1 The Kaplan–Meier curves of time to death post first hospitalization. hosp, hospitalization. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

AHA: American Heart Association; ALT: ...

Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.

Figure 1 (A) Distributions of model (prey; dashed line) and Mimic (predator; solid line) cue values, showing ... Figure 1 (A) Distributions of model (prey;

Source: Figure created by the author based on data ...

Figure 1 Maternal relatedness between calves and non-calf unit members correlates with babysitting rate. Relatedness ... Figure 1 Maternal relatedness.

Figure 2 Boxplots indicating male (top) and female (bottom) mate preferences for native (positive numbers) or foreign ... Figure 2 Boxplots indicating.

Black: diagnosis ... Black: diagnosis from any department; grey: diagnosis at a rheumatology department. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

RCTs: randomized controlled ...

Figure 1 (a) The distribution of paternity amongst 84 hatchlings sampled at a HDS on the western coastline of Little ... Figure 1 (a) The distribution.

Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis of the left acetabulum at baseline (A), 3 months (B), 1 year (C) and 2 years later, ... Fig. 1 MRI aspect of an osteitis.

Figure 1 Mean ± standard error proportions of (a) courtship and (b) copulation by female-male type pairing. Error bars ... Figure 1 Mean ± standard error.

Take home figure The protective role of CNP/NPR-B/NPRC.

Figure 1 The difference between dominance scores of individual male native Gehyra dubia (n = 10) and introduced male ... Figure 1 The difference between.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Fig. 1 Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematous at the lower limbs

Fig. 1 Flow chart of included patients for analyses

Figure 1 (A) Proportion of major prey types found in the diet of 9–10-day-old pied flycatcher nestlings in the Drenthe ... Figure 1 (A) Proportion of major.

Fig. 1 Flow chart for selection of study subjects

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1 Relationships between pair indices of dance performance (joint entropy or mutual information) and the past ... Figure 1 Relationships between.

Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected isolates (each line represents the average of duplicate studies). AMP, ... Figure 1. Time–kill studies for selected.

Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European children completing all components of B4SC in 2013 and 2015 Figure 1. Percentage of Pacific and European.

Figure 1. Trunk and leg fat over study period. LS, log transformed.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference in progression to RA in patients with clinically suspect ... Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot presenting no difference.

Figure 1. Oncoprint of selected pathogenic alterations detected in ctDNA. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the.

Figure 2 Model flowchart: (1) Look for a resource; (2) determine whether there are one or more resources in the ... Figure 2 Model flowchart: (1) Look.

Fig. 1 A network representation of top 100 co-occurring terms

Figure 1 Changes in average first serve speed (km/h) over age in women (dark gray; online version red) and men (light ... Figure 1 Changes in average first.

Fig. 1 Statistics of the main characters’ dialogues.

Figure 1 Patient selection.

Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.

Figure 1 Pace-of-life should mediate behavior

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Fig. 1: World distribution of field sampling locations of Aedes aegypti and Aedes mascarensis screened for Wolbachia ... Fig. 1: World distribution of.

Figure 1 Percentage of male and female helpers in different categories

Figure 1. Probabilistic learning task

Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.

Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves showing crude product limit survival estimates and 95% confidence intervals for time to ... Figure 1. Kaplan Meier curves.

Figure 1. Parenting Evaluations by Parenting Style, Education, and Vignette Parent Gender. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.

Figure 1. Measuring respondent unhappiness with their child marrying someone from the other party and happiness with ... Figure 1. Measuring respondent.

Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2

Figure 1. Forest plot of lung cancer mortality in LDCT trials.

Figure 1. Evolutionary process of a policy field.

Table 2. Mean noise level results for hand dryers in dBA

Presentation transcript:

Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated for the stimuli used in the experiment, centered on the background; following ... Figure 2 (a) Color hexagon calculated for the stimuli used in the experiment, centered on the background; following Chittka 1992. (b) Spectral reflectance measures for the colored stimuli used in the experiment, in comparison to the background color of the apparatus. The human colors are identified as 1) orange, 2) yellow, 3) dark blue, and 4) purple. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary140 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 1 Measured differences in preference for the stimulus colors chosen for the experiment. The total percent ... Figure 1 Measured differences in preference for the stimulus colors chosen for the experiment. The total percent chosen for each color averaged across all bees is shown. The x axis represents the color preference in relation to the focal color orange, with orange and purple representing a high preference difference, blue and orange representing a medium preference difference, and yellow and orange as the equal preference treatments. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary140 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 3 Design of trials Figure 3 Design of trials. The y axis is the level of reward, whereas the x axis is choice number. One resource ... Figure 3 Design of trials. The y axis is the level of reward, whereas the x axis is choice number. One resource provides a steady, mediocre reward whereas the second resource fluctuated between a poor reward and a good reward every 20 trials. The orange focal resource could be either fluctuating or stable in reward, and could be paired either yellow, blue, or purple to provide an equal, medium, or high level of difference. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary140 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 8 Errors of learning Figure 8 Errors of learning. (a) In a fluctuating patch, the proportion of bee choices to stay with the high rewarding ... Figure 8 Errors of learning. (a) In a fluctuating patch, the proportion of bee choices to stay with the high rewarding color once sampled (win-stay), as opposed to choosing to the color providing the steady (win-shift), but mediocre resource. The x axis represents the state of the focal color. (b) In a fluctuating patch, the proportion of bee choices to abandon a high rewarding color once sampled and instead return to the color providing the steady, mediocre resource. The x axis represents the state of the focal color orange. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary140 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 4 Proportional choices of the bees on the focal color orange Figure 4 Proportional choices of the bees on the focal color orange. The x axis reflects averages across blocks of 10 ... Figure 4 Proportional choices of the bees on the focal color orange. The x axis reflects averages across blocks of 10 choices. The fluctuating reward changes every 20 choices starting in a bad state in trial block 1. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary140 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 5 Statistically significant interaction of preference level and reward type upon the sampling window (number of ... Figure 5 Statistically significant interaction of preference level and reward type upon the sampling window (number of trials between sampling events). Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary140 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 6 Significant interaction of preference level and reward type on the proportion of choices of the fluctuating ... Figure 6 Significant interaction of preference level and reward type on the proportion of choices of the fluctuating resource. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary140 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 7 Full interaction of preference level, reward type and experience (blocks of trials). The interaction of block ... Figure 7 Full interaction of preference level, reward type and experience (blocks of trials). The interaction of block with preference type is statistically significant. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.comThis article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 1, 29 October 2018, Pages 150–158, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary140 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.